...how is a voter possibly expected to vote for a site that they can't even go to and evaluate? Putting a non-existant site in a category is not only ridiculous, because the voter may have never seen AMG, so they couldn't expect to know how great it was; doing so would also take a place in a category away from another site that may be just as deserving- and still up. Now how fair is that?
I do agree that a little note about the situation would be a good idea to put at the URA site, and it's a real shame that MG's awesome site is down. But a memory is not eligible for a nomination, no matter how much you wish it so, or how much it hurts. Please don't take your frustrations out through accusations.
|