Recently I replaced the springs and seals on a 25 and 27 model. (both .177)
Energy levels are now as follows:
both guns seem to perform best with H&N FTT 8.64 grain 4.52mm
25 (not D): 515 f/s or 5.09 fpe (maccari R7 spring)
27 : 565 f/s or 6.12 fpe (Chambers 300374 spring)
The energy seems to be stable now and not going up any more.
I am not really happy with these power levels.
I can live with the 25 being a 5 fpe gun, but the 27 (with more sweep-area and a larger spring should do better.
Compared with my 24 .22: RWS Hobbies average 523 f/s or 7.22 fpe
(so: the 24 shoots a .22 at roughly the same speed as the 25 shoots a .177)
I am thinking of selling these two "underachievers" and buying a new Diana 46C .177 instead (or a 300R). (and maybe another 24 in .177)
A question: does the 25D model perform better ? According to Chambers it has a different spring but is also tuned with R7 springs it seems. If one compares a 300294 with a Maccari R7, they seem like duplicates. But the R7 spring is better finished. This also goes for the 300374 and the Global Tarantula small XL: same dimensions, but the Maccari is better finished.
According to Chambers, the same spring (300294) is used for a 25 as for a 24, but I suppose the larger sweep-area of the 24 delivers more energy.
Please give me some wise advise. It's Chrismas time, remember...
I already replaced springs in Weihrauchs (97 .177 and 77 .25) and I always got the expected results. But the 2 Dianas really don't seem to perform.
Anyhow I wish you all a very nice and sweet Christmas holiday !
Joris