<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Back to the Start!  

New Editing Rules

February 29 2012 at 9:34 AM
Odd Todd  (no login)

If somebody edits a post of yours and you'd like to protest the edit. Please post a formal complaint in a NEW THREAD on the board regarding the edit.

I will review the edited post and be judge and jury if the said edit in question is justified. And hand out justice accordingly.

Starting today, if you edit someone's post just to bust their chops and the busted chops party posts a complaint post-- the chop buster will permanently lose editing privileges.

If you do not have editing privileges and would like editing privileges you most post on this thread requesting such privileges.

Note: Editing powers is not about being loosey goosey. They're about keeping the board free of spam and a convenience in case you'd like to change your own post. Think three times before editing someone else's post because that edit might be your last.

thank you,.

the management


 
 Respond to this message   
AuthorReply


(Login TrulyScrumptious)
__***__

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 9:37 AM 

Thank you, Todd. What about deleting non spam posts?


 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 9:37 AM 

Awesome, thank you Todd.

 
 Respond to this message   

ED
(Login englishdude)

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 9:38 AM 

Can we possibly review making logging-in mandatory as well?

Thanks.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 9:42 AM 

I love these rules too!

According to this, I see nothing about any of the edits I've made! No anon can post an edit complaint can they? How would we know it was actually them? What regular is going to complain on behalf of an Anon - especially when they can't even see what WAS there and don't really know how bad it was or wasn't?

The only one editing logged in posters is Appy, and several have officially complained!

None of my edits were loosey goosey, they all eliminated something nasty and worthless from the board!

These rules are completely consistent with my actions.

YAY! Vindication!

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 9:47 AM 

I disagree, Todd said anyone can complain and I hope the anons do. I don't want my board moderated by you.

 
 Respond to this message   

Barkenstein
(Login Barkenstein)
***__***

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 10:00 AM 

I would like editing power to edit my own posts 'cause sometimes I screw-up my own post and don't see it until after the post has been made.

Thank you in advance.

Although I see that now I can edit my post so maybe never mind.

I have no reason to edit someone elses posts, that is their problem.

Spam = definite edit or removal.






(this edit because I could)





"There has to be an invisible sun."


    
This message has been edited by Barkenstein on Feb 29, 2012 10:04 AM


 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 10:02 AM 

Well, people in hell would like ice water McAppy.

 
 Respond to this message   

Funk
(Login Funkenstien)
__***__

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 10:02 AM 

If an "anon" complains, how can it prove that it is the person that was actually edited? They can't...anons are by definition faceless, nameless, and without traceable history.


 
 Respond to this message   
AnonoBoom
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 10:04 AM 

tOdd can tell. You don't need to know.

 
 Respond to this message   
AnonoBoom
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 10:05 AM 

tOdd are you truly going to enforce these board rules? You haven't done so in the past. Why should we believe you?

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 10:07 AM 

New hereanon?.

 
 Respond to this message   
Anon
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 10:08 AM 

That one is, yes. Or it's Afro, that phrases everything in the form of a question, Jeopardy-stylee.

 
 Respond to this message   
smirk
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 10:14 AM 

Todd: "They're about keeping the board free of spam and a convenience in case you'd like to change your own post"

Squid: "If I see one of them calling a woman I think is terrific a fat cunt, I'm going to edit it."

Is someone calling someone a "fat cunt" spam in the true sense of the word?

discuss.

Think of yourselves as the supreme court justices and Todd's paragraph above as the constitution.





 
 Respond to this message   
AnonoBoom
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 10:15 AM 

Squid's all about friendship.

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 10:34 AM 

Except for mine

 
 Respond to this message   
AnonoBoom
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 10:35 AM 

Apparently. You seem to have stepped over the invisible line and onto a mine field. Sorry about that.

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 10:37 AM 

Thanks anon, hope you don't get edited for thinking that.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 10:37 AM 

I'm still your anonymous Internet friend Appy.

Have I done something to you that you'd like to discuss?

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 10:38 AM 

No, I'd like you to edit where I've been called nasty names.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 10:39 AM 

But you're the one usually going anon to call people c-words!


    
This message has been edited by SquiddyBoy on Feb 29, 2012 10:42 AM


 
 Respond to this message   

ED
(Login englishdude)

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 10:41 AM 

Uh...I work in a school. Can we please cut out the unnecessary bad language please? Not cool.

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 10:43 AM 

Yeah, really. He's just trying to shock me.

Why are you being such a jerk Squid? We can disagree with out all this vitriol.

Plus you're better then this, anon is right.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Lizzlee)
__***__

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 10:42 AM 

I apologize for that, Appy. I was going for shock value and regretted it. I was going to edit it this morning, but it appears someone deleted that whole thread.

 
 Respond to this message   
AnonoBoom
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 10:43 AM 

Is this irony?

 
 Respond to this message   

ED
(Login englishdude)

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 10:45 AM 

No, but this looks kinda irony:-

[linked image]

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 10:43 AM 

I guess I didn't even see that one. I know DJ called her some names, but well - you deleted her stuff Appy and she's a logged in poster.

If an anon calls you that, I'm all over it. Promise.

 
 Respond to this message   
AnonoBoom
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 10:44 AM 

I saw DJ's stuff this morning. I guess that's the thread that's gone.

 
 Respond to this message   

ED
(Login englishdude)

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 10:45 AM 

I don't think I saw anything from DJ, so it must have gone by early morning GMT.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login TrulyScrumptious)
__***__

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 10:46 AM 


 
 Respond to this message   

ED
(Login englishdude)

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 10:47 AM 

Ooh, I missed that one!

Not nice. sad.gif

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Lizzlee)
__***__

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 10:48 AM 

No, that's not the one. I posted it previous to that and it was plainly directed toward Appy. That one was jokingly pointed to Squid, but still crude.

