<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Back to the Start!  

The London Olympics

July 26 2012 at 12:01 PM

  (Login Tamrah)
***__***

 

olympics.jpg 

Who will be watching?  I can't wait for the Gymnastics!


 
 Respond to this message   
AuthorReply


(Login Smirkdirk)
__***__

Re: The London Olympics

July 26 2012, 12:03 PM 

I like the Olympics, but these Londoners are a bunch of whiners. Just 'cause Paris murdered their princess a few years back, I don't know why they have to take it out on the rest of us. Where's Ed so he can make some excuses for them?


 
 Respond to this message   

Arwen
(Login jeannien)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

July 26 2012, 12:08 PM 

I'll definitely be watching. Love track and field, gymnastics, swimming and biking.

 
 Respond to this message   
Squid Boy
(no login)

Re: The London Olympics

July 26 2012, 12:14 PM 

ME! ME!

The Mermaid is really excited too. As a kid she had no TV - except every four years when they'd rent one for the olympics (then every 2 years when that happened).

My brother is there right now - his band is playing some kind of pre-opening ceremonies party.

His band is on Fire this month!

They played Bonaroo, a major festival around here as a headliner, they were on a national talk show with a really famous guy this week, this, and then some private party for some rich person in Miami next week. Everything's coming up Millhouse for him right now! I hope it's a real tipping point.

I really wish I could post the clip of him on the show - but well that's not possible any more here.


BECAUSE IT'S ACTUALLY ME, TAM! Hahaha! you go get 'em, though!


    
This message has been edited by SquiddyBoy on Jul 26, 2012 12:17 PM


 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

July 26 2012, 12:15 PM 

Why should we listen to you, Anonowanger!


 
 Respond to this message   
Ginny
(no login)

Re: The London Olympics

July 31 2012, 6:07 PM 

This made me LOL. It's pictures of diver's faces mid-dive.

http://thefw.com/olympic-diving-funny-faces/

[linked image]

 
 Respond to this message   
Appalled
(no login)

Re: The London Olympics

July 26 2012, 12:16 PM 

Whats up with the mayors hair?

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: The London Olympics

July 26 2012, 12:18 PM 

The mayor of London? Who?

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

July 26 2012, 12:20 PM 

I knew it was you, stupidhead.  I was being ironic because you are...well...you, and you accidentally posted anon.

 
 Respond to this message   
Appalled
(no login)

Re: The London Olympics

July 26 2012, 12:21 PM 

[linked image]

Its a whole thing... dont tell me I'm the one telling you all about a thing?!

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

July 26 2012, 12:22 PM 

He has balloon-rub head!

 
 Respond to this message   
CapsLock
(no login)

Re: The London Olympics

July 26 2012, 12:27 PM 

He looks like whatshisface from SNL.

 
 Respond to this message   

Arwen
(Login jeannien)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

July 26 2012, 12:29 PM 

That's what I thought too Caps. A bleach-blond version.

[linked image]

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

July 26 2012, 12:30 PM 

Yeah, him,  Arwen, but he actually does a character (Ted Koppel?) where he wears a wig very similar to that.

 


 
 Respond to this message   

Arwen
(Login jeannien)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

July 26 2012, 12:35 PM 

I googled that, Tam. I couldn't find a good pic but I think the colouring of the wig is off

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: The London Olympics

July 26 2012, 12:28 PM 

You're the one telling me about a thing. First I've seen that.

 
 Respond to this message   
CapsLock
(no login)

Re: The London Olympics

July 26 2012, 12:30 PM 

No. Not him.

Tim Meadows.

 
 Respond to this message   
Ginny
(no login)

Re: The London Olympics

July 26 2012, 12:36 PM 

LOL, Caps.

I am going to watch the olympics this year. Last time I didn't get to see any of it for various reasons.

 
 Respond to this message   

Comet
(Login Comet9999)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

July 26 2012, 12:31 PM 

I love to watch the Gymnastics competition!



 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)

Re: The London Olympics

July 26 2012, 1:37 PM 

Sure! Summer Olympics are a good cure for insomnia

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login AnnyBoo)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

July 26 2012, 1:49 PM 

What the WHAT on that hair? Is that an on purpose thing??





 
 Respond to this message   


(Login lovebird8)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

July 26 2012, 2:24 PM 

I am looking forward to the opening ceremonies tomorrow night. happy.gif

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

July 26 2012, 2:26 PM 

Me too, Lisa!  They're being so secretive about it.  I know Sir Paul is singing.  I think it would be cool if Springsteen came out with him after what happened with them getting the plug pulled on their duet.

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)

Re: The London Olympics

July 26 2012, 2:27 PM 

Tomorrow afternoon for you. It starts here at 11.

I am actually going to try and watch the trampolining cause I know a girl competing. I think she's ranked 5th in the world right now.

 
 Respond to this message   

Arwen
(Login jeannien)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

July 26 2012, 2:36 PM 

Trampolining is a thing?????

 
 Respond to this message   

Anny
(Login AnnyBoo)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

July 26 2012, 2:40 PM 

That would be cool to watch.

Maybe they don't televise all the events?





 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: The London Olympics

July 26 2012, 2:47 PM 

Thanks to Neady, I'm rather excited for the women's 100 meter hurdling event.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

July 26 2012, 2:51 PM 

COUGHpervCOUGH

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login AnnyBoo)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

July 26 2012, 3:00 PM 

What was her name?





 
 Respond to this message   
CapsLock
(no login)

Re: The London Olympics

July 26 2012, 3:02 PM 

She's not in the olympics. That video is from the juniors.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

July 26 2012, 3:06 PM 

Awww...tough break.   But on the bright side, Squid, Women's Wrestling is new this year.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login AnnyBoo)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

July 26 2012, 3:23 PM 

nm. Michelle Jenneke - found it myself.

Did you guys hear about the athlete from Greece that got kicked out of the Olympics for some racist tweets?

Here is her tweet:

"With so many Africans in Greece, at least the mosquitoes of West Nile will eat homemade food!!!" she tweeted Sunday.

She also retweeted a bunch of crap from some extreme right-wing party called Golden Dawn.

Kinda hawt?

[linked image]


linky:
http://abcnews.go.com/International/greek-olympic-jumper-expelled-racist-tweet-defenders-flock/story?id=16856393#.UBGYkVJRzTo





 
 Respond to this message   
CapsLock
(no login)

Re: The London Olympics

July 26 2012, 3:27 PM 

Is that really racist?

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login AnnyBoo)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

July 26 2012, 3:32 PM 

shrug. That's what they are saying.

ETA: The thought is that she is mocking Greece's African immigrant population








    
This message has been edited by AnnyBoo on Jul 26, 2012 3:34 PM
This message has been edited by AnnyBoo on Jul 26, 2012 3:33 PM


 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Cuppajo)
__***__

Re: The London Olympics

July 26 2012, 7:27 PM 

totally into the Games -- Ceremonies start 4pm Friday EST

My bro heard Daniel Craig is part of Opening. Maybe some Bond-related entry into the stadium? Dunno.

Love to see some Monty Python crew, Adele would be wicked too.

 
 Respond to this message   
Ginny
(no login)

Re: The London Olympics

July 26 2012, 7:33 PM 

4 pm, that's like 1 my time. Poo! I'd love to be able to leave early tomorrow and watch but I don't think it will happen.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Cuppajo)
__***__

Re: The London Olympics

July 26 2012, 8:29 PM 

aww they'll be tons of recaps Ginny

Here is the sports sched
http://www.london2012.com/schedule-and-results/

edit fix- friggen kitten on keyboard





















































    
This message has been edited by Cuppajo on Jul 26, 2012 8:35 PM
This message has been edited by Tamrah on Jul 26, 2012 8:35 PM
This message has been edited by Tamrah on Jul 26, 2012 8:34 PM


 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

July 26 2012, 8:37 PM 

LOL!  I was trying to fix it for you and I guess you were too!  Kittens!!!


