Tomball church of Christ errr...make that ChristBridge Fellowship
November 1 2006 at 4:29 PM
Anonymous from IP address 15.235.153.107
Tomball, TX
The Tomball church of Christ has changed it's name of the congregation from Tomball Church of Christ to ChristBridge Fellowship. I had visited that church a number of years ago and had heard rumors of it changing it's name. I decided to visit the churches website and sure enough, they have changed the name and bought a piano.
I am disappointed in the leaders of the church and with the members as well. I know they know what the Bible teaches about how we should worship and for them to rather please themselves than please the Lord in the manner they choose to worship has me concearned.
From www.tomballcoc.org
"The name has changed, but for awhile you can find this website in one of two ways. Put either
www.ChristBridgeFellowship.com
or www.tomballcoc.org
in your browser. Either way, you'll wind up in the right place! "
Why is this post even here ? Other than to cause conflict and
the TOMBALL COC is gone!!!!! So why is this string even on here??
Somewhere in the good book it "say thou shall not lie"
You say you visited the church and they bought a piano, WRONG GERTRUDE, IF YOU CAN NOT TELL THE DIFFERENCE OF WHAT YOU SAW THEN YOU DID NOT VISIT THE CHURCH. ALONG WITH THE NAME CHANGE WAS ONLY ENACTED THIS YEAR, GET YOUR STORY STRAIGHT.
Remember, it isn't what you want, it is what God wants that matters. From your response, it is clear that you show up on Sunday to please yourself and not to worship God as he has instructed you to do.
The false teachers get all riled up when they are exposed for what they are. I'll pray for your church members to see them for what they are and dispell them from the church.
To their credit I think it is commendable that the leadership at least chose to identify clearly by their sign, email, and advertising that they are not affiliated with the Churches of Christ. At least graduates of our universities who move to this area can know up front that something - whether for better or worse - is different from the church they may have grown up in. Unfortunately the same cannot be said for some of the other congregations who have threads here.
P.S. If you're going to be a stickler for details, maybe you should learn to spell correctly; the word is RHYTHM.
Lamps and Name Removed: Revelation 18 just in time.
November 13 2006, 11:12 PM
I am glad that they are HAPPY: that is what God intends for them to do and HE removed the seven spirits or Lamps and the NAME of Christ in order to MARK those with THAT mark. This is the meaning of STRONG DELUSIONS. In The Book of Enoch and dozens of similar commentary on the Jubal family: when Lucifer (the singing and harp playing prostitutes) seduces you away from the Living word you have been warned and will NEVER be able to get back into the presence of the written word. When these people grasped that they were FALLEN ANGELS OF THE NIGHT they tried to seduce more and more into their musical and sexual and homosexual embrace to give them COMFORT and AFFIRMATION. But the HAPPY-CLAPPY is really just whistling through the cemetary at midnight (been there, done that).
Paul said that the converted Jews now worshipped in the SPIRIT rather than in the FLESH. His reason was that OUTSIDE there be concision and DOGS. These were the singing and dancing CYNICS or male prostitutes who PROWLED around even the Jerusalem temple from the beginning. The singing, musical sexual rituals was part of the Abomination of Desolation and the END-TIME charismatic speakers, singers and musicians John said were UNDER the Mother Harlot and were performing SORCERTY. Kineses is part of the EMERGING CHURCH OF CHRIST where musicologists knew that the DRUM BEAT of Africa was infused into the churchy music as VOODOO.
A. any regular recurring motion (pas rh. hôrismenêi metreitai KINESEI ):
<>I. measured motion, time, whether in sound or motion, kinêseôs taxis, opp. metron and harmonia, logoi meta mousikês kai rhuthmôn <>
2. special phrases: en rhuthmôi in time, of dancing, marching, rhuthmon choreias hupagein keep time, Ar.Th.956 (lyr.); thattona rhuthmon epagein play in quicker time
IV. state or condition of anything, temper, disposition, Thgn.964 (coupled with ORGE and tropos);
The Zoe Group brought in an expert to DISPROVE the Platonic Fallacy which PROVES that mimesis or music or acting is PROOF and the CAUSE of effeminancey.
