<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  

Two easy actions

February 21 2006 at 12:12 PM
No score for this post
Gerry Wolff  (Login gerry_wolff)

 
This posting is mainly for UK-based readers but the suggested easy-to-do 'actions' may be adapted for other countries.

In connection with the recently-announced 3-month public consultation on UK energy policy, I would like to suggest two easy-to-do 'actions' that people may like to do, designed to raise public awareness in the UK of the huge potential of renewable forms of energy, especially 'concentrating solar power' (CSP), a rather different technology from the better-known 'photovoltaics' (see http://www.mng.org.uk/green_house/renewable_energy/csp.htm and other sources detailed below).
Greater awareness that big cuts in CO2 emissions are possible without undue cost, inconvenience or risk should help smooth the path for mandatory 3% annual cuts in UK emissions of CO2 as proposed in EDM 178 ( http://edmi.parliament.uk/EDMi/EDMDetails.aspx?EDMID=28373 ).

At present, the nuclear lobby is making headway because politicians and the general public perceive renewable forms of energy to be worthy but somewhat impotent. If the real potential were better understood, there would be much less reason to accept the argument that building new nuclear power stations is the only way to plug the gap left as the old ones close down.

The first action I am proposing is simple: in the next two or three months, send one or more letters or press releases to the UK media about the great potential of CSP and other renewable forms of energy and how they can meet our needs quite easily without the expense and risks of building new nuclear power stations. Even if the letters and press releases don't get published immediately, they may help to raise awareness amongst journalists that renewable forms of energy are much less feeble than currently perceived and thus lead to relevant newspaper articles or TV and radio programmes in the future.

The second easy-to-do action that may interest you is to say something about the potential of CSP and other kinds of renewable energy in the Government's current consultation about energy policy ( http://www.dti.gov.uk/energy/en_consult.shtml ). A draft submission may be found at http://www.mng.org.uk/green_house/mechanisms/government/energy_consultation_2006.htm .

Putting the main focus on CSP should help to maximise the impact of these actions, because the potential of CSP is so enormous and because it is currently almost invisible in the media. Judging by the DTI and DEFRA websites, it is almost invisible in Government thinking too.

In connection with CSP, the following sources are particularly interesting:

The TREC vision of how CSP can provide electricity for Europe, North Africa and the Middle East at http://saharawind.com/documents/trec.paper.pdf .
Detailed projections for the same area up to 2050 showing how CSP, with other technologies, can cut CO2 emissions from electricity generation by about 70%, with a phase-out of nuclear power at the same time (in an 8 MB PDF file at http://www.dlr.de/tt/institut/abteilungen/system/projects/Stk/TRANS-CSP/TRANS-CSP_Scenario_06.pdf ).
A paper from Nokraschy Engineering describing some fascinating spin-offs from CSP ( http://www.nokraschy.net/107P0040.PDF ).
You will have your own lists of media email address and fax numbers but another one that may be useful is at http://www.mng.org.uk/green_house/resources/media_email_fax_list.htm .

An example of a letter for UK newspapers is below this email but you will no doubt wish to send out letters and press releases in your own style.

Gerry Wolff

www.mng.org.uk/green_house .

----------------------

Sample letter to media:

Dear Editor,

If the recently-announced public consultation on UK energy policy is not mere shadow-boxing while plans are laid to build more nuclear power stations, the Government should be looking closely at the huge potential of 'concentrating solar power' (CSP), a relatively simple, practical technology for tapping in to the enormous quantities of energy falling as sunlight on the world's hot deserts (see, for example, the website of the US Department of Energy Sun Lab at http://www.energylan.sandia.gov/sunlab/ ). Trough systems, for example, use parabolic trough-shaped mirrors, each one of which focuses sunlight on to a pipe containing oil or similar fluid that takes the heat to where it can be used to raise steam and generate electricity. Solar power plants like this can be replicated many times to generate as much electricity as required. There are methods for storing solar heat so that electricity generation can continue through the night.

The Trans-Mediterranean Renewable Energy Cooperation (TREC) argues that it is feasible and economic for CSP plants in North Africa and the Middle East to provide electricity for those areas and for the whole of Europe via high-tension power lines. CSP can provide inexhaustible pollution-free power very much more cheaply than nuclear power and without its many headaches (which include vulnerability to terrorist attack, facilitating the proliferation of nuclear weapons, the production of waste that is dangerous for thousands of years, and the release of significant amounts of CO2 in the mining, transportation and processing of uranium and in the transportation, processing and disposal of nuclear waste). When one considers that there is also great potential in wind power and interesting new developments in wave power and tidal power, it is abundantly clear that building new nuclear power stations would be a monumental blunder.

Further information about CSP may be found at http://www.mng.org.uk/green_house/renewable_energy/csp.htm .

Sincerely,

XXX

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
AuthorReply
Boneo
(no login)

Re: Two easy actions

No score for this post
February 22 2006, 10:18 PM 

I think I'll stick to nuclear rather than some alternative located in Africa or the Middle East where we can be held hostage.

The only good use for Africa or the Middle East is as a depository for nulear waste.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Gerry Wolff
(Login gerry_wolff)

Oh dear!

No score for this post
February 24 2006, 6:44 PM 

One of the many problems with nuclear is that the uranium comes from places like Kazakhstan, not noted for its political stability or as a reliable place to get one's energy from.

Hot deserts are very widely distributed in the world which gives much greater security of supply than with oil or gas.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Radioactive
(no login)

Re: Two easy actions

No score for this post
March 1 2006, 4:37 PM 

No it doesn't. This is the typical uninformed response to any topic that ever arises here.

2 seconds on Google, will tell you all you need to know about the sources. http://www.uic.com.au/nip41.htm

country 2001 2002 2003 2004
Canada 12520 11604 10457 11597
Australia 7756 6854 7572 8982
Kazakhstan 2050 2800 3300 3719
Niger 2920 3075 3143 3282
Russia (est) 2500 2900 3150 3200
Namibia 2239 2333 2036 3038
Uzbekistan 1962 1860 1598 2016
USA 1011 919 779 846
Ukraine (est) 750 800 800 800
South Africa 873 824 758 755
China (est) 655 730 750 750
Czech Repub. 456 465 452 412
Brazil 58 270 310 300
India (est) 230 230 230 230
Germany 27 212 150 150
Romania (est) 85 90 90 90
Pakistan (est) 46 38 45 45
Spain 30 37 0 0
France 195 20 0 7
Portugal 3 2 0 0
Total world 36,366 36,063 35,613 40,219

(42 886 t U3O8) (42 529 t U3O8) (41 998 t U3O8) (47 430 t U3O8)

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Current Topic - Two easy actions  Respond to this message   
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  
Create your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2009 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement  
Site Meter