Back to the Start!  

Re: The Slippery Slope to Censorship

May 29 2012 at 11:43 AM
Squid Boy  (no login)


Response to Re: The Slippery Slope to Censorship

collectively, with tOdd engaged, we decided that posts that were empty vulgarity had no purpose. This post was bascially a DV post. Because it wasn't exactly a DV post, I only edited it rather than deleting it outright - so that people could see that there had been something with no intrisic value added to the community, without being forced to see the bile it spewed, which so many have said harshes their mellow here.

It wasn't starting a conversation, it wasn't making any point, except to say something vulgar about/to Appalled. She (I think) is in agreement that this is the kind of post that gets edited or deleted.

And wow - I didn't think you were dick wing, but I guess you are!

I'd post that picture again in a second! No rule or threat of discipline (ha! as if there is any of THAT!) made me take it down feather-penis. I just did because you seemed like you were about to cry.


    
This message has been edited by SquiddyBoy on May 29, 2012 11:49 AM


 
 Respond to this message   
Response TitleAuthorDate
 Re: The Slippery Slope to CensorshipWedding Dude 2012May 29, 2012, 8:17 PM
  Re: The Slippery Slope to Censorship May 30, 2012, 9:04 AM
   Re: The Slippery Slope to CensorshipHep CMay 30, 2012, 9:25 AM
    Re: The Slippery Slope to CensorshipAnonoPajamaMay 30, 2012, 10:13 AM
     Re: The Slippery Slope to CensorshipWedding DudeMay 30, 2012, 8:05 PM
      Re: The Slippery Slope to CensorshipSquid BoyMay 30, 2012, 9:21 PM
       Re: The Slippery Slope to CensorshipWedding Dude 2012May 30, 2012, 9:26 PM
        Re: The Slippery Slope to Censorship May 31, 2012, 2:37 PM