<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Rhetoric  

wimbledon 2009 final

July 5 2009 at 2:18 PM
No score for this post
Anonymous  (Login happypup)
TopBoy

 
did anyone catch what someone shouted that cracked the whole centrecourt up?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
AuthorReply


(Login Niallmackay)
Precious

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 2:31 PM 

It was something like "Hit it up Roger". I'm not one hundred percent sure.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   


(Login Chenise)
Wykesette

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 2:44 PM 

what a challenge! federer just looks amazing

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(Login Babyshambles_Are_Wank)
TopBoy

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 2:50 PM 

Stifler's on form today.

_____________

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(Login tenpoundbag)
TopBoy

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 2:53 PM 

lol

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

(Login lee__wykes)

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 3:36 PM 

rog will destroy him now

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(Login GarconDeLaBand)
TopBoy

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 3:42 PM 

Is that Gavin Rossdale sat with Federer's missus? And Becker's sounding a lot like Bruno today...

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   


(Login Niallmackay)
Precious

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 3:57 PM 

Gavin Rosdale and Roger Federer are good friends.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   


(Login FrustratedJohnny)
TopBoy

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 4:14 PM 

Jimmy Carr plays tennis!?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(Login ted_plaincrisps)

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 4:32 PM 

well this is dull

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

(Login lytias)
TopBoy

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 4:58 PM 

Watching it since half an hour. They are both really good. Don't know who will will...5th game on.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

Anonymous
(Login sheerhunnery)
TopBoy

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 5:02 PM 

I'm sure Gavin Rossdale and Gwen Stefani were both part of Federer's contingent at the final last year.

Bloody hell, I never knew Gavin Rossdale was Daisy Lowe's father. Just read that when I was looking at Gwen Stefani's page on Wikipedia.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   


(Login Niallmackay)
Precious

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 5:06 PM 

Excuse the absolute crudeness of this.

Wouldn't it be good if after each time she fellated him he turned round and went, in his inimitable tones: "SWAAAALLLLOOOOWED".

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   


(Login papajay)
TopBoy

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 5:13 PM 

apart from the second set tie break this has been a dull final

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(Login singlehound)
TopBoy

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 5:15 PM 

It's been dull but tense at the same time. It feels like Federer has the edge but he keeps making silly mistakes.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(Login singlehound)
TopBoy

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 5:17 PM 

Roddick's serve fucks me off. It's practically carried him through at certain points.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   


(Login Niallmackay)
Precious

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 5:17 PM 

Federer has looked like he has the edge since the second, but Roddick has been incredible. Given they're well into the fifth after 2hrs 50 mins, it shows how dominant the serve has been.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   


(Login papajay)
TopBoy

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 5:19 PM 

true

even federer's served over 30 aces

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   


(Login papajay)
TopBoy

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 5:20 PM 

inn fact looking at those stats it looks more like federer's serve's carried him through this final, not roddick's

aces

federer 35
roddick 21

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   


(Login Niallmackay)
Precious

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 5:21 PM 

Still incredible stats. Roddick's groundstrokes have been amazing in the past two matches he's played.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   


(Login papajay)
TopBoy

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 5:23 PM 

this could go on and on and on

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(Login singlehound)
TopBoy

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

Score 1.0 (1 person)
July 5 2009, 5:23 PM 

Looks set for another tiebreak FFS.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   


(Login Niallmackay)
Precious

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 5:25 PM 

You can't get a tie break in the final set.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(Login Babyshambles_Are_Wank)
TopBoy

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 5:25 PM 

Oh dear.

_____________

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   


(Login papajay)
TopBoy

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 5:25 PM 

do thy have 5th set tie breaks now? honest question

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(Login singlehound)
TopBoy

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 5:26 PM 

Fuck I'm such a cock.

Sorry.

I wasn't thinking at all, I blame the self-induced illness.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   


(Login papajay)
TopBoy

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 5:27 PM 

easy mistake- they've just mentioned that the US Open goes to a 5th set tie-break

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   


(Login Niallmackay)
Precious

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 5:28 PM 

hahah, don't be silly, I was just letting you know.

Fifth set there is no tie-break. That's why last years final ended up like 9/7 in the fifth.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   


(Login FrustratedJohnny)
TopBoy

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

Average Score 3.0 (2 people)
July 5 2009, 5:30 PM 

Watched this shit for 10 minutes, there, its fucking shit, Tennis is an awful game for men.

It is a game for women.