 
 Respond to this message   

Amber
(Login Amber633)
__***__

Re: The London Olympics

July 26 2012, 8:55 PM 

Scoop!

Duran Duran will be playing in the opening ceremony.

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)

Re: The London Olympics

July 26 2012, 9:07 PM 

he's a monster Tam. He'll whip across the keyboard, switch fonts, sizes and turn the keypad off in seconds.

Duran! Oh ED will have nightmares over this

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

July 26 2012, 9:09 PM 

Never mind that!  I need kitten pix!


 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)

Re: The London Olympics

July 26 2012, 9:18 PM 

just got some juicy bits--

sheep, 70 precisely will be in the stadium alongside chickens
ED will like that happy.gif

A dance number featuring nurses. mmmmmmmm kay

The history of England will be portrayed (I smell Pythons)

Tribute of some sort to Glastonbury- I guess we all do lines with Babyshambles at that point?

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

July 26 2012, 9:29 PM 

Those bits aren't juicy.  Those bits have been cooked in a 400 degree oven for two hours.  WTF?  This sounds awwwwfulllllll!




 
 Respond to this message   
CapsLock
(no login)

Re: The London Olympics

July 26 2012, 9:56 PM 

Scoop!

The English basketball team didn't qualify for the games because they can't figure out how to run a screen play.

 
 Respond to this message   

Kohsblocks
(Login Kohsblocks)

Re: The London Olympics

July 27 2012, 9:40 AM 

I heard the Sex Pistols and The Clash were playing the entire opening ceremony from top to bottom.

I'll be tuning in.

.

...my distance isn't because of a lack of caring. It's because I really do want to focus on a happy ending...
--- tOdd







 
 Respond to this message   
Anonowanger
(no login)

Re: The London Olympics

July 27 2012, 11:42 AM 

[linked image]

Awesome.

 
 Respond to this message   

Arwen
(Login jeannien)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

July 27 2012, 11:45 AM 


 
 Respond to this message   

Lisa
(Login lovebird8)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

July 27 2012, 3:58 PM 

Did you hear that this is the first year that Saudi Arabian women are allowed to compete in the Olympics? It's awesome, but sad that it took so long.
I've got the DVR all set up for tonight's opening ceremonies! happy.gif

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login CanadianRaven)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

July 27 2012, 4:00 PM 

THEY ARE STARTING!!!!!

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login CanadianRaven)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

July 27 2012, 5:03 PM 

It's ok so far... but i'm finding the incorporation of text messaging into the pop culture segment weird.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login CanadianRaven)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

July 27 2012, 5:21 PM 

Finally my favourite part... the parade of nations!


ETA:lol The Queen looks bored.


    
This message has been edited by CanadianRaven on Jul 27, 2012 5:22 PM


 
 Respond to this message   
Kohsblocks
(no login)

Re: The London Olympics

July 27 2012, 8:58 PM 

Kohsdude and I watched it streaming on BBC, some internetsomethingortheother that Kohsdude streamed to our tv. Anywho, it was VERY COOL.

NOW.. re-watching and wish Matt Lauer would SHUT HIS WHORE MOUTH!!!!

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login chicaguayaca)
__***__

Re: The London Olympics

July 27 2012, 9:16 PM 

Bond, The Queen and the corgis! I love this!




 
 Respond to this message   

jo
(Login Cuppajo)
__***__

Re: The London Olympics

July 27 2012, 9:23 PM 

THERE WERE NO SHEEP!!!!

bah


or Duran Hamber!


I think Danny Boyle is a die-hard punk fan though.

oh and no sleep tonite. Creepy baby head will eat me---

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login CanadianRaven)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

July 27 2012, 9:32 PM 

The sheep were in the opening video montage.

Where there was also a python pointy finger.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Cuppajo)
__***__

Re: The London Olympics

July 27 2012, 9:38 PM 

oh saw them but I read LIVE sheep and chickens and sheepdogs.

THE INTERWEBS LIED TO ME, LIED!!

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login CanadianRaven)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

July 27 2012, 9:42 PM 

They probably didn't dare bring them into the stadium, lest the crowd was unable to resist them.

 
 Respond to this message   

Amber
(Login Amber633)
__***__

Re: The London Olympics

July 27 2012, 9:43 PM 

I think DD did some kind of "per-ceremony" thing in Hyde Park.

My first scoop and I get it wrong...

 
 Respond to this message   
Kohsblocks
(no login)

Re: The London Olympics

July 27 2012, 9:49 PM 

Keep watching! It gets really quite GREAT!!!!! happy.gif

 
 Respond to this message   

Bloomin' Onionhead
(Login BloominOnionhead)
__***__

Re: The London Olympics

July 27 2012, 10:23 PM 

I love the games but watching the opening ceremony is like watching a five hour super bowl half time show.

Also I have never been a fan of Bob Costas. "And here come the Germans, known for their alcoholism, techno music and atrocities against the Jews."

Shut the Fuck Up Bob.

 
 Respond to this message   

Tamrah
(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Queen of the Bored

July 28 2012, 12:31 AM 

As the British delegation entered the arena, the Queen applauded wildly:

QUEEN.jpg 




 
 Respond to this message   


(Login CanadianRaven)
***__***

Re: Queen of the Bored

July 28 2012, 12:52 AM 

She did not seem to enjoy any of it. She probably pulled something while parachuting in and was in a lot of pain.

 
 Respond to this message   

mar
(Login molagmar)
***__***

Re: Queen of the Bored

July 28 2012, 2:37 AM 

No she didn't seem like she wanted to be there but she had to utter the I declare the games open thing. Wills, Kate, Harry, Charles and Camilla looked like they were enjoying it. Prince Phillip appeared tired. sad.gif

I thought the torch trip was pretty neat. I wondered what those brass things were that were carried alongside each country's athletes and the only clue was that they had something to do with the flame thingy.

While I get the fact that the Brits contributed to the global music scene, that part seemed like what Bloomin' said, an extended superbowl half-time show.

I did like the cyclists with wings and the grassy hill where all the flags went. One thing did amaze me though.

Almost everyone volunteered for that and those drummers who had to drum while the parade of nations went on? They had to do that for a long time.

All in all, I'd give it a B+.

Oh and Mr. Bean was classic.


 
 Respond to this message   

ED
(Login englishdude)

Re: Queen of the Bored

July 28 2012, 8:52 AM 

I thought the opening ceremony was fantastic!

The mayor is a tool.

The queen is an old lady.

We don't whine that much.

I think that covers everything.


 
 Respond to this message   

Ginny
(Login Ginnyesq)
***__***

Re: Queen of the Bored

July 28 2012, 11:43 AM 

I caught most of the opening ceremony last night but missed the begining so I didn't see the parachute bit.  And the IOC are a bunch of Nazis so I haven't been able to find footage of it anywhere. But from what I saw, great job UK!  It cost like half as much as China's and I thought it was still great. Plus I like how they herded those folks along during the parade of nations so it didn't take 10 years "Get your arses in gear we got an old lady who could croak at any moment falling asleep up here!"

Emokid is throwing slomo dove at my face, I guess that means he flipped me the bird

 
 Respond to this message   
jo
(no login)

Re: Queen of the Bored

July 28 2012, 2:11 PM 

NBC now censors the Games...

Charming that.

