Respond to this messageReturn to Index
Original Message
  • "But the movement, Philipps, was NEVER a Rolex-made "
      • Addict (no login)
      Posted Mar 5, 2008 3:13 AM

      Hi Tom

      "But the movement, Philipps, was NEVER a Rolex-made " this is why Tudor is not a "second brand" even the cases,dial,adds .... are not the same ,of course history of Tudor is linked to Rolex, it's why Tudor is a brand for his own part , but us "Wine and cheese " guys seems to not see the thing like you , you must own a Tudor BC or MC to understand .The fact is that you come to Tudor for the price and then you understand ......


      Best regards
      Jerome
    Login Status
  • You are not logged in
      • Login
      Password
       

      Optional
      Provides additional benefits such as notifications, signatures, and user authentication.

      Create Account
    Your Name
    Your Email
    (Optional)
    Message Title
    Message Text
    Options Enable formatted text (Huh?)
    Also send responses to my email address
     
    Notice: This is a moderated forum. Your post will not show up until a moderator approves the message. If you regularly have full posting privileges, you may have to login first.
          


    Join the VRF!

    Contact

    Copyright Vintage Rolex Forum © 2002 - 2009