<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Pacific Faith  

fossils are against evolution and for world wide flood.

June 11 2012 at 12:33 PM
No score for this post
wilz 

fossils of turtles ,spiders, frogs, horse shoe crabs, butterflies, sharks, dragonflies, palms, trees, grapes, fish, sting rays, grapes , figs(fruit), and so many other plants and animals that are found show signs of no change to todays living animals and plants ! this creatures have not shown signs of evolution even after thousands of thousands of years ! All this fossils are exactly the same to our modern day creatures and have not evolved even the slightest bit, they are still the same. .

Your humble cockroach for instance and house fly are living fossils ! there ancestors have been found fossilized and yet no signs of evolution are visible.

fossils are evidence that a worldwide flood did occur. To make a fossil the following are needed.

1)hard bodies (bones, trees, shells)
2) water (lots of it)
3 fast, deep coverage.
4)No air (so the buried animals cannot rot !)

A world wide flood would obviously meet all this requirements. The sediments dispersed in the water would rapidly cover the dead animals very deep. This fast ,deep coverage would eliminate the air next to the animals. Because theres no air, the animal cannot rot. The water would cause mineral exchange to occur thus the animal would fossilize.


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
AuthorReply
patient teacher

Re: fossils are against evolution and for world wide flood.

No score for this post
June 12 2012, 12:43 PM 

Some things changed a lot over time, some things changed a little over time, and some things (like cockroaches) hardly changed over time.

It all depended if the populations of those species could survive in their environment. If there were problems, the fittest individuals of the population survived, passing on their traits thru their genes. Those individuals who could not survive, died early, passed on few or no genes, and their traits slowly disappeared in the population.

There are all kinds of intermediate stage fossils in the fossil record. Or did you expect that stone fossils will change before our very eyes? happy.gif

Bodies washing into lakes and seas over many many millions of years can easily make up the fossil record we see today. There is no need for a flood. Besides (a convenient fact that you seem to overlook), how could a flood occur all at once that created metres of fossils in the fossil record, and how, oddly, did this flood seem to kill the simplest (the oldest ones at the bottom of a fossil profile) organisms first, the dinosaurs in the middle, and more advanced creatures up at the top? Hmmmm. Maybe the fossil date data is right after all.

You obviously never learnt much about biology enough to decide whether it's true or its not. Go get a biology book and become educated first, then you can come back here and discuss with some valid points.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
EM NAU

Re: fossils are against evolution and for world wide flood.

No score for this post
June 13 2012, 10:08 AM 

Evolutionists write biology books. Fixed.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
YU YET

Re: fossils are against evolution and for world wide flood.

No score for this post
June 13 2012, 10:10 PM 

And lawyers make laws while judges make judgements. FIXED.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
><{{*->

Law

No score for this post
June 14 2012, 1:08 PM 

YU YET,

I think YU got that wrong!

Politicians (and priests) make the laws, lawyers (and priests) interpret them, an judges adjudicate on them!

fish-law

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
EM NAU

Re: fossils are against evolution and for world wide flood.

No score for this post
June 13 2012, 5:42 PM 

"There are all kinds of intermediate stage fossils in the fossil record."

This is a misleading statement. The intermediate creatures supposedly linking man to amoebas are all missing. The whole chain is missing. What creature preceded the horse? What creature came before whales? Did you know that biologists actually believe that chicken evolved from dinosaurs and whales returned to the sea from cows etc. They call that science? I call them fairy tales for grown ups.

Because if there are all kinds of intermediate stage fossils in the fossil record, surely we would
see a cowhale fossil somewhere. But none has been found so far. Hence, the statement is misleading.

What you see in museums and textbooks are drawings of imagined creatures crafted by hired artists.
They are just make believe nonsense.

Evolution is a dying religion. Did you know why the search for aliens by NASA is getting so frantic? It's because they want to find some new theory because evolution just doesn't add up anymore in the fossil record. They want aliens to come to their rescue, but that wont happen in a long time.



 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
><{{*->

Re: fossils are against evolution and for world wide flood.

No score for this post
June 14 2012, 1:14 PM 

EN MAU,
maybe you may also agree that the dinosaurs and the "six day creation" story is not another fairy tale for grown ups?

just checking.

fishy-tales

ps: i admire (grudgingly..hehe..) yor opinions/arguemnt tho!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
EM NAU

Re: fossils are against evolution and for world wide flood.