 
 Respond to this message   

ED
(Login englishdude)

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 10:51 AM 

I saw the Appy one, not the Squid one.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 10:46 AM 

DUDE - ED!

STOP WITH THE GIANT PICTURES PLEASE!

 
 Respond to this message   

ED
(Login englishdude)

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 10:48 AM 

I've already asked you how to shrink 'em and heard nada.

 
 Respond to this message   
AnonoBoom
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 10:48 AM 

He can't tell you out in the open like this! It'll be anarchy!

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 10:49 AM 

This is my job too?

 
 Respond to this message   

ED
(Login englishdude)

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 10:52 AM 

If you're the one bitching about my picture size, then YES, it is. Sorry 'bout that.

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 10:48 AM 

Thats the part I disagree with, either edit all the things (insert meme) or none of them. Why does DJ (and others) get to behave in ways anon gets edited for? There shouldnot be two sets of rules, and if you don't want to be called nasty names, start by not using them yourself.

 
 Respond to this message   

ED
(Login englishdude)

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 10:50 AM 

I think all posts which are offensive in a personal way should get deleted by the moderators. That may seem old fashioned of me, but it soon gets rid of the bad behaviour in my experience.

 
 Respond to this message   
AnonoBoom
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 10:51 AM 

Are you two going to brawl now? Because I'm going to have to get some more popcorn.

ED - is it irony that the most board activity comes from complaining about what people claim to hate the most, i.e., anons?

I always have trouble with irony. Not sure if I worded that well.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 10:51 AM 

Because they have measurable value to the community beyond a single post.

They have ten years of friendships and history here that any given action can be measured against.

They ARE more than the anons. They're the actual members of this community.

The rules SHOULD be different for DJ than they are for some random jerk - or even worse some NOT random jerk who's just being cowardly for that moment.

 
 Respond to this message   
AnonoBoom
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 10:53 AM 

Do you ever get tired of repeating yourself? I ask because clearly nothing ever changes. I've been reading your wild west analogy for nigh on 40 years.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 10:56 AM 

Says the cowardly not-random jerk.

Honestly though, I was just looking at my wall saying - Go back to work Squid, this is devolving to that well-traveled place again, and you haven't laughed in 20 minutes or so.

And ED is asking for unicorns and rainbows all around and that will make you hurl if he keeps it up. happy.gif

See ya for a bit!

 
 Respond to this message   

ED
(Login englishdude)

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 2:54 PM 

I was only asking for internet help! How did unicorns and rainbows sneak in there?

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 10:55 AM 

We are going to have to agree to disagree. The golden rulle applies here.

I think someone has to die for it to be irony.

 
 Respond to this message   

ED
(Login englishdude)

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 10:55 AM 

But then, logging in to call some other long term member a c-word is still not acceptable behaviour, is it?

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Lizzlee)
__***__

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 10:58 AM 

I'm always logged in. What does logging in have to do with it? I apologized and admitted that I, myself, was uncomfortable with my post.

However, I don't have a problem with DJ saying it.

 
 Respond to this message   

ED
(Login englishdude)

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 11:00 AM 

I just meant that bad behaviour from anons is perhaps not the only bad behaviour which should be deleted.


    
This message has been edited by englishdude on Feb 29, 2012 11:00 AM


 
 Respond to this message   

PearlGurl
(Login pearlgurl)
***__***

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 10:56 AM 

Also, named posters are all accountable in some way for what they post. They can be called on it, lose or gain friendships, dogpiled, banninated, etc. Inherently, anons have no accountability to deter them from posting whatever nastiness they want. Deleting is the only effective deterrent.

 
 Respond to this message   
AnonoBoom
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 10:59 AM 

Here's what's missing: nothing nasty was posted and it is no longer 2005 when whatever horrendous crap went on that everyone is referring to.

 
 Respond to this message   

ED
(Login englishdude)

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 11:01 AM 

I think I was away in 2005. Am obviously kicking myself about that now.

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 11:05 AM 

Nothing nasty was posted except about me.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 11:11 AM 

Well, fortunately you've already gotten one apology from Liz.

You can ask Troo and DJ (or whomever else said something you didn't like) for apologies personally, because you know who they are and how to find them here, or even on email.

I expect you'll probably have to apologize as well if you want them to take back some of what they said. But hey, that's how real life (non fake cowardly anon internet) relationships work, right?

Did I say anything that offended you, or was my stuff all just in that "the truth hurts" category? You've still not apologized for editing my stuff, I've noted.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login TrulyScrumptious)
__***__

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 11:18 AM 

I apologize for telling you to eff off. I was mad. I am over it now.


 
 Respond to this message   
smirk
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 11:28 AM 

There comes a time when you heed a certain call, when the board must come together as one...

 
 Respond to this message   
AnonoBoom
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 11:31 AM 

You made me think of Dionne Warwick, which made me think of Whitney Houston, which made me so sad.

That's it. I'm filing a complaint on you.

 
 Respond to this message   

DJ
(Login DJ.)
***__***

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 11:50 AM 

I'm not sorry for calling her a cuntbag or telling her to fuck off. She deleted my post. I think that's worse and I doubt I'd get an apology from Appy for that.


 
 Respond to this message   
AnonoBoom
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 11:57 AM 

I've heard that word a couple of times now. I have to assume that it's not this?

[linked image]

 
 Respond to this message   

ED
(Login englishdude)

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 2:55 PM 

How's that anger management going, DJ?

 
 Respond to this message   
AnonoBoom
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 3:00 PM 

Love...

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login DJ.)
***__***

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 4:13 PM 

Oh, Ed. Stop being such a cunthair.




 
 Respond to this message   

ED
(Login englishdude)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 6:06 AM 

Thanks, DJ, for respecting my wishes about gutter language.

 
 Respond to this message   

$8
(Login 8_Bucks)
***__***

New rules

February 29 2012, 12:00 PM 

These rules kind of remind me of a scene from "The Thin Red Line".

Appy pulled a Woody Harrelson. Nothing I did yesterday was a violation of this new set of rules. Everything she did in trying to make her point was. Ha ha. She pulled the pin out of the grenade without throwing it and blew her self up in the process.

After rereading stuff from yesterday it sure strikes me that appy's biggest concern as not what I did, just that fact it was me. Which is fine by me. She's barely above the sniping anons in my book.




Flibbertigibbet

 
 Respond to this message   
AnonoBoom
(no login)

Re: New rules

February 29 2012, 12:09 PM 

I'm pretty sure she repeatedly said you, Squid and Marney. But I somehow suspect you often make things all about you.

So you don't have to bother editing, maybe: I enjoy eating poo and often kick puppies for sport. My favorite flavor is "plain" and I think the Mona Lisa sucks. My ancestors roamed trailer parks far and wide and today the whole lot of us total 16 teeth. Ok? Ok.

 
 Respond to this message   

whitey
(Login whYtee)

Re: New rules

February 29 2012, 3:12 PM 

I thought I heard someone say something about having found a sandwich?

 
 Respond to this message   

$8
(Login 8_Bucks)
***__***

Re: New rules

February 29 2012, 3:15 PM 

Ham sandwich.




Flibbertigibbet

 
 Respond to this message   
AnonoBoom
(no login)

Re: New rules

February 29 2012, 4:27 PM 

Wonder why the board has lost it kick? This editing by Squid and 8 are about as mature as junior high girls. The board used to be fun and free range, now it is a parody of "Mean Girls". Any new poster is reviled and scorned and subjected to immature childish crap. It is no wonder there are hours between posts. A prime example was 8's post about Aurora veiled in secrecy like a tweens diary. I say kick off the little bitches and watch this place grow to be fun again.

EDIT THAT

 
 Respond to this message   
CapsLock
(no login)

Re: New rules

February 29 2012, 4:28 PM 

I think you mean 8's post about Arwen.

 
 Respond to this message   
AnonoBoom
(no login)

Re: New rules

February 29 2012, 4:31 PM 

ok arwen whatever

why don't u edit that

 
 Respond to this message   
CapsLock
(no login)

Re: New rules

February 29 2012, 4:39 PM 

You already said that in caps.

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)

Re: New rules

February 29 2012, 5:08 PM 

Anon mistakenly thinks I have courage!

 
 Respond to this message   
smirk
(no login)

Re: New rules

February 29 2012, 5:13 PM 

Aurora's a coward, just like anons.


Thank you for bringing the last 36 hours full circle.

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)

Re: New rules

February 29 2012, 5:15 PM 

:o

Why I otta.......

~runs away~


 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Syrgot)
__***__

Re: New Editing Rules

February 29 2012, 10:54 PM 

Can I complain about my own edits? Drunk Sleepwalker is appalled that Sober Sleepwalker has on more than one occasion corrected his typos. Can you please put him in detention?

 
 Respond to this message   
Bruce Hornsby
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 9:22 AM 

Here, let me say it again since my non-spam comment was deleted by some asshole. $8, I'm looking at you.

I agree with ED. DJ's language is abhorrent and particularly so coming from a woman. I'm trying to imagine someone talking like that in everyday conversation, but I just can't. I've seen this schtick and completely fail to understand why it's cheered? Why?

 
 Respond to this message   
AnonoBoom
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 9:24 AM 

Yes, why don't you let her speak for herself? I'm sure it would be entertainingly repulsive.

 
 Respond to this message   

ED
(Login englishdude)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 9:24 AM 

I agree with Bruce. (Except maybe the sexist part.)


    
This message has been edited by englishdude on Mar 1, 2012 9:25 AM


 
 Respond to this message   
Bruce Hornsby
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 9:26 AM 

Is it sexist? It's so...I cant' even find the words. I guess it's old fashioned to think of anything as "lady-like" anymore.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Lizzlee)
__***__

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 9:31 AM 

You do know there are women in the Navy now, too, right?

 
 Respond to this message   
Bruce Hornsby
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 9:33 AM 

Ok, fine. I get it. It's seriously gross not matter who it's coming from. Anywhere outside of a foxhole? Tone it down, already.

 
 Respond to this message   

Marney
(Login Marneyman)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 9:32 AM 

It's language. DJ chooses to use all of it instead of cherry picking her words to spare the feelings of someone who has never worried about anyone else's feelings. Her point was made, succinctly.

 
 Respond to this message   
Bruce Hornsby
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 9:34 AM 

You're qualifying it. Why? You can be succinct without making someone want to throw up on you. It's possible.

 
 Respond to this message   

Marney
(Login Marneyman)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 9:49 AM 

No qualification. The message had it's desired effect. It was terse crude and to the point. Self censorship sucks.

 
 Respond to this message   
Bruce Hornsby
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 10:02 AM 

See? This I really don't get. I thought was ED said was interesting. He's in a school checking out the board. A lot of people are at work. It seems unnecessarily disgusting, but I think I get it now. This is the cause that's being defended in the name of non-sexist non-censorship. It's still gross. Hair? Jesus.

 
 Respond to this message   
Arwen
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 9:36 AM 

I don't know what you mean by "I say kick off the little bitches and watch this place grow to be fun again." Why don't you work toward that end yourself? What have you contributed?

The only thing I am aware of $8 (or anyone) editing are posts that have no substance. I don't understand what the fuss is. I really don't. The bored would be the same whether those posts remained or if they did not. THEY ADD NOTHING.

Yeah yeah freedom of speech but come on! I dare anyone to show me an example of any anon troll post that added any kind of value to anything here. I'm not taking about anons that post personal things they otherwise wouldn't share. I am talking about the anon trolls that have been all over the bored lately and that Appy seems to have some sort of attraction to. No one has deleted anything that was written by an anon, only things written by trolls.

Oh an I want to go on record: I deeply appreciate $8's thread. That's the kind of thing that happens when you take the time to get to know the people here vs spending your time attacking people you know nothing about just to get people posting. Anon trolls bumping threads and insulting people is not a conversation. It's nothing. If that is what you are looking for, then you are in the wrong place.

Anon trolls have no rights and will never be taken seriously because the contribute absolutely nothing.

 
 Respond to this message   

ED
(Login englishdude)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 9:39 AM 

Dare I suggest, once again, that we make logging-in mandatory?

(Yeah, I know, scratched record.)

 
 Respond to this message   
smirk
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 9:45 AM 

Hey, I talked about alarm Alan Funt a few times this week. I want a lecture too!


You sexist Alan Funt!


    
This message has been edited by Smirkdirk on Mar 1, 2012 10:57 AM


 
 Respond to this message   

ED
(Login englishdude)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 9:51 AM 

That's pretty funny, Smirk. Hope you enjoy your 16th birthday party by the way.

 
 Respond to this message   
Bruce Hornsby
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 9:53 AM 

I sincerely apologize to Smirk and DJ for singling out DJ for the language. I think what got me was the hair one. Ugh.

Smirk, you kiss your sister with that mouth?

 
 Respond to this message   
smirk
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 9:55 AM 

That's just the way it is, Bruce. Some things'll never change.

 
 Respond to this message   
smirk
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 9:54 AM 

Squid, you're in charge of bringing the weed. Arwen, bring some of that Canadian Beer, (is Molson really Canadian or is it really American parading around as Canadian?) and Ed, you're in charge of bringing Alan Funt.


    
This message has been edited by Smirkdirk on Mar 1, 2012 10:58 AM


 
 Respond to this message   
Bruce Hornsby
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 9:56 AM 

Indeed, smirk. Indeed.

 
 Respond to this message   

ED
(Login englishdude)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 9:58 AM 

Can someone please delete the disturbed musings of this adolescent troll calling themselves 'smirk'?

 
 Respond to this message   
AnonoBoom
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 9:41 AM 

I appreciate the thread he started about you, too, even though I don't know you or what it's about. You seen like a nice person.

However: "No one has deleted anything that was written by an anon, only things written by trolls," That statement is not true. I've had things deleted that weren't "troll" just "anon." Neither here nor there at this point, but that's a fact.


 
 Respond to this message   
Arwen
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 9:44 AM 

I can sincerely say that I am sorry that happened and that if you were really trying to share something it should not have been deleted.

Oh and thanks happy.gif

 
 Respond to this message   
CapsLock
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 9:44 AM 

I thought the Dr. Evil pic posted on $8's cold fusion thread was hilarious. That was anon.

 
 Respond to this message   
AnonoBoom
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 9:45 AM 

That was me! I'm hilarious, BTW.

 
 Respond to this message   
Arwen
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 9:58 AM 

I'm not saying anons are bad. I agree, some of them are hilarious. It's the anon trolls I am talking about. I am pretty sure no one is complaining about any anons that actually add something.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Lizzlee)
__***__

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 10:01 AM 

Get ready, Squid!

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login chicaguayaca)
__***__

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 10:03 AM 

100!


 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Lizzlee)
__***__

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 10:04 AM 

Aw, Xica stole Squid's thunder.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login chicaguayaca)
__***__

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 10:14 AM 

lol



 
 Respond to this message   


(Login DJ.)
***__***

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 10:36 AM 

Glad to see the desired affect of my delivery was successful. happy.gif


 
 Respond to this message   

ED
(Login englishdude)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 10:39 AM 

So the desired effect was offending some people and delighting others in an almost 50/50 split? That's a complex goal for sure.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login DJ.)
***__***

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 10:42 AM 

Was it a 50/50 split? Really? Anons don't count, remember.

ED, you can lecture me all you want but I think what I did was equal to what Appy did and I'm not sorry. I was offended so I offended back. If you don't like my reaction to being poked with a stick don't poke me with a stick. And I used language as I see fit. If you don't like it I can't help that.




 
 Respond to this message   

ED
(Login englishdude)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 10:46 AM 

Yes you can help it. You can rise above sounding like a knuckle-dragging cavewoman. It's easy.

 
 Respond to this message   
Squid Boy
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 10:42 AM 

(To the ANON:) No, the small window of yourself that you choose to share here is a not what I'd call a good person. That's really what it comes down to for me. I don't see why we need to protect not-good people's rights to say mean things to people who contribute here. Whether or not you're a good person in real life is moot. You're not good here. You think it's fun to make people feel badly.

Oh right - I'm making this argument again. Whatever, I'll just keep doing what I do when I feel like doing it - which really hasn't been that often - and see what happens. I predict a few regulars will mildly complain, tOdd will do nothing, and no one will have missed anything said by a few people's not-good Internet personas.

Whether some here like it or not, I give a lot to this place. So do other people. I don't think our ongoing thanks should be to be insulted. In this way this forum CAN give us a rose garden - without losing a damn thing, as Arwen rightly noted above. I think we've earned it.

To talk about freedom is just plain silly. This is not America, it's a message board. There's no reason our community standard can't be higher because this is a club. Those that don't want to put up with it are not weak, they're adults, and they're good people.

Some of you don't even really seem to want freedom anyway!