NBC pulled a segment remembering victims of 7/7 which had Emile Sande singing and dancers giving a poignant tribute in last night's opening ceremonies

wow

And some German in the VIP seats gave a Nazi salute as German athletes came in.


ugh

 
 Respond to this message   

jo
(Login Cuppajo)
__***__

Re: Queen of the Bored

July 28 2012, 3:19 PM 

I assume NBC did the edit for timing reasons but still, chop away some of the dancing nurses or Arctic Monkeys instead of a tribute to the fallen


here is what NBC missed

http://deadspin.com/5929778/heres-the-opening-ceremony-tribute-to-terrorism-victims-nbc-doesnt-want-you-to-see?utm_campaign=socialflow_deadspin_twitter&utm_source=deadspin_twitter&utm_medium=socialflow

 
 Respond to this message   

potato
(Login potato222)
***__***

Re: Queen of the Bored

July 28 2012, 4:34 PM 

I just googled 7/7 and Google gave me a calculator.

 
 Respond to this message   
Barkenstein
(no login)

Re: Queen of the Bored

July 29 2012, 11:23 AM 

Congrats Canada!

You got a bronze second day in.

Cool for you!


 
 Respond to this message   

Tamrah
(Login Tamrah)
***__***

NBC Shooting itself in the foot

July 31 2012, 12:03 AM 

First fucking Brian Williams tells me the results of the swimming relay last night right before they air it, and then tonight they run a promo totally tipping off an American upset just before it happened.  Why?  Assholes, fucking assholes that's why. A.S.S.H.O.L.E.S


 
 Respond to this message   


(Login pearlgurl)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

July 31 2012, 3:19 PM 

Tam, NBC has heard your complaints and has a response (Hah!)

from
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/borowitzreport/2012/07/a-message-from-nbc-about-its-olympics-coverage.html#entry-more

LONDON (The Borowitz Report)Today NBC Sports issued the following message to viewers of its prime-time coverage of the 2012 Olympic Games in London:

Dear NBC Viewers:

Last night, millions of you were thrilled to see the U.S.A.s Missy Franklin win the gold medal in the hundred-metre backstroke race. That is, you would have been thrilled, except that just before the race we showed promos of Missy Franklin appearing on the Today show with the gold medal she won for the hundred-metre backstroke race.

If youve been watching NBC in prime time the past few nights, youve probably noticed how, night in, night out, weve been wrecking the Olympics for you. All we can say is, our bad. At NBC were just not used to broadcasting things that people want to watch.

But all thats about to change.

Tonight, for those of you who like watching the Olympics without having every moment drained of its entertainment value, we are launching a new premium service called NBCFree: the Olympics without any contributions from NBC whatsoever.

For only $29.95 you can watch the Olympics with no spoilers, no maudlin personal narratives, and no promos for NBCs new fall shows like that egregious one with the doctor and the monkey we show like every five minutes. And for $39.95, no Ryan Seacrest.

So contact your cable or satellite provider and order NBCFree today. And if you dont? Well, all we can say is, we already know what other medals Missy has won, and were not afraid to tell you.

Sincerely,

NBC

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

July 31 2012, 3:24 PM 

Ha!!!!  Where did you find that?   I love it.  Thanks PG, you da (wo)man! 

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login pearlgurl)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

July 31 2012, 3:28 PM 

Link to The New Yorker blog is at the top of it. Loved it!

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Cuppajo)
__***__

Re: The London Olympics

July 31 2012, 5:35 PM 

you likely know the results already but if you want to catch women's gymnastics, I know there are a lot of fans here, NBC at 8 EST is covering today's event.

 
 Respond to this message   

Arwen
(Login jeannien)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

July 31 2012, 9:20 PM 

This may help someone that's really interested

How an American Can Stream the BBC's Official Olympics Coverage and Overcome #NBCFail

http://lifehacker.com/5930437/how-an-american-can-stream-the-bbcs-official-olympics-coverage-and-overcome-nbcfail?utm_source=Lifehacker+Newsletter&utm_campaign=3d19c0a300-UA-142218-1&utm_medium=email

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login DJ.)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

August 1 2012, 12:28 AM 

I was so glad to see the gymnastics results plasted across the internet today 8 hours before it was going to be televised. Thank you, press. You suck.


 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

August 1 2012, 12:30 AM 

Somehow I avoided it, Deej.  It JUST aired here.  I had to work really hard not to find out.  What a night!


 
 Respond to this message   

(Login ClothingOptional)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

August 1 2012, 12:31 AM 

That's just normal life here, we find out who wins Survivor before the season starts.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

August 1 2012, 12:34 AM 

Well I never watched the Olympics in Idaho.  I always watched in Maine, where we were the first in the US to see stuff.  So this has sucked. 


 
 Respond to this message   

(Login ClothingOptional)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

August 1 2012, 12:35 AM 

Might be a different outcome in Idaho, the athletes have time to think where they went wrong and make changes

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

August 1 2012, 12:36 AM 

Har. Har.


 
 Respond to this message   


(Login DJ.)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

August 1 2012, 12:36 AM 

And just now a local casino advertised some touring gymnastics show and showed a screen shot of all the medal winners on the stands (in the middle of NBC airing the gymnastics). If I hadn't already known it still would have been blown. Assholes.


 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

August 1 2012, 12:42 AM 

But still, didn't it give you a grin from ear to ear?   Those little girls were so damned ecstatic!

And then Phelps wins his 15th gold and 19th medal blowing the world record wide open.  Lockte Shmockte!




 
 Respond to this message   


(Login DJ.)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

August 1 2012, 12:50 AM 

Are you fucking kidding me, Tam? THEY HAVEN'T SHOWN THE PHELPS SWIM HERE YET!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111


 
 Respond to this message   


(Login DJ.)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

August 1 2012, 12:51 AM 

I cannot belive you just spoiled that for me.




 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

August 1 2012, 12:53 AM 

You're kidding, aren't you?  You must be kidding.  They aired it right after the girls and you saw the girls.  Are you kidding?


 
 Respond to this message   

(Login ClothingOptional)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

August 1 2012, 12:54 AM 

Where is that popcorn?

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

August 1 2012, 12:55 AM 

Deej?


 
 Respond to this message   


(Login DJ.)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

August 1 2012, 12:55 AM 

I think I was clear that I'm currently watching it. I'm in CA, a hour behind you. No, they haven't even finished the gymnastics yet. So bummed. I'm out.


 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Lizzlee)
__***__

Re: The London Olympics

August 1 2012, 12:55 AM 

Just reach over here a bit

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

August 1 2012, 12:58 AM 

I am sorry.  I thought since you said you saw the girls that you were watching the same time as me.  I thought nobody could be watching it any later than this.  sad.gif  I just re-read what you wrote and saw that you said "in the middle of the gymnastics."  I am really sorry.  Going to bed now.


 
 Respond to this message   


(Login DJ.)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

August 1 2012, 1:01 AM 

It's OK, Tam. You didn't do it on purpose. I'm just feeling really poopy about stuff right now. I still love you.

 
 Respond to this message   

(Login ClothingOptional)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

August 1 2012, 12:59 AM 

Over there? Is that the popcor....

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Lizzlee)
__***__

Re: The London Olympics

August 1 2012, 1:02 AM 

Oh! Okay, this weekend may be a let down now...

 
 Respond to this message   

Tamrah
(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Good morning?

August 1 2012, 9:57 AM 

(slinking in)

Good morning everyone?  Anyone seen DJ this morning?  (eyes darting around)




 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: Good morning?

August 1 2012, 10:02 AM 

It's a little early.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: Good morning?

August 1 2012, 10:03 AM 

Is that a slam?  Is it?  Huh?


 
 Respond to this message   
Anonowanger
(no login)

Re: Good morning?

August 1 2012, 10:05 AM 

There's another time zone to the left of you? Who knew?

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: Good morning?

August 1 2012, 10:08 AM 

If you're facing south it's to the right.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: Good morning?

