--


  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  

Untitled

December 19 2002 at 6:06 PM
school memories 

-
When I was 14/15 I had a girlfriend who went to a private girlschool with a headmaster, thinking about it that must be quite unusual? any way I remember meeting up with her one lunch an not getting her back in time for registration. When I saw her later she was quite upset and claimed to have been given a smacked bottom by the her headmaster, I was shocked but she showed me the marks and I can only assume that he had, and she told me that he smacked and slippered girls all the time.

We didn't keep in touch for long but I've always wondered if she was telling the truth or not.

 
 Respond to this message   
AuthorReply
Banned from Pants Club

Re: Untitled

December 19 2002, 7:25 PM 

If the headmaster was named Robin Peverett it is quite possibly true. She could, however, have been a self-spanker. There are a lot of them about.

 
 
Eric

Re: Re: Untitled

December 20 2002, 12:32 AM 

Hi sorry meant to put my name on the post and putt the message title as school memories. Anyway no he wasn't peter pervert but from what she said they were alike. I have always been very scepticle of what she said as that kind of thing never happened at my school, but the school she went to did have a reputation of being a bit like that in the area. SHe could have been a self spanker as you say or perhapse her dad had spanked her before I arived or something, she could have had some kind of fetish or perhapse was just an attension seeker of the highest degree as 15 year old girls often are. Or perhapse her headmaster really did put her accros his knee, Iv'e always been curious about it and would love to meet her again to ask her as an adult if she was just winding me up or not, I like to beleive she was telling the truth. Anyway at fifteen it's wasn't everyday a girl lifted her dress to show me her pink well smacked bottom, so even if she was lying it was well worth that at least.

Anyway at the time I kind of beleived it or at least accepted that it could have happened, and I think that really illustrates how unbeleivably different things were back in the early 70's than they are now.

 
 
Anonymous

Re: Re: Re: Untitled

December 20 2002, 4:51 PM 

for peter pervert read Robin Peverett

 
 
mungo

Re: Re: Re: Re: Untitled

December 20 2002, 5:41 PM 

Everyone always mentions peverett in these cases but there are at least two other well know spanking headmasters who ended up going to court, these include Colin West who spanked his girl pupil's bare bottoms in Carlile and Kenneth Watson who also spanked the bare bums of girls up to the ages of 15. God knows how many teachers and headmasters who also indulged in this perverted pastime have so far got away with it? they must be loking over their sholders! The headmaster mentioned by Eric who's girlfriend he spanked could well be one of the few remaining, I personly think that there was probably some kind of communication between them perhapse a spanking club like this one although not online?

 
 
Nero

clarification

December 20 2002, 7:47 PM 

There is no mention of the girl being smacked on her bare bottom here, so, whatever the ethical rights and wrongs might have been, this was probably not illegal at the time.

 
 
Robin (not Peverett)

Col and Ken

December 20 2002, 10:10 PM 

It is plausible that Colin West and Kenneth Watson were members of a Headmasters’ Spanking Club, which may indeed be continuing on the World Wide Web where it has recently become fashionable to use an anagrammatised form of one’s own name. So watch out for ‘Sew-on clit’ and ‘Wanks on the Net’.

 
 
Anna Gram

Re: Col and Ken

December 21 2002, 7:21 AM 

Spare a thought for our newest regular contributor, whose name gives us "A New Orgasm Tart" or "Taste Warm Organ".

 
 
Jeff

Re: clarification

December 21 2002, 8:36 PM 

Nero is right, Eric never said she was spanked on her bare bottom and smacking a girls bum over her school skirt is no more than giving her a slippering which was common place.

It probably wasn't illegal although would have been frowned upon by the authority's as a smacked bottom is not really considered cp. and wouldn't have been entered into a punishment book meaning casual punishments like smacking would not be properly regulated. However if the spanking didn't involve smacking bare flesh it wouldn't have illegal at the time.

