Corporal punishment in primary school seems to be far less regulated than at secondary school. On the odd occasion I have looked at spanking pornography it seems to reflect cp at primary school far more than secondary. This actually makes me feel a little uneasy I mean does much of the fantasy come from primary school reality? and if so isn't that a bit worrying?

Spanking porn does seem to feature a lot of bare bottom spanking, which was a feature of primary school discipline, but how often did that happen at secondary school?

Also the actresses playing these roles often seem to be portraying younger girls, sticking their tongues out, making exaggeratedly sulky faces, etc.
Although I have always had this obsession with cp as I'm guessing most people on here if their honest have, I do find the acting in these films a bit sick and disturbing and so I've given them up.

Why aren't they made to properly reflect the reality of secondary school corporal punishment rather than some sick age-play which makes my skin crawl, I mean many of the girls used by these companies are only a few years out of school surly they can play the part of real schoolgirls rather than exaggerated overgrown ten eight year olds ?

In the relatively 'modern' era, it was very rare for CP to be administered to an unprotected rear in English primary schools and it was exceedingly rare in English secondary schools.

I have heard of such cases but, when the teacher was male and the recipient female, the man was arrested and prosecuted every time.

Just trying to find a different angle to preach the same unwanted rubbish. Go away you little twerp.

Don't worry Ben strangely there are some people who would rather not discuss the topic of corporal punishment, god knows why these people populate a site dedicated to corporal punishment but there you go!

Or perhaps some people would rather not question the morality of their favourite type of videos for fear of ruining their next masturbatory viewing experience!

Personally I can’t help but agree with you, one thing I’ve noticed is that the M/M corporal punishment movies don’t fall into these cliché’s and are far more lifelike than the M/F ones which can’t seem to help themselves from playing up the whole juvenile, Lolita type side of it corporal punishment, unfortunately being straight these films do nothing for me, if only M/f films followed their example.

Ben, I think you need to recognise the source of these videos is companies (i.e. individuals motivated by profit) who are trying to appeal to a paying audience. Presumably the buyers find the content acceptable or they wouldn't buy.

All we can do here is sympathise or disagree with you, but the videos will remain unchanged.

Why don't you contact the owners and make constructive suggestions?

To clear up any misunderstanding I think I should point out that the twerp who is trying to find a different angle to preach the same unwanted rubbish is Lotta Nonsense and not the author if this topic.

Lotta said:
"I have heard of such cases but, when the teacher was male and the recipient female, the man was arrested and prosecuted every time."
*************************************************************************

Surely you mean every time that the girl complained? Perhaps there were shy nervous girls who were too embarrassed to tell anyone. There were many kids who were abused in childrens homes who only found they could talk about it when they became adults and said nothing at the time it happened, which in many cases where there have been investigations were up to 30 years ago.
There is no way of knowing if a girl was spanked on her bare bottom unless she tells someone and I'm guessing that many didn't.

J

You are right J - im sure many also didnt say anything because to do so would have meant worse at home. Also even recent studies in USA have shown that given a choice the CP option is actually preferred to other punishments. In olden UK times the consequences of a "letter home" would be the greater of the two evils anyway.

SC
(________ (=!=)

Dream on, boys.

Dream on!

I have to say I find the comments on this post more disturbing than the videos!

If we insist on insulting each other's views, can we please do so with less repetition of trite phrases? Please keep Celebratory Death Match in fantasy land-this is a forum, not a bloody boxing/plasticene wrestling ring!

As for the original post, paedos are your main concern, I suspect? I'm afraid there are a lot of far sicker sites out there, and actual children are used on them, including spanking sites. It usually earns a few bob for the poor parents, most often in some 3rd-world country, even more if their kids are then penetrated.

So, in contrast, what you saw is unlikely to provide any paedo with stimulation-they have worse things to do with someone's stolen credit card details. Always assuming they aren't already everybody's favourite uncle anyway, which seems to be the "safest" place for them.

And in case you are wondering,yes, I WAS abused as a child, by an uncle. And that's abused as in sexually molested, not spanked etc.

But it's good to hear people do still cringe at the thought of paedo-friendly sites; I wonder just how many paedos did enjoy themselves at our expense in primary school days?


Steve M

Save your scolding for something legitimate Steve.
As long as Lotta Nonsense continues to post unwanted rubbish you can anticipate a reply that will at a minimum discourage anyone new from taking the Nonsense seriously.
If you insist on pretending to be Lotta Nonsenses daddy you will merely increase the needless clutter on the forum. (We now have 4 posts as a result of 1).

At other forums I belong to, people just ignore the posts of people they don't like. Of course I've seen people try to drive away someone they don't like, but it has NEVER worked. Lotta is not going away just because some new member is angry about being outed as a female impersonator. It has been done before and tried before.

You should just thank your lucky stars Sarah Jane isn't here to rip you a new arse hole. 

Bob T

I think you are confusing Newer member’s comments to me who posted originally as New Member (now Ketta to avoid confusion) . I certainly did not take Lotta Nonsense’s attack on my posting personally or indeed found necessary to raise personal insults in return .

I endorse Steve’s comment above with regard to the personal witch hunt that one member of the forum seems to have taken in terms of insulting one particular other.

If one persons comments irritate or are continually annoying make your feelings known, challenge by all means walk away but not let’s get vindictively personal. Most of us are mature enough to rise above negative suggestions and make light humour in our replies. The message still gets across avoiding the necessity for direct insults.

Once again an original thread has been side step to acommodate personal attacks.
Ketta

On the ‘Girls and male teachers’ thread Steve wrongly claimed that Lotta usually provokes a lively debate. It is a bit disappointing to read her reply to my logical argument about why it is likely that girls were spanked on their bare bottom.
I do enjoy a good debate but her reply of ‘dream on’ is not very meaningful is it? I see no indication that Lotta is very intelligent and her replies are very childish. An intelligent adult would construct a persuasive argument to support their view but she hasn’t demonstrated an ability to do this.
Perhaps she is a child using her dad’s pc and we should excuse her childish writing? If that is the case then we should not want her to leave this site and accept our obligation to educate her?

It's not possible to to argue rationally with someone who is convinced that something is the case despite there being no evidence to support that view.

If people believe fervently in God or Allah or Santa Claus or ghosts, nobody will never succeed in changing their belief via rational debate. One or more of the aforementioned entities may exist but there is no way to prove or disprove that existence - so why bother arguing?

If the fantasy merchants wish to claim that something happened, let them produce evidence that it happened and our rational members can assess the evidence.

Until such evidence is produced . . . happy dreams!

Pompous. Delusioned. Arrogant.
Another deceptive attempt to turn the tables. Apart from incorrectly identifying the culprit its shortcoming is an underlying assumption that people here lack the intelligence to see through the rhetoric.
It is Lotta Nonsense who consistently tries to change belief on this forum.
And it is the same Lotta Nonsense who consistently fails to produce any evidence.

Our more intelligent readers will readily accept it's not possible to prove that something never happened to anyone, anywhere at any time.

Those same intelligent readers will also realise that just because one can't prove that something is not the case is no reason believe it is the case. Indeed, it's no reason even to begin to believe there's any reasonable probability it might be the case.

The world of CP is a world jam-packed with fantasy, lies and deception in which any randomly-chosen 'true' story is almost certain to be false. Indeed, the more interesting the story the more likely it is to be false.

It is, however, a very easy matter to decide the frequency with which school pupils were at any time in any place punished in a particular way - and that is to quote official documents which testify to such events.

Fantasists and wishful thinkers may, of course, continue believe what they wish but there is simply no evidence to support many of their beliefs.

Can anyone produce evidence that girls in a state of undress were ever punished by male teachers in British schools in circumstances which didn't lead to the man's prosecution?

Sorry Lotta Nonsense. No learning ability. No deductive ability.
Our opinion is unreliable because it wanders and changes to accommodate our preferences. If we put aside our self interest and seek truth we find that reality is dependable and reliable. The truth cares not for our opinion!
Lotta Nonsense is stuck on a treadmill that is disconnected from truth. From that handicapped position we appear to be the unintelligent ones because we do not see things with the same limited vision!
Yet almost everyone else can see these issues more clearly.

I usually agree with Lotta's deductions but I cannot understand why he/she has to act as if the readership here (with a few notable exceptions) cannot see these things for themselves?

Our more intelligent readers will readily deduce that my explanation was intended for our less intelligent readers.

I have noticed in life that the less intelligent a person is the more he believes he is the only one who has a Degree in 'The Bloody Obvious' (as Basil Fawlty would say).

What does the Lotta Nonsense Fanclub / Be Gentle and Nice Brigade have to say about todays (Oct 26) literary masterpieces in the Skirt Lifting topic? Once again we are seeing Lotta Nonsense lunge like a teenager on drugs at someone who wont aggressively fight back.
Come on Steve Bob Mike et al. Lets hear how you excuse your hero this time.
And Mr. Peacehaven / sole proprietor with so many names and faces. You are responsible for this too. You are quick to criticise threaten and delete when there is little or no cause. Why are genuine problems ignored? When can we expect to see a meaningful response from you to keep this "Happy Circle" intact?

I've just posted-Lotta has missed something.



Steve

Bravo Steve. But how do you excuse your hero for lunging like a teenager on drugs at someone who wont aggressively fight back?

Lotta's beef is quite clearly with the researcher, not our esteemed contributor.

And if the researcher isn't around to fight his/her corner, I would have to say tough luck, for writing such hooey in the first place.


Steve

Lotta’s bits in the Skirt Lifting thread are great. The one sent in at 2.28pm today is almost pornographic.

Superb!