Never SLURP the juice while USURPING women are on the loose!
Posted Oct 3, 2006 12:34 PM
First, anyone who makes noise when others are DISCERNING the BODY and thinking about the Death of Jesus Christ are performing the Lucifer or ZOE FALLACY which is "bleeding off worship for themselves." Worship is "holding the thought and thoughts of God in your mind" and Paul's UNIQUE worship word was to GIVE HEED to the Spirit or Words of Christ. Therefore, the DRIVING PURPOSE is to mock Jesus Christ and CHASE Him out of the assembly were HE is the only teacher.
The meaning of the Abomination which makes Desolate were women doing music and sex in the Holy Place (type of church). The PLEASING which Paul outlaws was VIRTUAL sexuality and all of history notes that those in close contact MAKING MUSIC are usually caught making love.
They INTEND to induce a FEELING in you: be totally aware that Lucifer in the garden of Eden, Nimrod and Inanna at the towers of Babylon and MEDICAL SCIENCE knows that she is FONDLING your private parts. Inanna was an EVE or ZOE figure which Paul knew about but YOU do not. She got the MALE god drunk and stole the MEs.
He gave me the princess priestess.
He gave me the divine queen priestess.
He gave me the incantation priest.
He gave me the noble priest.
He gave me the libations priest.
He gave me truth.
He gave me decent into the underworld.
He gave me ascent from the underworls.
He gave me the kurgurra.
The kurgarru, the assinu, and the kulu'u performed plays,
music, dances, and games during rituals, Greenberg points out Hittite, Babylonian and Assyrian texts which refer to these male prostitutes. The texts picture assinu and kurgarru as"religious functionaries particularly associated with the goddess Ishtar, who danced, played musical instruments, wore masks, and were considered effeminate....such functionaries were believed to have magical powers...
'if a man touches the head of an assinu, he will conquer his enemy'...
'if a man has intercourse with an assinu, trouble will leave him.'"
Greenberg, David F. The Construction of Homosexuality . The University of Chicago Press, 1988. Quoted by Arlene Robbins
The GAY LIZZARDS involved "putting on of apparel" or performing religious roles and always perverted: the very addition of SINGING and INSTRUMENTS to reciting Homer or the Bible were the LESBIAN WOMEN.
He gave me the dagger and sword.
He gave me the black garment.
He gave me the colorful garment.
He gave me the loosening of hair.
He gave me the binding of hair.
He gave me the standard.
He gave me the quiver.
He gave me the art of lovemaking.
He gave me the art of kissing the phallus.
He gave me the art of prostitution.
He gave me the art of speeding.
He gave me the art of forthright speech.
He gave me the art of slanderous speech.
He gave me the art of adorning speech.
He gave me the cult of the prostitute.
He gave me the holy tavern.
He gave me the holy shrine.
He gave me the holy priestess of heaven.
He gave me the resounding musical instrument.
He gave me the art of song.
He gave me the art of the elder.
Second, they are fulfilling the prophecy of the speakers, singers or musicians of the Mother Goddess defined by John in Revelation 18 as performing SORCERY: they CLAIM to bring about some kind of contact with God and therefore they CONFESS to being Sorcerers. The literate Greek world just called them PARASITES.
Peter called those who CORRUPT or "sell religion aT Retail" ADULTERERS and so they are.
Finally, the Sophia-Zoe "mother goddess worship" operatives (speakers, singers, musicians, sorcerers) REMOVE the candles of the seven Spirits of God and INFILTRATE by being preside over elders (feeders) and PREACHERS by fooling the fools by PREACHING TO A TUNE.
"Women and girls from the different ranks of society were proud to enter the service of the gods as singers and musicians. The understanding of this service was universal:these singers constituted the 'harem of the gods'." (Johannes Quasten. In Music and Worship in Pagan and Christian Antiquity, beginning on page 41:)
In a discourse between Socrates and Callicles in Georgias, Socrates begins:
Socrates: Then a man may DELIGHT a whole assembly, and yet have no regard for their true interests?
Callicles: Yes.
Socrates: Can you tell me the pursuits which delight mankind-or rather, if you would prefer, let me ask, and do you answer, which of them belong to the pleasurable class, and which of them not?
In the first place, what say you of flute-playing? Does not that appear to be an art which seeks only pleasure, Callicles, and thinks of nothing else?
Outlawed for the synagogue in Romans 15 because it REPROACHES or "makes naked" that which people MAY NOT want to be OUTED.
Callicles: I assent.
Socrates: And is not the same true of all similar arts, as, for example, the art of playing the lyre at festivals?
Callicles: Yes.
Socrates: And what do you say of the choral art and of dithyrambic poetry?-are not they of the same nature?
Do you imagine that Cinesias the son of Meles cares about what will tend to the moral improvement of his hearers,
or about what will give pleasure to the multitude?
This GIVING PLEASURE connectes to the MUSES as adulterers: maybe just VIRTUAL sexual feelings, but it always LED to more where you DO NOT SEE.
Callicles: There can be no mistake about Cinesias, Socrates.
Socrates: And what do you say of his father, Meles the harp-player?
Did he perform with any view to the good of his hearers? Could he be said to regard even their pleasure?
For his singing was an infliction to his audience.
