Britanie peticia o danie ov Lugovoj es ostatok ov kolonializmus.
_______________________________________________________________________

Rusie prezident Vladimir Putin denes nomil ov postulat of Vele Britania pro otdanie ov podozrele zo umordenie pros'le rusie agent KGB Aleksander Litvinenko, kao ostatok ov koloniale dumanie.

" Tie predlogit zmeni ov nas' konstitucia, kor es insulte pro nas' nacion a nas' grodari, " rec'il Putin cez stretenie so aktivisti ov pro Kremele juniste organizacii pri Moskva.
" Tieh' mozgi, ne nas' konstitucia, trebit zmenit. To, c'o tie predlogit, es evidente ostatok ov koloniale mislenie, " registrit ov Putinov rec' Rusie state televizia.

" Tie musel jasno zapomnit, z'e Britania uz' ne es koloniale velsila, uz' ne egzistit kolonii a, dakenie om Bog, Rusia ne kei ne il ov Britanie kolonia, " il Putin citite s agentura Reuters.

Rusia negatil dat podozrite Andrej Lugovoj na judikacie proces zo mordenie ov Litvinenko vo Britania.

Most Slavs say -izm, not *-izmus. Only Czech and Slovak preserved the Latin ending in singular nominative.

- ism is "anglicalism".

Yes, it is an anglicism accepted by east Slavic and Polish. The rest have -izam (Serbo-Croatian, Macedonian), -iz_m (Bulgarian), -izem (Slovenian), -ismus (Czech), -izmus (Slovak). Out of these, why do you think that just the Slovak solution is the best?

because that's the only Slavic language he knows

I don't know how well he knows Czech, but certainly it doesn't show in his posts about his inter-Slovak language

iopq, be sure that I can speak better czech than you do. Or even better russian than you are able to speak slovak or czech languages as we were made learning russian at our schools for 40 years during soviet communism.

I am not boasting off (as you do many times) that I am perfect in other slavic langs but I've got no problem with understanding polish, russian, croatian and slovenian and serbian. Of course there are some words that I do not understand but it's the same problem with every slav without learning these languages.

I know only Czech, yet unlike you, I use Slavic dictionaries and let others to give me advice in terms of things that dictionaries can't tell.

Gabriel wrote :

Most Slavs say -izm,


Yes, it is an anglicism accepted by east Slavic and Polish. The rest have -izam (Serbo-Croatian, Macedonian), -iz_m (Bulgarian), -izem (Slovenian), -ismus (Czech), -izmus (Slovak). Out of these, why do you think that just the Slovak solution is the best?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

- Why do think that your "anglicism" is the best ?


- smus or slavicised -zmus comes from latin origin.

- anglicism (- ism or -izm ) comes also from latin origin but is deformated.

So, what is better original or deformated original ?

- Why do think that your "anglicism" is the best ?

Because it is most common.

- smus or slavicised -zmus comes from latin origin.

- anglicism (- ism or -izm ) comes also from latin origin but is deformated.

So, what is better original or deformated original ?

You have one said you like rather original dinosauri instead of Slavicised/deformed dinozavri, so I don't know why you now like Slavicised/defmored -izmus instead of original -ismus.

But anyway, to preserve Latin endings is weird, because while normal plurals (muz'i, z'eni) follow the normal pattern "root + Slavic plural ending", your komunismusi and teritoriumi have "root + Latin singular ending + Slavic plural ending". That's why Slovianski, as well as a majority of Slavic languages, has words like muzej, teritorija, Amadej, Hrist or -izm.

Hey Gabriel, your "komunismusi" doesn't exist. what is it - komunismusi.

what nonsense is it ???

Komunismus / komunizmus / komunizm / komunism or whatever you like, is just
a form of political, social, economical etc. ideology. It cannot have plural.

Sorry, but I've never heard of various forms of communism or even many forms of communism.

I've never heard about it even during our socialist republic
and at that time there were a lot of different slogans, banners and speech everywhere.

Plurals of communism or socialism or fasism and the like DO NOT EXIST.

Nonsens!
Ocxviduo, plural socializmum itd. existit. Napr.: Kubanju socializm es razlicxju cxem bilju Polskju socializm. To znacxit to dwa razlicxju socializmi.

Eugeniusx

Eugeniusx,

Maybe, some things of socialism are a bit different in some countries but neither Lenin nor Stalin or anybody after them mentions of different kinds of communism. The idea of communism was just ONE. Only the ways of applying some principles for achieving it were different.

Sorry, but I've never herd in my all life (and I lived 30 years in socialist state) of different kinds of communism.

Ways of achieving it - yes, but no different kinds of it.

Zdrav Ioannes!

Since more than 35 years I am a convinced follower of a human society, free of exploitation of man by man, free of have-nots, free of wars. A society living in harmony with nature, who we are a part of.
---

Let me try to make a long story short, Ioannes:

The way of reaching komunia was always different, even by any individual. Because of that there can not, and never will be ONE way (socializm) to komunia. And how Komunia will look like nobody knows; only the preconditions are our guidline, please look above.

Eugeniusx