My own memories of the late sixties early seventies conflict with some of the views on here. Although I never saw girls smacked at school as I attended a boys school I do remember incidents at home, one memorable incident was when I was 12 and my sister who was 15 at the time had brought home a school friend home to stay the night. That night I was awoken to the sound of screaming, and after racing down stairs I discovered that my sister and her friend had sneaked out during the night and been drinking. Both had been caught by my dad when attempting to sneak back into the house. My dad who to put it mildly stood for no nonsense had put my drunk sister straight over his knee and given her the spanking of a lifetime before doing exactly the same to her friend. When I ran into the living room to see what the noise was I was greeted with the site of my sisters best friend bent across my dads knee mini skirt having her bottom severely smacked whilst my sister stood in the corner crying and rubbing herself better.

This was not unusual in the climate of the late sixties, my dad saw this girl as being under his roof and in his care for the night and if she had of told her dad the chances are he would had said well done she deserved it. As far as I can see this is precisely the way a spanking in a school environment would have been seen.

 
 
C. Nickel

Re: Re: clarification

December 21 2002, 10:48 PM 

And then you woke up?

Right?



 
 
Jeff

Re: Re: Re: clarification

December 22 2002, 12:36 PM 

No actually then I went back to bed quick smart as my dad told me to either get to bed or join the back of the que for a good hiding.

My sister and Caroline her friend got up very early the next morning and left about two hours before school in order to avoid my dad. A few years ago I reminded my sister about that night and she told me that her and caroline were not only drunk but also high on grass and LSD or something like that, so god knows how getting their bottoms smacked by my dad must have felt, luckly he never sussed that they were anymore than just a bit woozy.

 
 
C. Nickel

Re: Re: Re: Re: clarification

December 22 2002, 12:41 PM 

Could Jeff be related to Margaret Watson?

 
 
Brian

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: clarification

December 22 2002, 4:51 PM 

1975 - Colin West Added by Fiona Brown
I had peppar thrown in my eyes by a couple of girls. Colin West brought them to 'matrons' room and then 'spanked' them in front of me. My aunt sent me a newspaper klipping a while after that about him

Can't have been that unusual otherwise these two would have been running home as soon as he told them what he was going to do to them, This kind of thing was unusual but not unheard of as far as I remember.

 
 
Anonymous

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: clarification

December 22 2002, 7:09 PM 

Can't help thinking they might have deserved a good spanking for risking damaging that girls eye's although no doubt West took it to a less wholesome level and probably indulged himself in a little bare bottom slapping and fondling knowing him. Although if he was punishing these girls in front of another girl perhapse he stuck to the rules? I think only the private smacked bottoms resulted in him rubbing girls bottoms and probably touching private parts? but who knows he was a sick man.

 
 
C. Nickel

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: clarification

December 22 2002, 7:28 PM 

Although the non-consensual spanking of teenage girls by adult males is always to be deplored and would in any enlightened society result in lengthy prison sentences for the spankers, it seems a little harsh to label Colin West 'sick' because he availed himself of opportunities that most visitors to Internet spanking sites would kill for.

"Let he who wouldn't spank a naughty teenage girl write the first sick note".

 
 
Margaret Watson

Anagrams

December 22 2002, 11:12 PM 

Having someone go to the trouble of making anagrams of my name makes me feel really accepted.

Another one (and this I hope you will find appropriate) is Great arts woman.

Margaret

 
 
Jeff

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: clarification

December 23 2002, 12:42 AM 

Speak for yourself C. Nickel, in his possision although a major tempation I beleive I would have been able to resist a spanking a couple of naughty girls. Well I like to think I could anyway, well perhapse not!

however I think that sick is the right word, spanking teenage girls who need it is fair enough but Colin West did more than spank, he touched up the girls sexually which in a possision of trust certanly is sick.

 
 
C. Nickel

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: clarification

December 23 2002, 8:51 AM 

No, it's not sick.

It's wrong, it's deplorable and he should have been locked up for it.

But it's not sick.

As far as human behaviour is concerned, nothing in the world could be more normal than a man being attracted to teenage girls. Also, nothing in the world could be more normal than wishing to touch the sexual parts of others to whom one may be attracted.

Where there is 'sickness', it lies entirely in the desire - not in the action - and West's desires were entirely normal.

West, like almost every non-gay man, was attracted to teenage girls but most men, unlike West, do not find themselves in positions where their self-control is so tested.

He was a sexually normal man who, when sorely tempted, broke the rules.


 
 
Janet

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: clarification

December 23 2002, 1:51 PM 

I think C. Nickel should be told off about this.