August 1 2012, 10:09 AM 

I hate you guys.


 
 Respond to this message   
Anonowanger
(no login)

Re: Good morning?

August 1 2012, 10:10 AM 

Yeah, but if I'm looking at a map, it's left. So, nyah.

 
 Respond to this message   
soozin
(no login)

Re: Good morning?

August 1 2012, 11:25 AM 

OK, so I understand how... nerdy? it is, but I want to watch syncronized swimming and rhythmic gymnastics!

My step-kid has never seen either. So I looked up the schedule for synch-swimming, and it looks like they only do duos? Do they not do whole big teams anymore?

And UGH - I felt so bad for that little Russian gymnast. Looked like she was about to have a serious panic attack.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Cuppajo)
__***__

Re: Good morning?

August 1 2012, 4:14 PM 

yes Mustafina. So on edge, focused, so DON'T TOUCH ME!!

I was shocked at how poorly Russia and Romania did though. The US was awesome. One gripe I have though.....and not just with gymnastics...it's the pan to the parents. Or I should say constant panning. I've tuned in to the athletes and performance. I could give a rat's arse about the grimaces, hand waves, facial expressions and clothing that Ms Phelp's has going on. She's gotten more coverage than some athletes. Same with gymnast Ali Raisman's folks. Enough already. Reality Olympics. No ta


 
 Respond to this message   

mar
(Login molagmar)
***__***

Re: Good morning?

August 1 2012, 4:28 PM 

This is some of the poorest olympic sportsmanship I've ever heard of. I watched a little of one game and it was so blatantly obvious, it bordered on pathetic.

http://sports.nationalpost.com/2012/08/01/expelled-olympic-badminton-players-cant-even-get-cheating-right/


edited to blatantly correct the spelling of blatantly

edited again because I forgot to correct it!
I must need a cold beverage


    
This message has been edited by molagmar on Aug 1, 2012 4:31 PM
This message has been edited by molagmar on Aug 1, 2012 4:30 PM


 
 Respond to this message   
Aurora
(no login)

Re: Good morning?

August 1 2012, 7:05 PM 


 
 Respond to this message   

potato
(Login potato222)
***__***

Re: Good morning?

August 1 2012, 7:59 PM 

Mar, I didn't see it live but I saw some of the replays today. Such a ridiculous thing to watch. I can't even imagine being there in person and having to witness that.
Any time a tournament is set up in such a way that it's sometimes beneficial for teams to deliberately lose just means that the tournament was set up really badly, and that goes for any sport.


ETA: and Lol at Queenie in those gifs. (can I call her that?)


    
This message has been edited by potato222 on Aug 1, 2012 8:02 PM


 
 Respond to this message   
Aurora
(no login)

Re: Good morning?

August 1 2012, 9:59 PM 

I find this..... sad

http://london2012.theglobeandmail.com/olympics/results

if you click through the dates at the top (takes a moment to load) it shows the size of countries relative to how many medals they won, and it just really drives it home how the olympics are really a first world event

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Cuppajo)
__***__

Re: Good morning?

August 1 2012, 10:14 PM 

that's a fascinating tool and wild to click on for different Games.

Explains a little why the young Lithuanian swimmer (Malutyte (sp?)) was sobbing so hard on the podium. It was really poignant.




 
 Respond to this message   

Arwen
(Login jeannien)
***__***

Re: Good morning?

August 2 2012, 9:57 AM 

re: "the olympics are really a first world event"

Yeah, it costs money to train, you have to have a stable political system, you have to know you will be eating on a regular basis, your government has to have the money to spend to support athletes

Not surprising. Why is it sad?

 
 Respond to this message   

Barkenstein
(Login Barkenstein)
***__***

Re: Good morning?

August 2 2012, 10:22 AM 

NBC has a pretty good site with lots of country info.

http://www.nbcolympics.com/medals/2012-standings/index.html

Similar to what Aurora posted.



"There has to be an invisible sun."

 
 Respond to this message   

Arwen
(Login jeannien)
***__***

Re: Good morning?

August 2 2012, 10:30 AM 

Canada just tries so hard, don't we? happy.gif

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Victoriabitter)
***__***

Re: Good morning?

August 2 2012, 10:42 AM 


 
 Respond to this message   

Tamrah
(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Beach Volleyball

August 2 2012, 1:05 PM 

Finally a nice day in London and the beach volleyball girls are back in their bikinis.  All's right with the world!!  happy.gif



    
This message has been edited by Tamrah on Aug 2, 2012 1:06 PM


 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Victoriabitter)
***__***

Re: Beach Volleyball

August 2 2012, 1:56 PM 

When are they going to televise women's boxing is what I'd like to know. From the Googles, I think it begins August 5th, but who knows if NBC will show it.

ETA: Also, why no quid pro quo with the male beach volleyballers? They wear all this baggy shit. C'mon lads, let's have some T(highs) and A(bs)!


    
This message has been edited by Victoriabitter on Aug 2, 2012 2:01 PM


 
 Respond to this message   
'neady
(no login)

Re: Beach Volleyball

August 2 2012, 2:34 PM 

We're waiting on women's boxing too, Veebs. Autumn has been watching the men's all this week.
Just this morning Autumn and a few of her boxing sisters were interviewed by the newspaper to talk about women's boxing and the Olympics. Photo shoot is tomorrow.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Victoriabitter)
***__***

Re: Beach Volleyball

August 2 2012, 2:41 PM 

NICE! That's great, 'Neady!

For some reason, I've become rather hooked watching synchronized men's diving and ANYTHING rowing. Looking forward to the track and field, too.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: Beach Volleyball

August 2 2012, 2:50 PM 

That's fantastic, Sinadie!  You must be very proud of her.  I wish the boys would find a sports focus.  They do play sports but never seem to stick to them.  One is going to do lacrosse this fall and I'm hoping he really gets into it.  Of course, the other one,  the one that is doing badly in summer school, has not signed up for a fall sport.  That's the one I really wish would. 



    
This message has been edited by Tamrah on Aug 2, 2012 2:52 PM


 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: Beach Volleyball

August 2 2012, 3:51 PM 

Lacrosse in the Fall? It's a spring sport up here.

I loved playing Lacrosse. I wish my coach had been cooler, but I loved the violence and the speed of it. I was a little too small to play football in High School, but not Lacrosse, because I had a good mix of speed and low center of gravity that allowed me to put a pretty good hit on someone.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login chicaguayaca)
__***__

Re: Beach Volleyball

August 2 2012, 6:32 PM 

We have 8 channels broadcasting the Olympics live here in Latin America. 5 through DirecTV and 3 for ESPN Latam. It's nauseating Olympics, but I'm loving it.

I guess NBC has exclusive rights in the US? FAIL.


 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: Beach Volleyball

August 3 2012, 10:41 PM 

Fail is right.  NBC just keeps committing one spoiler gaffe after another.  They should be really embarrassed but instead they seem as oblivious as Michael Phelps' mother.

Oh, and another thing.  Trampoline is a freaking olympic sport?  Seriously.

 

 

Edited to add: yes I know I sound a little hypocritical, but to my credit I was embarrassed at my spoiler gaffe.  And I just made the one.



    
This message has been edited by Tamrah on Aug 3, 2012 10:42 PM


 
 Respond to this message   
Aurora
(no login)

Re: Beach Volleyball

August 4 2012, 12:42 PM 

Ahhhhhh !!!!!!



SPOILER ALERT I GUESS~~~~~~



That girl I know, Rosie MacLennan, she won Canada's first gold!!!!!