No score for this post
June 14 2012, 4:18 PM 

Could be right if anything, anything ever happened at all, like matter just appearing across the universe at once from nowhere. And billions of years may not be required - and nothing could ever rise out of dirt in a trillion years. But it happened one day. One day could be millions of years ago, or just under 10,000 years ago. It had to come to reality at one point in time and we could be more closer to our day of origin than evolutionits want us to believe. And here we are. Perfectly created, never evolved. Life itself is a miracle. How come the universe reached perfect equilibrium and coordinated motions to sustain human existence? It could have been a dead universe without life and energy, or a constant flux of chaos and disorder or a wonderfully fixed environment with the perfect mix of oxygen to sustain human life. By accident, over millions of years...that's where fairy tales take off...

Let there be ...and there was. It wouldn't require billions of years when even time had to be created. If such a source of immense creative power exists, it would take a week if He so desired. I have no problem with that. Life is a miracle. If we think about it...seriously! That matter even came into being at one point in time, but organised into orderly systems of galaxies, stars and planets. There is a great mind behind it all, or nothing orderly and organised as the human brain would have emerged from nothing.

The God of the Bible is not one retard who made man through horrific mistakes, putting man through survival of the fittest curve over billions of years of blood, gore and death. No

And God saw that man and the environment was good, perfect as he desired.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Fantastic!!!!!

Re: fossils are against evolution and for world wide flood.

No score for this post
June 15 2012, 2:16 PM 

AMMMMAAAAZING that you're smarter than thousands of scientists that have devoted their lives to investigating these things.

Simply amazing! Have you ever thought of applying for the Nobel prize?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
EM NAU

Noble peace prize

No score for this post
June 16 2012, 5:56 PM 

Nobel peace prize? Like how the commies awarded their first black president for his 'visions' of peace and Al Gore for the second great scam (man made global warming) known to man. Obama can't do a thing about Libya, Egypt and now Syria. Its all mauswara as they say in PNG.

Those who swallow evolution will fall for Gore's lies and scam. You know, the sea level rising, ice is melting and drowning coastal regions crap? And it is this dodgy 'science' which they believe and award their climate gurus the Nobel prize. O the gullibles! Remember how Copenhagen collapsed after Gore took the prize. We've had straight severe winters in both the northern and southern hemispheres over the last few years against the warmists' threat that the earth was warming up.

Australians believed the doomsday warmist prophets who predicted it would never rain and that all its rivers would be dry due to global warming. (Google: Tim Flannery Climate Predictions) Instead of building dams to store water, they spent billions constructing desalination plants, now sitting idle in the rain and rusting off. Australians have seen record rains with sever floods, destruction and deaths, with no dam to store water. And the cold winters continue with no sign of the predicted warming. Scientists. Hmmmmmmmmmm.

No thanks, Fantastic!!!!!. As they say to the 'One' in the US. Keep you Nobel prize the change as well. Its all suspect, dodgy and totally unreliable as evolution, so is the global warming scam.

Why don't people ever, ever get off their backsides and investigate the evidence for themselves than relying on 'thousands' of scientists who feed them trash in text books, books and magazines?


A question for you. Is man still evolving?


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Der Wolfe Wer Fressen Katzen

Re: fossils are against evolution and for world wide flood.

No score for this post
June 16 2012, 7:22 PM 

Several years ago, I heard about human footprints being found alongside dinosaur tracks in a Cretaceous limestone in the vicinity of Glen Rose, Texas. There were newspaper accounts in both the Fort Worth Star-Telegram (June 17, 1982) and The Dallas Morning News. Also, Dallas area television stations Channel 5 and Channel 8 reported on the finds. I did not think much about this at the time but later, because of my extensive reading on the subject of evolution, I was reminded of it. In January, 1995, I made a trip to Glen Rose specifically to visit the Creation Evidences Museum and find out all I could about these footprints.

Several highly-qualified scientists had witnessed and testified to the genuineness of the discoveries. Media from around the country publicised at least some of them.

Evolutionists, however, rejected the human footprints as Indian carvings, tracks of a sick dolphin, a case of misidentification, or an outright fraud. One gentleman was so threatened by the discoveries that he actually took a hammer, went to the river, and broke up some of the footprints to make them useless for study.

