| Thoughts on a red dial?September 1 2009 at 10:24 AM |
(Login moelarrycu) VRF Member from IP address 207.237.88.65 | |
| Original?
![[linked image]](http://imagehost.vendio.com/a/6971585/aview/dial.JPG) |
| Responses- Not original IMHO - *Philip on Sep 1, 2009, 10:54 AM
- Not good IMHO - Toni Torres on Sep 1, 2009, 10:55 AM
- compare with original mark IV - rallepeng on Sep 1, 2009, 11:07 AM
- Looks like so called Mk.4 Closed "66" for last series RED Sub..nt. - Orchi on Sep 1, 2009, 11:09 AM
- sorry, could you explain? - thierry7461 on Sep 1, 2009, 11:41 AM
- That would mean that - *Philip on Sep 1, 2009, 12:15 PM
- The Zeros are leaning in the depth rating, Drunk Zeros?? - ChrisG on Sep 1, 2009, 12:38 PM
- for me it looks ok! - Marcel on Sep 1, 2009, 12:54 PM
- was called with mark half hour ago... - rallepeng on Sep 1, 2009, 1:26 PM
- Of course it is ok ... - Gatsby on Sep 1, 2009, 1:38 PM
- i stared at that dial and i thought it was ok - thesharkman on Sep 1, 2009, 1:41 PM
- Okay dial. - raywu on Sep 1, 2009, 1:41 PM
- So 4 or 5 versions for the ft first? - *Philip* on Sep 1, 2009, 1:52 PM
- Another one..? - T.O.W.S. UK on Sep 1, 2009, 3:52 PM
- Mark- IMHO this is WRONG- not a correct red sub dial- sorry :-( - Ty Erickson on Sep 1, 2009, 7:15 PM
- 100% correct IMO... - Maurix on Sep 1, 2009, 7:45 PM
- Wheww!!! Ok I'll put this post in my archives .... - michael b on Sep 2, 2009, 4:11 AM
- Ref: RED Sub-BEST Gurus PhilippS/Ralle/Werner/Delgado/VRF Archive-Kudos to all!.++ - Orchi on Sep 2, 2009, 4:53 AM
|
|
|