Hi Lotta Idiot (think I got that right.)

Its come to my attention that you don't believe I exist, that Lady Pandora wrote the article on her site to boost her image.

Well I guess you suit your name and you talk a lotta nonsense as well as being called it.

I am very much real, I do exist, and I guess its just pure jealously on your part because you can't have what others possess. But I guess lifes a Bitch and had I been the vindictive type which Lady Pandora will tell you I'm not I'd say something similiar about you. But instead I just feel sorry for you that you have to go through life in such a way its just so sad.

So dear girl (if thats what you are?) may I suggest you grow up and discover what real life is all about, being so poisonous only hurts yourself dear no one else.

At the end of the day I know I exist and so does Lady Pandora so wind your neck in little girl and get off the case

Netty. ( Very much alive and kicking.)

Very good posting, netty!

Its also come to my attention that lots of people don't believe I exist either, that Charlotte Bronte invented me in a book to boost her image.

I am very much real, I do exist, and I guess its just pure jealously on people's part because they can't have a mad woman running around in their attic.

Jane Eyre.

Well said, netty and Jane!

A lot of idiots don't believe I exist either. They think I was invented by William Shakespeare to boost his image.

I am very real indeed - and they're just jealous because they can't be rich and beautiful and have boyfriends committing suicide over them.

J. Capulet (Ms).

It was delightful to have a posting from such a well respected fictional historic figure as Jane Eyre on our humble forum. It gives us an opportunity to ask about what really happened at Lowood School. In Edward Anthony's "Thy Road and Staff" on page 179 he refers to the rarity of schoolmasters whipping girls, still less on their bare bottoms, even in the early nineteenth century but then refers to the greater likelihood of whippings being administered to girls by women teachers. In a footnote he states: "The classic literary example is Miss Scatcherd's birching of Helen Burns in Jane Eyre. This punishment was inflicted on the back of the neck, but at Cowan Bridge School for the Daughters of Clergy (the model for Lowood), girl pupils were birched on the more usual place, and it is likely that Miss Bronte bowdlerised this excoriation in order to conform to contemporary rules of propriety."
Can Jane help us with this? Or can anyone else tell us the source of information on Cowan Bridge School (near Kirkby Lonsdale) which Mr Anthony so confidently makes his statement?

yeah you exist netty but lady p is pulling your strings . she says jump you say how high

Congratulations in finding anouther thread on which to post the same old boring foolish postings. Your brain cell is working over time it has only taken you 2 weeks.

And you point is?????

You know something Anonymous.....jealousy eventually rots the soul and you end up bitter and twisted, but I guess from reading what you write you've already reached that point, you sad sad person.

Juliet Barker, "The Brontes" 1994, pp. 117, 125:

‘Crofton Hall, near Wakefield, was a country house run as a boarding school for young ladies. Misdemeanours, such as failing in lessons, were punished by having to learn Bible lessons or dictionary excerpts, wearing the dunce's cap or being sent early to bed; graver offences, such as lying, thieving, or obstinacy, merited whipping.’

There is no doubt that 'Jane Eyre' was based upon Charlotte's real experiences at the Clergy Daughters' School."

Charlotte Bronte, ‘Jane Eyre’ 1847, Chapter VI:

"'You dirty, disagreeable girl! you have never cleaned your nails this morning.'

My attention was now called off by Miss Smith. Till she dismissed me, I could not pursue my observations on Miss Scatcherd's movements. When I returned to my seat, that lady was just delivering an order, of which I did not catch the import; but Helen Burns immediately left the class, and, going into the small inner room where the books were kept, returned in half a minute, carrying in her hand a bundle of twigs tied together at one end. This ominous tool she presented to Miss Scatcherd with a respectful courtesy; then she quietly, without being told, untrussed her pinafore and the teacher immediately and sharply inflicted on her neck a dozen strokes with the bundle of twigs. ... 'Hardened girl! exclaimed Miss Scatcherd, 'nothing can correct you of your slatternly habits: carry the rod away.'"

All things considered, this fictional episode is probably the best evidence we have that the birch really was used in Victorian girls' schools.

Every one will wonder at the oddity of 'neck'! Would that not be dangerous - to the eyes? How near the word is to 'back' - that stock Victorian epithet for the nates! Could it be that we have here an instance of a publisher getting his printer to set something a little less risqué?

Calm down, Researcher.

It may be that, on some distant planet, the daughters of gentlefolk were routinely birched on their bare bums in front of their classmates - but not on planet Earth.

It never happened.

Lady Pandora was birched when she was a pupil in Ireland and I’m still waiting to read about it.

It's a great story, Big Muncher - but it never happened.

After many weeks, Deep Pan has come to the aid of the world's CP researchers by suggesting that the above type of birching was common in the convent schools of Southern Ireland as recently as the 1970s.

Furthermore, she claims to have experienced it at first hand (or at least first neck!).

Why then did she not volunteer the information when the matter was raised on this thread? Her failure to do so is rendered even more strange by the fact that her alleged minion 'Netty' started this thread and it is therefore to be assumed that the Deep Pan camp was reading the thread to watch its progression.

Netty gave us no indication of her existence either before or after her two contributions above and it may therefore reasonably be suspected that she is none other than Freddie in disguise. That makes it even more strange that the Deep Pan camp didn't come forward to assist Researcher in his quest for information re neck birching.