Musical and rhetorical performances DO afflict the audience: that his how they induce a DRUG HIGH wich they can SELL as being a HOLY spirit.
And of harp playing and dithyrambic poetry in general, what would you say?
Have they not been invented WHOLLY for the sake of PLEASURE?
Callicles: That is my notion of them.
Socrates: And as for the Muse of Tragedy, that solemn and august personage-what are her aspirations?
Is all HER aim and desire only to give pleasure to the spectators,
or does she fight against them and refuse to speak of their pleasant vices,
and willingly proclaim in word and song truths welcome and unwelcome? which in your judgment is her character?
Callicles: There can be no doubt, Socrates, that Tragedy has her face turned towards pleasure and the gratification of the audience.
Socrates: And is not that the sort of thing, Callicles, which we were just now describing as flattery?
Callicles: : Quite true.
Now HERE is part of the INFILTRATE and DIVERT: first we preach WITH a tune and then we preach WITHOUT a tune when PREACHING is a heresy with about the same apostasy as SINGING.
Socrates: Well now, suppose that
we strip all poetry of song and rhythm and metre, there will remain speech?
Callicles: To be sure.
Socrates: And this speech is addressed to a crowd of people?
Callicles: Yes.
Socrates: Then, poetry is a sort of rhetoric?
Callicles: True.
RHETORIC means HYPOCRITES Hupo-kritikos belonging to hupokrisis 2. suited for speaking or delivery, (sc. technê Rev 18=sorcerer) the art of delivery, the actor's art, hupokrinô reply, make answer, of an oracle, 2. expound, interpret, explain [Peter outlawed this as private interpretation.] 2. deliver a speech, declaim, of orators and rhetoricians, represent dramatically, erôtikôn dramatôn 3. of an orator, use histrionic arts, exaggerate,
One of the roles was as canto I. Neutr., to produce melodious sounds (by the voice or an instrument), to sound, sing, play (class. in prose and poetry; to sing and play while the actor accompanies the song with gestures or dancing, C. Transf., of instruments, to sound, resound:
Socrates: And do not the poets in the theatres seem to you to be rhetoricians?
Callicles: Yes.
Socrates: Then now we have discovered a sort of rhetoric which is addressed to a crowd of men, women, and children, freemen and slaves.
And this is NOT much to our taste,
for we have described it as having the nature of FLATTERY.
Callicles: Quite true.
They are STILL involved in INFILTRATING and DIVERTING right before your eyes and they CANNOT be remotely connected to Christ who CAST OUT the Musical Minstrels LIKE DUNG. Based on the history of the Sophia-Zoe hostile SUBJECTION of the "little dumb jehovah and logos" I would NEVER consume the communion JUICE: the AGAPAE and other such ABOMINATIONS INCLUDED DRINKING foul stuff. I am NOT just joking: DON'T DRINK THE STUFF.
This web site is not part of or approved by any Church!
...........................THE BOOK
What Happened At the Madison Church of Christ?
There are thousands of churches being taken over across America.
This book is only about one of those churches. It's about the Madison
Church Of Christ. By studying the methods used here along with the resource
references you might be able to inoculate your church. At the very least
you will recognize the signs early on.
Many of the current members of the Madison Church of Christ still don't
know what happened.
Some never will know! This book is for them as well.
Madison Church of Christ was a 60 year old church. At one time it was
one of the largest churches in the US, and the largest Church of Christ.
It thrived for many years on the vision of it's elders and those of
it's ministers. Those visions undoubtably came from the the inspired word
of Jesus Christ.
At sometime in the last 10 years there was a deliberate plan by a majority
of the elders to take the Madison Church of Christ into a more worldly
realm.
They used secrecy, covert planning, and outside sources to scheme and
to change the format and direction of the Madison Church of Christ.
The Elders knew that the membership would never approve such a plan.
Using the tools of the "Community Church Movement"(consultants, books,
seminars, meetings,planters,seeders) they slowly started initiating change
so it was never noticed by the members until it was too late.....
At the heart of the plan was the fact that old members were going to
be driven off so new techniques could be used to go out and reach the unchurched
through new "Contemporary Holy Entertainment" methods developed by the
"Community Church Movement"
Old members had to be kept on board long enough to get their plans ready,
or the funds would not be there to pay for the new building. So by the
plans very nature, it had to be secret.
The church had no plan in effect to renew or approve elders. There was
never any need. The elders had always been "as approved by God". 10 of the last
15 elders would begin to shed some doubt on that.
The Elders did not even need a majority at first, because some of the
elders went along unwittingly.
This edition starts shortly after some of the members begin to smell
something strange in January 2001. Later editions may go back and fill
in some of the timeline.
To even start to understand whats happening here, you must read the
background materials in the first of the book.
This is only the first edition, and not the end. New editions will be
printed as needed. To keep abreast of current changes, please visit our
web site; http://www.concernedmembers.com/madison
Here is the list of players;
5 Godly Elders
10 Not so Godly Elders
120 "Deacons" (allegiance unknown)
2,800 - 4,000 church "members"
2 "teners" (people who have publicly confessed to have broken all ten
commandments)
Unknown number of "sinners" (This is what the 10 elders call us.)
Unknown number of "demons" (Flying everywhere, to many to count)