<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Back to the Start!  

Tieks [Move along. Move along.]

November 29 2011 at 8:33 PM
Lea  (no login)

Why are these shoes so expensive?

[linked image]

http://tieks.com/boutiek/

Does anyone here own a pair?


    
This message has been edited by oddtodd7 on Mar 4, 2013 8:42 AM
This message has been edited by SquiddyBoy on Oct 23, 2012 2:49 PM


 
 Respond to this message   
AuthorReply
Bider
(no login)

Re: Tieks

November 29 2011, 8:39 PM 

Nope and I never would. Those would hit me right on the toe knuckle and I would, after some time, have to kill somebody. AND I WOULD. Especially with my amazon woman feet.

(shameless thread bump here.) Lea did you not find the illustrated hunting story cute?

 
 Respond to this message   
AnonoGobble
(no login)

Re: Tieks

November 30 2011, 8:03 AM 

$200? Because people are idiots.

 
 Respond to this message   
Arwen
(no login)

Re: Tieks

November 30 2011, 9:12 AM 

People do do some crazy shit

 
 Respond to this message   

Anny
(Login AnnyBoo)
***__***

Re: Tieks

November 30 2011, 12:08 PM 

I have no idea why those are so expensive. Never heard of them before.

Toms are getting really popular though. I think they are around 50 bucks. Have you heard of them before?

Photobucket







 
 Respond to this message   
'neady
(no login)

Re: Tieks

November 30 2011, 12:53 PM 

All of Autumn's emo friends wear Toms. I don't see the appeal. I'm still a sucker for a nice t-strap. They're so sexy!

 
 Respond to this message   
AnonoGobble
(no login)

Re: Tieks

November 30 2011, 1:08 PM 

I think Tom's is owned by the guy that donates a pair of shoes to a child that's shoeless somewhere in the world for every pair he sells.

If I wear those, I no longer need to be powered by my own smug sense of self-satisfaction. Tom does it for me!

Srsly though, good cause.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login AnnyBoo)
***__***

Re: Tieks

November 30 2011, 1:09 PM 

That's right, Anonny!

There are a couple of pairs I think are pretty cute and like you I like the charity part of it. I think I see a pair in my future happy.gif

ETA: I like these:

Photobucket







    
This message has been edited by AnnyBoo on Nov 30, 2011 2:51 PM


 
 Respond to this message   
jo
(no login)

Re: Tieks

November 30 2011, 6:34 PM 

Tieks look like an overated pair of Dr Scholl's Fast Flats---retailing @ $12

 
 Respond to this message   
Ginny
(no login)

Re: Tieks

November 30 2011, 7:14 PM 

Yeah, I have some flats from Target I got for 14 bucks that look the same - except without that stupid blue stripe.

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)

Re: Tieks

November 30 2011, 7:45 PM 

Im not a fan of the Tom's shoes. They look like something that would be popular on the mental ward of a hospital. They creep me out for some reason.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Dr.Zhivago)
__***__

Re: Tieks

December 1 2011, 9:52 AM 

I don't know why exactly, but I totally agree, Lea. I think Tom's are so creepy looking and I wish they would go away. I see them all the time and I can't figure out the appeal.

Land sakes alive, the steak's alive.

 
 Respond to this message   
AnonoGobble
(no login)

Re: Tieks

December 1 2011, 9:56 AM 

Is that all he sells, those flat espadrilles? For $50 bucks?

I need to find something that appeals to hipsters, pronto. This guy's made a fortune off these ugly things.

[linked image]


 
 Respond to this message   
Kohsblocks
(no login)

Re: Tieks

December 1 2011, 10:56 AM 

I love my Toms! I totally wore a red pair until the have holes in the fabric. They are linen, so they wore faster than one would expect.

My NEW pair is dark grey canvas and I love them long time.

They're comfortable.
I like the white soles.
They're durable.
Some kid is wearing a pair of shoes because I bought them.

Win. Win. Winnebago.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login DJ.)
***__***

Re: Tieks

December 1 2011, 11:00 AM 

I think they're super fug, too.


 
 Respond to this message   
AnonoGobble
(no login)

Re: Tieks

December 1 2011, 11:20 AM 

It's a good cause and all, but yeah. Fugly. My mom wore these 20 years ago, navy blue with white bottoms, except they came from Walmart and cost $6.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login chicaguayaca)
__***__

Re: Tieks

December 1 2011, 12:09 PM 

Those "Toms" are sold for $50???

Indigenous people sell them here for much less, and are more "authentic"


 
 Respond to this message   


(Login AnnyBoo)
***__***

Re: Tieks

December 1 2011, 12:14 PM 

I think they would make great beach shoes.

The guy who founded the company visited Argentina when he was on The Amazing Race and noticed that many children were without shoes. He wanted to start a company and do something about that.

This is what I like about the company (from WIKI):

The company designs and sells lightweight shoes based on the Argentine alpargata design. For every pair of TOMS Shoes purchased, a pair of new shoes is given to a child in need. Over 1,000,000 pairs of shoes have been given to children under the One for One movement since TOMS launched in 2006. The canvas shoes have been given to children in more than 20 countries worldwide, including the United States (Louisiana, Kentucky, Mississippi and Florida), Argentina, Ethiopia, Rwanda, Guatemala, Haiti, and South Africa.





 
 Respond to this message   
Cathy Dunham
(Login cathydunham)

Tom's versus Tieks

April 24 2012, 10:22 AM 

I agree about the over-priced ballet-styled Tieks footwear, but the Tom's are really ugly. That's like comparing apples and oranges.

 
 Respond to this message   
AnonoBoBo
(no login)

Re: Tom's versus Tieks

April 24 2012, 10:24 AM 

Wow, Cathy Dunham! Tell me more about this ugly shoe selection!

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)

tieks

February 11 2012, 2:18 PM 

I'm happy just not wearing heels and staying with my sketchers...that way I don't have to have an extra pair of shoes in my purse...makes more room for credit cards that I can use to buy purses

 
 Respond to this message   
SMiles
(no login)

Re: Tieks

February 19 2012, 9:15 PM 

Because Oprah wears them and endorses them... gak!

 
 Respond to this message   
AnonoBoBo
(no login)

Re: Tieks

April 24 2012, 11:45 PM 

Skechers has made a knockoff of Tom's called Bob's. No lie.

 
 Respond to this message   
AnonoBoBo
(no login)

Re: Tieks

April 25 2012, 6:22 AM 

Those shoes are so ugly. I hate shoes that show your toe cleavage.

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)

Tieks are Different

July 27 2012, 8:19 PM 

I have a pair of Tieks and I can tell you that they are totally different from what you all think. I bought a pair of the cheap brand called City Slips and those are thin, unconstructed-feeling, split leather, manmade lining, machine made junk that bit into my feet, especially at the little bunion area I have on my right foot. Tieks are hand made of the best Italian full-grain leather, with real shoe construction in there, a little lift in the heel and they actually made my feet feel BETTER when I put them on. They are like gloves on my feet and I don't show any toe cleavage on mine. They are not typical flats, believe me. Handmade shoes feel different on the feet and you get what you pay for. They have promotions from time to time and they also have a foundation that gives money to women entrepreneurs around the world. The cheap flats started peeling within an hour at the edges! Tieks are worth the money. I bought my first pair in cardinal red, which is a beautiful, muted blue red and I cant wait to get more. This is an excellent product. Go to their facebook page and read the tons of positive comments every single woman has written. Not one complaint. Everybody says the same things, that they LOVE LOVE LOVE them, and have never had such a comfortable shoe in their lives, adorable on the feet no matter what size they are, so that they don't use them as just an "extra" shoe, they actually wear them all day long. Please don't judge things so harshly without knowing. These are remarkable and I wish I could order at least 20 pairs out of the 29 colors and patterns they offer. Well, one at a time, I will collect them. I think leopard will be next, and cobalt blue. Do look into them and see what I mean.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Lizzlee)
__***__

Re: Tieks are Different

July 27 2012, 8:20 PM 

What? No hotlink?

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)

?

July 27 2012, 9:09 PM 

Not sure what you mean. Sorry

 
 Respond to this message   

Ginny
(Login Ginnyesq)
***__***

Re: Tieks are Different

July 27 2012, 8:56 PM 

Somehow I hate them even more now.

 
 Respond to this message   
CapsLock
(no login)

Re: Tieks are Different

July 27 2012, 9:02 PM 

I'm going to get some and wear them and my "mustache ride" shirt to the sangria party. The shoes and the shirt and nothing else. You know why? Cuz let's party

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)

??

July 27 2012, 9:13 PM 

I have no idea why you would hate them, let alone hate them more now. How silly. They're really fun to wear. You should see the amazing packaging. And their personal customer service is also amazing City Slips ignored me for three months, after promising me a replacement pair and lying about my emails going to their spam folder....and they finally sent me a new pair after they saw I commented on several You Tube videos to tell of my negative experience with them. Their service is terrible, but the product is even worse.

 
 Respond to this message   
CapsLock
(no login)

Re: ??

July 27 2012, 10:02 PM 

Do you have a nickel, Sharon?

 
 Respond to this message   
Anonowanger
(no login)

Re: ??

July 30 2012, 7:34 AM 

This is even sadder than telemarketing.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: ??

July 30 2012, 9:34 AM 

Odd, given she listed her name, I couldn't resist a little research.

Sharon - you seem to like to talk about clothing! You blog about it. You are described thusly: "Sharon Maxwell-Yamamoto is a Worthologist who specializes in vintage clothing and accessories."

You also seem to have something to do with running an opera company.

Do you also have a friend who is involved with the Tieks company? It feels like you're a very, very committed fan here, and odd that an entirely new person shows up in our forum extolling the virtues of any product so vociferously. You'll forgive the locals for suspecting that there's something in it for you.

 
 Respond to this message   

Arwen
(Login jeannien)
***__***

Re: ??

July 30 2012, 9:37 AM 

Why on earth does this thread get bumped so many times???

 
 Respond to this message   
Anonowanger
(no login)

Re: ??

July 30 2012, 9:42 AM 

Because some idiot is dredging the internet for mention of these ugly ass shoes and then spamming whatever they find. Whee!

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Smirkdirk)
__***__

Re: ??

July 30 2012, 10:17 AM 

I'm convinced, Sharon! I'm canceling that Coach purse and getting these!

I'm totally gonna get laid when Mrs. sees her B-day present!

 
 Respond to this message   
Anonowanger
(no login)

Re: ??

July 30 2012, 10:18 AM 

Dude - both of you are going to be sorely disappointed.

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)

Don't cancel the coach purse!