Men should play football, and in the summer months play golf and cricket.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(Login singlehound)
TopBoy

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 5:31 PM 

Lucky fucker.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   


(Login Niallmackay)
Precious

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

Average Score 4.0 (4 people)
July 5 2009, 5:32 PM 

Cricket? Noone should play cricket. See if this place is polluted with a million threads about the ashes, I am taking a haiatus. Sack that.

Even the players don't know what the fuck is going on. They stand about scratching their arse for about ten minutes before anything happens, then when it does the ball just trickles along the ground a few yards. Repeat process. Give me rounders.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   


(Login papajay)
TopBoy

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 5:43 PM 

here we go!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   


(Login papajay)
TopBoy

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 5:44 PM 

awesome federer- all about handling the pressure

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

w
(Login second_horse_bomb_box-face)
TopBoy

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 5:50 PM 

we love you andy

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i subscribe to esquire. its an excellent magazine and the subscription is really cheap.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   


(Login rotinaj_)
Wykesette

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 6:00 PM 

Come on Rodge.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   


(Login Niallmackay)
Precious

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 6:01 PM 

Rodge?! happy.gif

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   


(Login papajay)
TopBoy

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 6:04 PM 

is federer human?

roddick is dripping with sweat, he's drenched

there ain't a drop on federer

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

Roughyed
(Login alex19872003)
TopBoy

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 6:06 PM 

BORED NOW

____________________________________________

"Now that's a boy who looks like he could produce sperm."

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   


(Login papajay)
TopBoy

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 6:07 PM 

....and on and on and on and.....

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   


(Login Chenise)
Wykesette

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 6:08 PM 

imagine if this 5th set ended up being like 34-32

i really want roddick to win

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   


(Login weaz)
TopBoy

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 6:12 PM 

Somebody hurry up and win please

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   


(Login Niallmackay)
Precious

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 6:14 PM 

Roddick hasn't lost his service game since the third set of the Murray match. That's 6 fulls sets and the rest.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(Login thisonegoesto11)
TopBoy

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 6:16 PM 

and to think the winner of this match gets the same prize money and that 2 set match yesterday where one sister just lets the other one win.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

Roughyed
(Login alex19872003)
TopBoy

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 6:16 PM 

I really want to turn over but i know as soon as I do they'll someone will win.

____________________________________________

"Now that's a boy who looks like he could produce sperm."

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   


(Login Chenise)
Wykesette

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 6:17 PM 

has federer been for a wee yet?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   


(Login papajay)
TopBoy

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 6:18 PM 

this game i reckon

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   


(Login papajay)
TopBoy

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 6:20 PM 

or not

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Seth
(Login TheFatCat)
TopBoy

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

Average Score 3.5 (2 people)
July 5 2009, 6:21 PM 

Women should not be paid the same money as men in Tennis - they play half as much.

Though it is a pity that Wimbledon still racially segregate their tennis. Yesterday's men's final was not nearly as good.


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(Login thisonegoesto11)
TopBoy

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 6:21 PM 

how good would it be if they just both walked up to the net, did rock, paper, scissors and then called it a day.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   


(Login papajay)
TopBoy

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 6:24 PM 

women should get the same- it's all relative...they train to the peak of their abilities and play to the peak of their abilities.....one sex shouldn't get penalised financially just because they are physically weaker...regardless of whether they provide less entertainment (quantity) or not

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(Login thisonegoesto11)
TopBoy

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 6:27 PM 

yeah women should get the same pay as men for doing the same work but if the men are working like 25-33% longer then this should be reflected in their pay.

regardless of the fact that the men are better and draw bigger crowds.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   


(Login papajay)
TopBoy

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 6:29 PM 

i think if you take into account training as part of the work (most of the work), that percentage would be much much lower

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   


(Login second_horse_bomb_box-face)
TopBoy

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 6:29 PM 

they should let the williams sisters play against the blokes - would be interesting

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i subscribe to esquire. its an excellent magazine and the subscription is really cheap.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(Login singlehound)
TopBoy

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 6:29 PM 

Well thank fuck for that.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   


(Login second_horse_bomb_box-face)
TopBoy

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 6:30 PM 

why did that royal chap make a bee-line for that one ball girl then bugger off?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i subscribe to esquire. its an excellent magazine and the subscription is really cheap.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   


(Login Chenise)
Wykesette

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 6:38 PM 

cocky bastard having the 15 on his jacket

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

Anonymous
(Login vagrant_)
TopBoy

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 6:42 PM 

Well that dragged on. A long tennis match is not necessarily a classic one.