Some of you are now trying to censor long-standing board members who are being entirely consistent. I don't give a fuck about 'language,' and DJ's earned the right with a thousand recaps, pictures posted, awesome stories told, and more organized real-life efforts to reach out and do nice things for people in their actual lives to say whatever she wants in my book. How many anons organized fundraisers for fellow board members who needed a helping hand? How many anons cut out flat tOdds and sent them on their own dime to 40 people for an incredibly funny series of photos? There is a stuffed Squid in one of my kid's beds thanks to DJ and others. I could name 50 more things DJ has done here.

Seriously - to you DJ, say whatever the hell you want however you want.

Sure, if you're a logged in poster who's also contributed, you can ASK your friend DJ to please tone it down, but to say that DJ should be edited? To even COMPARE what DJ says in the same breath as the not-good people who bring the level of discourse down here is batshit crazy.



*Didn't realize I wasn't logged in. Fixed.


    
This message has been edited by SquiddyBoy on Mar 1, 2012 10:44 AM
This message has been edited by SquiddyBoy on Mar 1, 2012 10:43 AM


 
 Respond to this message   

ED
(Login englishdude)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 10:49 AM 

Just for the record I am not comparing DJ to an anon troll. I'm just asking her, and others, to respect my position regarding the excessive use of x-rated language. It's not so much about me being offended by it, but it may mean I can no longer visit this place between 9 and 5, and will therefore feel the need to move on again. Which I don't want to do.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 10:52 AM 

ED, I want you here too. I missed you dearly for years. You are one of the best human beings I've ever met on the Internet, and you're welcome in my home any time.

But saying that such language may make this place NSFW for you is very different than judging her for what she says.

Really, I need to tone it down too, because I swear like a sailor here. I'm glad to try for you, my long-time Internet friend who has done really nice things for me, so you won't get in trouble at work.

That said, I really like to swear.

 
 Respond to this message   

ED
(Login englishdude)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 10:56 AM 

You're AnonoBoom?!?!

I'm not judging the woman, I am judging the language. I'm also questioning the degree of vitriol for sure, but most of all it's about the language. I like to swear too (though in all honesty, I can count the amount of times I've used the c word on my fingers...it's just way too harsh IMO).

Thanks for the kind words though, Squid. Right back atcha. (It's a LoveFest.)

 
 Respond to this message   
AnonoBoom
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 10:50 AM 

Nobody said edit her.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 10:55 AM 

Several did anon. Read up.

 
 Respond to this message   
AnonoBoom
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 10:57 AM 

You're wrong. One of them said EDIT THAT about their own post. Other than that, it was along the lines of why doesn't she edit herself because it's freaking gross? Which it is. You read up, instead of seeing what you want to hear.

 
 Respond to this message   

Marney
(Login Marneyman)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 11:03 AM 

No you are wrong. There are places where people have specifically implied that DJ be edited. I'm not finding them for you.

 
 Respond to this message   
AnonoBoom
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 11:10 AM 

I've read it and read it again and you're both full of it, and you both have your pantied in a wad about the whole editing thing. Coincidence? I think not.

 
 Respond to this message   
AnonoBoom
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 11:19 AM 

Sigh - ok I'll try once more. ED and Appy both called for mean things from regulars to be edited. Appy said multiple times that she saw no difference between editing something nasty by an anon or by a logged in poster. That the standard should be the same. I mocked her for it, I'm quite sure.

ED, will you just admit you more or less called for the editing of regulars who swear so this bad person will maybe shut the hell up?


 
 Respond to this message   
AnonoBoom
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 11:23 AM 

Are you blind? They said ANONS said she should be edited. ED is not an anon. Jesus christ.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 11:34 AM 

NO it was me who said it, and I meant by "SOme of you" I meant logged in posters. Given it was me that said it, I'm pretty sure I know what I meant, and that it's you who are not only mistaken, but merely continuing to be a bad person who is trying to make people feel badly by posting nothing but non-additive bile.

And no, the board would not miss all of that if it went away.

And no, the board has not lost an ounce of its kick.


    
This message has been edited by SquiddyBoy on Mar 1, 2012 11:36 AM


 
 Respond to this message   
AnonoBoom
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 11:43 AM 

"Several did anon. Read up"

You are a wonder, you are.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 11:45 AM 

Wait, are you complaining about a missed comma there?

"Several did, Anon. Read up."

Better this way?

"Anon, several did. Read up."

Lord, you ARE a treasure. I can see why people are so vociferously defending your ability to enhance this place.

 
 Respond to this message   
AnonoBoom
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 11:48 AM 

You can't ever just admit overstating anything, can you?

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 11:49 AM 

Another insult, designed only to make me feel bad. So VALUABLE!

 
 Respond to this message   

ED
(Login englishdude)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 11:27 AM 

I honestly can't remember. But I do think a forum moderator editing any offensive post is fair game. Even if that leads to cries of censorship. Overall the good outweighs the bad IMO. I'm sure that naughty pictures posted by long-term members have been deleted by tOdd before now. I seem to recall that being the case.

 
 Respond to this message   
smirk
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 10:55 AM 

I'm done, dude, Ed. Don't want to drive anyone away from awesome Xanadu threads due to a cheap laugh.


 
 Respond to this message   

ED
(Login englishdude)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 10:58 AM 

I know this place has always been edgy. I can dig that. But there are degrees. Appreciate the good vibes regardless of what goes down.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Hepatitis_C)
***__***

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 11:20 AM 

This is why I've always been against editing privileges for members.

I will advocate for Anons if they get edited. And I doubt anyone here has more contempt for them than I.


 
 Respond to this message   

ED
(Login englishdude)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 11:22 AM 

I like editing because I hate making typos. I can see how it lead to mucho mischief though.