July 30 2012, 7:28 PM 

I don't think you should cancel the purse....I love Coach because of their quality leather and construction and the fact that they last forever. In fact, my red Tieks are a gorgeous dark shade of red that exactly matches a red coach purse I had from many years ago. I just used them both yesterday as a matter of fact! I think you should get her the purse, and add a matching pair of Tieks! LOL Just kidding....a Coach bag is plenty and a very nice present.

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)

I wish!

July 30 2012, 7:25 PM 

LOL, nope, I have nothing to do with the Tieks company, wish I did, considering how great their sales are and how much I love the product. I just ordered three more pairs this morning because I'm going on a trip and need comfortable and cute shoes that can pack easily. I wish I were getting something, like free shoes LOL! Nope. No such luck. I just like to tell people things I find out that might help them. I don't "blog" much, just wrote a few articles about vintage fur and stuff like that. I like pretty things and if they're comfortable and well-made, so much the better. Thanks for looking me up! I have nothing to hide! And yes, that's my new little concert opera company. I sing and do everything else to produce our shows, including costuming....just another extension of my love of pretty things.

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)

My website

July 30 2012, 7:39 PM 

Hey, since you did a search on me, how did you miss my vintage website, DivaSharon's Divine Vintage? You found Opera Bravura, I guess, and Worthpoint, but you missed that one, plus my other one SharonMaxwellSoprano.com If you're going to research somebody, do a thorough job, fer cryin' out loud.

The only reason I found your forum is that I was looking for comments on the shoes to see how people felt about them and to see if I could find any special promotions..you never know unless you look! I saw you guys chatting about them and just felt that since you hadn't actually tried a pair and I had, that you might want to know some details about them, and hear about my comparison between them and the City Slips (which failed miserably in all areas). That's all. I wasn't spamming, just commenting. I never thought newcomers would be bashed and made to feel unwelcome. How ungracious! Oh well.

 
 Respond to this message   
Ginny
(no login)

Re: My website

July 30 2012, 7:59 PM 

We bash and make newcomers feel unwelcome all the time. Maybe you should have done a little research of your own.

 
 Respond to this message   
Kohsblocks
(no login)

Re: My website

July 30 2012, 8:07 PM 

BEST.THREAD.EVER.


 
 Respond to this message   

potato
(Login potato222)
***__***

Re: My website

July 30 2012, 8:22 PM 

I don't know Sharon but in her defense if you google "tieks" this thread comes up on the first page of results. I've done it myself (and probably others here too) where I've googled something, found a thread about it on a message board, and then posted a reply to it. No?

 
 Respond to this message   
Ginny
(no login)

Re: My website

July 30 2012, 11:25 PM 

No, I can't say that I ever went on an unknown message board and bumped a months old thread to let everyone know how wrong their opinion is.

 
 Respond to this message   
Anonowanger
(no login)

Re: My website

July 31 2012, 7:49 AM 

And who owns so many pairs of the same expensive shoe? It's not like you're loading up a cart of flip flops at Walmart. These ugly things are $200 a pop. "I just bought 3 more pairs yesterday!" Ok, Mrs. Rockefeller. Whatev.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: My website

July 31 2012, 8:28 AM 

Everyone who wades into any message board, anywhere with a bunch of spammy know-it-all crap gets treated that way Ms. Yamamoto!

I searched you to see if you were tied to the company, and once I'd satisfied myself that there was at least no formal connection, I stopped.

I wasn't THAT interested in you.

You seem kinda smarmy overall.

Feel free to try again, but yes - this board (and not just me) definitely bashes newbies. Into a shape that fits here. If you've caught the bug, might I suggest reading up a bit, before your next foray?

Best of luck with your many pairs of shoes, Imelda.


    
This message has been edited by SquiddyBoy on Jul 31, 2012 9:00 AM


 
 Respond to this message   
CapsLock
(no login)

Re: My website

July 31 2012, 9:21 AM 

Quit buying all these f'ing shoes, Sharon.

[linked image]

And why are posting on that stupid f'ing message board, Sharon?

SHARON!!

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)

Cute

July 31 2012, 2:46 PM 

I like the picture with the Pom. That's was funny.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: Cute

July 31 2012, 2:47 PM 

Yes, that picture is why people keep coming back.  Because we can be big meanies, but we also can be very funny.  And in my case, extremely smart.  Welcome, SHARONNNNN!!!!


    
This message has been edited by Tamrah on Jul 31, 2012 2:48 PM


 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)

Not $200

July 31 2012, 2:44 PM 

They're mostly priced at $165 and with a 20% off coupon, free shipping and no sales tax to certain states, they are not as expensive as you say.

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)

Wrong opinion?

July 31 2012, 2:43 PM 

I was only responding because I saw that nobody on the thread had actually even seen a pair, let alone tried a pair on. It's funny to have such strong opinions about something you've never tried. So to say it was odd that I had a strong opinion is funny to me....at least it was an informed one, not just criticizing something for no reason other than you thought they were too expensive. There are some things you can buy for less where you can't discern the difference in quality, which would explain the price, but in this case, the materials, workmanship and comfort/fit make it very clear. On Facebook, you can read people's response to getting the shoes..suddenly they understand the price. You get what you pay for in this case.

 
 Respond to this message   
Anonowanger
(no login)

Re: Wrong opinion?

July 31 2012, 2:53 PM 

The very first post has a link with lots of pictures. Ballet flats were ugly in 1989 and they're still ugly now, but at least they've lost the bows.

And I don't care what you say, most people don't plunk down $500 on 3 pairs of flats for a trip.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: Wrong opinion?

July 31 2012, 4:14 PM 

Could you explain yourself just a little bit further?

I'm not sure I fully understand your position on this particular brand of shoe, why you decided to comment on them, or what you find odd about us.

Thanks!

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)

You

July 31 2012, 7:25 PM 

Okay SquidBOY, I'll explain further. You, BOY, are an ass. You call me "smarmy", yet what is a BOY doing here commenting so vehemently on women's shoes? Your name conjures up images of a gelatinous, multi-tentacled slimy creature....so if that's not the pot calling the kettle black, I don't know what is. You seem to be so proud of yourself and consider yourself so witty, but you are a fool.

All I did was search for a promo and more info about some shoes and tell my experiences with them. Do you hate all bloggers too, who blog for that very reason? I try to help people with information I have learned by research and experience. Grow up. I bet you wouldn't be so brave to talk like a big-mouth ass to a person face to face! Nice and safe here in cyber-space, isn't it? You are pathetic.

Now, go play in mommy's shoe closet, since you seem to be so interested in women's shoes. Got a little foot fetish, eh? Run along now and go do some more searching and try to learn something useful.

 
 Respond to this message   

Lizzlee
(Login Lizzlee)
__***__

Re: You

July 31 2012, 7:55 PM 

This definitely calls for popcorn.

 
 Respond to this message   
Anonowanger
(no login)

Re: You

July 31 2012, 7:57 PM 

Wow, she sure does have strong opinions about someone she doesn't know, doesn't she.

PS those shoes are ugly.

 
 Respond to this message   

Tamrah
(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: You

July 31 2012, 8:03 PM 

Hey come on. How long since we had an articulate heckler?

(grabs big handful of popcorn)

I've got jujubes if anyone wants any.


 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)

Re: You

July 31 2012, 9:07 PM 

Yes, I have a strong opinion about somebody who attacks me simply because I saw comments about something I was interested in. I cam here and told my experiences in a polite manner and was jumped on by more than one person. The rudeness, sarcasm, ignorance and obvious jealousy of people who can buy things from places besides Walmart is beyond ridiculous and beyond comprehension. He was nasty, called me "smarmy" (without knowing ME, although he did look me up and see that I am an opera singer and vintage clothing business owner), and I feel it was totally uncalled for. I did nothing to warrant such an attack and I am not the shrinking violet type who will simply slink away and bawl in a corner. Not this one.

I was simply telling people about the shoes I was enjoying. I see you cannot cast pearls before swine. Enjoy your flip flops.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Lizzlee)
__***__

Re: You

July 31 2012, 9:10 PM 

Aw, I was really liking you until that last line. sad.gif

 
 Respond to this message   
Appalled
(no login)

Re: You

July 31 2012, 9:11 PM 

This is why we can never have new people.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Lizzlee)
__***__

Re: You

July 31 2012, 9:11 PM 

LOL!!

 
 Respond to this message   
CapsLock
(no login)

Re: You

July 31 2012, 9:12 PM 

We'll always have the picture with the pom...Farewell, Sharon of the Shoes, we hardly knew ye.

 
 Respond to this message   
Sharon Maxwell-Yamamoto
(no login)

I tried to be nice

July 31 2012, 11:24 PM 

You are a bunch of bitter and mean people who don't deserve any new friends. I hope you'll all be very happy pickling in your own vitriol. Ignorance is bliss in your case. You don't want to know anything. Very sad. Re-read the thread and see that I am not the one who bit first. I was very cordial even when certain people were not. I was simply pushed too far. I never hid who I was, although you all do. Possibly because I have nothing to be ashamed of. I'll enjoy my new Tieks knowing that they are rather exclusive and that the hoi polloi do not know enough to appreciate them.

Good night.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Lizzlee)
__***__

Re: I tried to be nice

July 31 2012, 11:32 PM 

Hey, Sharon, take a breath. You got heat initially because your post seemed to be from a spammer -- that's why I asked no hotlink?

You have chops, you sound intelligent, and I think you could be a good new board member here. Just step back, ease off, let this thing go... read some other threads and see if you would like to be a part of... us. From what I have seen, you could add some welcome content.

Think about it.

 
 Respond to this message   
Sharon Maxwell-Yamamoto
(no login)

Lizzlee

August 1 2012, 1:08 AM 

Thank you. happy.gif

 
 Respond to this message   

Tamrah
(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: I tried to be nice

July 31 2012, 11:33 PM 

Just 5 tenths of a point off for over-rotating the flounce!

This 9.5 Score! laser Gymnastics Laser Italian Charm is a Standard 9mm stainless steel modular charm is interchangeable with 9mm Italian Charm Bracelets, watches, keychains, etc.





    
This message has been edited by Tamrah on Jul 31, 2012 11:37 PM


 
 Respond to this message   
Ginny-Me
(no login)

Re: I tried to be nice

July 31 2012, 11:47 PM 

Tam. I'd buy you Tieks if they weren't ugly and apparently worn by histrionic personality disorder sufferers.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login LizSalander)

The truth?

July 31 2012, 11:54 PM 

Long time fan of this site...but only within the past year have started lurking around the bored and enjoying the familial discourse! It hasn't been till now that I have felt compelled to post, as I am very suspicious of others by nature. My job has required me to be an investigator at times, so figured you'd enjoy what I found about our dear Sharon.

Googling Sharon Yamamato, I have found a LinkedIn profile
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/sharon-yamamoto/3/b4a/758
"extreme"??? WTF? She needs to take another class on guerrilla marketing. It's success depends on being anonymous!