I knew that the human footprints, found side by side with dinosaur tracks, if genuine, destroyed the theory of evolution all by themselves. Still, I wanted to see for myself. See agoracosmopolitan.com


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Der Wolfe Wer Fressen Katzen

Re: fossils are against evolution and for world wide flood.

No score for this post
June 16 2012, 7:55 PM 

Woooooooofffffff!

" Science supports the Bible. That's just how it is. On the other hand, there's the theory of Evolution which is not science. What sustains it? FAITH !Science as Religion. One has to believe that all matter is self created, that this matter in turn created intelligence and; in spite of the fact that it has never been seen, that this inorganic self-creating matter then created life in opposition to observed science. All of this in violation of the 1st and 2nd law of Physics, probability theory, biogenesis and common sense.

This belief system necessitates extraordinary explanatory contortions, strange suppositions and sleight of hand. For example, since catastrophic events in our history would lend too much credence to the truth of the Flood of Noah event, those theories are avoided. It is thought and promoted that man has evolved both physically and technologically from the primitive to the modern on a uniform basis.

Given that presupposition, what do you do as a scientist when you encounter ancient artifacts produced by antique high technology?

As a scientist, you�d better be careful what you say or risk ridicule and professional suicide. As a result one can wind up convincing oneself, other scientific disciplines and the public that these things can be explained by elbow grease or some other arcane theory which is best not examined too closely.(That's how items like true optical lenses get described as "worship artifacts"--because everyone knows the ancients didn't have optical lenses). See True Suppressions


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
EM NAU

46 percent believe in Creation

No score for this post
June 15 2012, 3:37 PM 


A recent (June 1, 2012) Gallup Poll in the US has suggested that 46 percent of Americans have a creationist view of human origins, that God created man less than 10,000 years ago.

That is a massive loss given all those billions spent in text books, public school indoctrination and TV programs to convert people into believing in evolution.

About 32 percent believe God guided the evolutionary process, that when Genesis says God made man in his own image, he really doesn't mean that. (The fence sitters, too cowardly to chose one or the other, who either embrace or drop the Genesis record depending on room temperature and company because those atheists and evolutionists are so mean, rude and intimidating. They are the weak ones, indoctrinated to some degree but want to reserve some space for God, to plead some innocence over their unbelief.) For such God has a warning in Revelation. You will either be hot or cold, don't get lukewarm or I'll spit you out. You're either for God or against Him.

Revelation 3:15&16. I know your works: you are neither cold nor hot. Would that you were either cold or hot! So, because you are lukewarm, and neither hot nor cold, I will spit you out of my mouth."

Only 15 percent believe in pure Darwinian evolution. That is truly sad. Someone should be sacked for doing a poor job. It's time to get a new theory. ET? Please phone Earth. This is Houston calling. There is a problem!

7 percent don't really know what's going on.

www.gallup.com/poll/155003/hold-creationist-view-human-origins.aspx

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
mama

Re: 46 percent believe in Creation

No score for this post
June 16 2012, 6:39 PM 

scientists only "assume" and draw possibilities when it comes to dating fossils . So i really dont see why people totally believe that the earth is million upon millions of years old. After they die to right ? there only human whom make mistakes...have you people who are suporting them thought about this ???

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Der Wolfe Wer Fressen Katzen

Re: 46 percent believe in Creation

No score for this post
June 16 2012, 7:25 PM 

An article from Strand magazine (December,1895) reprinted in "Traces of the Elder Faiths of Ireland" by W.G. Wood-Martin mentions this fossilized giant discovered during mining operations in County Antrim, Ireland: "Pre-eminent among the most extraordinary articles ever held by a railway company is the fossilized Irish giant, which is at this moment lying at the London and North-Western Railway Company's Broad street goods depot, and a photograph of which is reproduced here. . . This monstrous figure is reputed to have been dug up by a Mr. Dyer whilst prospecting for iron ore in County Antrim. The principal measurements are: entire length, 12ft. 2in.; girth of chest, 6ft. 6in.; and length of arms, 4ft. 6in. There are six toes on the right foot. The gross weight is 2 tons 15cwt.; so that it took half a dozen men and a powerful crane to place this article of lost property in position for the Strand magazine artist. Dyer, after showing the giant in Dublin, came to England with his queer find and exhibited it in Liverpool and Manchester at sixpence, sixpence a head, attracting scientific men as well as gaping sightseers".