 
 Respond to this message   

Squid Boy
(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 11:22 AM 

Have fun Hep! So will I! And since that's what this place is for, we all win.

 
 Respond to this message   
AnonoBoom
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 11:51 AM 

This "feel bad" bullshit. Really? No, really? I can't take it anymore, it's making me nauseous. Genital hair was more appealing.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 12:46 PM 

You not being able to take it any more and leaving would be one of my goals for doing it.

 
 Respond to this message   
AnonoBoom
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 1:33 PM 

Do you always feel everyone's pain so intensely? That's admirable.

 
 Respond to this message   

$8.00
(Login 8_Bucks)
***__***

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 1:44 PM 

Few things appear to bother the pointless anons more than having their worthless junk deleted.

So I'm cool with the result.

 
 Respond to this message   
AnonoBoom
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 2:16 PM 

[linked image]

 
 Respond to this message   
AnonoBoom
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 9:15 PM 

If I actually had a login, this wouldn't have happened. But I would like to say how I think DJ rocks.


    
This message has been edited by AnnyBoo on Mar 1, 2012 9:44 PM


 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Lizzlee)
__***__

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 9:18 PM 

Ooooo, this anon has been "lurking" a LONG time.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login AnnyBoo)
***__***

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 9:45 PM 

IKR? You need time on the bored to get how much DJ rocks. wink.gif





 
 Respond to this message   

PearlGurl
(Login pearlgurl)
***__***

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 9:51 PM 

Indeed, that anon has been posting for years as the arbiter of what is "classy". Ask it how it feels about tattoos. I picture somebody in a fly-over state with church lady hair and L'eggs pantyhose in the "suntan" shade every time it posts.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login AnnyBoo)
***__***

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 10:03 PM 

LOL PG! I used to covet those L'eggs containers when my mom would give them to me. They made great Fischer Price People space capsules!





 
 Respond to this message   
'neady
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 1 2012, 11:17 PM 

Wow. I used them for something totally different.

 
 Respond to this message   

Marney
(Login Marneyman)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 2 2012, 1:32 AM 

That made me lol.

Eh.

 
 Respond to this message   
Appalled
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 2 2012, 8:03 AM 

I never realized DJ was ashamed of that... I always thought she was kinda proud. Huh, learn something new everyday.

I loved the eggs. We had a neighbor who macramed them into her creations and I always thought they were the coolest things. I haven't thought about macrame in a looooong time.

 
 Respond to this message   
Squid Boy
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 2 2012, 8:13 AM 

So you were the anon who posted it then Appy?

 
 Respond to this message   
Appalled
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 2 2012, 8:17 AM 

Are you seriously asking me that?

If you dont know me by know..... You will never ever ever know me.


 
 Respond to this message   
Squid Boy
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 2 2012, 8:19 AM 

Oh, but I do Appy, I do.

 
 Respond to this message   
Appalled
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 2 2012, 8:50 AM 

It stinks that you would even imply that, put it in people's minds. I'm prepared for the onslaught of ridicule the next statement will provoke, so here goes..

The cursing, the name calling... All of that is just noise, but it really bums me out that after all these years this is what you think, and all the veiled threats.

The truth is I posted Anon years ago... Like six or eight years ago, maybe more.... Meanly for a purpose, JUST LIKE YOU and so many others. I haven't done it since, because I've never seen the point. I thought you knew this about me, plus I'm sure I've admitted this over and over.

I want to be done with this so badly because the board isn't fun, but the sanitized version, the Virgil board isn't fun either. It honestly puzzles me that you think it is. So I don't know the answer.

I quit the board yesterday, thankfully I didn't make the speech, because you see how well that stuck.... I have to go though, busy day... So I won't see a reply until later.

Hopefully you won't play this down as "drama" and see my real intent.

 
 Respond to this message   
Squid Boy
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 2 2012, 9:03 AM 

EDITING THIS UP A BIT - I realized you could take what I first said as me playing down the 'drama' and not having heard you.

If you want me to stop treating you the way you treat everyone else, I will based on our friendship.

Mostly though Appy, will you take a deep breath? Nothing of substance has been sanitized around here.

Say and do what you want as always. Nothing's changed. You may get to miss some anon call DJ a c-word, but you say yourself that you don't like to see that. The rest will still be here. There've hardly been any edits, and this place is far from sanitary. The Marsha-like anon will still insult me at will, I'm sure, and I'll still rise to it more than once in a while.

Listen - if you wanna talk more about this stuff, email me or get on gchat or something. I started a longer response, but this seems like it's gone to a place for you that shouldn't be on display for the cockholes who'd mock it.


    
This message has been edited by SquiddyBoy on Mar 2, 2012 9:16 AM


 
 Respond to this message   

DJ
(Login DJ.)
***__***

Re: New Editing Rules

March 2 2012, 9:44 AM 

Appy - I can't fathom where you see in this thread that I'm ashamed of what I think you're talking about but I'm not. In the least. Anny edited whatever was said, I only know the gist, on her own. I didn't ask for it. Furthermore, your righteous indignation over me calling you a name is ridiculous. Especially after what you did. It was an eye for an eye straight up and if you can't see that, heh, you're beyond obtuse and just dumb.




 
 Respond to this message   
Appalled
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 2 2012, 10:38 AM 

DJ -

I don't care what you (or anyone) calls me. I'm outraged that you, and your crew, do it with impunity, while others get edited.

Also, if you didn't care, weren't upset about what the anon posted, why was it edited?

These two things are my entire argument against the freewheeling editing that's been going on.

I can't say it any plainer.


Squid -

Thanks.

Also, just as an FYI the cword that was deleted was not the one I was called repeatedly, it was "classy"

I'll try to get on gchat later this afternoon.