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/sports/olympics/rosannagh-maclennan-wins-canadas-first-gold-of-olympics-in-trampoline/article4463173/

END SPOILER ALERT~~~~~~

 
 Respond to this message   

Arwen
(Login jeannien)
***__***

Re: Beach Volleyball

August 4 2012, 5:14 PM 

I just read that! I wondered if that was your friend. Yay!

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)

Re: Beach Volleyball

August 4 2012, 11:19 PM 

Double amputee dude is hot.

Although I don't really understand why he's allowed to compete.

 
 Respond to this message   
mar
(no login)

Re: Beach Volleyball

August 5 2012, 3:04 AM 

I am still wondering that. Didn't add up

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: Beach Volleyball

August 5 2012, 4:29 PM 

Actually it added up just fine. He qualified, same as all the other runners. I watched him run. He doesn't have any more bounce than the others. His stride is the same as theirs. He is a great runner, same as the rest.  Only he can't bend his ankles or feel his feet.


 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)

Re: Beach Volleyball

August 5 2012, 7:22 PM 

Well then why have two different olympics?

Since I could never qualify for the Olympic Olympics, would they be ok with me participating in the paralympics even though I'm not para?

 
 Respond to this message   

Tamrah
(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: Beach Volleyball

August 5 2012, 7:26 PM 

So, what you're saying is, even thougb he never chose to have them invent the para-olympics, if he's a gimp he has to be in those.  Even if he qualifies to be in the regular Olympics. 


 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)

Re: Beach Volleyball

August 5 2012, 7:30 PM 

I'm saying it has nothing to do with him. If they are cool with letting disabled people into the olympics, then just do away with the paralympics and just say whoever qualfies qualifies.


 
 Respond to this message   
CapsLock
(no login)

Re: Beach Volleyball

August 5 2012, 7:35 PM 

I don't think he should be allowed. He's using mechanical assistance to run.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: Beach Volleyball

August 5 2012, 8:02 PM 

Why should they do away with the paraOlympics?  They aren't the Olympics.  They started out independently and the IOC eventually started recognizing that they were something hopeful for paraplegics and started helping out with them.  Unless you think paraplegics are just getting way too many perqs for losing their legs.


 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: Beach Volleyball

August 5 2012, 8:05 PM 

You could argue that people using hearing aids are getting mechanical assistance.  Or pacemakers.  Or glasses.  Or....The Olympic Committee determined that his prosthetics weren't better than legs.  So it's his talent that got him there.




 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)

Re: Beach Volleyball

August 5 2012, 8:12 PM 

I don't know if I agree with that finding. He doesn't have an ankle that could turn, or laces that could untie, or calf muscles that could cramp. Maybe he doesn't have more "bounce" than normal legs, but with the metal legs there are elements he doesn't have to deal with, that the other runners do have to deal with.


 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: Beach Volleyball

August 5 2012, 8:15 PM 

Yeah, but they don't have to deal with no feeling in their feet, and no bend to their ankles.  Everyone has something to deal with.


 
 Respond to this message   
Ginny
(no login)

Re: Beach Volleyball

August 5 2012, 8:19 PM 

Or their leg falling off in the middle of a race. That'll put a dent in your time.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: Beach Volleyball

August 5 2012, 8:38 PM 

Yeah, or aching stumps.


 
 Respond to this message   
Skelsea
(no login)

Re: Beach Volleyball

August 5 2012, 10:03 PM 

I'm still on the fence about this guy. I kept wondering why he wasn't in the ParaOlympics. I read all the arguments above, and am even more confused. Why was he allowed to be in this? I'm sure his "handicap" can be argued on so many fronts. I think it's awesome that he is even considered for the Olympics, but what am I missing?

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: Beach Volleyball

August 5 2012, 10:07 PM 

He has competed in the paraolympics.    The fact is he was good enough to run with guys with legs.  Then he was good enough to make the Olympics.  Is it wrong for him to strive?  If anyone else in the paraolympics were able to compete in the Olympics, don't you think they would?  And as far as his legs go, as he said, thousands of people have these springs instead of legs, and you don't see any of them running as fast as me.  It is about his talent, not about a couple pieces of metal.


 
 Respond to this message   
Anonowanger
(no login)

Re: Beach Volleyball

August 5 2012, 10:10 PM 

I'm not arguing about it, not at all. But, like you said, a "couple of pieces of metal". Couldn't that be construed as an atvantage?

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: Beach Volleyball

August 5 2012, 10:11 PM 

See above on advantages.


 
 Respond to this message   
Skelsea
(no login)

Re: Beach Volleyball

August 5 2012, 10:12 PM 

duh, Advantage. Meaning my spelling

 
 Respond to this message   
Skelsea
(no login)

Re: Beach Volleyball

August 5 2012, 10:16 PM 

I agree with Aurora. This guy is awesome, yes, but clearly "handicapped" in all ways that are clearly defined. Since when has the line between "The Olympics" and the Para Olympics been so hard to define?

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: Beach Volleyball

August 5 2012, 10:20 PM 

Nobody ever said they were mutually exclusive, is all.  Nobody ever said, "Once you're defined as handicapped, you don't get to try to qualify for the Olympics.  Nobody said, "Your place is over here and only over here."  It's sort of like saying, "You negros have your own baseball  league.  Why do you want to be in ours?"




 
 Respond to this message   
CapsLock
(no login)

Re: Beach Volleyball

August 5 2012, 10:22 PM 

Everybody gets a trophy. Yay!

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: Beach Volleyball

August 5 2012, 10:26 PM 

Um...I don't get what you're saying, Caps.  Nobody "let" him come to the regular Olympics.  He earned it.  He raced in regular races with guys with legs.  You don't get a trophy.  I don't get a trophy.  We aren't as talented as him.  And while we're at it, the remark makes me think you're a little confused between "special" olympics and "para" olympics.  One is for people with physical disabilities, one is for people with mental disabilities.  And for the latter, I say, a trophy for everyone!  And I hope nobody would be mean-spirited enough to think that's not okay.



Edited to say, sorry about the "um..."


    
This message has been edited by Tamrah on Aug 5, 2012 10:32 PM


 
 Respond to this message   
CapsLock
(no login)

Re: Beach Volleyball

August 5 2012, 10:41 PM 

What I'm saying is your arguments are equivalent to the namby-pamby attitude youth sports leagues have adopted. "Everyone gets a trophy". Is the guy talented? Absolutely. Does it suck that he ain't got no legs? yup. Should he be allowed to run in a race wearing mechanical implements? Nope.

The fact is he can't run as fast as an able bodied person without the mechanical assistance of a man made device. They developed his prosthetic to not only help him run but run faster. I'm sure he'll go home and work with some engineers to develop some new prosthetic to help him run even faster for the next Olympics.


Frankly, I think your arguments are all over the place on this one. This is not comparable to the exclusion of people over race. Not even close.

 
 Respond to this message   
Ginny
(no login)

Re: Beach Volleyball

August 5 2012, 10:50 PM 

"They developed his prosthetic to not only help him run but run faster."

Why do those feet having people get shoes?

 
 Respond to this message   
CapsLock
(no login)

Re: Beach Volleyball

August 5 2012, 10:53 PM 

Shoes are available to all. Springs from the knee down are not.

 
 Respond to this message   

Anonowanger
(Login Tamrah)
***__***

NO LEGS

August 5 2012, 10:51 PM 

My arguments are all over the place because there are so many angles I can come from at which I have valid arguments.  You say the fact is his prosthetics were developed to make him go faster.  They are not bionic, they have no special springs.  The IOC decided they didn't give him an advantage.  And anyway, even if you posit that the Olympic Committee is wrong and you are right, and they do give him an advantage, can't the same be said for custom sneakers, and aerodynamic helmets, and expensive bicycles?  The fact is, they have an advantage over people from poor countries.  Everyone has advantages and disadvantages.  Why should his advantage exclude him, when his disadvantage is he HAS NO LEGS?


