The layout of the ‘RE: Frantasies (Continued)’ thread has become aesthetically unacceptable. Please continue commenting on, what they are calling in Burgess Hill, the ‘Full Frantal’ here below.

TONY

How is a man to keep his e-bay listings and fantasy football going?

Anyway,the technical trick is to respond to the bottom message on the page, not the earlier one you are answering. If you put the recipent's name up top, we can all follow the thread as it cross-references! Mind you, this thread needs to go on a fruit diet,too, like me.

I'm not defending Lotta, just my own views. I know damn well what is on Fran's posting DID happen occasionally, but very occasionally in the 60's & 70's. It may have happened more frequently. but still not all the time or everywhere between 1946 and 1963. I'd also say primary school was always possibly another matter altogether.

Lotta HAS actually posted before that her problem is not that what Fran says NEVER happened, rather that it didn't happen to Fran, at least not a GIRL now posting as Fran! That is not entirely unreasonable, and it STILL doesn't preclude Fran being a woman, who overheard this at the time.

Lotta's views are not necessarily mine. She has posted before that no woman would yearn for a complete stranger to spank them-I know differently! She is, though, correct in saying that the vast majority of women wouldn't so desire-sorry to be ambivalent here, can't be arsed to look up what Lotta actually said!

I think the raincoat anaology is interesting. Don't however forget the thoughts of Chairmam Mao:

Man who carry raincoat in case of storm may find himself in paedophile storm if passing girl's school when it's not raining!

You are right about black and white-it's the preserve of the young(Lotta) or the prejudiced old hack(me) to see life as such.

DANNY

Thanks-you know Lotta is a little minx! If she were reasonable more often, she wouldn't be so lovable, nor as interesting, nor as typically female, either!

MIMI

Yes, it did indeed go on in our lives. Just so long as we don't start getting into the areas of boy's school plays & what those assigned female parts got into re costume, we'll probably be OK!

My own view would be Lotta was either a script or floor manager, or even wrote the play-I think she is too gifted to be a mere performer, unlike me, the only Captain Hook to have an entire audience applauding me & booing Peter Pan-that including PP's parents! If only they'd had camcorders in 1957!!!!


Steve

Yes, Lotta is a little minx but lovable too! Where would this forum be without her constancy? The problem is she puts people off of telling their stories to us all. I, for one, would relate some of the tales of the days when I was the headmistress of an all girl's school somewhere in deepest Basildon (or was it Peacehaven, I always get those two mixed). It was before my sex change, of course, when my name was Madam Danniele. I won't tell you about all those bottle green knickered hissies I caned because I'm sure Lotta would have some silly comment about knowing it happened somewhere to someone but not to old Danny. So I'll just have to keep hoping that one day we hear from another female who our little minx can believe.

DANNY


The question is whether you can remember if the bottle-green knickers were part of the uniform or not.

You didn't by any chance in another life have the headmistressship of Cheltenham Ladies college, too? I believe that august lady once commanded every girl in the establishment at assembly to lift up their skirts, rather than their voices.

Thus was she able to establish that every one of her charges was wearing the regulation bottle-green knickers prescribed. Prescribed presumably to disinterest anyone of the other sex for life-??

The best part was that she did not tell anyone until this unilateral display of uniformity that anyone NOT in green would have been swiftly advanced to the stage for six of the cane across the non-u underwear! Clearly NOT a woman to be trifled with!


Steve

No, it must have been someone else. I was only ever an under-mistress at CLC

DANNY


It's getting too late at night for a full pun, but that certainly sounds the sort of position many of us here would've given our eye teeth to've been in!


Steve

Yes, I admit it was one of more comfortable positions I've found myself in over the years, Steve,

The hilarious Frantasies continue to provide fabulous entertainment as the man formerly known as 'Fran' continues in his absurd attempts to convince us he's a once-green-knickered female.

Gullible fools will, of course, always be gullible and will always be fooled.

Grow up, you silly little fool. We don't need another round of this.

Tony,

Please moderate your language.

Thank you.

Compare my language to the post immediately above mine.

What I wrote is accurate.

In the latest reprinted Frantasie, Fran says "none of you understand . . . the menopause".

That might be true but, as long as some of us understand the men(pretendingtobewomen)opause, frauds like Fran and his gender-bending ilk will continue to receive short shrift on this forum.

On August 19 2006, in response to questions about IP numbers (to determine whether there is any truth in Lotta's improbable, boring asssertions), Subscriptions Manager posted "As a relative newcomer to this Forum, you may not have realised that Fran and Deus ex Machina are one and the same."

When asked for justification, on August 20 2006, Research Assistant replied; "The answer lies in the Frantasies. All will be made clear when the Full Frantal is published."

Following some entertaining, realistic preliminaries describing school life and repeated descriptions of the same cp experience, the Frantal has contained weeks of disjointed comments that are almost entirely side issues and bits of fill in. I get the strong impression the Frantal is being spun out for the sake of it, as opposed to leading to meaningful conclusions...?

(Meanwhile there is an ever increasing feeling that Fran is female and exactly who she says she is. This confidence in Fran's gender hints that, while improbable, if there is any connection between Fran and Deus, Deus is a pen name of Fran, meaning that that Deus is also female, not the other way around!)

The mystery of colluison and support for Lotta, the forum's number one disruption and disturbance, the refusal to provide confirmation or denial of Fran's identity (IP numbers of the many posts by Deus and Fran) and the forum administration's own strangely misfitting claim about Fran remains to be resolved. Just like Lotta's silly wishful thinking, has the forum administration made unfounded assertions that they are now trying to cover up with smoke and mirrors? If this Fran and Deus issue is all a giant practical joke it might be excusable, even praisable, but I fail to detect the slightest hint of humour from either parties.

While we are waiting for the outcome, Lotta, may we suggest you refrain from making dumb statements.

Every time you have been asked to provide evidence to support what you claim, you have shown yourself to be a complete time-wasting fool.

LOTTA

I,too, strongly suspect no self-respecting woman would write that-there are plenty of men who DO understand it and act appropriately when it descends on their loved one.

You don't need to be in touch with your feminine side either. Just have some respect for the many things the woman in question has brought to your relationship.

Don't worry-It was my wedding anniversary last month & I didn't forget.

You and others may be interested in this archive print, which took a bit of sourcing--could this be Fran composing a post?





Steve