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
><{{*->

Re: 46 percent believe in Creation

No score for this post
June 20 2012, 6:58 PM 

EM MAU,
Am also doing some amateur research (readings mostly) on evolution and Darwinism (some argue are not the same), Adam and the so-called three (or four?) races/ethnic groups, namely Caucasoid, Mongoloid and Negroid (and now some contend, Autraloid or aborigines), and a bit of eugenics.

With the "race" thing, what happened since Adam? The feature/complexion changes/contrasts between the three (or four?) major ethnic groupings are so profound, however the genes may be more similar/identical?

Ok, so God did all that over a few thousand years,....but how ?

Maybe like some contend, some mysteries should remain mysterious....and tell the scientists to find another job...and the curious to remember that "cat"...hehe

fish-cat

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
EM NAU

Re: 46 percent believe in Creation

No score for this post
July 3 2012, 3:01 PM 

"Ok, so God did all that over a few thousand years,....but how ?"

Good question. That has to be accepted by faith as written in Scripture. By the power of God's word.

But evolution says it took billions of years. Same question. BUT HOW?
That's why we say evolution is a religion. You have to believe in one or the other, creation or evolution.

The reason why we believe in Creation is because nature is in harmony with the Bible record. Fossils,
lack of evidence for past or continuing human evolution, Jesus who spoke often about God'd creation was raised from the dead (You cannot kill Truth.)

And unlike evolutionary theories, Scripture never reinvents and corrects itself, never. It is sealed and no new discovery will disprove it because it was directed and authored by the Creator who saw it all from the beginning and faithful men recorded his word. You cannot outsmart God and his word.

But how, you still ask. By the power of his (God's) word.

And God said let there be, and it all came into being. He spoke the universe into existence.
Nature cannot just appear from nowhere.

Furthermore, who holds chemicals, atoms and matter together in orderly fashion? Where does this organised cohesion come from? Mindless nature? I don't think so.

We live in a potentially explosive minefield of immense proportions if the universal order and coordination came unhinged and went chaotic.

Creation is one thing but sustaining the whole real estate across the entire universe is in itself a miracle.

It would bring utter chaos if gravity, motion and mass of heavenly bodies were uncoordinated without clockwork precision, if there were no laws set in the universe to act and counteract providing balance and order for existence of life on earth.

Scripture has that important area of universal order covered in Colossians 1:15-20.

The Supremacy of the Son of God

15 The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. 16 For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. 17 He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. 18 And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy. 19 For God was pleased to have all his fullness dwell in him, 20 and through him to reconcile to himself all things, whether things on earth or things in heaven, by making peace through his blood, shed on the cross.






 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Der Wolfe Wer Fressen Katzen

Re: fossils are against evolution and for world wide flood.

No score for this post
June 16 2012, 9:50 PM 

Dont be lazy, find the evidence and info yourselves!!!

"It's one heck of a climb to see the footprint; more than a thousand feet up a rugged mountain in the Cleveland National Forest. And James Snyder's house sits right at the bottom. "I go out of my way to make a slip trail where nobody else has been and I was actually looking for gold," said Snyder (the discoverer).

That was back in February 2002 . But instead of finding gold on Gowers Mountain, Snyder found a giant fossilized footprint, at least it looks like one, embedded in solid granite.

The footprint was found in what becomes a creek bed during the rainy season. It looks as though something big crossed the creek a long time ago leaving its footprint behind.

What made it and when? Who knows....Granite is supposed to have formed over 1 billion years ago.

No doubt scientists will try to argue that it just looks like a footprint as they do for every one of these types of anomalies. For science, if not fraud it's the only acceptable answer."

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Geologist

Re: fossils are against evolution and for world wide flood.

No score for this post
June 18 2012, 11:42 PM 

Yeah, there's only one small problem with this: granite NEVER has fossils because of the way that kind of stone is formed. Fossils couldn't possibly form inside a volcano!

Nice try, though.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
another possible evidence to flood.

Re: fossils are against evolution and for world wide flood.

