How is it that girls those seedy spanking films can take anything up to 25 strokes of the cane following a severe strapping and usualy also after a spanking? most of us guys who were at school in the age of CP could just about cope with six of the best?

Have they got some method to make it hurt less, or are they just really sued to pain? Some of them are really young 18/19 so it can't really be just that their used to it can it?

I've only seen a few clips posted on the internet - the impression I have is that the accoustics of the rooms used amplify the sound effects over what you would hear normally. But otherwise it's a good question! All I can suggest is that they have a high tolerance to pain.

Simple. They thoroughly enjoy it. I have had girls thank me after a (seedy????) photoshoot because they have had such a lovely time having their bums caned. They also make a profitable living out of enjoying themselves. Think about. If some men like being caned, why on earth wouldn't the same apply to some women.

I agree that some girls must enjoy it the same as men, but most girls on those sites seem to have got into it through mainstream glamour modelling. I mean there must be some that have a go but really can't cope with the pain, and give up after the first session, or mid session, aren't there?

I didn't mean to suggest that it is a seedy industry, but the clips I've seen have been a little on the seedy side.

The marks from a caning of that type must stay around for days?
I'm guessing these girls need a rest after each shoot in order for their bruises to heal, so that they have a an unmarked bottom for the next set of pictures?

If you are wondering whether the videos are faked in some way or if the recipients have been given pain-killers, in my experience that it is not the case. I give corporal punishment to both males and females and generally find that the females can take many more strokes of the cane than males. The marks are less severe, too. I guess it has something to do with the anatomy of their bottoms. However, most of my female "pupils" go weak at the knees when I get my slipper out!

Tim

Why...does the slipper hurt them more? Girls do tend to have plumper bottoms does this mean that the cane has less muscle to bruise, but that the slipper with it's larger impact area is worse for them?

Would this mean that spankings and slipperings would be worse than the cane for girls? Meaning that school had it all the wrong or right way depending on your disposition?

As the Divinyls once said in a pop song, - endorphins in action presumably - but there still must be limits to that?

It's a question of natural bodily adaptation. If you take enough canings, your skin will grow tougher. Some boys at my school had had so many canings, they had arses made of rhino-hide.

Is all this connected to the fact that women are designed to endure the pain of child birth?

It seems there are girls who enjoy canings etc (or willingly submit to them) just as much as men although I suspect there are actually fewer masochists amonst females as perhaps many don't like their lovely skin scarred.

However having said that, for those few who really do enjoy pain, I think their natural ability to cope with it may well be greater than us 'weak' males.

This wouldn't, of course, lead one to think they would prefer caning to slippering unless they are more sensitive to surface pain than deeper pain.

Would be nice to hear views from genuine females who like to receive!

Yes, a couple of my female "pupils" have claimed that the slipper hurts more than the cane, although to be fair, they do get a longer dose of the slipper than they do of the cane.

Tim

I've heard it suggested that abuse victims may have a form of PTSD that drives them to recreate the trauma that was inflicted on them in the past, which may also induce a kind of "leaving your body" dissociative state. Of course, that assumes these girls were actually caned growing up.

Most of these girls are far too young to have known school corporal punishment...they would have to be at least thirty five or over to have been caned at state school, younger if they had been at public school, maybe thirty-ish. Very unlikely most of the models in spanking films are early twenties or at least they claim to be!

Does anyone know of a spanking model, perhaps one from the seventies, eighties or early nineties CP world, who claims to have been caned/slippered etc.?

I suppose they could have been spanked or belted at home by a drunken dad!

A woman who was once active in the ‘scene’ tells of being slippered at school in a short piece titled ‘Re: slipper’. It is about half way down the page.

http://www.britishspanking.com/forums/showthread.php?s=bd8d6a61e96a7ca29803196e7f6e56de&t=3568

The account referred to by Pete (above) is very obviously a fantasy.

Wake up, gentlemen.

Returning here to see what's happening I find nothing has changed. Everyone is in a fantasy world, according to Miss Know-it-all and CP is all a myth and never happened. I can assure you, Lotta, it did happen and in my humble opinion the world is no better a place since it was banned in our schools.
Oh, and Happy New Year to you, Jonathan!

If your posts are not to be met with derision, Danny, you'll have to supply a link or a reference to the places where I make the absurd suggestions you attribute to me.

Alas, you do not - and as long as you insist on inventing things I'm supposed to have said, you'll remain unable to do so.

Surely, nobody on Earth doubts that CP was a daily (if not more frequent) reality in many British schools right up to the day of abolition.

Indeed, at the height of its popularity, it was a reality experienced by dozens of pupils every day at some of our public schools.

That having been said, it remains a fact that where teenage boys were so punished, exceedingly few of them were ever punished by female teachers and where teenage girls were so punished, the number punished by male teachers is utterly minuscule.

It also remains a fact that over 99% of 'females' posting and chatting on CP websites are males in disguise.

Wake up, gentlemen!

I don't think anyone here wishes Lotta any harm, myself included.

You are in no danger unless you ask for it, Lotta.

But if this same old rubbish that the entire forum is tired of reading continues you can expect to be publicly made an example of.

Lotta says

'Surely, nobody on Earth doubts that CP was a daily (if not more frequent) reality in many British schools right up to the day of abolition.

Indeed, at the height of its popularity, it was a reality experienced by dozens of pupils every day at some of our public schools.

That having been said, it remains a fact that where teenage boys were so punished, exceedingly few of them were ever punished by female teachers and where teenage girls were so punished, the number punished by male teachers is utterly minuscule.'

True, but a minuscule number of girls spanked and caned by male teachers, in comparison to the thousands and thousands of boys spanked and caned each day by male teachers would still add up to quite a number of the former.

Certainly enough for quite a few contributors on sites such as this one to be telling the truth, even in the vast majority may be fictions. The thing is I can't imagine Lotta ever believing a female contributor who says she was spanked or caned by a male teacher!

I recall reading somewhere that one of the company’s who make these films, would attend magistrate and county court hearings and target girls, mainly single mums who had a CCJ against them or large fines for something like now having a TV licence.

They would offer the clear the girl’s debt for her, in exchange for her appearing in one of their films. No doubt some girls would think a few strokes of the cane, however painful, would be a small price to pay to clear their debts.

Sorry, Mikey, but this is simply journalistic fantasy.

Probably false but I do like the idea, I suppose because it means in a way the girls are actually being punished for a real offence, rather than just play-acting...probably complete nonsence though!