She works for the Kern Organization (marketing, shocker!). Upon further investigation, the Kern Organization is an Omnicom Agency.

Naturally, I needed to find a connection between these marketing groups and Tieks. Hhhhmmmm, seems as if the founder and CEO of Tieks, Kfir Gavrieli, was a founding advisor at Palindrome Advisors.

Also a founding advisor at Palindrome: Michael Napoliello, former president of....wait for it...Omnicom! Buddies! Yay!

There are no coincidences...only stupid people.




 
 Respond to this message   
Ginny
(no login)

Re: The truth?

July 31 2012, 11:57 PM 

Wow. Now YOU should stay. That's some skillz right there! Hats off, madam!

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: The truth?

August 1 2012, 12:03 AM 

UnLEEESSS.....you don't by any chance work for Tom's, do you, Liz???


 
 Respond to this message   


(Login LizSalander)

The Truth?

August 1 2012, 12:11 AM 

You guys are funny! No, I wouldn't be caught dead in either of those shoes! At the moment, I am proudly wearing a $10 pair of generic flip-flops, thank you very much!!!!! And they're soooooo comfy!

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Lizzlee)
__***__

Re: The truth?

August 1 2012, 12:03 AM 

I DEMAND that Liz S stay.

Well done!

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login DJ.)
***__***

Re: The truth?

August 1 2012, 12:26 AM 

This thread is much more entertaining when read bottom to top.




 
 Respond to this message   

$8
(Login 8_Bucks)
***__***

Re: The truth?

August 1 2012, 12:42 AM 

I must say... This newbie appears to have pulled off the impossible. A first post that was legible, reasonable, and punked a marketing weenie all at the same time.

That post had plenty of win. Please stay so that we may perpetually compare everything else you say to that great first post. We'll insist that you continuously improve on each subsequent post or declare that you're slipping.

My entrance strategy was to set the bar as low as possible just to give myself attainable goals.




The opinions expressed above are the sole opinions of the author and do not reflect actual human thought. Any resemblance to intelligent opinions is purely coincidental.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: The truth?

August 1 2012, 12:47 AM 

The threads are not changing color once read.  That is irritating!  Stupid Net54.  I'm flouncing to bed!!!!


 
 Respond to this message   

(Login ClothingOptional)
***__***

Re: The truth?

August 1 2012, 12:48 AM 

Change colour for me, maybe it's delayed in Idaho

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: The truth?

August 1 2012, 12:50 AM 

Okay, Ronnie.  Now I'm really flouncing.  You obviously will never be Ronrah!


 
 Respond to this message   
Sharon Maxwell-Yamamoto
(no login)

Not well done

August 1 2012, 1:13 AM 

Why on earth do you think it's "well done" to find some public information by someone named Sharon Yamamoto? There must be a zillion of Sharon Yamamoto's. However, there is ONE Sharon Maxwell-Yamamoto in the whole United States and it's ME.

 
 Respond to this message   

(Login ClothingOptional)
***__***

Re: Not well done

August 1 2012, 1:18 AM 

Why do we think it's 'well done'?
Look at the frenzy it sent you in

The boots on the left? What size are those?

 
 Respond to this message   
Sharon Maxwell-Yamamoto
(no login)

Ronnie..

August 1 2012, 1:39 AM 

That's not why you thought it was "well done". You thought Liz had uncovered some great truth LOL. Not.

The boots on the left are sold...I have some others, size 8 and 9. I love those boots!

 
 Respond to this message   

(Login ClothingOptional)
***__***

Re: Ronnie..

August 1 2012, 1:42 AM 

No, no, that is actually why I would think it is well done.

If you did have the boots on the left, how much would they be?

 
 Respond to this message   
Sharon Maxwell-Yamamoto
(no login)

Boots

August 1 2012, 1:58 AM 

Ronnie, thanks for asking about the boots...the price info is on the boot page on the site. I don't think it's appropriate to discuss that on a site like this. I am pretty sure selling things on a site like this is frowned upon. I am not a habitual rule-breaker..LOL Thanks for asking though. I really love those boots. I pretty much only carry things I myself like, which means I don't make money at it. It's just for fun. A hobby, at this point, although it's a business. My opera company is my real passion.

 
 Respond to this message   
Sharon Maxwell-Yamamoto
(no login)

Be careful whom you admire

August 1 2012, 1:11 AM 

You are so quick to compliment this person on her "skilz"....without knowing if what she found is about me or not. I am not a marketing person. I went to Manhattan School of Music and Juilliard. Studied music, opera, not marketing. So foolish.

 
 Respond to this message   
Sharon Maxwell-Yamamoto
(no login)

That Sharon Yamamoto is NOT ME

August 1 2012, 1:07 AM 

How utterly idiotic to post that drivel about a marketing person named Sharon Yamamoto. My name is Sharon MAXWELL-Yamamoto. I am an opera singer, opera producer, own DivaSharon's Divine Vintage and write articles for Worthpoint. That is all. There are numerous pictures of me on the internet.....very possibly, Sharon Yamamoto is a Japanese person, no? I am not. Unless it's her married name as well. However, that is NOT me.

I love how you think you solved some big mystery. Hilarious.

 
 Respond to this message   

(Login ClothingOptional)
***__***

Re: That Sharon Yamamoto is NOT ME

August 1 2012, 1:08 AM 

No really, it doesn't take much to amuse us

 
 Respond to this message   
Aurora
(no login)

Re: That Sharon Yamamoto is NOT ME

August 1 2012, 1:21 AM 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n8suG_IlvV8

Sharon, how come you don't always sing under your full name? I looked through a bunch of your youtube clips and sometimes you're listed as your full name, sometimes not. Is that a professional thing? They are all fairly recent.

You sound nice.


 
 Respond to this message   
Sharon Maxwell-Yamamoto
(no login)

Aurora, thank you

August 1 2012, 1:34 AM 

Aurora, thank you for listening to my video. In answer to your question, when I'm performing in an Opera Bravura show, I list myself in the program as Sharon Maxwell, soprano, to differentiate myself from my role as executive director. When I perform with another company, singing a role of some kind, I go by my hyphenated name. I started doing that when I sang Madame Butterfly because my husband liked it and now I do too. Thank you for the kind words! Much appreciated.

 
 Respond to this message   
Sharon Maxwell-Yamamoto
(no login)

Liz Salander, so proud of yourself now? LOL

August 1 2012, 1:28 AM 

Here is my Linkedin profile:

http://www.linkedin.com/pub/sharon-maxwell-yamamoto/40/243/aa2

Well? Apology? LOL I didn't think so. If you're going to try to sound intelligent, at least do the OBVIOUS research before you make an ass of yourself! You only succeeded in making everybody painfully aware of how stupid both you AND those who admired you really are. Shame on you for such careless "investigative" work. You're fired.

 
 Respond to this message   
Anonowanger
(no login)

Re: Liz Salander, so proud of yourself now? LOL

August 1 2012, 1:32 AM 

Oh jesus. WE DON'T REALLY CARE. Christ. Just like no one really cares about your stupid shoes. You effing psycho. Now break that down to 18 more response posts you weirdo attention whore.

 
 Respond to this message   
Sharon Maxwell-Yamamoto
(no login)

You do care

August 1 2012, 1:36 AM 

Quite obviously, you do care, or you would not have bothered to respond in such a fine and ladylike manner. LOL How telling.

 
 Respond to this message   

coolbreeze
(Login cool.breeze)
__***__

Imelda

August 1 2012, 1:44 AM 

At least it has been a break from the regular spam.



Enjoy your flip flops. - Sharon MAXWELL-Yamamoto

 
 Respond to this message   
Anonowanger
(no login)

Re: You do care

August 1 2012, 1:47 AM 

[linked image]

 
 Respond to this message   
Sharon Maxwell-Yamamoto
(no login)

Not impressed

August 1 2012, 1:54 AM 

I would be much more impressed if you could respond with something clever that you yourself had written or created. This is obviously something you snagged from another site. Yawn. Try harder. You can surely do better than that. Or...maybe you can't. LOL

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Hepatitis_C)
***__***

Re: Not impressed

August 1 2012, 7:35 AM 

"It's funny to have such strong opinions about something you've never tried."

And she managed to sum up 10 years of this board with one sentence.

Those shoes are fucking hideous though. Sometimes people with money buy things merely because they are expensive and they think the act of owning them sets them above the rabble. Most of you people are in your 40s; you should have learned that by now.

And, Sharon, if you read back on this thread you will see that it was an Anon that was insulting you in the beginning. It is kinda what anons do here. They are our own version of Statler and Waldorf. Don't let their comments draw you into an unnecessary skirmish. Just ignore them like everyone else (except Squid, his ego won't allow it) does.

If you read back, the others were politely skeptical until you responded to the anon bashing you by voicing your counter-attack at them. I know it is probably too late, since everyone has dug into their foxholes and drawn their lines in the sand, but you seem to be a reasonably intelligent and multi-faceted person. I hope you stick around.



It's pretty sad when I'm the voice of reason in a thread.

.


    
This message has been edited by Hepatitis_C on Aug 1, 2012 7:46 AM


 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: Not impressed

August 1 2012, 8:24 AM 

I beg your pardon, Mr. C!

It's not ego, it's righteous indignation!

 
 Respond to this message   
Anonowanger
(no login)

Re: Not impressed

August 1 2012, 8:33 AM 

You're right. Couldn't be more surprised that you aren't skeptical of this "I compared Tieks to City Slicks, and let me tell you, there's NO COMPARISON" marketing bullshit.

And Liz S - newbies don't say "bored." Even "year old" newbies. Impressive work, nonetheless.

 
 Respond to this message   
Appalled
(no login)

Re: Tieks

August 1 2012, 8:49 AM 

I have to admit I'm thinking of buying tieks. They must be great shoes to take this amount of crap. What if they are THAT comfortable???

 
 Respond to this message   
Mrs. Thurston Howell III
(no login)

Re: Tieks

August 1 2012, 8:53 AM 

They're ballet flats, they're not that comfortable.

But they are made of FINE ITALIAN LEATHER. Apparently, we "hoi polloi" just don't get it.

We also need to look up "hoi polloi."

 
 Respond to this message   
CapsLock
(no login)

Re: Tieks

August 1 2012, 9:03 AM 

"the hoi polloi" is redundant. It's like saying "the the masses". I googled.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: Tieks

August 1 2012, 9:22 AM 

I did not know that! Thank you, kind sir! I have noted this it in my plutocracy handbook.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Smirkdirk)
__***__

Re: Tieks

August 1 2012, 9:25 AM 

the 100

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: Tieks

August 1 2012, 9:29 AM 

Nice!

So, what did we decide?