'Why should they?' you might ask - and indeed they have a right to remain silent if they so wish, but isn't Deep Pan the one who never tires of reminding us of her unrelenting efforts to serve, help, assist, support and expand the CP scene? Surely a brief note on this thread wouldn't have troubled her? Certainly, it would have brought her considerable kudos and no little gratitude from the world's CP researchers, many of whom (like our own dear Researcher) have long puzzled over the mystery of Ms Eyre's neck birching. It would have been a major contribution to the world's understanding and knowledge of school CP.

What, therefore, was the reason for her silence?

Perhaps she will enlighten us?

This is becoming so very tedious, not to mention rather concerning. It appears that Lotta nonsense has now developed an obsession with me and is quickly joining certain other disturbed individuals as an online stalker.

I didn't reply to Researchers questions because I missed the thread. I do have a real life and I am incredibly busy. If Researcher would care to contact me direct, I will gladly furnish him/her with all relevants facts in my possession. I flatly refuse to waste my time catering to the one hand typist brigade by printing salacious details online.

Whilst I am obviously flattered that certain people are made so very insecure by my success that they have to waste a large portion of their sorry, sad little lives trying to discredit me, I am afraid I must go as I have a new video to prepare for release; I have a Day School to prepare for, a Munch to arrange and a Summer Fete & Disco to organise. I also have a very nice young lifestyle couple staying with me at present ... free of charge. Bang goes the much vaunted assertion that I only do things for money!

Regards,
Lady Pandora

Lady Pandora wrote: ‘a new video to prepare for release’.

This should read ‘a new video to prepare for private release’.

Carl and His Mats

Lotta Nonsense

Sarajane

Freddie JimJams

Bob T

Saro

Phil and Dorothy Holden of Basildon

Netty

I am very concerned at the large number of On-Line Stalkers that we have on this forum.

Does anyone have in their possession a photograph of any of these disturbed people?

Freddie





Netty

Thank you Lotta dear for your nice photos. They are almost as rare as this one of Phil and Lulu.

ohhhhhhh thank you lotta twat.......I've not read this forum for a while because I couldn't bear to be parted from my pjs or teddy bear and wouldn't dream of spitting the dummy!

I hate to disillusion you but that isn't me dear I'm alot more good looking and have a side parting not a midline parting.

I guess your just jealous because if they put up a picture of you it would have three heads and posionous sores as your poison itself.




As for online stalking which I've also been accused of ummmmmm would that cowardly person like to provide the evidence? then think about getting a bloody good lawyer for protection in court over slander? Some how I think not because like most people on here your a sad git and probably do this yourself.

I know who I am and obviously most people on here don't and suffer with very sad illusions of grandeur whereas in my real world I don't need too

Netty

Why dont you just GIVE IT A REST and FOCK Off from this board. You are a first class TW*T.

Why do you assume that all the people Lady Pandora spanks are fictional?

Why do you carry on this stupid crusade over the birchings?

You are BORING, You are SAD, You are a DICKHEAD

It takes a lot of courage to make a statment like that and then hide behind a name like Anon. And BTW, who the hell are you to tell someone to get off this forum?
I am convinced that Lotta has the best interests of this forum in mind. I can't say the same for this invasion of Lady P and her horde of patrons who only want to use this forum to advertise her over priced services and 'munches', picnics,etc., which are all aimed at increasing her client list.
The name you see at the left of this message is my real name. The email address attached to it is my real email address. If you had a single hair on your arse, you would do the same and quit hiding behind Anon. If you have got the balls to post that kind of a message, why not put your name on it?

This is all getting rather dreary. What I want to know is, if I came to a munch, would grosvenor pie be provided?

It has come to my attention that out of 4 billion pages in Google, only 23 pages contain the phrase "grosvenor pie". I want some before it dies out entirely, and I still want to know how they make the hard-boiled egg go all the way through from one end to the other.

Because, remaining anonymous is easier, it prevents wenkers such as Lotta getting their teeth into other, real people.

Nobody really knows who Lotta is, just everybody knows he is a tw*t.

I have emailed you. But I doubt the wisdom of doing so as you will probably expose my real name, identity and job on this board.

Sorry, haven't received any mail from you.I clicked on my name just to make sure, and it is the correct address. So you must have had a dream about it.

Dear Lotta; When replying to ant future posts by Anon, please try to incorporate the word Poltroon.

Gladys; You also have my blessing to use the word however you see fit.

The word on the street in Basildon is that Anon is Phil and Doris Holden of Basildon.

Phil is a retired Dulux salesman and Daisy is a social worker in Wigan.

alaric - perhaps in your day as the last embers of the Roman imperium sputtered out in the West there were indeed no more than 23 web pages mentioning that disgusting confection grosvenor pie, however today google throws up a list of them three pages long, even with "similar results ommitted", and one can only conclude that your prediction of its impending extinction is a grosvenor lie put about to engender amongst the toiling masses fear of the end of civilisation as we know it in the hope that they will with one accord rise up and peacefully and respectfully demand of those set in authority over us; compulsory id cards, antisocial behaviour orders against all persons between the ages of 10 and 25, judicial caning for persons suspected to be of a pervy disposition and a minimum five year jail term for ****ing on public transport and ten years if the offence is committed without a ticket but your plan will come to naught as there are dark forces at work in this c***try of which we know nothing other than that they have a finger in every pie.