 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: NO LEGS

August 5 2012, 10:57 PM 

Shoes are available to all.  I don't know that that is true.  I do know that custom shoes and custom bikes and custom clothing is not available to everyone.  But you know what is available to everyone, except him?  Legs.


 
 Respond to this message   
CapsLock
(no login)

Re: NO LEGS

August 5 2012, 10:59 PM 

And ain't that tough shit? Still doesn't make it fair for the other runners who have to use only muscle to propel their bodies down the track.

 
 Respond to this message   
Ginny
(no login)

Re: NO LEGS

August 5 2012, 11:02 PM 

He's not self propelled! I'm sorry. I just can't agree with the premis that the guy with no legs is a big cheater. Everyone does what they can within the rules and their means to compete to the best of their own ability. I guarantee there are more engineers working on running shoes for big companies like Nike than trying to help a guy with no legs run faster than the poor dummies not smart enough to hack their limbs off.

 
 Respond to this message   
CapsLock
(no login)

Re: NO LEGS

August 5 2012, 11:05 PM 

His run times are a result of the design of his legs more than his athletic ability.

 
 Respond to this message   
Ginny
(no login)

Re: NO LEGS

August 5 2012, 11:11 PM 

Well, I don't agree. The IOC determined they don't allow him to do anything more than a person with feet. A person who has muscle going all the way to their toes has MORE muscle, not less. They are allowing him to use the muscle he has to run, they aren't doing the work for him.

 
 Respond to this message   
CapsLock
(no login)

Re: NO LEGS

August 5 2012, 11:14 PM 

He can't run without them. So his speed is most definitely dependent on the prosthetic whether you agree or not.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: NO LEGS

August 5 2012, 11:12 PM 

No, as it happens, it's not tough shit.  It's good on him because he made it fair and square.  And as for your contention that he has an advantage, there are two camps on that and both sides have valid points, but the fact is the IOC decided in his favor, which is tough shit for his naysayers.


 
 Respond to this message   
CapsLock
(no login)

Re: NO LEGS

August 5 2012, 11:16 PM 

And a victory for bleeding hearts.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: NO LEGS

August 5 2012, 11:30 PM 

Nope.  A victory of reason.  I won't deny I'm uplifted by his story, but that's not why he deserves to be in the Olympics.  He earned it.


 
 Respond to this message   
CapsLock
(no login)

Re: NO LEGS

August 5 2012, 11:32 PM 

That's exactly where you're wrong. My argument is based in reasoning and logic. Yours is emotion.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: NO LEGS

August 5 2012, 11:35 PM 

Just because I have passion doesn't mean my argument isn't logical.  You really can't point to one illogical thing I've said.  And you won't address the real issue.  He earned his way there and the IOC said he deserved to be there.   That's reality.  It's ultimately illogical to rail against reality.


 
 Respond to this message   
Ginny
(no login)

Re: NO LEGS

August 5 2012, 11:32 PM 

I just saw an old lady in a walker going past my place yelling at her grandkids who were ahead of her "I AM hurrying, dammit! This is me running an olympic 50 meter dash!"

Goddamn robots are taking over.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: NO LEGS

August 5 2012, 11:33 PM 

I know it!  The next thing you know walkers will be the hottest trend.  And young men will be whacking off their legs so they can run faster.  It's a slippery slope! 


 
 Respond to this message   
CapsLock
(no login)

Re: NO LEGS

August 5 2012, 11:44 PM 

Yeah. Yeah. Joke it up.

His run times begin and end with his prosthetic. That point is undeniable.

Enjoy you're uplifitng. Meanwhile, some dude who trained his ass off is sitting home because he got beat by two pieces of carbon fiber.

 
 Respond to this message   
Ginny
(no login)

Re: NO LEGS

August 5 2012, 11:57 PM 

Because the guy with no legs didn't train hard? He trained harder, and then some.

 
 Respond to this message   
CapsLock
(no login)

Re: NO LEGS

August 6 2012, 12:02 AM 

And that's great. But he can train the live long day, and without his fake legs he could "run" the 100m in about 15 minutes.

 
 Respond to this message   

Tamrah
(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: NO LEGS

August 6 2012, 12:20 AM 

That's a totally emotional argument. You're the one getting emotional. The guy won his spot. You say he couldn't run without the metal legs.  Without legs none of them could run. He just got his legs from a box. It's not like all of a sudden there are legless men running all over the tracks. If there were, your argument that it's all about the metal might make sense.

Anyway, good debate. I would argue that Ginny and I won, but I'm sure there are a few of you who would disagree.  happy.gif I hope you, Aurora, and you, Caps, don't take any of it personally. Or anybody else on the other side.  Night guys!




 
 Respond to this message   
CapsLock
(no login)

Re: NO LEGS

August 6 2012, 12:22 AM 

Good night. Good to have ya back, Tam.

 
 Respond to this message   
Ginny
(no login)

Re: NO LEGS

August 6 2012, 12:22 AM 

That thing with the old lady and the walker really did happen.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: NO LEGS

August 6 2012, 12:24 AM 

LMAO!!  Goodnight, Ginny-me!


 
 Respond to this message   
CapsLock
(no login)

Re: NO LEGS

August 6 2012, 2:04 AM 

I know this is dirty pool, because you already went to bed, Tam. But please explain how my last point was emotional and not factual.

 
 Respond to this message   
CapsLock
(no login)

Re: NO LEGS

August 6 2012, 2:13 AM 

And also,

Because the guy with no legs didn't train hard? He trained harder, and then some.

Why make that assumption? There's no way to know how bladerunner would run with two legs. There's no way to know how hard he would have to train. Because he has no legs.

The man can't run.

 
 Respond to this message   
Aurora
(no login)

Re: NO LEGS

August 6 2012, 2:18 AM 

I don't concede a loss, I just thought it was going in circles.



 
 Respond to this message   
Ginny
(no login)

Re: NO LEGS

August 6 2012, 12:11 PM 

Because Caps. You are assuming he runs fast because he has part of his legs missing, and that's kind of ridonkulous. They allow him to run upright, they aren't made of muscle. He is missing a lot of the muscles runners use. He has to use the muscles he does have better in order to compete with guys who have full legs. I think it is a pretty safe bet that he had to train harder to get the same results as someone who has more muscles in functioning legs.

 
 Respond to this message   
Anonowanger
(no login)

Re: The London Olympics

August 6 2012, 8:24 AM 

For Caps:

[linked image]

 
 Respond to this message   

Tamrah
(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

August 6 2012, 12:21 PM 

You just couldn't let it go, could you?  It just kept eating at you and eating at you until you had to dirtypool post.  An hour. And a half. Later.

What I was referring to:

"Enjoy you're uplifitng. Meanwhile, some dude who trained his ass off is sitting home because he got beat by two pieces of carbon fiber." 

How bleeding heart is that?  Awww...poor baby sitting at home because someone else won, "and he didn't even have feeties!  Me has feeties and me sitting at home!"




 
 Respond to this message   
Anonowanger
(no login)

Re: The London Olympics

August 6 2012, 12:28 PM 

Caps gets mean sometimes, but he's still funny.

I don't get what all the hubbub is about. I see a little of both sides, but mostly it's good publicity for the Olympics, that's for sure.