Is this woman actually a marketing shill who works for Omnicom, or is this a cosmic coincidence of statistically significant proportion?

Which it really may not be. Lots of people work in marketing. Aurora - you heard her sing. Does she sing well enough to pay the bills? I'm not sure her online blogging is good enough to do so - though it's by no means horrible. I'll bet very few bloggers can live by their rants alone.

The bloggers I know are not in the 99%, and find 'blogging' to be a nice way to have a job without having a job.

 
 Respond to this message   
CapsLock
(no login)

Re: Tieks

August 1 2012, 9:30 AM 

I hope she sticks around. She's got sand.

 
 Respond to this message   
Anonowanger
(no login)

Re: Tieks

August 1 2012, 9:32 AM 

Is that sand where I think it is? Because I have a corner on that market.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: Tieks

August 1 2012, 9:37 AM 

Funny Anon!

 
 Respond to this message   
Sharon Maxwell-Yamamoto
(no login)

I am Not a Marketing person

August 1 2012, 11:34 AM 

I cannot believe you still think I work in marketing!! Did you see my Linkedin profile? There are many people with the same last name, but once again, there is only ONE person in the U.S. with both of my last names hyphenated.

I do not have to make a living with my worthpoint articles. I am not a blogger. I just wrote a few articles about something I like, which is vintage clothing, specializing in vintage fur.

I do not have a business education. The only marketing I do is at the grocery store. Period. I compared the two shoe brands because I bought the City Slips and they sucked. Wore out in an hour. Again I declare, "you get what you pay for".

 
 Respond to this message   
Sharon Maxwell-Yamamoto
(no login)

Hoi Polloi

August 1 2012, 11:28 AM 

Capslock, I see you were interested enough to try to learn something. The use of "the" in front of the term hoi polloi is arguable. Purists of ancient Greek don't use it, but in English usage, it's often used that way.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: Hoi Polloi

August 1 2012, 11:33 AM 

Mid-thread bump.

Strike TWO!

Just kidding Sharon. Messin' with ya. Can we be besties? I could use some new fans here I think.

I'm not really a BOY. Or a Squid for that matter.

 
 Respond to this message   

Arwen
(Login jeannien)
***__***

Re: Tieks

August 1 2012, 9:26 AM 

This is the most bizarre thread I have seen in a long time

"Me and my tampon, just kickin' it." Cornbread McIncest


    
This message has been edited by jeannien on Aug 1, 2012 9:29 AM


 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: Tieks

August 1 2012, 10:01 AM 

I just listened to Sharon Maxwell's voice. Way better than mine! I'm not qualified to judge such things. I can think of a former poster who could have given us a complete run-down on her talent.

Funny, she's right in this board's age wheel-house too.

What other products do you like Sharon? Tell us about M. Yamamoto!


 
 Respond to this message   
Japonica
(no login)

Re: Tieks

August 1 2012, 10:08 AM 

Anybody wanna see a hamster on a piano?

 
 Respond to this message   

Arwen
(Login jeannien)
***__***

Re: Tieks

August 1 2012, 10:13 AM 

LOL @ "Way better than mine!"

Not sure what type of compliment that is LOL

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: Tieks

August 1 2012, 10:14 AM 

Hi Japonica!

I just found your piano-hampster thread!

http://www.network54.com/Forum/181413/thread/1226937277/New+here+-+plus+hamsters%21

Welcome back!

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: Tieks

August 1 2012, 10:20 AM 

Hamster's gone.  sad.gif  Damn I hate that my threads aren't changing color!


 
 Respond to this message   
CapsLock
(no login)

Re: Tieks

August 1 2012, 10:30 AM 

I think it has something to do with your cookies setting, Tam. Mine are still changing color.

 
 Respond to this message   
Japonica
(no login)

Re: Tieks

August 1 2012, 10:31 AM 

I know my cookies ain't where they used to be.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Hepatitis_C)
***__***

Re: Tieks

August 1 2012, 10:39 AM 

I doubt she is internet marketing for Tieks.

Those people usually have canned responses that reek of advertising, and they seldom read the replies they get, much less engage in flame wars on the forums they're spamming.

Plus, a forum on a comedy web site about unemployment doesn't seem like a key market demographic for their product. I would think a forum on a site for rich people with poor eyesight would be a much better place to advertise those shoes.

.

 
 Respond to this message   

Arwen
(Login jeannien)
***__***

Re: Tieks

August 1 2012, 10:41 AM 

~snorf!~

 
 Respond to this message   
Soozin
(no login)

Re: Tieks

August 1 2012, 10:51 AM 

ohmahgawd. I read 5 posts here and had to go get a cup of coffee.

1. Best reality show on the 'net.
2. Reminds me of freki
3. Omnicom is freakin huge (I work for an Omnicom company) and I'd bet most people are two degrees (or less) of separation from an Omnicom connection. But I liked the daily show-style run-down anyway...
4. I hope everybody stays! Start more threads! :D

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: Tieks

August 1 2012, 10:55 AM 

I know a bunch that work for Omnicom too! They were buying up DC firms like crazy a while back!

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

CAPS

August 1 2012, 10:57 AM 

CAPS, help!  It was working yesterday.  Can cookies change their own settings?  What do I do?




 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: CAPS

August 1 2012, 11:05 AM 

Never mind!  I deleted my history and that did the trick.  That hint was enuf.  U rock!


 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: CAPS

August 1 2012, 11:32 AM 

S-M-Yamamoto is back again after an epic fail of a flounce!  See above!


 
 Respond to this message   
CapsLock
(no login)

Re: CAPS

August 1 2012, 11:34 AM 

I have a feeling once this thread goes away, so will she.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: CAPS

August 1 2012, 11:35 AM 

Nobody can resist looking back to see what was said about their flounce.  Welcome back to the hoi polloi, Sharon!


 
 Respond to this message   

Arwen
(Login jeannien)
***__***

Re: CAPS

August 1 2012, 11:38 AM 

This thread will never, ever go away. It just keeps getting bumped.

 
 Respond to this message   
Sharon Maxwell-Yamamoto
(no login)

Of course

August 1 2012, 11:50 AM 

Of course I came back...to see if any of you people would admit that you were wrong. The way many of you were so impressed with the pathetic "investigation" which any idiot could do...and not very thoroughly, as it was not even my correct name, and then think you had solved some big mystery....made me laugh and I wanted to see if you had read my responses.

Again, you all hide here under some stupid names, but I DO NOT. Never have. No need for it. If I am not actually famous, then at least I am notorious. Works for me.

And I still maintain, although Tieks are a ballet flat....they are INDEED COMFORTABLE, and that is saying a lot from someone with bad feet. They don't feel like typical flats. That is why they're expensive! And I know taste is a personal thing, but I don't see how a simple little round-toed shoe could be construed as ugly. Now, some of those Minnie Mouse platforms they're wearing today, that's my idea of ugly. I saw some color blocked ones at Nordstrom that looked like Frankenstein's bowling shoes and I literally burst out laughing right there in the store. Those were ugly. Nobody can walk gracefully in those.

As for being able to afford these shoes....I am not rich, but I am not young anymore either, and have earned a lifestyle that enables me to have a few nice things. Big deal. When you criticize people for that, it makes you sound jealous, and green, although I like it as a color, doesn't look so good on most people. I am not jealous of anyone and am happy for them if they have nice things or achieve something wonderful, even if I cannot and have not.

As for being in the same age group as you people, maybe, maybe not. I will be 50 shortly. Make of that what you will. I'm no spring chicken.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: Of course

August 1 2012, 11:57 AM 

Man, I gotta hand it to you - when you like a pair of shoes, you're totally committed.

I really don't think I could write 12 or so total paragraphs about any pair of shoes I own, and some have suggested I'm a little long-winded.

The fake names are really only protection against the casual drive by kooks. Most of us know each other's real names.


 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: Of course

August 1 2012, 11:58 AM 

Oh, Christopher Columbus!  Will you stop talking about those stupid shoes?  And stop telling us why we're horrible.  We all know we're horrible.  We all know WHY we're horrible.  Obviously you don't care, or you wouldn't expend so much energy sticking around to convince us that we're horrible.  So get on with it if you're gonna stay. 


 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: Of course

August 1 2012, 12:01 PM 

We are horrible, aren't we.

I can live with that.

 
 Respond to this message   
Sharon Maxwell-Yamamoto
(no login)

Why

August 1 2012, 12:06 PM 

Tamrah, why is it okay for others to say over and over how much they hate the shes, or how ugly they are, and for me it's "stop talking about those shoes!" Makes no sense. At least my comments were coherent and had substance, not just saying they were ugly and I hated them WITHOUT EVEN HAVING SEEN OR TRIED THEM. It's very childish, like saying you hate broccoli, although you had never actually eaten it.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: Why

August 1 2012, 12:08 PM 

My God you're like a pitbull with a hambone!  I LOVE THE SHOES!!!  I'LL BUY A PAIR!  THEY ARE GOD'S GIFT TO MY UNPEDDIED FEET!

A KAY??????




 
 Respond to this message   
Anonowanger
(no login)

Re: Of course

August 1 2012, 12:04 PM 

Verbosity is not a shortcoming of yours, but you might want to work on not sounding like a total snot. You're not new to the internet.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: Of course

August 1 2012, 12:04 PM 

You first.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Hepatitis_C)
***__***

Re: Of course

August 1 2012, 12:08 PM 

Not everything is about you, Squid.

I think he was talking to Sharon.

I once said that I had never met anyone with a hyphenated last name that wasn't I pompous ass.

I'm thinking I can still make that statement.

.

 
 Respond to this message   
Sharon Maxwell-Yamamoto
(no login)

Hyphenated last name

August 1 2012, 12:17 PM 

I was not born with a hyphenated name, like Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon or Camilla Parker-Bowles. I had a singing career before I was married, so I needed to keep it for that reason, because that is how I was known. I used to keep them separate, but my husband liked it when I hyphenated and said I must keep my own last name because that's who I was. I started hyphenating when singing Madame Butterfly to show directors that I knew something about Japanese ways (which I do), and decided I liked it too. There is nothing pompous about it.

If defending oneself against unwarranted attacks and being unjustly accused makes one pompous in your eyes, so be it. I mentioned before, I am not the shrinking violet type to go off and cry in a corner.

I never hit first. But watch out for second. I can hold my own against anyone.

 
 Respond to this message   
Sharon Maxwell-Yamamoto
(no login)

A Snot

August 1 2012, 12:11 PM 

I was not snotty until many people jumped on me. A normal human response. I did nothing wrong. I came here in a good mood, wanting to tell about something I had recently found that I liked, and that you were talking about, but did not have any first-hand knowledge. As a matter of fact, the OP asked "anybody have these" or something to that effect. Nobody had. I had. I posted. I thought she really wanted to know about them. I did not realize it was just a thread where children could gleefully bash things simply because they're nasty and naughty. I didn't know it was a pre-school site. The responses have been so immature and utterly silly. And then I was accused of being a someone else, although I post under my own name and gave names of where one could find me. It was insane. Who wouldn't be a snot, after that?