No score for this post
June 19 2012, 1:00 PM 

its possible he could have found the prints in the volcano ! just evidence of what the great world wide flood could have done . It would have mixed everything up in bundles : sea creatures and land creatures , all in close or same proximity of each other(which alot of evidnece has been found). Sea shells have been found on Mount everest ! a thousand miles from the sea !

I belive that its possible since the flood would have collected that foot print and while in the process of drying up ,left that "fossilized " foot print in the volcano . its very very possible !

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Rok Dok

The Meister Print

No score for this post
June 27 2012, 3:48 PM 

"These prints disprove evolutionary theories about rock strata and reveal it is quite young, and place dinosaurs as living at the same time when people did. The prints also reveal that giants once lived on our planet"..Creation/Evolution Encyclopedia

Fossil human footprints embedded in rock continue to be a source of consternation and embarrasment for those who promote or accept the evolutionary timeline. Rocks whose age science continues to push out further in order to, accomodate evolving evolutionary timelines.

These rocks are supposed to range in age from 10 million to over a billion years but they sometimes contain imprints of barefoot and or shod human feet. According to evolutionary timelines, humans are too recent (last 3 million years or so) to have left those prints.

It's a little known secret that beginning with the earliest immigrants to the Americas, fossil footprints have been found in rock the rock strata. The tracks were fairly common and taken in stride until Darwin came along. Then these fossilized human footprints, many of them of gigantic proportions, became a problem for the "educated" man.

Indeed, many of these reportedly millions of years old rock strata are too old even for the animal tracks imprinted thereon. A seletion of data indicating that these reports have been made and documented over a long time period and have often been examined and accepted by science is presented below.

"What may be the oldest fossil footprint yet found was discovered in June 1968 by William J. Meister, an amateur fossil collector, and reportedy, an evolutionist. If the print is what it appears to be-the impression of a sandaled shoe crushing a trilobite-it would have been made 300 to 600 million years ago and would be sufficient either to overturn all conventionally accepted ideas of human and geological evolution or to prove that a shoe-wearing biped from another world had once visited the planet.

Meister made his potentially disturbing find during a rock-and fossil-hunting expedition to Antelope Spring, 43 miles west of Delta, Utah. He was accompanied by his wife and two daughters, and by Mr. And Mrs. Francis Shape and their two daughters.

The party had already discovered several fossils of trilobites when Meister split open a two-inch-thick slab of rock with his hammer and discovered the outrageous print. The rock fell open 'like a book,' revealing: on one side the footprint of a human with trilobites right in the footprint itself. The other half of the rock slab showed an almost perfect mold of the footprint and fossils. Amazingly the human was wearing a sandal!


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
wilz

wake up call

No score for this post
June 28 2012, 2:47 PM 

Evolution is the foundation of socialism and Communism . Countries like China which is a communist country like Russia , there Communist founders took over UN link province china the entire population was forced to undergo propaganda classes in Darwins evolution ! Its the same for Russia and all communist countries .
So evolution is the foundation of these terrible philosophies.

From the year 1620 to 1860 scientists believed in creation. But today the modern mind scientist has been molded by Darwin's theory. It was until Darwin that all scientists started to lose the grip on creation belief that all animals came from there own type and not from one form evolving to another.

Heres just how silly Darwin's theory is : say were in a evolution class, the lecturer claims that in a few seconds a worm can become a man . I bet everyone would think he has lost it right ? but suppose he says ,"give it a long period of time for a worm to evolved into a man" ...I bet everyone would agree right ? so you see given long periods of time ,a ridiculous idea can be accepted !... thats the magic factor in the evolution theory -long periods of time.





 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
best man

evolutionists and supporters have got it all wrong !

No score for this post
June 28 2012, 10:51 PM 

i agree rok dok ! since the earth is not as old as sayed by scientists (millions of years old), the Bibles account of the earth would definitely fit these since the time of Jesus what about 2000 thousand years ago. From the time of Jesus to about Adam and Eves time would approximately be 4000 thousand years . Thus the Earth would be around that age ! Its proof in the fossil/rocks !!!!!


