aformentioned statement proof enough that tOdd has no idea what he's talking about, and reason enough for me to stop reading his movie reviews. not only are they ridiculously hard to read and follow (talk about amatuer hour- what the hell was that diatribe you called a Walk The Line review? It was like listening to a 3rd grader)- but they have no basis in reality.

done and done. goodbye.

Jeez. I write one thing that upsets you and you run away??

I posted a warning apology for that one. Oh well. I'm wimpy when it comes to criticism...

it worked for "the return of the king"
or did it?

Dood!

its oddtodd.com (odd)
if you want snobbery reviews... You'd might like SF's Jan Wahl.

She reviews like a TAX AUDIT...those reviews are about as fun as watching a train wreck.

Word to your mother!
And i thought it was funny anyway. fu people!

lol- no, I'll be back

ISATBM
(I suck at the being mad)

The entire point to the original start of this thread was that the review made no real sense. Was Todd trying to show us that the movie made no sense in a subtle way? Not really. It was just a mess. Now everyone isn't mad at what he wrote because it wasn't dull and dry like a regular reviewer. They're just upset because they don't know why Todd hated it. They want insight; not a script cobbled together by Todd's id, ego, and superego. But hey, he did give us his three good and bad at the end and isn't that what we usually jump straight to anyway?

www.thedivinesatire.com See what the controversy is all about!