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: A Snot

August 1 2012, 12:14 PM 

Someone with a sense of humor about themselves, maybe?


 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Smirkdirk)
__***__

Re: A Snot

August 1 2012, 12:16 PM 

I like her!

 
 Respond to this message   
Ginny
(no login)

Re: Tieks

August 1 2012, 12:14 PM 

I'm not going to feed this particular troll any longer - there's a vile whiff of dickwing in the air and when she finally threatens to la traviatta over no one liking those stupid ugly shoes I'm not going to take the blame this time.

 
 Respond to this message   

'neady
(Login sinadie)
__***__

Re: Tieks

August 1 2012, 12:17 PM 

Totally dickwing. I'm not very good at figuring out who the anons/trolls are but this is painfully obvious.

 
 Respond to this message   
Anonowanger
(no login)

Re: Tieks

August 1 2012, 12:18 PM 

You bumped a thread from 2011, Sharon, and came on like gangbusters sounding like you are selling stupid shoes. Lizzlee told you this, but yet here you are, wasting time with children in preschool acting like a total fucking psycho.

Let it go before somebody attaches a penis to your face and posts it. You've been warned.

 
 Respond to this message   
Ginny
(no login)

Re: Tieks

August 1 2012, 12:20 PM 

Not accusing her of actually being him, just saying it's that type that can't take a joke, takes everything way to seriously, and is combative over inane bullshit.

 
 Respond to this message   
Anonowanger
(no login)

Re: Tieks

August 1 2012, 12:20 PM 

Exactly. Ginny is usurping Appalled. She's right, again.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: Tieks

August 1 2012, 12:18 PM 

Oh you big dirk.  You like every girl.

Seriously, I don't dislike you at all, Sharon.  I think lots of us have indicated we'd like to give you a chance if you'd stop posturing for a second and giggle.  If you don't have enough immaturity to do that, you're too pure to be Todd.




 
 Respond to this message   
Anonowanger
(no login)

Re: Tieks

August 1 2012, 12:20 PM 

OooOOOooohh - are there matching jackets? I'll totally get a name if we get matching jackets.


 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: Tieks

August 1 2012, 12:21 PM 

Are u telling me you actually "got" my GREASE reference?  You definitely need a name.  How about Rizzo?


 
 Respond to this message   
Anonowanger
(no login)

Re: Tieks

August 1 2012, 12:25 PM 

I did. I didn't sit through that movie 3 times in a row on a hot afternoon in 1978 because I hated it.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Hepatitis_C)
***__***

Re: Tieks

August 1 2012, 12:26 PM 

A pompous explanation for the last name followed by, "Nothing pompous about it."

I love it! Comedy gold.


.

 
 Respond to this message   
Sharon Maxwell-Yamamoto
(no login)

Vile

August 1 2012, 12:23 PM 

Ginny, the only thing vile is your vulgar language. I'm sorry you were brought up under a bridge. Perhaps that is how you think you know trolls. I am not one.

You should never have turned down that scholarship to charm school. You certainly are lacking in that area. Very nice. Very feminine. shudder

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Hepatitis_C)
***__***

Re: Vile

August 1 2012, 12:27 PM 

Meh, now the facade is cracking.

Very Kirwing.

.

 
 Respond to this message   
Anonowanger
(no login)

Re: Vile

August 1 2012, 12:30 PM 

[linked image]

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: Vile

August 1 2012, 12:28 PM 

Okay now I'm bored of you.  Shudder.


 
 Respond to this message   

'neady
(Login sinadie)
__***__

Re: Vile

August 1 2012, 12:28 PM 

Eat a bowl of troll dicks and choke.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: Vile

August 1 2012, 12:29 PM 

Neadie that was vile.


 
 Respond to this message   

'neady
(Login sinadie)
__***__

Re: Vile

August 1 2012, 12:30 PM 

Tam, suck my left tit and make the right one jealous.

 
 Respond to this message   
Anonowanger
(no login)

Re: Vile

August 1 2012, 12:31 PM 

Wasn't it? It was great.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: Vile

August 1 2012, 12:32 PM 

I blush for you.


 
 Respond to this message   

'neady
(Login sinadie)
__***__

Re: Vile

August 1 2012, 12:34 PM 

If you leave again I'll threaten to harm myself.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: Vile

August 1 2012, 12:36 PM 

Me?  Or S-M-Y? 


 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Smirkdirk)
__***__

Re: Vile

August 1 2012, 12:39 PM 

So, as a wrap up, does that make those of you against this footwear antieks?


 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: Vile

August 1 2012, 12:43 PM 

Nice try.  But this thread isn't going to die. 

What does everyone think of these?  I swear by them.

tevas.jpg




 
 Respond to this message   

'neady
(Login sinadie)
__***__

Re: Vile

August 1 2012, 12:45 PM 

Those are another form of birth control, right?

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: Vile

August 1 2012, 12:46 PM 

Absolutely.  I haven't had a baby yet.


 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Smirkdirk)
__***__

Re: Vile

August 1 2012, 12:45 PM 

Actually, I think Mrs. has a blue pair of those that she's been wearing since 1999.

 
 Respond to this message   
Anonowanger
(no login)

Re: Vile

August 1 2012, 12:48 PM 

River shoes. Fer shur.

 
 Respond to this message   

DJ
(Login DJ.)
***__***

Re: Vile

August 1 2012, 12:55 PM 

Awww, look at the troll trying to kick ass. It's like watching the be-glittered Russian gymnasts choke all over again.




 
 Respond to this message   
Anonowanger
(no login)

Re: Vile

August 1 2012, 12:57 PM 

Is there anything weirder than getting spit-slinging angry about shoes? Wow.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login DJ.)
***__***

Re: Vile

August 1 2012, 1:01 PM 

If they were Crocs, yes.


 
 Respond to this message   
Anonowanger
(no login)

Re: Vile

August 1 2012, 1:02 PM 

HA! Good point.

 
 Respond to this message   
Anonowanger
(no login)

Re: Tieks

August 1 2012, 2:23 PM 

You enter St. Alexander's Hospital. Somebody has spray painted an image of Sharon Yamamoto (Izumi Orimoto) eating a bowl of dicks.


 
 Respond to this message   
Anonowanger
(no login)

Re: Tieks

August 1 2012, 2:26 PM 

Is this what a stroke does to you? Because that was almost witty.

 
 Respond to this message   
Anonowanger
(no login)

Re: Tieks

August 1 2012, 2:35 PM 

"I really don't think I could write 12 or so total paragraphs about any pair of shoes I own, and some have suggested I'm a little long-winded."

REALLY?

The amount of time blowhard has written paragraphs after paragraphs arguing with anons? Now a few is throwing him off on shoes?

come on

 
 Respond to this message   
Anonowanger
(no login)

Re: Tieks

August 1 2012, 2:38 PM 

He's turning over a new leaf. Lay off, asshole.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login TrulyScrumptious)
__***__

Re: Tieks

August 1 2012, 2:30 PM 

BUAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

Awesome Urban Dead line, Anon! Good old St. Alexander's. Those were good times.


 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: Tieks

August 1 2012, 3:12 PM 

Gee I wonder who THAT anon is?

 
 Respond to this message   
Anonowanger
(no login)

Re: Tieks

August 1 2012, 3:37 PM 

And who am I?
You are a self absorbed delusional little bitch. Tell me Kreskin!

 
 Respond to this message   

Arwen
(Login jeannien)
***__***

Re: Tieks

August 1 2012, 3:53 PM 

I always thought Kreskin was Canadian because that is exactly the kind of lame ass magician show Canada would produce happy.gif

 
 Respond to this message   
Kohsblocks
(no login)

Re: Tieks

August 1 2012, 3:50 PM 

I kinda like the flats.

So there's that.

I'm pretty confident I couldn't talk about them for days though.

And that.

 
 Respond to this message   
Anonowanger
(no login)

Re: Tieks

August 1 2012, 4:01 PM 

This board used to fun witty way to pass time. Now it filled with angry middleaged obese women and that little shit playing them like a fiddle.

Waiting for blowhard to breakout with I love this community BS.


 
 Respond to this message   
Kohsblocks
(no login)

Re: Tieks

August 1 2012, 4:05 PM 

Anon -- you seem oddly angry.

 
 Respond to this message   
Kohsblocks
(no login)

Re: Tieks

August 1 2012, 4:06 PM 

I like the orange ones. Don't hate a lover.

happy.gif


 
 Respond to this message   

Arwen
(Login jeannien)
***__***

Re: Tieks

August 1 2012, 4:09 PM 

re: "angry middleaged obese women"

I'm not sure what Hep and smirk and Squid and... will think of that

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: Tieks

August 1 2012, 4:31 PM 

Holy cow angry anon!

my post: "Gee I wonder who THAT anon is?"

Was about the Izumi Orimoto in St. Alexanders reference above made by an anon, and responded to by Truly that can only be talking about the game "Urban Dead."

Given Troo responded, that anon can only have been $8 - who has since texted me to say, 'oops! I didn't log in in my drive by post there!' - I was JOKING with my friend that of course it was him, because it was a specific reference to things that happened to US playing that game.

I would like an apology, please. happy.gif


 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: Tieks

August 1 2012, 4:34 PM 

Also, if that's the demographic and BMI profile of this board, it has been since the beginning - so any 'used to be' there is just plain silly. Didn't you see the thread the other day about how many folks have been here for nearly 10 years?

It's not like all the dudes and skinny chicks left en masse one day.

CapsLock is my favorite obese woman here. She really knows how to grill.

 
 Respond to this message   

$8
(Login 8_Bucks)
***__***

Help!

August 1 2012, 6:13 PM 

I think I may be an angry obese middle-aged woman trapped in a mildly annoyed relatively fit middle aged man's body.

(Can I at least be a lesbian trapped in a man's body? 'cause I'm not into dudes. Sorry fellas)




The opinions expressed above are the sole opinions of the author and do not reflect actual human thought. Any resemblance to intelligent opinions is purely coincidental.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: Help!

August 1 2012, 6:16 PM 

Well, my guess is most of us women are all a little more middle-ageder and obeser than we were 10 years ago.  But come on, you can't argue that this thread wasn't witty and fun!

That just makes me angrier and bitter. rer.


 
 Respond to this message   
Aurora
(no login)

Re: Help!

August 1 2012, 6:50 PM 

Why can't you all just be nice, like me.