Scientists dont tell people how they date rocks and fossills . But from what i studied about the way they assume how old fossils are ,they basically GUESS how old the fossil is then carry it back to there lab where they find books that tell what era certain rocks were formed etc..... If it does not fit there expectations then they keep on making guesses until they are satisfied ! see how fake that is, or do you fall for that kind of stuff every-time ???? lol ... that aint scientific !! thats LYING if you ask me !!!!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Un-friken-believable

Re: evolutionists and supporters have got it all wrong !

No score for this post
June 29 2012, 9:53 PM 

You are unbelievably ignorant. Scientists don't tell the public how they date rocks? Come on, you've got to be kidding! Do you know how to use Google.... or go to a bookstore?

The ignorance we see in PNG is astounding and says a lot about why no matter how much money we get progress simply doesn't occur. Just because someone learns to wear the clothes of an educated person doesn't mean anything at all is happening inside their brains!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
EM NAU

Re: evolutionists and supporters have got it all wrong !

No score for this post
July 1 2012, 11:49 PM 

@ fricken. You mean the use of circular reasoning to date fossils and rock layers because someone fooled everyone with the geologic column which only appears in textbooks and gets lost in the real world. You've been had by the big con the world has ever known. Left that cage years ago.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
i see

Re: evolutionists and supporters have got it all wrong !

No score for this post
July 3 2012, 9:10 PM 

"fricken" ..so you are saying you believe in evolution and you came from an animal ??? how said really.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
some people can't stand the truth!!!!!!

Re: evolutionists and supporters have got it all wrong !

No score for this post
July 3 2012, 9:58 PM 

Of course we realise that such thoughts boggle your simplistic mind!

But the main Christian churches all accept evolution today as a fact.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
EM NAU

Re: evolutionists and supporters have got it all wrong !

No score for this post
July 5 2012, 10:49 AM 

Nope. It's a case of abandoning God's truth and surrendering to Satan's evolution which effectively makes God a liar, i.e. what God declares in Genesis is not really true because we came from worms and monkeys.

The Bible speaks of apostasy in the last days by so-called churches and these main churches fit into that mold. The Bible holds itself up from Genesis to Revelation and any church that denies any section of God's word is denying the whole truth.

There are churches and there are churches, too. For instance, the church persecuted the church in the middle ages. The Bible and history go hand in hand. Darwinism is out of step with God and his word.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Believer

Re: evolutionists and supporters have got it all wrong !

No score for this post
July 6 2012, 10:39 AM 

Fortunately you're out of step with what most Christians believe today. Thank God for that!

God gave us a brain that was inquisitive for a reason, don't you think? If he wanted us to be blind and obedient He would have adjusted our brains accordingly.

With our natural God given curiosity and inquisitiveness, we seek the truth, with teh brightest minds going the furthest in making new discovering. And we are finding more and more truths of the world around us thanks to our God given brains.

Again, thank God the average Christian would label a person like you as an extremist.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
evolution is a blind fold

ow yes

No score for this post
July 6 2012, 6:29 PM 

"believer" how do you define extremist ?? we are basically defending our faith. And we do that by throwing scriptures and what Jesus has said about false prophets of today !!! dont fall for the lies that you and i came from a brute ape ! besides what common factor do we have with animals ?? NONE ! just because apes have a similar shape/figure to us humans does not give scientists the right to class us with them ! you get my point ? they are strictly animals that dont have conscience ! we are far more than animals ! we humans rule over all creation for goodness sakes ! thats the purpose why God made us superior in intelligence having a conscience and both spirit and soul.

Animals dont have goals and aspirations like us ! they were created to eat ,copulate, produce offspring and die. We were created to commune with a higher spiritual bieng than us ! we also have goals and aspirations to boot with that packAGE .

I hope that has opened your eyes on the massive massive difference between us and animals !

I agree with "emnau" that its indeed a weapon of satan . It has all the characteristics of a satanic lye

1) it confuses humans to thinking lowly of themselves, even though he was made in the "image" of God.
2) it denyes the fact that theres a God.
3) it degrades and destroys all moral standards by deluding people to think of themselves as mere animals with no purpose.

4) It blinds the person to the point where he sees life as "meaningless" so abortion/ suicide is "ok" !


