I think it is a good idea that this forum accepts only such orthography which is legible on every computer of the world. If it would accept specialized letters which can be read only on specially installed computers it would be out of touch with reality, the same way some of the participants of this forum are out of touch with reality and instead of using standard Slovio-orthography they insist on using special orthography which cannot be read on all computers.

yes, I agree, this is holy thruth.

Soglosijm!

instead of using standard Slovio-orthography

If I were a faithful Slovioist, why shouldn't I be able to use the standard Slovio orthography?

The second thing is, even faithul Slovioists should sometimes need to discuss linguistics, which they can't do it without being able to cite natural Slavic words in the original orthography. Or how do I spell Polish with Slovio alphabet without merging cz and ć, h and ch, l and ł (eventually ł and w), n and ń, sz and ś, ż and ź? How do I spell ą and ę?

You know, whole America (I mean both Americas) uses languages that can be covered with just one code page (windows1252 a.k.a. iso8859-1). And yet I never have problems with typying in Cyrillic or Greek characters on Latin American forums (I like to hang out in virtual Mexico) -- all the forums support UTF8 there, even though it isn't really necessary. So don't give me that crap about "special orthography which cannot be read on all computers", Slovianski's orthography isn't special, this forum is SPECIAL. Artificially crippled forum for artificially crippled language.

You know, whole America (I mean both Americas) uses languages that can be covered with just one code page (windows1252 a.k.a. iso8859-1). And yet I never have problems with typying in Cyrillic or Greek characters on Latin American forums (I like to hang out in virtual Mexico) -- all the forums support UTF8

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The problem is not in tha fact that you cannot write it but the others who will read it will have
unreadable marks/ signs on their monitors - why should they "convert" your untipical "signs"
into readable text ?
They simply will not read it and go to other (readable) texts in other forums.

P.S.

You nevertheless write your articles for the others not for yourself.

Ñóвôďý hàś ţõ ádĵùšť âňÿŧĥìʼnĝ, íţ'ŝ úp ťö føŕûm ōŵŋèŗş ŧŏ мąкé îт şő ťħāŧ ŵĥăţêvëř ïś póšťēđ ħĕŕė ŵòüĺď вę côŗŗěcŧļy ŝèéñ вŷ êvëřýвõdÿ. But şĩňcē ţĥĕŷ ãŕėʼn'ť вöŧħęŗěđ вŷ ţĥăt ŵè ħāvé ťø ľêäřŋ ĥőŵ тō dëåł wītħ ĭţ.

PS. I hope it didn't take too long to adjust your browser to read this.

Li Eulenspiegel, li Pahol?

I am not interested to "switch" my keyboard to some special forms of writing - I think it is one useless thing more that I (and lots of others) wouldn't do.

I still can't see any reason to use such diacritical marks in texts.

I still can't see a reason not to use diacritical marks in text

Hmm, becaue these "diacritical marks" shows themselves very differently in different writing systems and without "transferring them into your system", nobody can read the texts without orthography problems. It's too complicated "transfer" (every time) texts written in Slovianski into systems that do not use diacritical marks - it's basically one task more and that's why useless for readers.

Anonimnik, the Trojka of Slovanski do not care about your comment, because Slovianski is nothing else but an anti-Slovio brain-masturbating construct.

Their first pathological attack against Slovio was against its simple and logical orthography.