After all the posts, the real issue is about the punched papers. We have not even confirmed if the man accused is actually the man selling the watch in question. And now there are claims that the watches are not even the same watches.
Earlier in the posts there seems to be disagreement among members as to five and six hole punches and whether or not Rolex had both. I have yet to see a definitive answer from our in-house "experts" on that.
I think everyone should take deep breaths and go back and re-read this entire thread to see how much is made from inuendo and without facts.
This message has been edited by VintageRolexForum from IP address 188.8.131.52 on Oct 15, 2011 12:49 PM