Thanks....... can you give a little more definition on this one?
by
How would you define the difference of a reputable breeder with proper care of the animals vs how some "BYB" have many dogs in crates stacked two or three high? You all know there are some like that, that you would "not approve". So, what are your ideas of what would be fair, what would be right?
A) Inspections are a great way to start. I think EVERYONE should be inspected before acceptance. One persons ideal of what is correct may be totally different from another. So, some guidelines in place could create a balance.
>>>>>>>>>>>
Now, from reading so many of the protests from across the country about permits, breeding permits, etc, and inspections being required, it seems MOST loudly oppose having to have their place "inspected".
As you said, Jessica, "one person's ideal of what is correct may be totally different from another....so some guidelines in place could create a balance". This is where I need ideas, suggestions, something to be able to discuss and work with. We will be having another meeting soon on this. So.....WHAT would be acceptable guidelines? I realize this is a very touchy subject. Yet, if the local politicians are willing to work with us to "define" things, what can we offer back?
Posted on Jan 5, 2009, 11:51 AM from IP address 56.0.84.23