 
 Respond to this message   


(Login DJ.)
***__***

Re: New Editing Rules

March 2 2012, 10:44 AM 

Jesus Christ, this is like arguing with a toddler on cough syrup. I DID NOT ASK FOR IT TO BE EDITED. I didn't even see it! Anny did that on her own. So I had nothing to be upset over.

The editing taking place is to scoop out the turds in the punchbowl. You came along and squatted over the dessert plate. You were treated in kind. So shut up about it.




 
 Respond to this message   
Appalled
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 2 2012, 10:49 AM 

If you didn't ask for it, why was it edited?

That's the problem with the "new editing".


 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Smirkdirk)
__***__

Re: New Editing Rules

March 2 2012, 10:51 AM 

I hope this whole thing doesn't get ruined by having David and Maddie sleep with each other.

[linked image]

 
 Respond to this message   

Bider Spite
(Login BiderSpite)
__***__

Re: New Editing Rules

March 2 2012, 10:58 AM 

lol @ Smirk.

"Ta Friggin da"




 
 Respond to this message   
Arwen
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 2 2012, 11:09 AM 

Appy, quit referencing the Virgil board. This is the second time recently. You were never there and you have no idea what you are talking about.

Also, what is it that you are saying DJ is ashamed of? I reviewed this thread 3 times and I don't see anything. Can someone help me out?


 
 Respond to this message   
Arwen
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 2 2012, 11:11 AM 

I see my second question has been answered. I need to remember to hit refresh more often.

 
 Respond to this message   
Appalled
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 2 2012, 11:40 AM 

I was never in nazi Germany, but that gets refeneced all the time, and so will Virgil Turtle, because it fits.

And you can't see what DJ isn't embarrassed about because it was deleted which is my whole point!


HAHAHAHA

LOLOLOLOLOL !!!!

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: New Editing Rules

March 2 2012, 11:42 AM 

You back now Appy? I've got a 20 minute window or so...

 
 Respond to this message   
Appalled
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 2 2012, 11:45 AM 

I cant on the iPad, I don't think, I'll use the computer in about two hours, ok?

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: New Editing Rules

March 2 2012, 11:50 AM 

sure thing.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login DJ.)
***__***

Re: New Editing Rules

March 2 2012, 11:51 AM 

I can't be embarrased by something I didn't see. Just like you can't convince me you're right about all of this.


 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: New Editing Rules

March 2 2012, 11:54 AM 

Piling on - why should she have to be embarrased or feel bad when she comes here anyway? Is that part of the mission of this place in your mind? That DJ, at any moment, after deciding she'd like to check in with her kooky online friends at this fun place, you get a WHAMMY! and feel like shit for some reason? That has some instrinsic value worth expending this much energy over? That the anonymous asswipe that has their genitials in their hand wating for her hurt reaction to rub one out gets to do that? So weird to me.

 
 Respond to this message   
Arwen
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 2 2012, 12:33 PM 

Speaking of Nazis, I read a blog post today that compared local boot camp instructors as "not being as bad as Nazis." Just because you can compare two things, does not mean it's appropriate especially when you don't know what you're talking about as you did not experience either one.

As an aside, I am surprised you would use Nazis as a reference after your tirade against the C-Word. If you don't know what I mean, just use your fancy iPad to Google why using references to Nazis and the holocaust are offensive and serve to diminish the experiences of those who were actually there but I suppose only some things apply to you and you can pick and chose what you chose to complain about.

And you can give up the whole "DJ is embarrassed" thing because even I understand that DJ didn't edit her post. Anny did. Know how I know that? Because DJ said so...a few times...see? "Anny edited whatever was said, I only know the gist, on her own. I didn't ask for it" or does your iPad block out the text you don't agree with?

How does Anny editing DJ's post mean DJ is embarrassed? Do you see how that doesn't even make sense? And I can think of very little that DJ would post here that she would even be embarrassed about except maybe something she is posting for our amusement, which we love.

You really are incapable of admitting when you are wrong and that's pathetic really.

 
 Respond to this message   
Ginny
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 2 2012, 12:49 PM 

Well I was there until I got kicked out for daring to disagree with der turtle, and I have to say the smug sense of unjustified "I edit what I want!" rightousness spinkled with "haha you can't stop me" I'm getting from a lot of people about this topic is pretty turtle-esqe to me.

Next thing you know we'll have secret little invitation only groups where we can talk about people behind their backs...

 
 Respond to this message   
Arwen
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 2 2012, 1:01 PM 

You were there Ginny. Appy was not. Sorry, not sure how your response changes that fact.

 
 Respond to this message   
Ginny
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 2 2012, 1:05 PM 

Well for one thing, Arwen, you are not the arbitrator of who gets to talk about what. She brought it up because she thought it was a fair comparison and I agree with her. I don't know why you feel justified in telling anyone what they are or are not allowed to discuss.

 
 Respond to this message   
Arwen
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 2 2012, 2:11 PM 

I'm not telling her what she can and can't discuss. I am pointing out that it doesn't make sense to me for her to use something she did not experience as a comparator. All she knows is what people have complained about as far as being on that board and that is a bit skewed and and subjective.

Plus, it discounts the fact that pretty much anyone and everyone here can ask for editing powers and they would be granted - which was not at all the case there.

I have admitted a few times to agreeing with Appy on some issues but there is nothing she (or you) can say to help me see and agree with her perspective on troll anons.




 
 Respond to this message   
Ginny
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 2 2012, 2:19 PM 

Well, you did tell her "quit referencing" it. That doesn't read as "I disagree with that comparison". It reads as "I'm telling you you can't talk about it".

And I didn't bring up troll anons, I just don't like the way we are heading towards a slippery slope of content regulation. Which seemed to be what you were doing. If that wasn't your intention, fine. But I'm letting you know that's what I am getting.

