Comparison of the Five Sorting MethodsSeptember 26 2002 at 12:47 PM
|Mac (Premier Login iorr5t)|
Response to Five (5) sorts comparison program
Five sorts are provided in the post above:
This is the sort that Solitaire published and named the "Shell" sort. I don't think it is, but there are conflicting definitions on the web.
it seems like this matches QuickSort more than Shell.
Anyway, I tried it on 10,000 numbers and it ran in 18 seconds.
This is the sort that has been called the "Bubble" sort many times in the QBasic forum. I believe that "Selection" is the correct name.
Anyway, I tried it on 10,000 numbers and it ran in 518 seconds.
This is the correct "Bubble" sort. I didn't try it because it is always even worse than the Selection sort.
This is the correct "Shell" sort (I think).
Anyway, I tried it on 10,000 numbers and it ran in 24 seconds.
This is the correct version, I think.
Sorting an array of 10000 elements
S = Results when sorting an already Sorted file
U = Results when sorting an unsorted (random) file
S U Sort Used
----- ------ ---------
0.16 1.92 Solitaire
56.08 77.88 Selection
0.00 249.09 Bubble
3.71 22.01 Shell
0.17 0.33 QuickSort
Conclusion: For large tables, the QuickSort is best and even if the table is previously sorted, you don't loose much time.
For short tables (less that 100 elements) I would use the Selection sort, as it is easiest to code.
|This message has been edited by iorr5t on Nov 10, 2003 11:15 AM|
Newbies usually go to www.qbasic.com and click on
The QBasic Forum
Forum regulars have their own ways, which include
The QBasic Community Forums