Percente sloz'enie ov populacia vo zapadoslovane stati.
No score for this post
June 17 2007, 9:46 AM
To es ne zle, kao Gabriel skribil. 51% zo vse ludi kor z'it vo C'eh'ia es slovane original. To percente skumanie es podobne (ja dumat) vo vse zapadoslovane stati. Ne velmo vele diferencia es tez' vo Slovakia abo Polakia.
To tez' moz'no rec'it o Slovenia, abo H'rvatia.
Ja bi rec'it, z'e to ne es problem kor spojite so sloz'enie ov populacia vo tie stati. Glavne es to, z'e tie ludi gvorit s slovane lingvi.
C'o vi dumat o percente sloz'enie vo ine stati ? Na rovnanie so zapadoeurope stati kao Germania, Francia, li Vele Britania. Tam es populacia tez' diferite
a konec'no vic, c'em vo C'eh'ia, ale vse gvorit len s en lingva vo oficiale debate, abo vo televizia, radio. Tez' Anglie novini es len vo anglio lingva a ne vo germanio, francio, abo polakio lingvi.
Re: Percente sloz'enie ov populacia vo zapadoslovane stati.
No score for this post
June 17 2007, 12:09 PM
Ioannes pisal:
To es ne zle, kao Gabriel skribil. 51% zo vse ludi kor z'it vo C'eh'ia es slovane original...
===
Tvoi konklusia ne es korekt. Analisa pokazit zxe rasi ne ima! Tut-den Cxeskju cxlovek imat Slavju, Romanju, Germanju, Semitju Finno-Ugriju i Kavkazju krevniki.
Who are romani? Romance? Roumanians? Or maybe Gipsies?
Who are South Caucasians?
Veleslav is right -- where are Celts?
And honestly I doubt very much that it's possible to make such research; there is no such thing as 'national genes'. Maebe it's possible to make a research about how genetically close two nations are, but it's impossible to say 'how much genetically Slavic' you are, because there is no such thing as official standard of Slavic genome. Where we can get a Standard Slav?
And honestly I doubt very much that it's possible to make such research; there is no such thing as 'national genes'. Maebe it's possible to make a research about how genetically close two nations are, but it's impossible to say 'how much genetically Slavic' you are, because there is no such thing as official standard of Slavic genome. Where we can get a Standard Slav?
Yes, I tend to agree with this. The research is to be taken as a curiosity, not as a base for something serious.
Who are romani? Romance? Roumanians? Or maybe Gipsies?
-------------------------------------------------------
Well, gypsies have never had anything common with Rome, Romans, Romanians, and the like. Gypsies are gypsies (cigany in slovak and czech). So, don't put together "apples and pears". If they call themselves Romans or Romani - it's their problem but it's the wrong name for them as they came from India and present day Pakistan through Middle East westward to almost all Europe.
But they cannot call themselves Romans or Roms.
Romanians who were occupied by the Romans (originated in Roman Imperium), were a mixture of the roman garrisons on some areas of the present day Romania and original tribes that were living there at that time (The Daci).
Some time between 12-13 th centuries the gypsies came there in a large amount and settled there.
Why they tried to adopt the name "the Romas" I do not know and hardly anybody will cause there were not written evidences about that among the gypsy tribes.
So, anything else is just a sheer conjecture.
Anonimnik pisal:
Well, gypsies have never had anything common with Rome, Romans, Romanians, and the like. Gypsies are gypsies (cigany in slovak and czech). So, don't put together "apples and pears".
===
First of all Roma and Sinti are humane beings like you and me. So please do not insult them by calling them non-apples, gipsies or cigany.
...Most Roma refer to themselves as rom or rrom, depending on the dialect. The word means "husband", romni/rromni meaning "wife", while the unmarried are named čhavo ("boy") (IPA pronunciation: /cʰaʋo/) or čhej ("girl"). The Sanskrit word rama (रम) or ramaṇa (रमण) meaning "husband" have been suggested as etymologies for rom.
