Are there any teachers or ex-teachers on this board? If so did you use corporal punishment on your pupils and what were your methods.

Yes and No. I was quite capable of controlling classroom behavior without resorting to hitting children.

Yes, I am a teacher, I have used corporal punishment, I do use corporal punishment. I only visit this board occasionally today, as I run my own forum where I find it much easier to keep the most obvious fetish posters away. Not that I am criticising this board - there's a place for free speech without the censorship I impose, but personally my time is too valuable to wade through a lot of nonsense.

That's extremely wise because we do indeed have a Lot of Nonsense here. Some would say too much. Just out of curiosity, why are you telling us this?

Yes, I am a teacher, I have used corporal punishment, I do use corporal punishment. I only visit this board occasionally today, as I run my own forum where I find it much easier to keep the most obvious fetish posters away. (Dr. Dominum)

Pa...lease. Your forum is just as full of fetishists as any other place you can find on the internet that deals with this topic. The only difference with your forum is that you approve all messages and the fetish talk is kept off the public board and what is there is disguised to seem like academic interest in caning. Fact is, I can't think of a better place to get more detailed accounts of boys and girls being caned: how, when, where, for what, how often, pants up, pants down, and on and on and on. There are even charts and graphs.

You may say interest there is not fetishistic and that the site isn't a fetish site or that you aren't into it even though you claim to have spent a lifetime caning children even though you really hate it but my wise old mum used to say "if it looks like duck and it waddles like a duck and it quacks like a duck...it's most likely a duck."

Because somebody asked if there were any teachers here, and if they used corporal punishment, and so I answered their question. I added a little more information because I used to be a reasonably regular poster here about two or three years ago now, and I thought that my reappearance might have left some people wondering where I'd been. Call it a preemptive to a question that might never be asked.

Pa...lease. Your forum is just as full of fetishists as any other place you can find on the internet that deals with this topic. The only difference with your forum is that you approve all messages and the fetish talk is kept off the public board and what is there is disguised to seem like academic interest in caning. Fact is, I can't think of a better place to get more detailed accounts of boys and girls being caned: how, when, where, for what, how often, pants up, pants down, and on and on and on. There are even charts and graphs. (Rez)

It's probably true that my forum has as many fetishists as most, that's true. I didn't say that I'm able to keep them all away - just that I find it easier to keep the most obvious fetishists away - I see their names before they are allowed to join the list and they have to provide reasons for joining. Those who are obviously fetishists and nothing else are not generally approved for membership. Of course, if people lie - and it's not hard to do - they can get past that, but I wind up rejecting at least a third of potential members so it keeps some undesirables of the lists.

And because all messages have to be approved, obvious fetish posters can often be identified before their first post gets to the list and they can be removed.

I don't stop them all, but I do stop the most obvious ones - and some of them are incredibly obvious. Even in Alabama, I'd expect an English teacher to be able to spell reasonably well.

I don't block all fetishists - if they are willing to be open about their interest and not try and pretend to be something they are not, I generally allow their presence. A persons sexuality doesn't preclude them having valid views.

I must say I find it fascinating that on one hand I get criticised because I won't reveal every piece of information some people seem to think I should and on the other I have to deal with criticism when I do provide significant general detail. You can't please anyone, so I'm afraid I've given up trying. I provide the level of information I believe is appropriate. Yes, I describe incidents, both recent and historical on occasion, and, yes, I give quite detailed statistical information. I personally think that this should be as out in the open as possible, consistent with my duties and responsibilities to my pupils and to my school.

On any CP forum, the overwhelming majority of contributors are fantasists and that applies as much to those claiming to be schoolteachers as to any other group.

I simply cannot believe that Dominum is a 'real' teacher who is administering 'real' CP to 'real' children in a 'real' school.

If he were, he would have identified many years ago and dismissed from his job as the dangerous pervert he undoubtedly would be if he were genuine.

On any CP forum, the overwhelming majority of contributors are fantasists and that applies as much to those claiming to be schoolteachers as to any other group. (Lotta Nonsense)

Agreed.