 
 Respond to this message   
AnonoBoom
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 2 2012, 12:49 PM 

Okay there, reading Nazi.

"And you can't see what DJ isn't embarrassed about because it was deleted which is my whole point!"


 
 Respond to this message   
Arwen
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 2 2012, 1:02 PM 

OK cunt. I'll say it louder for you

"Anny edited whatever was said, I only know the gist, on her own. I didn't ask for it"

 
 Respond to this message   
AnonoBoom
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 2 2012, 1:13 PM 

That's not louder, it's bolder. Typing in all capitals traditionally signals to the reader "louder" when in type.

 
 Respond to this message   
Arwen
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 2 2012, 2:14 PM 

Thanks anon

I didn't feel like retyping it.

 
 Respond to this message   
Appalled
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 2 2012, 2:19 PM 

To Squid:

If it was a nasty post that hurt DJ I'd be happy that Anny edited it. Thats not what happened tho...

What happened was an Anon poster said this and that about DJ, all things that were true and she's fine with, (maybe even proud of?) and the anon said "Based on those things I form this mildly unkind opinion of you"

And Anny out of the goodness of her heart, with best intentions to save DJ any discomfort, edited the post.

But DJ wouldnt have been uncomfortable. So now peoples opinions based on fact are not allowed??

Its that type of edit I have a HUGE problem with. Do you really not see that?

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login AnnyBoo)
***__***

Re: New Editing Rules

March 2 2012, 2:24 PM 

Whatevs, Appy. DJ asked me privately what it said, I told her, and she said thanks. Drop it.

ETA: And for someone who was so desperately trying to get people to move on yesterday about your editing, you really like to beat the horse today doncha? Just as long as the light is shining elsewhere.






    
This message has been edited by AnnyBoo on Mar 2, 2012 2:25 PM


 
 Respond to this message   
Appalled
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 2 2012, 2:30 PM 

I disagree with the edit and I can.

I am not dropping it.

While I think your intentions are fine, I think that quickly its going to become a delete fest around here.

I think its wrong. I think this board has been her a long time without deleting peoples opinion.

Besides, this is not about you and DJ... its about the whole mentality this week.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login AnnyBoo)
***__***

Re: New Editing Rules

March 2 2012, 2:31 PM 

Fine. Then I want to continue to talk about your abusive, intentional, editing of logged in posters that you did this week and how you should be banned for that. No one else has done that.

GO!





 
 Respond to this message   
Appalled
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 2 2012, 2:46 PM 

Honestly, I'm willing to take the ban if that means that everyone who edits a post outside of todds rules will be banned.

I thought it might happen when I did it and was ready to take the risk.

YOUR TURN

 
 Respond to this message   

Anny
(Login AnnyBoo)
***__***

Re: New Editing Rules

March 2 2012, 2:50 PM 

How did your butternut squash soup turn out?

I want to learn how to make lobster bisque but it looks so complicated.





 
 Respond to this message   
Appalled
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 2 2012, 2:51 PM 

It was great!

Lobster bisque is a pain, make Ina's shrimp bisque, its wonderful and easy.

 
 Respond to this message   

Anny
(Login AnnyBoo)
***__***

Re: New Editing Rules

March 2 2012, 2:59 PM 

But I really want to make lobster bisque (whine)! I have tried and tried to find something passable at grocery stores but always strike out.

There is a restaurant at the beach right by my house, World Famous, and they have the most fantastic lobster bisque. But it never has enough lobster in it for my taste. If I could make it myself, it would be a little bisque with my lobster.







 
 Respond to this message   
CapsLock
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 2 2012, 3:03 PM 

Anyone ever made a consomme? That sounds like a wicked pain in the ass.

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 2 2012, 3:21 PM 

No? How do you even do that?

 
 Respond to this message   
CapsLock
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 2 2012, 3:25 PM 

You make a stock and then you simmer and filter the hell out of it.

 
 Respond to this message   
Sweet Cheeks
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 2 2012, 2:52 PM 

There was no cream in it! I think that's a crime of some sort.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: New Editing Rules

March 22 2012, 10:03 PM 

This thread is pretty close to 200, Anny.

Yeah, I know I said good night. There was something I had to edit before I went to sleep I realized. happy.gif

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: New Editing Rules

March 22 2012, 10:05 PM 

Really - Anny could easily keep this one going...

GAH! My new computer is a touch screen, and bugs are landing on it and doing things!

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login kirwing)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 22 2012, 10:36 PM 

I will call authorities if you don't pull that down and I have a sceenshot. You went too far dude and you can get into a lot of trouble. Edit it out or face the music asslick

 
 Respond to this message   
$8.00
(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 22 2012, 10:58 PM 

Every time I see "kirwing" my brain says "earwig".

I dub thee "earwig".

Tough break kid.

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 22 2012, 11:37 PM 

LOL $8! Now I do too!

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: New Editing Rules

March 23 2012, 7:27 AM 

Call 'em fuckstick.

Not a bannable offense. You linked everything, called out your own name ad nauseum.

Believe me, I helped write the rules. I know what they are.

I took it down because you asked, not because it violated any rules.

Maybe I should put one up of another flying penis wearing skorts?

 
 Respond to this message   

Sweet Cheeks
(Login Swee_Cheeks)

Re: New Editing Rules

March 23 2012, 8:46 AM 

I believe it was "jorts."

happy.gif

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Lizzlee)
__***__

Re: New Editing Rules

March 23 2012, 9:05 AM 

LOL! I thought that looked funny! My daughter wears skorts all the time. Combo skirt/shorts. Funny image.

 
 Respond to this message   
Current Topic - New Editing Rules
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Back to the Start!