http://www.ealingtimes.co.uk/display.var.1774189.0.0.php

posted on another forum

SC

I think there's been a mis-translation here,reading the story.


Someone, somewhere has mistaken AU pair for OW Pair. Easily done?


Wonder who told the police? Mrs BTP? Bet it wasn't Griselda!



Steve M

She is over 16 it says-so whats the problem?I just dont get it?
the phrase "got her to..."is insidious....it ought to be "she consented to the suggestion.

I am angry about this story!!!!!
Its obvious this tart knew exactly what this hanky panky was all about!
And what are the "background matters"???????
Money ???
The fault here is entirely with the au pair if she wasnt sufficiently educated to know or sufficiently assertive to decline"hed bouht me it so i thought id better put it on...bollocks"
then thats her tuff luck she should go back to austria
its time the pyublic was stopped from hearing stories like this trivia
theres more puttin on school uniforms and smacking bums goes on in london every hour of the day than any place in europe!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
and why do corrupt councils like westminster council piously force public computer users to sign an onlue areement that porn is bad and that they wont look at it with one hand whilst accepting millions of pounds in tax and rates
in the other from industries in Soho based upon Porno entirely including GAY porno??????
if Wetsministre doesnt liek porno then dont take rate money for it!!!!!!!!
opne a line of disney world julie andrews souvenir shops instead!!!1
Typoes cos bozo is angry

BOZO

It ain't Westminster council taking money from porn;at least in my time working in Savile Row, my dinner-hour forays suggested other organisations were enjoying the fruits of immoral earnings.

No names, no packdrill, but let's just say that, had the present chief been around then, he would have been more appropriately know as Sir Ian BARE!

If you think DS Bob is or was bad..................!!


Steve M


PS-I agree about the non-news angle;the magistrate should have spanked her properly & then jailed the BTP rozzer under the Trades Descriptions Act!!

Now we started how about the nice man being summoned under the 'Health and Safety Act', that way he could have been found guilty for not taking down her knickers himself to ensure no damage was done.

MONTY

I retain as keen an interest in H & S as S & M.

Could you, or others, suggest ways in which I could spank any girl I CHOSE in the office in the interests of H & S without any disciplinary comeback? Please also bear in mind equal opps legislation in the Civil Service-how could I choose the recipient without having to offer the same service to every old hound in the building?

Yours intriguied-you might just be on to something!


Steve M

Ahhh now then Steve.

Not sure of the Civil service rules you see. Although I do know of many old hounds as you call them that would welcome the chance to present 'ones posterior' for correction.Place a laminate on the notice board asking for names to take part in a team building exercise to be left on your voice mail.
Chances are that any lady who would submit to this discipline will be in her late fifties plus as of the banning of the cane at school, you should therefore be very selective in choosing your prey. I suggest that the only way to fulfil your quest is to select ones with firm trim figures and place a bag over the head to gain modesty (tell them its to conform to safety regs) and of course this allows you to imagine her being a younger offender.
Meantime we must await BOZOs submissions as this could become 'sub-judicy' or other legal things. Who knows the judge might give him an absolute discharge.

Oh and one from adjoining Inner Urban Child Abuse Zone Hammersmith too.