--


  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  

More on Knickers

January 18 2005 at 6:45 AM
Peter 

-
I found the following piece in a Yahoo Group. It is brilliant. The author is a bit kinky, but altruistic, and I am sure that he won’t mind his post appearing here.

He writes:

A recent report in the UK has probably consigned that abiding item of
CP-related clothing, the gym knicker, to history as an actively worn
garment. According to a Government report on school sports, the active
involvement of girl pupils has been hampered for years by fears about
ridicule and exposure of the body. It is to become common policy now
to allow tracksuit bottoms and fashionable tops to be worn to
encourage participation. But if only modern schoolgirls could see into
the heads of those boys (and, indeed other girls) they are so worried
about attracting scorn from, they would not be so quick to dump a
uniform that has served to excite lifelong passions for so many of us
through the years. Although it has changed to suit the times - from an
extremely baggy garment with legs that came down the thighs, through
the rather neater briefs so enticingly displayed in that wonderful St
Trinian’s hockey match in the second film of the series, to the 70s and
80's somewhat tighter, nylon knicker - this item of clothing has
always fascinated precisely because it did not reveal much at all.
Providing adequate cover of the buttocks and crotch, it both protected
decency while at the same time allowing a girl to run freely, her legs
exposed to the elements. Or do we now consider that exposed legs is
too risqué? Given the length of skirt of choice of today's teenagers, I
don't think so. More than likely, it is just one more concession to
individualism, and a step away from the discipline of formal
uniformity, so despised by moderns. Not that uniformity itself is
despised - what could be more uniform than fashion consciousness. But
that is a uniformity dictated by commerce. And such commerce sells
chiefly through sexuality. So, perversely, our modern social leaders
are dumping an uncommercial but subtly 'sexy' outfit for the brasher,
sexiness of sportswear and all that it signals (how long before the
prettier girls assert their own peer pressure on the rest to wear the
kind of buttock-revealing athletic briefs so favoured by mature
athletes). What a pity! No wonder our youth are undisciplined and
immoral. Among the many signs of the 'leave them to it' philosophy
that saw the cane abolished and has now outlawed smacking, this has to
go down as a major milestone.



 
 Respond to this message   
AuthorReply
Sill Lee Asso

Re: More on Knickers

January 18 2005, 2:35 PM 

How you know he altruistic?

 
 
Peter

Re: More on Knickers

January 18 2005, 5:08 PM 

He lives in a suburb of Sheffield and is known as ‘Altruistic Arthur of Attercliffe'.

 
 
Current Topic - More on Knickers  Respond to this message   
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  
Find more forums on SchoolsCreate your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2008 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement