Perhaps Patek is saying something to all die-hard classic fans

That Patek decide to go young! Perhaps there are too many billionaires below the sage of 35 now who can spend $1-2M on new looks like the skeletonised perpetual repeater (sorry I cannot remember the reference, my brain still refuse to register that as a Patek watch). I suggest Mr Stern should catergorise those new avant garde references(i.e., that 5960P, the skeletonised perpetual repeater) as for the bold and daring , e.g., the " Venturer" series?? In that case, old fashion bores like me (who only like 5020, 3970, 3940, 5140, 5100, 3939H, 5959 (yes, the best creation, Mr Stern!!)can comfortable shut my brain and move my retina away from these exasperating items whilst browsing the new Patek catalogue.

Is that a feasible measure, Mr Stern?

Larry