II. of the arts, represent, express by means of imitation, of an actor, of painting and music, Pl.Plt.306d; tên tôn melôn mimêsin tên eu kai tên kakôs memimêmenên Id.Lg.812c ; of poetry, Arist.Po.1447a17, al.; of mimoi, represent, act, ti X.Smp.2.21.--Neither mimos, mimeomai, nor any derivs. occur in Il. or Od.:--Trag. use only pres. and fut. mim-êlazô , = foreg., agathon kakôi m. Ph.1.557 (s. v.l.); -azontes kai parakoptontes to dokimon nomisma ib.610 (-izontes codd.), cf. Hsch
Athenian Law forbade sending out a herald (kerusso or preacher or presbyter) a philosopher or poetes: one who composes and delivers their OWN message. Because they always composed two or three REMOVES from the truth they could not be trusted;
Arist.Po.1447a27 Aristotle, Poetics
For just as by the use both of color and form people represent many objects, making likenesses of them--
[20] some having a knowledge of art and some working empirically--and just as others use the human voice; so is it also in the arts which we have mentioned,
they all make their representations in rhythm and language and tune, using these means either separately or in combination.
For tune and rhythm alone are employed in flute-playing and harp-playing and in any other arts which have a similar function, as, for example, pipe-playing.
Rhythm alone without tune is employed by dancers in their representations, for by means of rhythmical gestures they represent both character and experiences and actions.4
2 The explanation of mimêsis, as Aristotle uses the word, demands a treatise; all that a footnote can say is this:--Life "presents" to the artist the phenomena of sense, which the artist "re-presents" in his own medium, giving coherence, designing a pattern.
That this is true not only of drama and fiction but also of instrumental music ("most flute-playing and harp-playing")
was more obvious to a Greek than to us, since Greek instrumental music was more definitely imitative.
The technical display of the virtuoso Plato describes as "a beastly noise." Since mimêsis in this sense and mimêtês and the verb mimeisthai have a wider scope than any one English word, it is necessary to use more than one word in translation, e.g. mimêtês is what we call an "artist"; and for mimêsis where "representation" would be clumsy we may use the word "art"; the adjective must be "imitative," since "representative" has other meanings.
3 i.e., means that can be divided into separate categories.
4 pathê kai praxeis cover the whole field of life, what men do (praxeis) and what men experience (pathê). Since pathê means also "emotions" and that sense may be present here, but as a technical term in this treatise pathos is a calamity or tragic incident, something that happens to the hero.
So, Tom Ballites, eat, drink and make Mary because God has ORDAINED that you be happy clappy. When you reject the Word as in The Book of Enoch and quoted by Jude, he DELUDES you to hold you captive but will come with ten thousand of His saints or angels to pour out judgment on you. The musicians are the LOCUSTS in John's Revelation where he defined you as ministers for the Mother of Harlots performing SORCERY (Rev 18): they have lulled you to sleep with their music and probably have given you the STING OF DEATH because they have scorpion stingers in their tails. In the CIRCE (church) legend probably based on fact, she uses music and drugs (sorcery) or magical enchantments to get you into hter sexual embrace. Then, she turns you into beasts and feeds you the best hand-patted DUNG BALLS which probably means songs and sermons because Jesus CAST OUT the musical minstrels LIKE DUNG.
You have a false PLANT who is terminally ignorant or terminally evil. Because these people are so slick Jesus might call them a race of VIPERS or a CROOKED generation meaning the wineskinners who sing SKOLION songs and WEAVE to exclude those without talent in singing quite simple songs while DRUNK ON WINE meaning in the literature PIPED DOWN WITH WINE.
Jesus MARKED them by removing the CANDLES because they were practicing sorcery with music (Rev 18) and removing HIS Name so that people will have a WAY PROVIDED TO ESCAPE being tempted to make the HARD-WIRED connect when you associate music with worship. That is the primary meaning of The Book of Enoch and many other ancient documents explaing Jubal who handled musical instruments meaning WITHOUT AUTHORITY.