In that incident the two girls had been extreamly naughty and if any other headmaster had lined up these two girls up to put them over his knee to have their bums spanked it would be fair enough, but West wasn't a normal headmaster he was a sicko who made girls remove their knickers and then lifted their gymslips for his own gratification. these punishments were not purly for punishment purposes, the girls weren't spanked to teach them a lesson, they were spanked to satisfy Wests urges.

 
 
C. Nickel

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: clarification

December 23 2002, 6:13 PM 

As I said earlier, 'sickness' lies in the desire rather than the deed.

If the desire to spank teenage girls for one's own sexual gratification indicates a sick mind, I think most readers of this forum should add a strait jacket to their Christmas wish list.

 
 
Janet

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: clarification

December 23 2002, 8:02 PM 

It's ok for a man to fantasise about smacking schoolgirls bare bottoms, but actually doing it is another thing, the sickness is letting that urge drive you to actually do that to a girl, the humiliation must have been unbearable for two teenage girls to have a man spank their bare bum. The man is sick, tell me the truth would you in his possision where you are a headmaster in 1975 and have two teenage girls sent to your office to be punished, Would you have put them both over your knee and spanked their bare bottoms, or would you have given them lines or something?

I hope the answer is you could have resisted the urge to gratify yourself, otherwise you're just as bad as him.

 
 
Anonymous

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: clarification

December 23 2002, 8:04 PM 

Sorry that should have been

the humiliation must have been unbearable for two teenage girls to have a man spank their bare bums. not bare bum.

 
 
C. Nickel

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: clarification

December 23 2002, 8:37 PM 

Millions upon millions of 'normal' men and women share and have shared Colin West's desire to spank naughty teenagers of one or either sex for self-gratification.

Every one of those people (and I include Mr West) is/was fully aware of the wrongness of doing so when the spankee is coerced.

Mr West was tempted beyond his endurance and he succumbed to temptation - as would a great many others had they been in his position.

He lacked self-control, and that may be a failing but it is most certainly not a sickness.


 
 
C. Nickel

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: clarification

December 23 2002, 8:56 PM 

If spanking schoolgirls on the bare bum indicates that a Headmaster is very sick, to what extent was Jeff's dad sick when he spanked his daughter's friend on her (presumably partly-bare) bum?

a) sick?
b) quite sick?
c) just a little under the weather?

 
 
Janet

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: clarification

December 23 2002, 9:38 PM 

Hi again,

I don't think we know whether Jeff's dad had fetish for spanking girls, if he did then yes he would have been sick, we do know Mr West had a fetish however.

Jeff's dad could have been disciplining the two girls out of pure motives in order to tech them a lesson.

Also I don't remember reading that the girls were spanked on their bare bums by Jeff's dad, I assumed they were smacked over their skirts? he would have been missguided either way I think but not sick, unless he did enjoy it and it was on the bare, in that case very sick.

 
 
Janet

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: clarification

December 23 2002, 10:39 PM 

you also skillfully avoided my question about what you would have done to the two naughty girls in West's possision. So come on what would you have done to them?

 
 
C. Nickel

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: clarification

December 23 2002, 11:01 PM 

A more relevant question is whether you wish to be known as 'Janet' or 'Jeff'?

 
 
Janet

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: clarification

December 23 2002, 11:03 PM 

Why?

 
 
C. Nickel

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: clarification

December 23 2002, 11:11 PM 

Because it's confusing when you change sex in the middle of a topic and your new persona denies all knowledge of the previous one.

 
 
Janet

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: clarification

December 23 2002, 11:58 PM 

why on earth would you think that Me and Jeff are the same person?????????

I'm very confused, how do I know you and Jeff are not the same person? or you and anyone else for that matter?




 
 
C. Nickel

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: clarificatio

December 24 2002, 9:47 AM 

In the words of the old song:

You say 'possision' and I say 'position'
Jeff says 'possision' and I say 'position'
Possision? Possision? - Suspicion! Suspicion!

Gotcha! And, if I'm not much mistaken, the uncovering of your deception throws more than a little doubt on your story about your father, your sister and her best friend.

Time to call the whole thing off, I think.




 
 
Current Topic - Untitled  Respond to this message   
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  
Find more forums on SchoolsCreate your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2008 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement