Na prošloj sedmice v Ukrajne bil prezentovany projekt mosta ktori sjedini ukrajnski Krim s rosijskim Krasnodarskim Krajem. Cena projekta oceňa se okolo $480 milionov. Po slovam specialistov pri adekvatnom prigotovenije most bude vitvoreny v dva ľeta.

Projekt mosta vkľuča v sebe vitvorenije drogi s širinoju 15 metrov; može biť tam bude takže naftovi trubo-provod. Polna dolgosť mosta bude okolo 4,5 km.

Most prez Kerčevski kanal može stať se drogoj dľa tranzitovanija više než 10 milionov človekov každo ľeto, i smože ukrotiť distanciju od Ukrajiny do Krasnodarskogo Kraja o 450 km.

V nebe nad Moskvoju bilo odvroteno sostykanije dvoh aeroplanov

17 juľa moskovske kontroleri avia-drog odvrotili to čo blizko stalo bi sostykanijem aeroplanov v nebe nad Moskvoju. Incident vipadl kodga reaktivny biznes-aeroplan Bombardier Challenger 60 narušil instrukciji kontrolerov i viletel na drogu Boeinga 757.

Po oficiaľnomu reportu, Challenger nekoľko raz bil instruktovany ne leteť više než 1800 metrov. Ale aeroplan ostaval se na 2070 metrah, i vzjal drogu Boeinga 757 ktori sbližal se k moskovskomu aeroportu Vnukovo.

Dva aeroplana podleteli tak blizko če na borte Boeinga aktivovala se avtomatična sistema unikanija od sostykanija i alarmovala komandu aeroplana. V tot čas avia-kontroleri ugľedeli situaciju, i rozvedli dva aeroplana jedin od drugogo.

---

Here I used the next system:

— When a palatalizable consonant is followed by i sound, its softness is marked by i/y distinction.
— Otherwise it’s marked by distinct letters for soft and hard consonants d/ď, l/ľ, n/ň, t,ť.
— When I have to mark palatalization of non-palatalizable consonant I do it with letter j, which is considered a separate sound and phoneme (vzjal).

Note distinctions:

sjedini — it will unite
jediny — single

bili — (they) were
bily — former

Why don't you have a r/r' distinction? Etymologically, those two are distinguished in most languages.

When you have so many distinctions with every consonant and vowel you'll get finally an alphabet with several dozens letters that means mess in writing.

Is it your goal doing that ?

well, if he has the i/y distinction and doesn't have the r/r' distinction

then he'd have words like riba, rit', rik, korito, etc.
every language that has y puts y there

in my version of the language this is fine since there is no i/y distinction, but I still have soft r

for example, the word r'ad should not be confused with rad if nasal e goes to 'a

Well, instead r'ad it could be something like medajla.

what's a medajla?

It means medal' (medal). In Czech and Slovak, r'ad means not only "row", but also "order" (as opposed to chaos) and "medal".

Anonimnik pisal do Igor:
When you have so many distinctions with every consonant and vowel you'll get finally an alphabet with several dozens letters that means mess in writing.
Is it your goal doing that ?
===
Pocx Ti ne mosxit otvetit tut prostju vopros?
Why canīt you answer this simple question?

Because five soft letters = too many, right?

Let's forget that Russian, Ukrainian, Polish, Belarusian all have more

It's not apology that "that Russian, Ukrainian, Polish, Belarusian all have more"....

And what ???

And what ???

And Russian, Ukrainian, Belarusian and Polish are at least a half of the Slavic languages.

Russian, Ukrainian, Belarusian and Polish are at least a half of the Slavic languages.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

rusio, ukraino a belarusio mat temer to same lingva. Pak mi bi trebit uvaz'it tez' ine slovane lingvi samostajitelno kao : c'eh'io, slovakio, slovenio, h'rvatio, serbio, macedonio, kor bi mat status ov samostanie ov kien lingva.

Yes, that's why Slovianski uses the system of votes - otherwise the pan-Slavic langauge would only be a pan-south-Slavic one.

OK, but now it is pan-east slavic one

OK, let's imagine the situation that we have one east Slavic word, one west Slavic word, one souh Slavic word and all three are completely different from each other. In this situation, I know no better solution than to adopt the east Slavic word, because:

east Slavic - 190 million speakers
west Slavic - 60 million speakers
south Slavic - 30 million speakers

If you know a better and fairer solution for this situation, tell me, I will be glad to accept it.

Igor pisal i Gabriel soglosil:
Russian, Ukrainian, Belarusian and Polish are at least a half of the Slavic languages.
---
Gabriel:
Yes, that's why Slovianski uses the system of votes - otherwise the pan-Slavic langauge would only be a pan-south-Slavic one.
===
Knowing that Gabriel has problems with logic, I was not shocked to learn that he is not able to add 1 + 1
---
1. There are more than 8 Slavic languages
2. The eastern Slavic languages are three. But keep in mind that the majority of Belarussians speak better Russian than "their" mother tongue ( cf. Irish and English!)
3. The western Slavic languages consist of Polish, Czech, Slovak, Sorbian, Kashubian and Silesian: 6 Slavic languages!
4. Thec southern Slavic languages are, I would say three.
Slovenian, Serbocroatian and Bulgaria / Makedonian

Ja to bil
Eugeniusx

What's a "r'ad" ?

A r'ad is a red in other languages

The same way you say that the mothertongue of Belarusians is Russian, you can apply the same logic to Sorbian, Kashubian and Silesian, they speak German/Czech/Polish as their mother tongue

Also, if you consider Bulgarian and Macedonian the same language, you should consider Kashubian a Polish dialect since those two languages are just as close
in fact, you'd consider Ukranian and Belarusian a dialect of Russian

but what a language is is just politics, nothing to do with linguistics

I agree, 20 Slavs would compile 20 different lists of Slavic languages. Languages are a matter of politics, but language sections (Lechitic, Czech-Slovak, western south Slavic, eastern south Slavic, i.e. more or less the voting system used in Slovianski) are not.