 
 Respond to this message   
Anonowanger
(no login)

Re: Help!

August 2 2012, 7:22 AM 

That shit up there (Kreskin, chunky ladies, etc.) is how DV posts when it's on its meds. Good job, little guy! Try to keep it up.

 
 Respond to this message   
BroadwayBaby59
(no login)

How Dare You!

August 5 2012, 12:43 PM 

"This board used to fun witty way to pass time. Now it filled with angry middleaged obese women and that little shit playing them like a fiddle."



[linked image]

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)

Tieks are worth the price!

October 23 2012, 2:39 PM 

I know from experience that Tieks are worth the price. I had the same thought as you. What makes them worth $100+?
I actually asked that question on the Tieks' FB page. Apparently, the owner was at dinner with a female friend who was playing with his phone and noticed my question and playfully formulated a response to me, not intending to send it, but inadvertently hit the send button. The owner and the friend were horrified and, long story short, I got a free pair of Tieks out of it.

I have to say, from the moment I put them on, I saw the reason. Wonderful butter soft leather, rich, Italian leather insole and upper. Sturdy shoe. I find I grab them every chance I get and not just when I need to relieve my feet of the pain of heels.
I bought myself a pair shortly thereafter. I love them and I tell people about them often. $200/pair is quite steep in my budge for flats, but I will probably purchase at least a couple more pair in time.

They are coming out with a vegan line soon I've heard as well.

Bottom line. Don't knock 'em til you've tried them. I have bought the cheapies and these are 1000 times better than anything you would buy for $40 or under.

 
 Respond to this message   
Ginny
(no login)

Re: Tieks are worth the price!

October 23 2012, 2:40 PM 

Oh sweet chocolate jesus, not again.

 
 Respond to this message   
Lisa Gaines
(no login)

What?

October 23 2012, 2:44 PM 

I just stumbled on this thread. Not a regular user. Just wanted to share my opinion about the shoes.

I'm sure I didn't offend 'sweet chocolate Jesus'. Sorry I messed up your Tuesday.

 
 Respond to this message   
Ginny
(no login)

Re: What?

October 23 2012, 2:47 PM 

If I were an abuser, I would delete this thread entirely.

Ok, granted, it is mildly amusing to supposedly random a-holes crawl in from all corners of the internet to bump years old threads about these stupid shoes, but honestly. Enough already.

 
 Respond to this message   
AnonoJam
(no login)

Re: Tieks are worth the price!

October 23 2012, 2:40 PM 

I KNEW IT!!!! Marketing marketing marketing!!

How's Sharon Yamamoto, Little Lisa??

 
 Respond to this message   

Arwen
(Login jeannien)
***__***

Re: Tieks are worth the price!

October 23 2012, 2:45 PM 

I agree with Ginny! Not again!

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: Tieks are worth the price!

October 23 2012, 2:46 PM 

Seriously?!?!

Tieks people, really? You're doing more damage to your brand with this shit than you are helping it.

 
 Respond to this message   
AnonoJam
(no login)

Re: Tieks are worth the price!

October 23 2012, 2:47 PM 

Read the fucking thread, LISA. You're like the 4th one, already.

 
 Respond to this message   

Arwen
(Login jeannien)
***__***

Re: Tieks are worth the price!

October 23 2012, 2:48 PM 

Can someone change the thread title to "We hate Tieks so don't bother" so maybe when it comes up in a search people won't post?

 
 Respond to this message   
Ginny
(no login)

Re: Tieks are worth the price!

October 23 2012, 2:51 PM 

I approve of this edit.

 
 Respond to this message   
Appalled
(no login)

Re: Tieks are worth the price!

October 23 2012, 2:51 PM 

Omg! Change that back! Let's see how many tiek people will try to convert us! Anyone want to bet?

 
 Respond to this message   

Arwen
(Login jeannien)
***__***

Re: Tieks are worth the price!

October 23 2012, 2:51 PM 

Awesome edit LOL!

 
 Respond to this message   
Ginny
(no login)

Re: Tieks are worth the price!

October 23 2012, 2:51 PM 

200 ugly pairs of flats!

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: Tieks are worth the price!

October 23 2012, 2:52 PM 

These are not the shoe loving rubes you're looking for.

 
 Respond to this message   

Arwen
(Login jeannien)
***__***

Re: Tieks are worth the price!

October 23 2012, 2:53 PM 

LOL!!

 
 Respond to this message   
AnonoJam
(no login)

Re: Tieks are worth the price!

October 23 2012, 2:52 PM 

HA!

 
 Respond to this message   

smirk
(Login Smirkdirk)
__***__

Re: Tieks are worth the price!

October 23 2012, 3:43 PM 

So nobody but me wants to know the playful answer the owner inadvertently sent?


 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: Tieks are worth the price!

October 23 2012, 3:47 PM 

Couldn't we buy our own copy of 50 Shades of Crappy Shoes for similar fan-fiction?






* are own? WTF SB?


    
This message has been edited by SquiddyBoy on Oct 23, 2012 3:49 PM


 
 Respond to this message   
'neady
(no login)

Re: Tieks are worth the price!

October 23 2012, 4:01 PM 

It happens.
I don't proof read or bother to edit my spelling/grammar mistakes anymore.

 
 Respond to this message   

Arwen
(Login jeannien)
***__***

Re: Tieks are worth the price!

October 23 2012, 4:02 PM 

smirk, I do but I scanned the thread, what owner??

ETA smirk


    
This message has been edited by jeannien on Oct 23, 2012 4:02 PM


 
 Respond to this message   
Lisa
(no login)

smh

October 23 2012, 4:19 PM 

First of all, I am not on the Tieks marketing team. Secondly, you all obviously would rather
trash talk than be positive about anything. Sorry I crashed your little party.

I agree, I should have noticed the date on the thread and I certainly will think twice before
joining a conversation on other sites lest I butt in on other close-minded middle aged women's cliques.
Jeez! (sweet chocolate or otherwise).

Good day. I hope things get better for you all.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Smirkdirk)
__***__

Re: Tieks are worth the price!

October 23 2012, 4:20 PM 

But he's playful, Damn It! And he has a female friend... and he owns a shoe company....


...and she felt his power, and yet it was a gentle power. Commanding, yet she could sense his tendency to cleave, to give in, if the fight just wasn't worth. Even as he leaned in to take her phone from her and look at the Facebook posting, the scent of his cologne almost, but not quite, hiding underneath the smell of leather from a hard day spent overseeing the Tiek factory, she had to catch her breath.

He playfully typed something into the phone, a response to lady who was asking why the shoes were just so damned expensive, and handed it back to her. She had to giggle when she looked at what he'd written. He was a rascal! She put her hand to her mouth to stifle her widening smile and accidentally hit the send button.

"Oh shit!"

"Did you hit send?" He was concerned.

"I totally didn't mean too. I'm so sorry!" She really was.

His face dropped, and then he shook his head. "Well, I guess that just means another pair of free shoes to send out."


CHAPTER 2

She examined her buttocks in the mirror. Tieks sure can give an ass whooping.

 
 Respond to this message   

Arwen
(Login jeannien)
***__***

Re: Tieks are worth the price!

October 23 2012, 4:34 PM 

LMAO!!!

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: Tieks are worth the price!

October 23 2012, 4:39 PM 

So you've read it then, Smirk.

Lisa - I'm proud we made you buttsore, if that's the way you're going to be.

Do we think anyone will ever just say,

"OK, you busted me. Not only do I work for Tieks, I was totally lazy and didn't put in the time to even slightly insinuate myself into your community before I tried to sell you shit."

I'd probably go buy some Tieks if they'd frickin' do that.

I mean, I give Ginny shit about Lush and I've known her 10 years. She stuck with it, and now I'm psyched to win some of that shit for cooking up the best garlic dish.





 
 Respond to this message   
Appalled
(no login)

Re: Tieks are worth the price!

October 23 2012, 4:43 PM 

Ginny made me buy lush.

 
 Respond to this message   
Ginny
(no login)

Re: Tieks are worth the price!

October 23 2012, 4:44 PM 

What kills me is, it is always the exact same personality. Comes in here to tell us all how great these shoes are, gets butthurt over nothing, calls us all names because we didn't fawn all over them for spamming us, keeps coming back to defend their own stupidity.

Is there a Tieks spam school out there I don't know about?

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: Tieks are worth the price!

October 23 2012, 4:52 PM 

Seriously! Not only are you a miserable Internet spammer, you're BAD at it [Lisa Yammamoto].



    
This message has been edited by SquiddyBoy on Oct 23, 2012 4:53 PM


 
 Respond to this message   
nicoblue
(no login)

Re: Tieks are worth the price!

October 23 2012, 4:55 PM 

I was thinking the same thing Ginny.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: Tieks are worth the price!

October 23 2012, 5:03 PM 

Lisa is from the Bay Area. Is that where S-M-Y was from too?

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Smirkdirk)
__***__

Re: Tieks are worth the price!

October 23 2012, 5:04 PM 

There's no buckles on tieks. How you supposed to tie a bitch up real good?

 
 Respond to this message   
Ginny
(no login)

Re: Tieks are worth the price!

October 23 2012, 5:13 PM 

[linked image]

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login pearlgurl)
***__***

Re: Tieks are worth the price!

October 23 2012, 5:39 PM 

You know what I don't understain, is why bother marketing ballet flats when it is mid-autumn? In the inimitable words of Colin Nissan, " Why? Because its not summer, its not winter, and its not spring. Grab a calendar and pull your fucking heads out of your asses; its fall, fuckers". If you're going to spam us, spam us with expensive Italian leather boots already.

 
 Respond to this message   
Randomanon
(no login)

Re: Tieks are worth the price!

November 19 2012, 11:25 PM 

Lol this thread is more popcorn worthy than most of the stuff on 4chan. at one point i don't even know who's trolling whom anymore (at this point I'm fully inclined to believe that SMY is winning at the trolling game).

I'm way too cheap to shell out for my own Tieks. Having said that, I have (richer, hipper) friends who swear by them. I have no doubt that they are quality and comfortable shoes, but uh, the way they seem to brainwash people into obsessive crazies is more than a tad scary.

Still, Lisa, if that friend of a friend is having another giveaway, let me know, eh? :P

 
 Respond to this message   

Anny
(Login AnnyBoo)
***__***

Re: Tieks are worth the price!

November 19 2012, 11:50 PM 

It totally is, anonny! And (honest) thanks for bumping it. I missed most of it when I was in Israel in late july/august sad.gif

I just want to say after reading:

Arwen: you posted "this thread will never, ever die"

Trufax!





 
 Respond to this message   
Squid Boy
(no login)

Re: Tieks are worth the price!

November 20 2012, 8:00 AM 

AGAIN!

