Be careful with spreading your opinion if you yourself even admit that you do not have all info.
You are dismissing my watch and others at least as "not the correct reference for a ranger", which means non-correct , which is ridiculous. Have you seen my watch? Have you seen Tom's watch? Have you seen mr Dowlings watches? All not correct you think?
Just because YOU do not know, it does not mean that it is not correct.
Mine came in a very sorry state to me, covered under lots of dirt of 40 years of wear and tear. No way that it is a fake/ alteration, and I would appreciate it if you would correct your posting to a bit more open minded one.
I know that I do not know everything, and you do not see me posting about DRSD mark I's, because I simply do not have all info or own the watch.
If however I had a very original DRSD mark I , and there was a discussion going on about mark I's , then I would give my opinion as well. But without the watch or all info available, I would not declare some DRSD's as incorrect.
Robbe