I missed the NT passage where God instructs how to conduct a worship service, actually I can't even find the passage that instructs corporate worship. I can find assembling in order to edify and exhort other believers, but nothing about preaching Gospel to non-believers in those assemblies. I can find instruction on taking up collections for needy believers. I can find instructions on qualifications of elders, deaacons, and widows. But I cannot find this instruction that several here have referred to where God tells us how to worship him.
BTW, yes the assembly is for the benefit of those present, certainly Heb 10:24,25 means what it says and says what it means. Also check out 1 Cor 14, it is about "us". I know that is shocking, but all the giving was not "giving back a small portion to God" if you actually read and hear scripture, it is about giving to others and imitating God in this love.
I know the traditions that are taught as doctrines of God, and I know the inferences and conclusions that have been traditionally made, but truly I cannot find this instruction to which cofc tries to use the Jedi hand wave and make the mind go blank. It just isn't there.
I missed the NT passage where God instructs how to conduct a worship service, actually I can't even find the passage that instructs corporate worship. I can find assembling in order to edify and exhort other believers, but nothing about preaching Gospel to non-believers in those assemblies. I can find instruction on taking up collections for needy believers. I can find instructions on qualifications of elders, deaacons, and widows. But I cannot find this instruction that several here have referred to where God tells us how to worship him.
I am so sorry you missed that: no one else in early EKKLESIA missed that for hundreds of years: no singing until about the year 360-373 to add NON Scriptural songs written by the person who composed his own SCRIPTURE. You MISSED that because Jesus never DEFINED a worship service. Paul's UNIQUE worship concept means to GIVE HEED to the Word (Spirit) of Christ. You worship what or whomever you PAY ATTENTION TO. If you are paying attention to the effeminate praise singers then you are worshiping the PRAISE LEADERS. If you sing Twila Paris then you are worshiping Twila Paris. Physical and mental limitations: you cannot GIVE HEED to the sister singers and to the Word of God at the same time. For heaven's sake they INTEND that you worship them: that is the meaning of the ZOE MOVEMENT.
The Jews never missed that the assembly as Qahal which Stephen defined as "the church in the wilderness" was not to blow loud instruments and "make a joyful noise before the Lord" because this PRAISE was the warrior's panic song. The instructions for the EKKLESIA was to hold a holy convocation to REST, READ and or REHEARSE the Word which would be in the memory of ANY copmpetent tribal elder. Boys began synagogue mandatory school at about age 5-7 at the time of Jesus and NO ONE was such a slow learner that he did not understand the UNCHANGED role of the SYNAGOGUE or EKKLESIA which was a SCHOOL OF THE BIBLE. Paul's ONLY worship word speaks of GIVING HEED to the Word of God by "public reading, exorting that read portion and explainig universal doctrine in THAT passage." That never changes since the Church in the Wilderness. There are numerous times when Paul assembled (synagogued) out in the mission fields and you NEVER hear Paul having a song service. I think that the charismatic singing and charismatic preaching is EXACTLY that which prevented you from learning that in card class (before women began to RULE OVER).
No one in the history of the world disobeyed that DIRECT COMMAND until in a liberal German synagogue in the year 1815. The Rabbi sowed discord and the congregation went to law. What makes the Rabbi REDEEMABLE is that he had the UNcommon decency to leave and start another synagogue.
The Temple was a Gentile-like shrine for the king, clergy and military. The synagogue or ekklesia or CHURCH quarantined the people from traveling on the REST days (not Saturday) and prevented SENDING OUT MINISTERS: why not! They were to READ the word as it had been written and to dialog it. That NEVER changed and the only addition was the Lord's Supper in Christ's Ekklesia or Synagogue which was ALSO to "preach the Death of Christ."