HA! "Y'all are funny and isn't this such a hilarious internet board and gee, now that I think of it, Tieks ARE pretty cool - I wish I could afford them, so I'm saving up and you should too!"

Seriously? I mean I guess it'll keep the thread going - but seriously, you think we're that stupid?

Here's what I really think: There is someone who is really, really bored in the marketing department of Tieks. So they read this board and hang on our every word. APPY IS THE UBER GODDESS, THEN Ginny, Anny, DJ and Arwen are like Goddesses to this person. Caps and Hep are like wood sprites playing pan flutes. Anyway - this woman's boss keeps catching her reading - so she's convinced him or her that she's going to get us all to buy these shoes by hook or by crook.


    
This message has been edited by SquiddyBoy on Nov 20, 2012 8:53 AM
This message has been edited by SquiddyBoy on Nov 20, 2012 8:22 AM


 
 Respond to this message   
Anonoshudder
(no login)

Re: Tieks are worth the price!

November 20 2012, 8:15 AM 

There really are a lot of seriously crazy assholes out there. Exhibit A above. Wow.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: Tieks are worth the price!

November 20 2012, 8:23 AM 

I totally agree! Watch out for those. They might try to sell you SHOES.

 
 Respond to this message   
Appalled
(no login)

Re: Tieks are worth the price!

November 20 2012, 8:37 AM 

What the heck squid? You cut me deep.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: Tieks are worth the price!

November 20 2012, 8:51 AM 

Sorry? How did I cut you? I was talking about the anon?


OH HA! OK, I'll add you to the pantheon.


    
This message has been edited by SquiddyBoy on Nov 20, 2012 8:52 AM


 
 Respond to this message   
Appalled
(no login)

Re: Tieks are worth the price!

November 20 2012, 8:55 AM 

And you don't even see it....

"Ginny, Anny, DJ and Arwen are like Goddesses to this person. Caps and Hep are like wood sprites "

I won't lie... It hurts

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Hepatitis_C)
***__***

Re: Tieks are worth the price!

November 20 2012, 9:22 AM 

I always wanted to be Puck.

Not the reality-show guy, you Philistines.

.

 
 Respond to this message   

liu
(Login Livinitup)
***__***

Re: Tieks are worth the price!

November 20 2012, 10:53 AM 

Now I view the bored in a whole new light.

[linked image]


Edit to make the link safe for Arwen's company which thinks art made from classical literature is inappropriate happy.gif


    
This message has been edited by Livinitup on Nov 20, 2012 11:11 AM


 
 Respond to this message   

Arwen
(Login jeannien)
***__***

Re: Tieks are worth the price!

November 20 2012, 11:00 AM 

lui?

Hmmm. Can't see the image but...

"Based on your corporate access policies, access to this web site ( [linked image] ) has been blocked because the web category "Porn" is not allowed."

 
 Respond to this message   

Arwen
(Login jeannien)
***__***

Re: Tieks are worth the price!

November 20 2012, 10:54 AM 

What? Why include me? I want this thing to die as much as the next person. I've never even seen them in real life.

 
 Respond to this message   

liu
(Login Livinitup)
***__***

Re: Tieks are worth the price!

November 20 2012, 11:07 AM 

That's hilarious. it's a pic of puck from the midsummer night's dream. I'll try to photobucket and repost. Hang on, it's password guessing time.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login AnnyBoo)
***__***

Re: Tieks are worth the price!

November 20 2012, 12:12 PM 

There's no shame in her game. I like it.

 
 Respond to this message   
Randomanon
(no login)

Re: Tieks are worth the price!

November 20 2012, 6:44 PM 

Wait what? I'm not SMY or a marketing person! It's the WORST case of MISTAKEN IDENTITY EVAR. There's no one else in the US of A named RandomANON! I will proceed to clutch my pearls so hard that they crack and throw the dust in your eyes. To blind you. because you're blind because YOU CAN NOT TELL THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ME and an opera singer and a theoretically existing marketing team.

also that picture. are you sure those fairies aren't wearing nude Tieks? huh? HUH????

 
 Respond to this message   
AnonoTurkey
(no login)

Re: Tieks are worth the price!

November 21 2012, 7:26 AM 

Simmer down, Koool.

 
 Respond to this message   
Goldie
(no login)

Tieks

December 6 2012, 6:07 PM 

I was searching to see if people liked these shoes...now that I've read almost this entire thread (skipping only here and there) I want the fucking shoes.

Bumpity-bump-bump... wink.gif

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Lizzlee)
__***__

Re: Tieks

December 6 2012, 6:10 PM 

Would someone PLEASE lock this thread?! wink.gif

 
 Respond to this message   

Liu
(Login Livinitup)
***__***

Re: Tieks

December 6 2012, 6:57 PM 

Crap- my feet are achy today and I almost want these. Stupid subliminal marketing Anon.


 
 Respond to this message   
'neady
(no login)

Re: Tieks

December 6 2012, 7:49 PM 

And......scene!

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)

You're still at it?

December 9 2012, 10:38 PM 

OMG, you guys are so funny. I see a couple of others have made the same blunder I made....and you lambasted them nicely, as you did me. Carry on.

p.s. I have six pairs of Tieks now LOL!!!

And.....ACTION!

 
 Respond to this message   

PearlGurl
(Login pearlgurl)
***__***

Re: You're still at it?

December 9 2012, 11:08 PM 

Sharon! Welcome back! As long as your here, perhaps you can offer some guidance to this misguided soul:
http://www.network54.com/Forum/181413/thread/1354645901/last-1354660433/Need+board+help!

 
 Respond to this message   
Foghorn Shoehorn
(no login)

Re: You're still at it?

December 10 2012, 8:47 AM 

Yeah, Sharon's not constantly scouring the internet for any mention of these ugly ass shoes. Nope! Not here. When somebody tells her to shut up, she shuts up. She's not one that has to keep talkin'. Some fellas just have to keep their mouths flappin', but not Sharon! She was brought up right, her pa used to tell her "shut up" and she'd shut up! She wouldn't say nothin'! One time, darn-near starved to death - wouldn't say she was hungry!

 
 Respond to this message   

Squid Boy
(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: You're still at it?

December 10 2012, 9:06 AM 

You know what? I've changed my mind.

I hereby endorse these shoes. Please all of you - buy some.

I'll be expecting part of your commission Sharon.

 
 Respond to this message   
AnonoZunes
(no login)

Re: You're still at it?

December 10 2012, 9:10 AM 

Your endorsement is all that's needed to justify purchasing something you could get in a Kmart bin for $4, but instead pay $150 a pop. That's for sure.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: You're still at it?

December 10 2012, 9:39 AM 

Yes, I thought so too. Just think how COOL you'd look though, Anon.

 
 Respond to this message   
AnonoZunes
(no login)

Re: You're still at it?

December 10 2012, 9:44 AM 

Nothing sexier than toe cleavage, I always say.

 
 Respond to this message   
Sharon Maxwell-Yamamoto
(no login)

What a bunch of morons

December 10 2012, 6:31 PM 

For some reason, I got an email from this idiotic group that led me back here, so I clicked. Silly me. However, I see that a couple of other people think the same thing I do about the shoes, so do enjoy your $4 pieces of junk and keep on spewing venom! Tasty stuff,huh? I am just amazed you were still at it after all these months.

Buh-bye! happy.gif

 
 Respond to this message   
Ginny
(no login)

Re: What a bunch of morons

December 10 2012, 6:48 PM 

You are the dumb beaver who keeps bumping it! WTF? If you don't want us to tell you that we think you are stupid for paying this kind of money for ugly cheap looking shoes why do you keep coming back and bumping a thread for MONTHS AND MONTHS!?

Man, if it wasn't for edit-ageddeon 2012 I'd be seriously tempted to delete the whole farking thread.

 
 Respond to this message   
smirk
(no login)

Re: What a bunch of morons

December 10 2012, 9:34 PM 

dumb beaver?

Personally, I'd like to know more about Sharon Maxwell-Yamamoto.

That name is the fo-shiz.

I wanna see that family tree.

 
 Respond to this message   
AnonoZunes
(no login)

Re: What a bunch of morons

December 11 2012, 7:29 AM 

Sharon got an email? Isn't that the most interesting thing EVAH?

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: What a bunch of morons

December 11 2012, 8:42 AM 

Smirk - you can know everything you want, if you're so inclined. As you'll recall from earlier in the thread, she's 100% transparent and open.

 
 Respond to this message   

smirk
(Login Smirkdirk)
__***__

Re: What a bunch of morons

December 24 2012, 9:45 AM 

I wanna buy these shoes...

For my mama, please.

Its Christmas Eve and these shoes are just her size.

 
 Respond to this message   
Shivah
(no login)

Re: Tieks [Tieks Marketing Team - You've already tried here. Move along. Move along.]

January 10 2013, 5:10 PM 

.-. i like the tieks :\ i'm hoping i dont get flamed for saying so. I'm diabetic and i needed a good pair of flats that last. These really made a difference. the leather IS really really soft and supple. the sole is nice and sturdy. they really travel well. Im hoping these last because the price was expensive. too early tell tho, so far they are excellent. I figure if i pay as much for a purse why not take care of my feet. shurg

I had the dr. sholl's and for 12 bucks its a bargain, but they offered no support and after a bit they actually hurt my foot, they are better as house slippers sad.gif that might be because as a diabetic i need more support, who knows? Still tieks is a good product, you're paying for the brand, the quality but if you need something more out of shoes, then you pay the price.


 
 Respond to this message   

Lizzlee
(Login Lizzlee)
__***__

Re: Tieks [Tieks Marketing Team - You've already tried here. Move along. Move along.]

January 10 2013, 5:17 PM 

shurg

 
 Respond to this message   
Ginny
(no login)

Re: Tieks [Tieks Marketing Team - You've already tried here. Move along. Move along.]

January 10 2013, 5:23 PM 

Coo welcome, Fermeriya!

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login pearlgurl)
***__***

Re: Tieks [Tieks Marketing Team - You've already tried here. Move along. Move along.]

January 10 2013, 5:49 PM 

How many of us wear a size 9? Because if ten of us all chip in $20, we can all take turns living the dream. If I had $200 to spend on ballet flats, I'd spend it traveling to someplace warm enough to wear my flip-flops.

 
 Respond to this message   

Arwen
(Login jeannien)
***__***

Re: Tieks [Tieks Marketing Team - You've already tried here. Move along. Move along.]

January 10 2013, 6:59 PM 

I have no idea what the attraction is to this thread. I am just fascinated. I will be very sad when it gets so big we can no longer open it and see what the newest posts are.

Can we get a 10 and some of you wear thick socks, because I can't do a 9 sad.gif

 
 Respond to this message   

Arwen
(Login jeannien)
***__***

Re: Tieks [Tieks Marketing Team - You've already tried here. Move along. Move along.]