[linked image]

 
 Respond to this message   

Arwen
(Login jeannien)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

August 7 2012, 2:53 PM 

Even the Olympic ruling bodies couldn't decide if he had an advantage or not, at first

From wikipedia

In 2007, Pistorius took part in his first international competitions for able-bodied athletes. However, his artificial lower legs, while enabling him to compete, have generated claims that he has an unfair advantage over able-bodied runners. The same year, the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) amended its competition rules to ban the use of "any technical device that incorporates springs, wheels or any other element that provides a user with an advantage over another athlete not using such a device". The federation claimed that the amendment was not specifically aimed at Pistorius. After monitoring his track performances and carrying out tests, scientists took the view that Pistorius enjoyed considerable advantages over athletes without prosthetic limbs. On the strength of these findings, on 14 January 2008 the IAAF ruled him ineligible for competitions conducted under its rules, including the 2008 Summer Olympics. This decision was reversed by the Court of Arbitration for Sport on 16 May 2008, the Court ruling overall there was no evidence that Pistorius had any net advantage over able-bodied athletes.

"Me and my tampon, just kickin' it." Cornbread McIncest

 
 Respond to this message   

Anonowanger
(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

August 7 2012, 10:02 PM 

Just got done watching the women's volleyball semifinal. The Chinese against Misty and Kerry. If you get a chance, it's a nailbiting edge-of-the-seat match.  I won't tell you the outcome, but my heart is pounding from watching it.

 
 Respond to this message   
'neady
(no login)

Re: The London Olympics

August 7 2012, 11:17 PM 

Why do the young gymnast girls wear such bitch faces?
Oh snap! This chick is tumbling around to Pink Floyd.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login CanadianRaven)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

August 7 2012, 11:21 PM 

Their Russian coaches beat the happy out of them

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

August 7 2012, 11:22 PM 

More like the other way around.  The Russian coach said the girls make his life miserable.  They are all drama queens having tantrums every day and he has to baby all of them.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login CanadianRaven)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

August 7 2012, 11:23 PM 

CAN'T WE AGREE ON ANYTHING, TAM????

Let's just say they make eachother miserable.

 
 Respond to this message   

Arwen
(Login jeannien)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

August 8 2012, 9:57 AM 

So there's a big controversy about the women's soccer and the fact that the official was biased towards the Americans and Canada should have won.

Tam?
Aurora?

GO!

 
 Respond to this message   

whitey
(Login whYtee)

Re: The London Olympics

August 8 2012, 11:57 AM 

What is soccer?

 
 Respond to this message   
The Wind
(no login)

Re: The London Olympics

August 8 2012, 11:59 AM 

Another tie? Everybody wins! Woo!

Was an overlarge picture from King of the Hill depicting everyone winning something. Edited with permission.


    
This message has been edited by SquiddyBoy on Aug 8, 2012 1:03 PM
This message has been edited by SquiddyBoy on Aug 8, 2012 1:03 PM


 
 Respond to this message   

Tamrah
(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

August 8 2012, 12:29 PM 

Soccer?  We don't watch no steenkeen soccer.  Oh, and  "The Wind"?  Suck it.




 
 Respond to this message   
The Wind
(no login)

Re: The London Olympics

August 8 2012, 1:00 PM 

Apologies. Please edit it, if that helps.

 
 Respond to this message   
Anonowanger
(no login)

Re: The London Olympics

August 8 2012, 1:15 PM 

"Thank you," anon said, sheepishly.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login CanadianRaven)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

August 8 2012, 1:21 PM 

Not that Canadians should have won, but that they were robbed of the chance cause of some highly questionable calls against them.


 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: The London Olympics

August 8 2012, 1:25 PM 

Looks to me like your goalkeeper is a cheater and she was warned.

http://www.latimes.com/sports/olympics/olympicsnow/la-sp-on-us-canada-soccer-referee-20120807,0,2900543.story

LONDON Most of Canada will disagree, but some have found justification for the controversial calls made by Norwegian referee Christiana Pedersen late in the second half of the U.S. soccer team's 4-3 overtime win against Canada in Monday's semifinal.

First, to review:

With Canada protecting a 3-2 lead with 12 minutes left in regulation, Pedersen flagged Canadian goalkeeper Erin McLeod for holding the ball longer than six seconds, a rarely invoked infraction. But rather than issuing a warning or a yellow card, the referee gave the U.S. an indirect free kick.

Then, with Megan Rapinoe's close-range shot heading directly for Marie-Eve Nault's chest, the Canadian defender twisted her body, moved her arm in front of her body and the ball struck her elbow. Pedersen called a hand ball and awarded the U.S. a penalty kick that Abby Wambach converted to tie the score, 3-3. The U.S. then won the game in overtime on Alex Morgan's header with less than minute left in stoppage time.

Now the analysis:

Mike Woitalla, writing in the online newsletter Soccer America Confidential, says the referee's calls were correct.

McLeod admitted an assistant referee reminded her at halftime that she was taking too long to get rid of the ball after making saves, though she said she didn't take it as an official warning. So with a fatigued Canada trying to run out the clock McLeod held the ball for more than 15 seconds, well over twice the permitted time, four times in the second half before the foul was assessed.

"In the 58th minute she held the ball for 17 seconds, in the 59th for 12 seconds, in the 61st for 16 seconds, in the 68th for 11 seconds," Woitalla writes.

As for the hand-ball call, Woitalla consulted FIFAs rulebook guidelines for help. There referees are told to take into consideration the movement of the hand toward the ball and the distance between the opponent and the ball.

"On the second point," he writes "Nault would have expected the ball to come her way because she was standing in front of a free kick. On the first point, her hand did move toward the ball."

If Nault had not raised her arm she would have gotten blasted in the chest, he continues, so a case can be made that she was punished for protecting herself. But that is not something FIFA has asked the referees to take into consideration.

"So if there is injustice in the call," he concludes "its the rulebooks fault and not Pedersens."



    
This message has been edited by SquiddyBoy on Aug 8, 2012 1:26 PM


 
 Respond to this message   


(Login CanadianRaven)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

August 8 2012, 1:28 PM 

The handball is the only one that bothers me a bit.

If you watch her, she twisted away from the ball coming at her, not towards it. It looks like she thought it was going to hit her face.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: The London Olympics

August 8 2012, 1:30 PM 

I can see how any fan would be upset. That said, being the victim of a judgement call by a reasonably functioning referee and being 'robbed' are pretty different things.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login CanadianRaven)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

August 8 2012, 1:35 PM 

I personally don't care about it. I think soccer is stupid. But the canadian players made some remarks filled with vitriol about the refs after the game, so apparently those involved in the game not just fans, also think the calls were messed up. They were really pissed at the refs, and now the comments they made are being investigated by FIFA to see if they should be penalized for their post game actions.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: The London Olympics

August 8 2012, 1:39 PM 

Yeah, any time you have a nuance rules and the stakes are the championship (or in this case Gold Medals), people go a little crazy.

Unless a given sport has an instant replay review rule, the human error of referees is part of the game as much as the condition of the turf. It seems like it's not a slam dunk that an error was even made here. I hope the investigation turns up something satisfying for everyone - but it probably can't.

Believe me I get it. If this were Sox - Spankees, I'd be googling the ref's home address and plotting atomic wedgies.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

August 8 2012, 2:45 PM 

OMG!  Did anyone see those adorable remote control mini-coopers that get sent out to retrieve stuff like shotputs and discuses?  Cool little British touch.

Capture.jpg 




 
 Respond to this message   

nicoblue
(Login nicoblue)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

August 8 2012, 5:18 PM 

Conspiracy theory
Soccer has been promoted non-successfully to Americans for years and years. What better way to get the children of the US to play their little hearts out for soccer than to give the citizens a Gold Medal from the Olympics?
Follow the money trail people! haha

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)

Re: The London Olympics

August 8 2012, 6:10 PM 

Who here is a fan of the US rowing team?

[linked image]



 
 Respond to this message   

whitey
(Login whYtee)

Re: The London Olympics

August 8 2012, 6:14 PM 

That's quite the bulge on homeboy second from the left. Sportin' wood on the medal stand is ALL win.

