did you really think that was the point here dave?
frankly it doesn't matter WHOM the poster of a given article is.....G-d is a respector of no person and works through and uses many to call others to his truth.
most do not realize imv they are so combatitive in their approach on the forums, generally speaking.....that it frustrtes them when someone offers something from someone else for then.....they cannot argue to strain that gnat....
they actually...unless of course they just attack the source outright....armstrongism....JW lies etc....then have to test the sc riptural element of what is posted....and not the personal element.
and i do not think people mean to be this way....it is human nature....in fact Dave, no offence meant... but if i was posting things from the Catholic Encyclopeida or other catholice scholars....i bet you would appauld the post and the content and not claim it was a form of laziness because i didn't give my meaningless 2 cents synopsis of what ik thought of what was in the article.
it is the way it goes.....as Phil always tells me on this matter.....as he is confronted with it also...is that he looks at it half full instead of half empty...saying 'thankfully, not all are quick to anger when presented witgh something that challenges their preconceived notions' (ibid)....and i agree too....
anyhow....i won't say anymore on this.
people are free to read and move on if things do not suit their personal preferences....ya know?
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.