Jesus endorsed the synagogue by going in and standing up to READ the word and having the uncommon decency to SIT DOWN and "rehearse"or dialog: Paul never preached until Midnight: he DIALOGED or COMMUNED about the Word. There is not a jot or tittle that Paul or the other evangelists SANG in the ASSEMBLY or GATHERING which is defined with the word SYNAGOGUE and the synagogue "had no praise service" based on the DIRECT COMMAND well understood from Numbers 7 and minimal common sense and decency: when Jesus Christ meets as out ONLY teacher when the elders "teach that which has been taught" why would anyone want to listen to gender-confused singers whine or screech out their OWN silly, erotic praise ditties?
Paul EXCLUDES private practices in Romans 14 and then defines the synagogue in Romans 15. They were to speak that which was written or Scripture with ONE MIND and ONE MOUTH. This would EDIFY or EDUCATE which is the purpose for the assembly, glorify God who wrote the songs as sermons as "the Spirit of Christ." Paul commanded the WORD of Christ in Colossians 3 to TEACH and ADMONISH and in Ephesians 5 called that word the SPIRIT. That is exactly what those "uninformed" people graped from reading simple words. For instance, the word SPEAK in these assemblies is the OPPOSITE of either poetry or MUSIC. That is why Paul put the singing AND melody (or grace) in the PLACE of the human heart or SPIRIT which is the only Place God pays any attention to us: He DOES NOT judge according to SIGHT or SOUND (Isa 11 defining the 7 SPIRITS of God).
Paul said that we should ASSemble ourselves and read and learn and honor Christ. When WE DISSemble ourselves the "assembly" goes the same place a flame goes when we puff it out. In the civil ekkleisa they elected a "contact elder" for the year. When Paul addressed a letter to Corinth it did not go to an address but to the man known to be the "contact man" who could then call the assembly to LISTEN AND LEARN ONLY.
BTW, yes the assembly is for the benefit of those present, certainly Heb 10:24,25 means what it says and says what it means. Also check out 1 Cor 14, it is about "us". I know that is shocking, but all the giving was not "giving back a small portion to God" if you actually read and hear scripture, it is about giving to others and imitating God in this love.
That's true so you would advise NOT giving to the preacher who is RARELY knowledgeable beyond the "dry onion skin" level to fill a role not invented for another hundred years in the sense of "sermonizing" the Word. If he is an able-bodied male then shame and all of Bible history before preachers (priests) became operatives of the civil state should force him into the Thessalonian dilemna: "If he will not work neither shall he eat." Paul was speaking of the MANY riding the backs of the new churches.
Paul outlawed songs or sermons which came out of their OWN SPIRIT and compared their own minor dialects (not gibberish) to lifeless instruments which he parses to WITCHCRAFT, WARFARE or the THEATER. His regulation of 'revelatory' prophesying DID NOT mean that anyone in Corinth had the smalles gift.
I know the traditions that are taught as doctrines of God, and I know the inferences and conclusions that have been traditionally made, but truly I cannot find this instruction to which cofc tries to use the Jedi hand wave and make the mind go blank. It just isn't there.
The TRADITIONALISM which the LIBERALS assuredly will NOT abandon while they use the RACA words on non-instrumentalists all SURFACED destructively in my lifetime:
The Law of Preaching: denied by the evangelists who lost their support to "Located Missionaries" in about 1930
The Law of Singing which didn't go legal for almost four centuries and THEN no one hallucinated chanting the Psalms and playing the organ at the same time. Catholics never did that until after 1911 when they began to Protentasize. The gender-bleed songs just pooped out in the last decade or so.
The Law of Giving which Paul DISPUTES and identifies any coercion EVEN for the DESTITUTE with extortion which he lumps with adultery.
THESE ARE THE TRADITIONALIZING WHICH THEY WILL NEVER ARGUE AGAINST: wonder why?