For me that was one of the most boring finals for a while. There was probably nearly 100 aces in that match.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(Login Chairman_LMAO)
snazzy

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 6:41 PM 

Golf = 'Sport' that gets geriatrics and the dysfunctional out of their house. Who, let's face it, shouldn't actually be allowed out of their house.

Cricket = 'Sport' for toffs and unfit bloaters that can't be bothered running further than 20 yards.



 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   


(Login Niallmackay)
Precious

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 6:50 PM 

I do confess to being a golfer. It's my dad's fault.

It's a hellish sport. Have you ever known anyone to play golf that actually enjoys it? The most miserable people in the world play it.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

Anonymous
(Login Im_So_Sorry)
TopBoy

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 7:51 PM 

roddick did good.
He was so gutted at the end i felt bad for him.

Losing in 3 wimbleon finals against the same player must be frustrating.
That's that for another year...
Bring on the us open.


Women definatly should be payed the same.
The amount of travelling and training is the same as the men.
Plus most of the women have to retire early to have kids or not have any at all.
The only player to have a kid and carry on was Davenport and she was never the same afterwards.

Clijsters quit to have a kid now she's bored and coming back.
Can't wait.
If anyone can challange the williams sisters she can.

--------------------------------------------

"Why do you come here?
And why do you hang around?
I'm so sorry"

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

Anonymous
(Login Im_So_Sorry)
TopBoy

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 7:58 PM 

"Golf = 'Sport' that gets geriatrics and the dysfunctional out of their house. Who, let's face it, shouldn't actually be allowed out of their house.

Cricket = 'Sport' for toffs and unfit bloaters that can't be bothered running further than 20 yards."


I totally agree about cricket. An watching it is even worse it makes me literally fall asleep.
Although I woul like to learn how to play golf one day.
It's the closest thing to a sport i could do without getting knackered...

I love watching Football/Tennis/Boxing. I think 3 is enough anyway, I wouldnt have time to be in to any more...

--------------------------------------------

"Why do you come here?
And why do you hang around?
I'm so sorry"

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(Login Chairman_LMAO)
snazzy

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 8:12 PM 

I do enjoy playing golf and cricket. But they are pass-times. Not sports. They can be filed away along with Darts and Bowling.



 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

Anonymous
(Login Im_So_Sorry)
TopBoy

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 9:06 PM 

The fact that darts is considered a sport is laughable.

When it's on tv on sky sports and it's just like a big pub but with people cheering like they are at a football match.
very strange...

--------------------------------------------

"Why do you come here?
And why do you hang around?
I'm so sorry"

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

Anonymous
(Login sheerhunnery)
TopBoy

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 9:27 PM 

Darts is fucking great. The atmosphere and tension is just amazing.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(Login tawny_sinn)

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 9:21 PM 

federer has gold rolexes, private jets & monogrammed shit coming out of his ass. he could use billion dollar bills for toilet paper. he's too rich & too acclaimed & it's all so lame now. he got the french open because he wasn't up against nadal; he technically won today but not really since he only had 38 games to roddick's 39. he'd still be at 13 grand slams if he hadn't been so lucky during these past 2.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(Login singlehound)
TopBoy

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 9:29 PM 

"he technically won today but not really since he only had 38 games to roddick's 39"

That's the lamest thing I've heard ever. He still pulled through and in the end outclassed Roddick. I'd say today Roddick was undeniably the more consistent player (Federer faffed up a few times), and I have the utmost respect for him, but Federer played better if that makes sense. It's hard to explain but when Federer got into his stride today he was brilliant.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

Anonymous
(Login sheerhunnery)
TopBoy

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 9:35 PM 

I think it was telling in the last set when Federer was winning his serve in almost every game with ease, often to love or 15. Roddick's service games were often closer, especially once the set got to "sudden-death". Although Federer was never getting to break-point, he pushed Roddick to 30 or even duece quite often.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

(Login Leopardi_9)

Re: wimbledon 2009 final

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 9:32 PM 

"he got the french open because he wasn't up against nadal"

It isn't really his fault Nadal got knocked out is it though? Also, he comfortably defeated the guy who defeated Nadal.

Also, the game is best of five sets. Number of games won is pretty irrelevant. You could hypothetically lose two sets 6-0 but win two 7-6 and one 8-6. That's just the way the game is, it is important that you win the games that really matter.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Current Topic - wimbledon 2009 final
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Rhetoric  
 Copyright © 1999-2009 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement