http://editthis.info/gazeta_slovian/Miss_World_2006

Tat'ana Kucharz^zova (rodini v rok 1988) jest Miss Sv'atovu 2006. Ona jest pervu z^zena iz C^zehija, ktora vigrivali eto titul v 30u september 2006.

Kucharz^zova delali poraz^zka sto tri inu z^zene v glosovan'e ot suditel'i i gl'adatel'i televizic^zku iz celu sv'at podc^zas dva-c^zasovu konc^zovu ceremonija v Vars^zava (Polakija).

Kucharz^zova, sto sedemdes'at sedem cantimetri visoku studiovatel'ka s dolgu blondu vlosi, bili rodini v Trnava (Slovakija) i virastali v Opoc^zno (C^zehija). Ona raskazivali k suditel'i, c^zo ona hotit' studiovat' universitet i posleuo bit' model'ka. Ona uvaz^zat' tenis i jehan'e na kon i jej deviz osobinu jest: "Vsekogdi bit' optimist."

http://editthis.info/gazeta_slovian/Miss_World_2006

Nice to read, only your -li´s disturb the fluency of reading: ...ktora vigrivali...Kucharzzova delali...

-So you use -i for plural, -l-i for past tense and -i for adjective, if I am right. A little bit too much of -i endings, isn´t it?
-"Vsekogdi bit' optimist." -i ending also for adverbs?

Vsegda buj optimist!

ah but vsekogdi (should be vsekogda) is a reserved word

should be vsekogda

Russian: kogda
Ukrainian: koly

Polish: kiedy, gdy
Czech (Slovak): k(e)dy

Serbian: kada
Bulgarian, Macedonian: koga

So a/i is half to half ... I'd have no problem with kogda.

Nice to read, only your -li´s disturb the fluency of reading: ...ktora vigrivali...Kucharzzova delali...

Maybe ... But Kuharzzova delal would disurb more or at least the same, I think. Of course, -lo would also be possible: on delalo, Kuharzzova delalo, ono delalo, oni delalo. However, I don't know if this is the direction we should take ...

A little bit too much of -i endings, isn´t it?

I used -i for adjectives in the times when plural nouns were identified by plural article too, so there was no confusion. Now I use -u for adjectives, so -i has got only one function.

-l-i for past tense

In GS-Slovianski, masculine-like nouns end in l' rather than in l (artikul', prijatel', roditel', stol'), so their plurals (artikul'i, prijatel'i, roditel'i, stol'i) create no confusion with past tenses (blistali, hoteli, blogodarili, moguli).

-i ending also for adverbs?

Iopq is right, (vse)kogdi is a reserved word.

---

Thank for this constructive criticism!

stol'?
столь?

Can I get a hit of what you're smoking? It must be some good stuff.

you can't tell the difference between your foot hurting and playing a sport?

футболь?

you can't tell the difference between your foot hurting and playing a sport?

Do you really think that in a pan-Slavic language, the word for "foot" will be fut?

no, but it doesn't make it less ridiculous or stupid to have all -l words end in -l'

Better example:

krol and krol'

krol and krol'

What's the difference between these two? Sorry, Czech has no softened consonants except d, t and n, so I really don't know.

damn never mind all three of them are krol'

OK, mol and mol'

although in most Slavic languages it's molo and not mol (but it's from the the word mole)


in Russian there's also:

жаль, жал

first is "pity" the second is "pressed"

oh yeah žal and žal' is what you proposed never mind

but at least I got mol and mol' (only in Russian/Ukrainian though)

I'd just use mol' for moth and molo for mole ... Or if we wished a maximum clarity, we could have e.g. south Slavic mol'ac for moth.

Igor i Gabriel, gubieloki?

What is gubieloki?

STUPid ones???

Sorry for this question, but I do not understand your talking about the difference of l and l`. Just let everybody use it like he/she wants. Ref. to Slovio.

In Slovio, nouns ending in -l can theoretically be confused with past tenses, whose ending is also -l. By differentiating l' (nouns) and l (past tense), this confusion doesn't exist in GS-Slovianski.

gubieloki are people who have lips (gubi)

Igor:
gubieloki are people who have lips (gubi)
===
gupielok (a ne gobielok) es Sleskian, prosijm porovnit so głupek(pl) i ÇÌÕÐÙÊ(ru)

Interesju:
Sleskian: gymba = usta(pl+slovio)= mouth, lips