Nextly, what the SECTARIAN and LEGALISTIC "new style musicians" lie about is that the NON-use of MACHINES (for doing hard work) is JUST based on our ignorant, Southern Rednecked traditionalism. None of those actively trying to infiltrate and divert peaceable churches of Christ by using Rubel Shelly, Max Lucado or Rick Atckly who are MUSICAL to pretend to represent the non-instrumental churches of Christ. How can anyone honest do that? Furthermore all of their books and sermons DELIBERATELY lie about every musical passage related to religion. The LUST to lick up the references to PSALLO which speaks of PLUCKING as authority for DELIBERATELY SWIPING CHURCH HOUSES OF WIDOWS and the NEVER tell you that ALL of these males PLUCKING a harp as their authority is SEDUCING young boys for pederasty: there IS NO music in religion testimony which DOES NOT identify prostitutes: if males are involved in singing and playing we are told that they are DRUNKS or PERVERTS or maybe JUST FOR FUN. Maybe like dressing up in your sister's clothes which they also did.
Well, there, you have people who are terminal and without redemption because Isaiah says that hell was made to drive people into with Wind, String and Percussion instruments and John in Revelation adds LIARS and DOGS (Singers in Paul's imagery or CYNICS) and Sorcerers. John identifies the Mother of Harlots (Rev 17) and her singers, musicians and ALL teknokrats as SORCERERS who HAD deceived the whole world. so, we have NUMEROUS passages which prove that Topheth (Hell or solomon's music grove) was prepared for Lucifer the singing and harp playing prostitute and all She /He / It could seduce with music.
Rick Atchley representing all of the musical DISCORDERS distorted every single musical term in the Bible and recorded history. When he knows that elders have to resign, members flee and stealing the church house of widows is the result. This CANNOT be the work of sincere people and I think that Revelation 18 is coming true before our watching eyes and listening ears and the GOATS (a capella singers) CANNOT help doing what they are doing. All misleaders use the same LIES to do something which HE lusts to add and you need to ASK WHY?
They ALL ignore all recorded history which associates MUSICAL WORSHIP with Satan, warriors, prostitutes and Sodomites and claim that those who DO NOT fit one of those categories are the EVIL LEGALISTS. Satan IS called the FALSE ACCUSER.
SO the false teachers USE AND ABUSE the only LEGALISTIC TRADITIONALISM for their own PROFIT and ADD those practices universally and 100% of the time condemned by God from Genesis to Revelation.
Music used in a RELIGIOUS SENSE has more coverage in the Bible and secular literature than any subject I am aware: the fella you PAY to lie to you doesn't have a clue because CORRUPTING THE WORD means "selling learning at retail" and he has fallen and will never recover: why should he?
Re: Tomball church of Christ errr...make that ChristBridge Fellowship
June 3 2007, 5:35 PM
Ken, Good news: Your expose' on the Artios Academy (under the Smith Springs thread) is right on target: my brother used to attend there before they went Augustinian.
Bad news: The article is buried under your main page here that I doubt any of the parents who need to see this will ever stumble upon it. Doesn't it deserve it's own home page so people can find it when they enter "Artios Academy, Nashville" under a search engine? Just a suggestion.
Thanks: by putting it on my home page It gets on the search engines faster.
I will work on getting it bumped up.
If you have any suggestions let me know: I have had some good feedback
with needed corrections but it needs all of the punch it can get.
I sense there is a strong Reformed influence at LU although I think they have bridled David Lawrence who probably has tenure.
They worry me a whole lot when they bring in the changelings as "attractants" and are honoring Lynn Anderson, the father of the "Blowing the Winds of Change" which lifts liberally from neo-paganism.
Briley is going to speak on what was Nailed to the Cross and there is a very large body of people wanting to MERGE the Old Testament into the church: they assuredly do not hesitate to live the music from the Sacrifician syatem "added because of transgression."
I used to be a member of the Tomball Church of Christ. We are no longer. I did not agree with the WAY the church made their changes. People make mistakes in judgement but my family and I still love these people. They are GOOD people. They are NOT Evil as you suggest and I hope this church is thriving. I drive by there often and it looks as though they are.
Why do you keep discussing this! What difference does it make to you worry warts? This site is a belly ache session not a Christian site. If you were a Christian you would not be pointing fingers!
Leave them alone. Take care of your own business and let them worship as they please. Remove the plank from you own eyes before slamming someone else.
Just because YOU don't believe the same way these people do, does not make their way wrong.
This is why the Church of Christ as we know it is dying. People are starting to open their eyes and realize the C o C is not perfect. Not being allowed to clap or sing up-to-date songs is absolutely ridiculous. What is wrong with being happy at church? Music is NOT wrong. Quote all you want to but it is NOT wrong. Singing in church without music is NOT wrong either.
Shame on your accusations and narrowmindedness.
I know you will write a 30 minute rebuttal to this but go right ahead as this must be only thing you have to do in life is criticize others.
May God watch over us ALL as we are ALL his children.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
This is a very brief comment -- not even a rebuttal as it is not worth it.
You said, "I used to be a member of the Tomball Church of Christ. We are no longer. I did not agree with the WAY the church made their changes."
So, you left because you "did not agree with the WAY...." Please clarify. What was the "WAY" that you would have preferred? Do you NOW agree? And have you thought about going back?
BTW, no one is arguing that "they are GOOD people." Let's get that straight.
Donnie
This message has been edited by Donnie.Cruz from IP address 68.19.221.212 on Aug 1, 2007 8:12 PM
I will clarify. This church has had its share of issues and the elders made choices that was not for the benefit of all members. Everyone makes mistakes and I am sure they are well aware of this. We left because of our own issues, those of which are our own concern and not yours.
Have you ever made a mistake? We are all guilty!
Yes! You people are saying these are not GOOD people. It is evident in the ramblings of Mr. Sublett. I question this man's sanity. Some of his ramblings are just plain vile. My question is why do you all keep re-hashing this over and over. In fact this website does nothing but bash other churches and churches of Christ that do not follow your way of thinking.
It is a losing battle to spar with you people. Why don't you use your time and talents to help others. Create a positive web site not one with so much negativity.
This web site is not part of or approved by any Church!
...........................THE BOOK
What Happened At the Madison Church of Christ?
There are thousands of churches being taken over across America.
This book is only about one of those churches. It's about the Madison
Church Of Christ. By studying the methods used here along with the resource
references you might be able to inoculate your church. At the very least
you will recognize the signs early on.
Many of the current members of the Madison Church of Christ still don't
know what happened.
Some never will know! This book is for them as well.
Madison Church of Christ was a 60 year old church. At one time it was
one of the largest churches in the US, and the largest Church of Christ.
It thrived for many years on the vision of it's elders and those of
it's ministers. Those visions undoubtably came from the the inspired word
of Jesus Christ.
At sometime in the last 10 years there was a deliberate plan by a majority
of the elders to take the Madison Church of Christ into a more worldly
realm.
They used secrecy, covert planning, and outside sources to scheme and
to change the format and direction of the Madison Church of Christ.
The Elders knew that the membership would never approve such a plan.
Using the tools of the "Community Church Movement"(consultants, books,
seminars, meetings,planters,seeders) they slowly started initiating change
so it was never noticed by the members until it was too late.....
At the heart of the plan was the fact that old members were going to
be driven off so new techniques could be used to go out and reach the unchurched
through new "Contemporary Holy Entertainment" methods developed by the
"Community Church Movement"
Old members had to be kept on board long enough to get their plans ready,
or the funds would not be there to pay for the new building. So by the
plans very nature, it had to be secret.
The church had no plan in effect to renew or approve elders. There was
never any need. The elders had always been "as approved by God". 10 of the last
15 elders would begin to shed some doubt on that.
The Elders did not even need a majority at first, because some of the
elders went along unwittingly.
This edition starts shortly after some of the members begin to smell
something strange in January 2001. Later editions may go back and fill
in some of the timeline.
To even start to understand whats happening here, you must read the
background materials in the first of the book.
This is only the first edition, and not the end. New editions will be
printed as needed. To keep abreast of current changes, please visit our
web site; http://www.concernedmembers.com/madison
Here is the list of players;
5 Godly Elders
10 Not so Godly Elders
120 "Deacons" (allegiance unknown)
2,800 - 4,000 church "members"
2 "teners" (people who have publicly confessed to have broken all ten
commandments)
Unknown number of "sinners" (This is what the 10 elders call us.)
Unknown number of "demons" (Flying everywhere, to many to count)