I simply cannot believe that Dominum is a 'real' teacher who is administering 'real' CP to 'real' children in a 'real' school. (Lotta Nonsense)

I am almost positive that he is indeed a Deputy Headmaster at a prestigious boys independent school in Melbourne, Australia. CP is still allowed and practiced there---this I know with absolute certainty, although it is kept very quiet. The new education law presently being considered there may very well put a stop to CP in these independent schools. No CP has been used in government schools for years.

If he were, he would have identified many years ago and dismissed from his job as the dangerous pervert he undoubtedly would be if he were genuine. (Lotta Nonsense)

Not necessarily---the acceptance of CP at these schools is amazing among the staff, students and parents. They all like to claim that CP is good for kids and those that do admit a sexual CP interest always say how they can separate their fetish interest from the use of CP at school. On his forum, Dr. Dominum has admitted to being sexually aroused in the past from caning a female student yet insists that it is all right for someone who is sexually aroused by the practice to continue to engage in the practice all long as the CP they administer sticks to procedure.

What frightens me most about this sort of situaiton isn't that Dr. Dominum's SchoolCP Group at Yahoo is a fetish group pretending to be otherwise but that he is really a known and respected educator in his area and has been so successful at fostering the use of CP with real children. I have never met anyone who wasn't a fetishist who was so devoted to CP and spent so many hours talking about, writing about, making charts about, describing specific details of CP as the good doctor.

The Old Boys CP enthusiasts stick together and they defend each other and the practice of CP with a loyalty that is astounding.

Lotta, I would certainly like to believe you are right about all this being fantasy---but believe me I have too much information from several different, dependable sources that it is not.

She's at it again. If we let her, Lotta will once again deflect attention to irrelevant, silly side-issues, Larry1951 will rush around deleting things (detrimental to Lotta!), topics will be forgotten and the whole shebang will descend into chaos as it has many times before.

The trick is to completely ignore Lotta.

She's at it again. If we let her, Lotta will once again deflect attention to irrelevant, silly side-issues, Larry1951 will rush around deleting things (detrimental to Lotta!), topics will be forgotten and the whole shebang will descend into chaos as it has many times before.

The trick is to completely ignore Lotta. (Conquistadore Jim)


Gee Jim...what exactly have you added to this thread other than to slam Lotta? If you disagree with her then perhaps you should either take your own advice or rebut what she has to say. So what is your take on the issues raised in this thread?

On the strict understanding that this kind of thing can happen.....

Oh, sorry I'm not Yul Brynner, am I & this isn't The King & I.

On the strict understanding that I'm a happily married man, who is NOT intending to do anything about it & is typing with both hands on keyboard.......


Lotta is a BABE! And she has a sense of humour! How can you ignore either??

Lotta is a BABE! And she has a sense of humour! How can you ignore either?? (Steve M)

Can't speak to her Babe-a-liciousness but her sense of humor is definitely a fun ride.

Teachers with an interest in this who are reading this site are probably not what you think. It's one thing to have fantasies. The real world is something else. In a real situation hurting a student is not something I ever want to do. It's one thing to read about others' experiences of the past. In the classroom all you want's a bunch of really nice, enthusiastic kids. When other teachers are punishing students it's a strange feeling. I empathize with them in a strange way. If a student getting punished is a real trouble maker you hope it helps straighten them out. If it's someone you think can be corrected some other way it sucks and if the teacher doing the punishing looks like it's out of anger it pisses you off. I like to lurk this board sometimes to read about scenes in a different country than where I work.

Teacher in the U.S. and author of the above message,

Thank you for your interesting piece. Please supply a nom-de-plume. Anonymous contributions are not permitted on this forum.

I'm not in the U.S. You can call me Ajoshi-dude.

Ajoshi-dude, I agree with much of what you have to say. The reality of punishing children for many of us is very different from the fantasy. That said, I do think it is almost never appropriate for a spanking fetishist to spank children especially in school. And I never think it is right to hit children with implements like canes, paddles, straps, etc---too severe and too dangerous.