is this a good choice for a beginner? whats its fps with .22? or should i buy a 94 or a 34 maybe a 24 there all cheap but the 40 is the most expensive so it must be better? wich one out of these would you pick and why? thanks.
doesn't always mean better, it means thats what they want you to pay for it. For general use, hunting and plinking go with the 34, its a long time proven performer. Caliber is up to to what you prefer, but for hunting I'd go with .22. Power is about the same in either caliber, 12-13 fpe.
i did some research on the 34 and i came across a topic about wether a guy should switch from a 24 to a 34 and in that topic it seems like the 34 is a great rifle witha long range capability but its a lot longer
im used to long rifles my airsoft vsr-10 is 1200 mm's its a little to long for me but its fine
34 in .22cal for quite a while now, and it is a great rifle. I've done the de-bur and moly home tune on mine and I'm getting just over 15ftlbs with H&N FTT's with excelent accuracy. It is a pretty long rifle, but I find it quite light compared to my 48 or HW77k. It's a good choice in my books. Mulby
comes with a scope, from what I have read about these "combo's" I would stay away from them and stick with the gun only purchase. Then if you want to scope the rifle invest in some good mounts and a springer rated scope, it will work better with the right gear. HTH, Mulby.
