|
Realistic DisciplineApril 21 2003 at 9:40 AM | Becky |
| - I have just been looking through the notes on school discipline, what I feels spoils things is the covert references to Miss Prim.
Sure she was good once - when there was nobody to compare her with, I know I must of spent thousands with her. Now I attend Miss Lancer's, there are no 'just tests' proper lessons actually, well the lady was Convent School taught and the deputy Headmistress was a boarder at a girls public school! So we get the most realistic school life available.
Petty rules, regulation uniforms and lady teachers who are not prepared to laugh whatever the disruption in class - just deal with it ... as was the case when I went to school.
If you would like to join in this great scenario take a look at www.ladyteacher.com -if you are just happy looking at pics and vids www.disciplinarian.com
Apart from all that I am looking for a ex/retired lady teacher who has experience of belting or caning girls on the hand.
Becky |
|
| Author | Reply |
C. Nickel
| Re: Realistic Discipline | April 21 2003, 10:46 AM |
I've just had a look at www.ladyteacher.com and it seems to be some sort of transvestite spanking club.
Some of the staff look frighteningly masculine and the dusky head girl who goes by the traditionally undusky name of 'Antonia Soames-Fraser' could easily pass for Fatima Whitbread's sister.
There's a video message from the Headmistress who speaks with an accent more reminiscent of trouble at t' mill than the halls of academe. The video does however include the bare-bottom caning of an attractive girl pupil.
I say 'caning' because a cane is used, but 'tapping' would be more accurate. If it's an example of the punishments to be expected at the school, a trip to the Head's office should hold no fears for even the most timid pupil.
It's all good fun but it's not cheap at £185 per day. |
|
T.T.
| I went to both! | April 21 2003, 11:52 AM |
I go to both the Muir and the ladyteacher, LADY TEACHER IS THE BEST - I just go to the Muir and Miss Prims because I KNEW them for a few years.
The canings are spot on in class! But I don't think they want to frighten people off. If you can take it you get it there, Miss Lancer breeds Horses and runs marathons so she really can lay it on!!
Regarding the transvestites, well all the ladyteacher staff are ladyteachers [very much so] but they present themselves as sternly as possible - but that touches a nerve Miss Prim does have another teacher an actual TRANSVESTITE.
On the question of value for money, if it was not that good so many like me would not have left the Muir to join THE WEST RIDING GRAMMAR SCHOOL. It has more lady teachers afterwards there is a resturant meal and party till about three o'clock in the following morning. It is THE value.
I have just played that video of Miss Melly on the site, SHE DOES NOT NORMALLY SPEAK LIKE THAT MUST BE STAGE NERVES.
T. T. |
|
Jayne
| CREDIT WHERE IT IS DUE! | April 21 2003, 11:58 AM |
Miss Lancer is the best Headmistress, her package is the best!
But then you always have to remember "You only get what you pay for"
I bet when Miss Lancer has been "teaching for as long as Miss Prim" She will have classes 5 times the size Miss Prim has!
I speak from experience [Not like C.NICKEL who never sees anyone]I have seen over 90 different mistresses, Miss Lancer is the way ahead.
|
|
Anonymous
| WHY | April 21 2003, 12:12 PM |
Can someone tell me why - whatever anyone does on this board C. NICKEL has to critise.
I bet he is a T.V. himself |
|
Steffosama
| Re: WHY | April 21 2003, 1:35 PM |
|
The rest of the message board
| Death to C. NICKEL | April 21 2003, 3:16 PM |
Here, Here.
An so say all of us
crucify him, Crucify him |
|
C. Nickel
| Re: Death to C. NICKEL | April 21 2003, 3:57 PM |
I say, chaps - steady on! |
|
Anonymous
| C. NICKEL needs .... | April 21 2003, 4:07 PM |
Nickel doesn't like it when he gets what he dishes out.
If we were all stiil in shorts and gymslips he would be going behind the bike sheds at playtime or in the stream at hometime.
We would get a canning but in this case it would have been well worth it.
A good dorm kangeroo court and summary justic would not go amiss |
|
C. Nickel
| Re: C. NICKEL needs .... | April 21 2003, 4:21 PM |
Of all the things that wouldn't go amiss, a dictionary appears to be top of the list in Anonymous's case.  |
|
Not an Anonymous Donation
| In Praise of C. Nickel | April 21 2003, 6:07 PM |
I am an admirer of C. Nickel. She has wit and charm and is included in the Friendly List. She is, moreover, very knowledgeable, which is more than can be said for most of you BASTARDS here.
Roger: Please add me to the Friendly List.
|
|
Anonymous
| NICKEL - YOU CAN'T GROW UP | April 21 2003, 6:07 PM |
That last posting proved it all! You really socially unacceptable -
I noted on an other message board someone named you and said you were not fit to burn,
I put the other opinion that you were .... a few minuts later another member added "the sooner the better"
What is a sad sod like you think you are proving
P.S.
Don't forget to press your anorak for the morning. Now be a good lad and book a holiday in Iraq
|
|
C. Nickel
| Re: NICKEL - YOU CAN'T GROW UP | April 21 2003, 7:54 PM |
The problem with postings by 'Anonymous' is that we have no idea which postings might be from the same source.
If one deliberately writes 'Anonymous' in the Name Box, your posting is credited to 'Anonymous'.
Likewise if one leaves the box blank, either deliberately or accidentally, one's posting is credited to 'Anonymous'.
The real problem is that one never knows how to respond to a posting by 'Anonymous' because one doesn't know if he's the Anonymous one knows to be a nice guy or if he's one of the many Anonymouses whose names are writ large in one's Bastard Book. |
|
Steffosama
| Re: Re: NICKEL - YOU CAN'T GROW UP | April 21 2003, 8:52 PM |
|
Jane
| THE REAL REAL PROBLEM | April 22 2003, 7:57 AM |
C. Nickel is right there is a problem on this board it is C. NICKEL
Jane |
|
Anonymous
| This is great | April 22 2003, 10:20 AM |
This is great, Nickel is getting what we have all wanted to say to him for ages.
So why does it not shovve off!
#
It is that dim it has not realised why none of put our names to these postings, CAN HE NOT GET THE MESSAGE??????? |
|
Spokesperson
| Re: This is great | April 22 2003, 11:15 AM |
Who is this 'we' that Anonymous mentions?
Does he really think others agree with him - or is he the Queen?
I know most people on this board think C.Nickel is absolutely brilliant so what is Anonymous talking about? |
|
Anonymous
| Did NICKEL give him a fiver?? | April 22 2003, 4:22 PM |
Well I suppose even Nickel has to have one supporter ... but what does he pay him? |
|
George Galloway MP
| Re: Did NICKEL give him a fiver?? | April 22 2003, 5:32 PM |
If he's paying him less than $600,000 a year, he's ripping him off.
Good PR doesn't come cheap. |
|
|
|
|