|
OUT THE SPOILERMay 10 2003 at 7:50 PM | Anonymous |
| - THERE IS NO GREATER SPOILER THAN C.NICKEL HE PROBABLY GOES TO TOWN WITH A PAIR OF KNICKERS ON HIS HEAD SO HE IS SURE HE IS LOOKING THE REAL **** HE IS!!
PISS OFF YOU GET |
|
| Author | Reply |
C. Nickel
| Re: OUT THE SPOILER | May 10 2003, 10:11 PM |
If Anonymous's brain were made of dynamite, it's clear there wouldn't be enough to blow his hat off. |
|
Julie
| Anon is right! | May 11 2003, 7:04 AM |
This Anon guy is right, this board would be better if Nickel departed and quickly.
I have just looked at how many threads have been running very well then he/she has to put a spanner in the works and ruins the whole thing.
Everytime it is with petty sniping and being totaly negative.
I agree Nickel you are not wanted infact most people don't like you and are fed up with you! |
|
JANE
| YES - GO!! | May 11 2003, 7:11 AM |
Nickel,
Have you never wondered why nobody ever defends you!
WE ALL WANT YOU TO GET LOST!!
Jane |
|
Roger
| Re: YES - GO!! | May 11 2003, 8:25 AM |
The Research Team are indebted to C. Nickel for her many contributions. |
|
Fred
| Re: YES - GO!! | May 11 2003, 8:28 AM |
I defend C. Nickel!
Most people agree with all the C.Nickel postings! |
|
Barney
| Re: Re: YES - GO!! | May 11 2003, 8:29 AM |
Three cheers for C. Nickel - the best poster on this site!
We LOVE you! |
|
Wilma
| Re: Re: Re: YES - GO!! | May 11 2003, 8:31 AM |
C. Nickel is fantastic.
Long may the postings continue! |
|
Betty
| Re: Re: Re: Re: YES - GO!! | May 11 2003, 8:32 AM |
I agree, C. Nickel is wonderful! |
|
Tony the Tiger
| Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: YES - GO!! | May 11 2003, 8:35 AM |
C.Nickel is GREEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAT ! |
|
Jason
| is C.Nickel a fraud?? | May 11 2003, 9:15 AM |
All of a sudden C. Nickel has support if you believe this thread.
Just look how many so called supportive postings were put in 1, 2 or 3 mins appart - NO HE PUT THEM ALL IN.
Again we are saying just go Nickel, we are all pissed off by you |
|
Proud Member
| In Praise of C. Nickel | May 11 2003, 9:30 AM |
I am honoured to be part of a clique that includes C. Nickel. |
|
Sherlock Holmes
| Re: is C.Nickel a fraud?? | May 11 2003, 9:44 AM |
Jason is quick to point out the short time intervals separating the pro-Nickel postings but fails to point out the short interval separating the anti-Nickel postings of the man posing as Julie and Jane.
Alliteration leads me to suspect that Jason, Julie and Jane might be related. |
|
terry
| I am fed up with c*** nickel to | May 11 2003, 10:24 AM |
There may well be a coincidence with the 2 anti Nickel posts.
But the number of pro ones so quickly tells us 2 things
C. NICKEL has no support all - and he is panicing.
People do not post this early usually on a Sunday morning.
So Nickel get yourself a life .... off this board pref!
|
|
Darwinian Man
| Kindness | May 11 2003, 11:01 AM |
I am despised by certain members of this forum, but one person has been kind to me. In the ‘Biography’ thread is a very special photograph just for me. It was sent by C. Nickel. |
|
Robin (not Peverett)
| Re: Kindness | May 11 2003, 12:10 PM |
Carry on, C. Nickel, with your super pieces of research and your kindnesses to the unfortunate! |
|
Webster Chambers O.E.D.
| Re: I am fed up with c*** nickel to | May 11 2003, 5:29 PM |
Terry says C. Nickel is "panicing" but I don't believe him.
Why would anyone ice a pan? |
|
Dermatologist
| Re: Re: I am fed up with c*** nickel to | May 11 2003, 5:34 PM |
Nobody, I suppose, would ice a pan
P.S. I know Terry in real life. His surname is Bull-Ackney |
|
|
|
|