Evolution has all clear characteristics of something aposing what God has said about Humans, thus giving it a "satanic" banner ! remember anything that apposes what God has said is of the devil !

its a devistating lye on helpless people who still belive it . I pity those who still are bound by EVOLUTIONS blackest of blacks blind fold.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
evolution is a blind fold

ow yes

No score for this post
July 6 2012, 6:33 PM 

"believer" how do you define extremist ?? we are basically defending our faith. And we do that by throwing scriptures and what Jesus has said about false prophets of today !!! dont fall for the lies that you and i came from a brute ape ! besides what common factor do we have with animals ?? NONE ! just because apes have a similar shape/figure to us humans does not give scientists the right to class us with them ! you get my point ? they are strictly animals that dont have conscience ! we are far more than animals ! we humans rule over all creation for goodness sakes ! thats the purpose why God made us superior in intelligence having a conscience and both spirit and soul.

Animals dont have goals and aspirations like us ! they were created to eat ,copulate, produce offspring and die. We were created to commune with a higher spiritual bieng than us ! we also have goals and aspirations to boot with that packAGE .

I hope that has opened your eyes on the massive massive difference between us and animals !

I agree with "emnau" that its indeed a weapon of satan . It has all the characteristics of a satanic lye

1) it confuses humans to thinking lowly of themselves, even though he was made in the "image" of God.
2) it denyes the fact that theres a God.
3) it degrades and destroys all moral standards by deluding people to think of themselves as mere animals with no purpose.

4) It blinds the person to the point where he sees life as "meaningless" so abortion/ suicide is "ok" !


Evolution has all clear characteristics of something aposing what God has said about Humans, thus giving it a "satanic" banner ! remember anything that apposes what God has said is of the devil !

its a devistating lye on helpless people who still belive it . I pity those who still are bound by EVOLUTIONS blackest of blacks blind fold.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
evolution is a blind fold

Re: evolutionists and supporters have got it all wrong !

No score for this post
July 6 2012, 6:56 PM 

when i said "we humans rule over all creation" , i meant to add we humans are a higher "dominion" to animals . Angels and evil spirits are a different dominion to us human - they are higher than us. thus you see humans around the world trying to connect with this higher spiritual beings/powers !

We are a totally different dominion to animals - they are lower to us , thus we humans control every living creature in this world. We are of a higher domain to them- thats what the bible said = genesis 1:26

Angels and demons (evil spirits) are of a higher domain to us , therefore you hear the term "demon possession" because a human (lesser domain) gives himself over to a being whose of a higher domain -demon !.

To conclude, we humans are totally different to animals ! its like comparing Demons and Angels to Humans ! evolution is trying so much to do this -classing a higher domain to a lower domain. And i think darwin fooled the world with his theory.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
think twice

Re: evolutionists and supporters have got it all wrong !

No score for this post
July 6 2012, 7:39 PM 

"main" christian churches accept evolution as a fact ??? How can a christian deny what God said about creation in Genesis and call himself a christian ?? How can you call yourself christian when you decide NOT to believe even a small part of the Bible : creation and how man came into the world ,and his purpose here - Genesis !! this is the foundation of the whole bible ! you remove this and you basically tear the foundation of christianity ! and the purpose Jesus came to the earth !

Just because i call myself a christian dont make me one if i dont belive what the word says ! after all the word -IS GODS WORD AND GUIDE TO you na me !

Even cults use the word of God from the bible but "twist" and "remove" and "add" there own in !(Deuteronomy 4:2) says not to do this !! see now ????



 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
What is an average christian????????

Re: evolutionists and supporters have got it all wrong !

No score for this post
July 6 2012, 8:00 PM 

Can you please elaborate on what an "AVERAGE CHRISTIAN" is ????? To me that is a christian who is a sleep and sits on the fence and by looking at your postings ie Moderate Christian/Average Christian etc etc etc you are a classic case of a 'Fence Sitting' Christian you are to afraid to move out of your comfort zone.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
EM NAU

No average God

No score for this post
July 9 2012, 9:18 AM 

There is no average God and there is no average Christian.
Either God is God and did it all or he didn't.
Either Genesis is the truth or its just a fable.
Make your choice.

God will not suffer fools and fence sitters.

My response goes to those average thinkers who borrow evolution and Christianity and do their thinking on the average.

There is no average heaven and there is no average hell, same applies to God and Satan.


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Current Topic - fossils are against evolution and for world wide flood.
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Pacific Faith