January 10 2013, 7:07 PM 

260 people! 260!


 
 Respond to this message   
Ginny
(no login)

Re: Tieks [Tieks Marketing Team - You've already tried here. Move along. Move along.]

January 10 2013, 7:44 PM 

Arwen, I wear a 10. You me and Kathleen can share.

 
 Respond to this message   

Arwen
(Login jeannien)
***__***

Re: Tieks [Tieks Marketing Team - You've already tried here. Move along. Move along.]

January 10 2013, 8:45 PM 

Awesome! Now all we need to do is agree on a colour.

 
 Respond to this message   

liu
(Login Livinitup)
***__***

Re: Tieks [Tieks Marketing Team - You've already tried here. Move along. Move along.]

January 11 2013, 8:52 AM 

I wonder the attraction too. so I googled.

I tried tieks. nothing
should I buy tieks. nothing
are tieks worth the price. nothing


But then I found it....

[linked image]


    
This message has been edited by Livinitup on Jan 11, 2013 8:57 AM
This message has been edited by Livinitup on Jan 11, 2013 8:53 AM


 
 Respond to this message   

Dr. Zhivago
(Login Dr.Zhivago)
__***__

Re: Tieks [Tieks Marketing Team - You've already tried here. Move along. Move along.]

January 11 2013, 9:01 AM 

Ha ha ha ha ha! Mystery solved: damage control.

Land sakes alive, the steak's alive.

 
 Respond to this message   
Snake
(no login)

Re: Tieks [Tieks Marketing Team - You've already tried here. Move along. Move along.]

January 11 2013, 9:07 AM 

I think the best part is how they're always compared to some terribly inferior brand of $12 knock offs.

Enjoy your flip flops!

 
 Respond to this message   
soozin
(no login)

Re: Tieks [Tieks Marketing Team - You've already tried here. Move along. Move along.]

January 11 2013, 11:11 AM 

Seriously!

I wanted to get my boy an espresso maker for Christmas - and my ONLY options were for a $600 one, or a $35 one.

Nothing in-between??

Also, this thread makes me LOL. And I guarantee that if I ever see them when I'm out shoe shopping, I will try them on to see what the fuss is all about. Also guaranteed that I won't be actually buying them...

 
 Respond to this message   
AnonoPutz
(no login)

Re: Tieks [Tieks Marketing Team - You've already tried here. Move along. Move along.]

January 11 2013, 11:30 AM 

You mean these casual drop ins from totally random people that just happen to love Tieks so much that they compared them to alternative brands has had ZERO effect on you?

There is no god.

 
 Respond to this message   

Arwen
(Login jeannien)
***__***

Re: Tieks [Tieks Marketing Team - You've already tried here. Move along. Move along.]

January 11 2013, 12:12 PM 

That is hilarious. We are the architects of our own demise people.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login graymusik.)
***__***

Re: Tieks [Tieks Marketing Team - You've already tried here. Move along. Move along.]

January 11 2013, 12:41 PM 

I just read this thread after deliberately avoiding it from the first week. Holy crap! That's all.
I'm never opening this thread again... although that's what I said about Ronnie's thread.


    
This message has been edited by graymusik. on Jan 12, 2013 4:47 PM


 
 Respond to this message   
trout
(no login)

it worked in beetlejuice...

January 11 2013, 1:10 PM 

I hate tieks
I hate tieks
I hate tieks

runs for cover

 
 Respond to this message   

Adi
(Login WesSmackey)
__***__

This is The Best Thread Ever!

January 11 2013, 7:15 PM 

Have I told you lately that I love you?

 
 Respond to this message   
Karma Chameleon
(no login)

Re: This is The Best Thread Ever!

January 11 2013, 11:21 PM 

I am a mere interloper here, but I confess that I love this thread!

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Dr.Zhivago)
__***__

Re: Tieks [Tieks Marketing Team - You've already tried here. Move along. Move along.]

January 12 2013, 12:23 AM 

We're all interlopers here.

 
 Respond to this message   
Rachel
(no login)

has anyone heard of KANDALS

March 2 2013, 10:51 PM 

Hi everyone, has any heard of KANDALS? They're a eco-friendly shoe company similar to TOMS and look way more comfy. Wasn't sure cause i've never heard of them but I guess Lauren Conrad featured them on her pinterest.

So cool, the shoe's are made in Spain and they're on 32 bucks. and they plant a tree for every pair.

what do you guys think?

 
 Respond to this message   
Balti
(Login Baltimoron)
__***__

Re: has anyone heard of KANDALS

March 3 2013, 7:33 AM 

I HATE KANDALS!

And they're ugly too.

 
 Respond to this message   
Squid Boy
(no login)

Re: has anyone heard of KANDALS

March 3 2013, 8:15 AM 

Can I lower my interest rates too Rachel?

 
 Respond to this message   

Dr. Zhivago
(Login Dr.Zhivago)
__***__

Re: has anyone heard of KANDALS

March 3 2013, 10:06 PM 

I hate trees so much.

Land sakes alive, the steak's alive.

 
 Respond to this message   

$8
(Login 8_Bucks)
***__***

Re: has anyone heard of KANDALS

March 3 2013, 10:52 PM 

Trees and power lines must be your nemesis's.




The opinions expressed above are the sole opinions of the author and do not reflect actual human thought. Any resemblance to intelligent opinions is purely coincidental.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Dr.Zhivago)
__***__

Re: has anyone heard of KANDALS

March 4 2013, 8:25 AM 

Bingo. happy.gif

Land sakes alive, the steak's alive.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Hepatitis_C)
***__***

Re: has anyone heard of KANDALS

March 6 2013, 6:21 PM 

The plural of nemesis is nemeses.

I learned that watching Buffy the Vampire Slayer.

.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login pearlgurl)
***__***

Re: has anyone heard of KANDALS

March 6 2013, 7:41 PM 

I was concerned that this thread will never make it to 300 if all of the trolls are locked out. this is giving me hope.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login graymusik.)
***__***

Re: has anyone heard of KANDALS

March 6 2013, 7:43 PM 

~ Dang, I did it again!

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login pearlgurl)
***__***

Re: has anyone heard of KANDALS

March 6 2013, 7:46 PM 

Also, I just ordered these today because my feet are too messed up to enjoy cheap flip-flops and I really like SOLE insoles.

http://www.rei.com/product/850905/sole-sport-flip-flops-womens-2012-closeout

 
 Respond to this message   

nicoblue
(Login nicoblue)
***__***

Re: has anyone heard of KANDALS

March 6 2013, 8:10 PM 

I can't handle wearing flip flops cause the bracket inbetween my large and second toe gets all hurty. That means I am destined to wear the sport sandal all summer.

[linked image]


What do you say? I think they compliment my complete lack of style. happy.gif

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login pearlgurl)
***__***

Re: has anyone heard of KANDALS

March 6 2013, 8:11 PM 

They look like they come free with the purchase of a Subaru.





happy.gif

 
 Respond to this message   

Bider Spite
(Login BiderSpite)
__***__

Re: has anyone heard of KANDALS

March 6 2013, 9:27 PM 

WOW... seriously?

"Ta Friggin da"

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login CanadianRaven)
***__***

Re: has anyone heard of KANDALS

March 7 2013, 2:32 AM 

I like sports sandals a lot ~hangs head in shame~

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: has anyone heard of KANDALS

March 7 2013, 8:29 AM 

I love air Jesus'... but I don't see them as fashionable at all...

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Dr.Zhivago)
__***__

Re: has anyone heard of KANDALS

March 7 2013, 8:47 AM 

I never wear anything with exposed foot. My feet are outstanding and I can't risk it by exposing them to the elements.

Land sakes alive, the steak's alive.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Lizzlee)
__***__

Re: has anyone heard of KANDALS

March 7 2013, 8:58 AM 

Sure thing, Bilbo. happy.gif

 
 Respond to this message   

$8.00
(Login 8_Bucks)
***__***

Re: has anyone heard of KANDALS

March 7 2013, 9:10 AM 

Heard a comedy bit the other day about men not wearing sandals. How tough can a man be while seeing sandals? Don't remind me of the Spartans. They didn't have footwear choices.






The opinions expressed above are the sole opinions of the author and do not reflect actual human thought. Any resemblance to intelligent opinions is purely coincidental.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: has anyone heard of KANDALS

March 7 2013, 9:40 AM 

I dunno - those are way better than boots in some pretty manly circumstances. Like class 4 whitewater rafting...

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Dr.Zhivago)
__***__

Re: has anyone heard of KANDALS

March 7 2013, 10:45 AM 

Yeah, you might want sport sandals for white water rafting, but if you have to ferry your war elephants across the Rhone, you're probably going to want something with a little ankle support.

Rafting...lol.

Land sakes alive, the steak's alive.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: has anyone heard of KANDALS

March 7 2013, 11:55 AM 

So, War Elephant ferrying would presumably happen in... War?

Sport sandals are inappropriate for war. Totally agree.

If I were flying a kite, I would rather have support sandals on. If I were remotely piloting a drone, I'd probably have boots on. Or maybe staff shoes.

Kite Flying... LOL!

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Dr.Zhivago)
__***__

Re: Tieks [Move along. Move along.]

March 7 2013, 12:41 PM 

Ha ha ha ha ha! Yes, sport sandals for sport, not for war. Ha ha ha ha ha!

I like Vibrams for kites - feels like running around barefoot, totally.

IMG_0366

Land sakes alive, the steak's alive.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: Tieks [Move along. Move along.]

March 7 2013, 1:01 PM 

We're having weird interactions Doc.

Something on your mind?

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Dr.Zhivago)
__***__

Re: Tieks [Move along. Move along.]

March 7 2013, 1:46 PM 

No, I seriously was imagining Hannibal fighting in sport sandals and thought it was hilarious.

For real!

[linked image]

Land sakes alive, the steak's alive.

 
 Respond to this message   

PearlGurl
(Login pearlgurl)
***__***

Re: Tieks [Move along. Move along.]

March 7 2013, 1:46 PM 

There would be a lot fewer wars if more men wore dancing shoes.

 
 Respond to this message   

MAT
(Login curriedfavors)
__***__

Re: Tieks [Move along. Move along.]

March 7 2013, 1:59 PM 

Alley oop?

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login pearlgurl)
***__***

Re: Tieks [Move along. Move along.]

March 7 2013, 2:11 PM 

300!

ETA: I'd like to thank the Academy and all of the little people who helped me get to where I am today. You all mean so much to me. Thank you.


    
This message has been edited by pearlgurl on Mar 7, 2013 2:12 PM


 
 Respond to this message   
Current Topic - Tieks [Move along. Move along.]
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Back to the Start!