In 'CP Revisited (Cambridge Journal of Education)' Sill Lee Asso wrote:

"www.femalefirst.co.uk - yes please! It filled with ladyboys writings with corporal punish in

http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/abuse-at-school-t104184.html and

http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/orgasm-during-school-corporal-punishment-t53979.html

Also there is contributed contributions from contributor to this contribution board."


Another_Lurker replied:

"Sill Lee Asso, you have made me a very happy man! I followed your link to the femalefirst abuse at school thread, and there on the very first page was a contribution from someone called 'Guest' about school boys swimming nude with a female instructor and girls swimming with the boys but wearing costumes. It brought back those happy days I shared here with Eric and that I miss so very much!"


Look again, Another_Lurker at

http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/abuse-at-school-t104184.html

and you will get a surprise!

Emily said:

Look again, Another_Lurker at

http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/abuse-at-school-t104184.html

and you will get a surprise!

Where am I supposed to be looking? There appear to be 68 posts in the thread as of the last post at 18:48 on 23 May 2009 and much as I appreciate a good laugh I try apply the principle of moderation in all things so I'm not going to read them all.

Hi Emily. The post you were presumably referring to has now appeared on the 'Female First' forum. I'm afraid that it doesn't score any points though. Eric's posts always had schoolboys swimming nude either supervised by female teachers or with their female classmates swimming with them wearing costumes, sometimes both.

In the case posted on the 'Female First' forum the person supervising the swimming is clearly male. He is referred to as 'the headmaster' and 'this guy'. The persons doing the swimming are clearly male too, and there is absolutely no mention of female classmates wearing costumes swimming at the same time. In other words it is not a CFNM fantasy. It may well be a homo-erotic fantasy, but I am not qualified to judge. In any event I do not understand what it is doing in a forum entitled 'Female First', but since I do not use that forum I have no reason to question that.

Some interesting questions do arise though. You claim to be 'Emily', which is a female name. I have thought you guilty of a terminological inexactitude in respect of your sexuality, which is why I have included you on my list of male fun posters elsewhere in this estimable Forum. You informed me of the post in 'Female First' at 20:49 on 27 May 2009, and yet the post there was not made until 11:57 on 28 May 2009, by a person purporting to be male and using a name 'nbear8' which doesn't sound like a female name to me. I don't think our old friend Perry Mason would have too much trouble in convincing a jury that you are in fact nbear8 and thus male. I rest my case m'lud!

Of course, if this is all a dreadful mistake on my part, if there is another logical explanation and if you are in fact a genuine female please accept my sincere and heartfelt apologies. In this event it would be very much appreciated by me, and I suspect some other members of this Forum, if you stopped posting in fantasy threads and acting as a ventriloquist's dummy for HRH and instead gave us a female viewpoint in some of the non-fantasy threads. Not much chance of that though I fear!

I don't want to spell this out but the writer of the following two posts from the 'Abuse at School' thread is a respected contributor (under another name) to this present message board.



"I was at a girls' school a bit before you - 1968 - and after repeated misbehaviour was carpeted by the Headmistress. I was given a choice of being "asked to leave" i.e. expelled, or the cane. Feeling tough and brave I chose the latter.

Nearly 40 years on and I still recall those 3 whacks across the seat of my knicks...it literally took my breath away. I certainly didn't volunteer for a repeat dose.


May I make a second, and final, contribution to this strand :

Firstly, I apologise if I seemed to belittle Janet007's experience. If those spankings were painful and humiliating then I sympathise. I should have made it clearer that my use of Keith's word "lucky" was ironic in large measure.

As for my own experience, perhaps I came off lighter than Janet. The punishment was administered by a woman (a very important distiction) and I did not have the humiliation of being put over someone's knee. Instead I was politely invited to bend over a chair. Afterwards she gave me a hanky to dry my eyes (I'm ashamed to say I wept a little) and then told I could sit quietly in the Library until I felt able to go back into class.

I, too, am against corporal punishment and have never used it on my two daughters (now 26 & 24). Afterall, I know how much it hurts - the cane at least. But back then the shame and disgrace of being expelled would have been worse, for me at any rate, and a sore bottom seemed the better option. It made a full recovery and now the whole thing is a vivid if unpleasant memory !"

In the interests of science, I read all the posts on those 2 threads.

Incredible is not the right word.

Uncredible is for 99.99% of the men posing as women on it!

Yuk is probably the better word.


Steve M

So Emily, you have completely failed to respond to my reasonably argued suspicions (my post at 01:16 on 29 May 2009 above) that you are not a female called 'Emily' but a male who uses the name 'nbear8' in the 'female first' abuse at school thread. Now you are telling us that 'JennyS' or 'Jenny S' (both forms are used) who made two contributions to that thread back in 2006 is a respected contributor to this estimable Forum under another name!

I trust you mean that the individual concerned is a current contributor here, not someone who only posted here back in 2006, otherwise your allegation is rather pointless. I also trust that said allegation has a little more substance than recent claims by 'A Lurkologist' that I used to be 'Fran of Wembley'!

If indeed you are referring to a current contributor here, are you going to name said contributor, reveal the reasons for your suspicions and let them defend themselves, if indeed defence is required? No, I suspect you are going to do exactly what you did about the Emily/nbear8 issue, that is to say ignore it. If this is your approach, why on earth post this stuff in the first place?

And for the record my opinion of the female first CP threads echos that of Steve M, only more so! Happily, I didn't have to do as Steve so bravely did and read the threads. Well above and beyond the call of duty, that one, Steve! No, at my advanced age laughing too hard can be dangerous so as Emily had quoted the posts I was very happy that Google took me direct to JennyS/Jenny S.