 
 Respond to this message   
Ginny
(no login)

Re: The London Olympics

August 8 2012, 6:17 PM 

Wow. Not much left to the imagination there.

 
 Respond to this message   

Anonowanger
(Login jeannien)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

August 8 2012, 6:34 PM 

Holy! Moly!

 
 Respond to this message   

Arwen
(Login jeannien)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

August 8 2012, 6:36 PM 

That's the photo celebrating their bronze metal win for coxless.

Coxless!

LOL!!!


 
 Respond to this message   

Anny
(Login AnnyBoo)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

August 8 2012, 6:38 PM 

200!!





 
 Respond to this message   

Tamrah
(Login Tamrah)
***__***

The US Wins Gold!!

August 9 2012, 12:01 AM 

The US Women's beach volleyball team won gold tonight!  And I'm not spoiling anything.  Because The US Women played the US Women.  So one team won gold, and the other silver.  And I'm not saying whether it was Misty and Kerri, or April and Jen.  What a matchup!  Both teams are excellent.  Great sport.




 
 Respond to this message   
Anonowanger
(no login)

Re: The US Wins Gold!!

August 9 2012, 8:41 AM 

The US Rowing Team: whatever the male equivalent is to "butterface." Butthisface? Hm.

 
 Respond to this message   

Lizzlee
(Login Lizzlee)
__***__

Re: The US Wins Gold!!

August 9 2012, 9:54 AM 

They have faces?

 
 Respond to this message   
Anonowanger
(no login)

Re: The US Wins Gold!!

August 9 2012, 10:08 AM 

This is my point, here. Sort of.

I've heard people raving about how big it is. I'm going to have to say, only if it's not at attention. Which I think it is, no matter what he says.

 
 Respond to this message   

Arwen
(Login jeannien)
***__***

Re: The US Wins Gold!!

August 9 2012, 10:15 AM 

This is what the guy says:

So, come on: was it a boner? Nope! If I did have one you can bet I would've tried harder to cover it up with the flowers. Those spandex are pretty tight fitting and whatever position it happens to be captured in, it's staying that way.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/07/henrik-rummel-us-rower-erection_n_1753594.html

 
 Respond to this message   

Tamrah
(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: The US Wins Gold!!

August 9 2012, 10:40 AM 

Whoa!  If that's him at ease - ten-hut, sailor!


 
 Respond to this message   
Anonowanger
(no login)

Re: The US Wins Gold!!

August 9 2012, 10:46 AM 

He's full of shit.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: The US Wins Gold!!

August 9 2012, 10:54 AM 

U Jelly?


 
 Respond to this message   
Anonowanger
(no login)

Re: The US Wins Gold!!

August 9 2012, 10:58 AM 

Goddam, that's awful.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: The US Wins Gold!!

August 9 2012, 11:05 AM 

Come on ladies, didn't Kinsey teach you anything?

"There is a much wider range of size in men's penises when flaccid, with the average ranging from 1 to 4 inches. In general, smaller flaccid penises lengthen at erection by a greater percentage than do larger flaccid penises, with most men reaching an average size of 5 to 7 inches, so the flaccid size of a penis is not a good predictor of erect size. The vast majority of men measure within the average genital size range and have a penis size that is more than adequate for sexual functioning."

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: The US Wins Gold!!

August 9 2012, 11:06 AM 

Oh, man.  Squid.  You got a BAD case of the jellies.


 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: The US Wins Gold!!

August 9 2012, 11:09 AM 

sigh. And the Gold Medal for predictable response to any comment about penis size by a man on a message board goes to Ms. IdaHO.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: The US Wins Gold!!

August 9 2012, 11:16 AM 

No, Udaho, bitch.


 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: The US Wins Gold!!

August 9 2012, 11:22 AM 

I'm watching synchronized swimming on The Today Show.  It is really stupid.  But strangely mesmerizing.  Maybe it wouldn't be so queer if they didn't have those stupid grins plastered on their faces and those stupid noseplugs.  No, it'd still be queer.  And yet I can't look away.


 
 Respond to this message   
Anonowanger
(no login)

Re: The US Wins Gold!!

August 9 2012, 11:41 AM 

People still use queer to mean strange? Who knew?

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: The US Wins Gold!!

August 9 2012, 11:45 AM 


 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Tamrah)
***__***

Re: The US Wins Gold!!

August 9 2012, 11:45 AM 

Your attempt at chastisement is a fail, queer anon.


 
 Respond to this message   
Anonowanger
(no login)

Re: The US Wins Gold!!

August 9 2012, 11:54 AM 

It wasn't a chastisement. It was an observation. However, now I'm not so sure I was right.

Klassy.

 
 Respond to this message   
CapsLock
(no login)

Re: The US Wins Gold!!

August 9 2012, 12:25 PM 

I heard the South Africans were eliminated from the 4x400 meter relay because Pistorius missed the first two legs.

 
 Respond to this message   
Capslock's Anon
(no login)

Because Doc Z has forsaken me

August 9 2012, 2:04 PM 

Ba dum tss

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login DJ.)
***__***

Re: The London Olympics

August 9 2012, 12:55 PM 

Poor jumping guinea pig. That top rail is on its way down. 4 faults!!


 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)

Re: The London Olympics

August 9 2012, 1:25 PM 

Yeah, we brought home the bronze in soccer anyway, bitches. Take that Norwegian ref. Up yours Fifa!

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: The London Olympics

August 9 2012, 2:10 PM 

Now they can rule on the whole thing right?

The championship match starts in 30 mins! Rematch of USA v. Japan from last years' World Cup!

 
 Respond to this message   
Anonowanger
(no login)

Re: The London Olympics

August 28 2012, 7:49 AM 

So - why does South African blade runner guy get to compete in Paralympics if he competed in London Olympics? Won't he just steal somebody-less-abled's thunder?

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login SquiddyBoy)
__***__

Re: The London Olympics

August 28 2012, 8:22 AM 

I had a similar thought - why does he get it both ways?

Then I thought, jeez, the guy has no feet. Why do you care where and when he wants to run. There's no dispute at all that he's qualified for these games. He won the legal right to compete in the other, and didn't exactly blow Bolt away or anything, so no sense obsessing about that any more either.

 
 Respond to this message   
CapsLock
(no login)

Re: The London Olympics

August 28 2012, 8:31 AM 

I don't think he should be denied the right to run in the paralympics because he was allowed to run in the regular olympics. They didn't declare that he was able bodied, they just said he didn't have an advantage. I still say their logic is flawed though.

But, he should definitely be allowed in the paralympics. It's where he belongs.

 
 Respond to this message   
Anonowanger
(no login)

Re: The London Olympics

August 28 2012, 9:14 AM 

And I totally agree. It just doesn't seem fair he gets to compete in both when there are plenty of athletes out there that have worked very hard to qualify.

FWIW, I think it was gimmicky to allow him in the "regular" Olympics. Generates viewership, donchaknow.

 
 Respond to this message   
CapsLock
(no login)

Re: The London Olympics

September 3 2012, 10:47 AM 

Pistorius loses and complains that the other guy's fake legs are too long.

You can't make this stuff up.

http://msn.foxsports.com/olympics/track/story/oscar-pistorius-apologizes-for-timing-of-complaints-after-paralympics-loss-090312

 
 Respond to this message   
Anonowanger
(no login)

Re: The London Olympics

September 4 2012, 7:51 AM 

Somehow, this isn't surprising.

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)

Re: The London Olympics

September 4 2012, 8:18 PM 

I was talking about this with the boy last night. We had a good laugh over it.

 
 Respond to this message   
Current Topic - The London Olympics
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Back to the Start!