Err...sorry IF it had caused you any problem or inconvenience...
But if you could see it in your heart to bear with Orchi(3rd person thingy)...
please do...
Other than that...please ignore Orchi.
Either way...Orchi won't hold any grudge...
or ill feelings against you...
just as Orchi hopes you won't do the...
unlikely against...Orchi.

http://www.network54.com/Forum/207593/thread/1265984531/Is+OCC+really+the+first+1675-

Hopefully soon...
Orchi shall worked harder to earn more...
n perhaps be able to own...all of these...
or perhaps Orchi might afford to get them...
one by one...

BUT Orchi hopes you would see that...
it is NOT about whether Orchi can or cannot afford them...
it is rather...
the Buddy Seller happens to be a very well respected VRF member here...
hasn't decided to sell these to Orchi...yet.

Thus Orchi hopes you won't put down Orchi too much...
for NOT owning anyone of these...as yet...
in order to learn from VRF...n from you...


?t=1266000339

?t=1266000368

?t=1266000393


Yes...the above Dials...
n the following 1675 watches(mostly under 509,xxx)...
one of which might even be under 506,xxx...
are definitely for sale...n very available for Orchi...

n Orchi is in opinions...
that they are 100%...genuine n original Rolex...


?t=1266000421


Orchi shall receive this watch very soon...for further study...
until then...please let Orchi asks...
that this is perhaps the RAREST of all 1675 PCG...?


?t=1266000447



This one is in Orchi's humble possession...








This is your example: It's very very nice 1675 PCG with SCOC Dial + Exclamation Point...
(Orchi's own opinion...SCOC is later version)





Therefore...when you won't consider Orchi's newbie opinions on the matters...
relating to 1675 OCC n SCOC...Gilt Dials variants...
"for Orchi only that is...

- 1959/early 1960 OCC(CR) Very RARE - PCG "SWISS"

- Early 1960 onwards SCOC-CR - Exclamation-Point(RARE) in 1960/61 - PCG "SWISS"...

- Chapter Ring SCOC n Underline(RARE) in 1962/early 63 - PCG - White/Silver (Single or Double) "SWISS" or "T"

- NON-CR SCOC 1963/64 - Square-Guards - 5 minute indexes under "SWISS-T<25"... <br> - NON-CR SCOC 1964 to 1966 - Rounded-Guards - 3 minute indexes under "SWISS-T<25"... <br> - Matte Mk.1/2/3/4/5 etc. 1966 up...

Crossovers in rare nos. might exist between the respective...
Transitional period..."


Please do consider these experienced n highly respected opinions...instead.

From Buddy Francesco...

http://www.network54.com/Forum/207593/message/1265990810/I+had+several+1675......

From Buddy Stefano Mazzariol...

http://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=en&sl=it&u=http://stefanomazzariol.blogspot.com/search/label/Rolex%2520GMT%25201675%2520%2522OCC%2522&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dstefanomazzariol%26hl%3Den%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26channel%3Ds%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26hs%3DF4K%26sa%3DG&rurl=translate.google.com.my&twu=1&usg=ALkJrhjoUnrtIYIVFucl0mClzPr7PqjeGA



Best regards
Orchi.

Maybe we should have an Albino post only with Stefano, James Dowling and 4-5 more...

I really remember when you started a few years ago here on VRF. In all this time you are getting one of the TOP members here, love to read your posts.
And for me, you are always KIND and helpful to many other members and your knowledge about GMTs is really fantastic.

Keep it going just as you are!

Best to you!
Werner

Keep up the good research. Love to hear what you say and never with a malicious or nasty word.

...you are definitely my source of
knowledge of the GMT world!!
Take care
Lorenzo

I think that us Rolex fans/collector we are here to learn ,and I are the first!!!

Peace & love!

Cheers,

Francesco

Buddy Orchi,

I really enjoy your style of writing. If I were to try to write in your language??????? No way. Besides, there are very few people in the U.S. capable of writing "properly". Much less being qualified to proof another's work. Keep writing just as you do. Screw the critics. I learn a lot here from all of the VRF'ers, regardless of their command of the language. All that's truly important is a passion for Rolex. There are a lot of passionate people here.

Peace,
Mark

(Buddy Mark to you, Orchi)

I have always enjoyed reading your posts. Pls continue that way yo do.

Chye

So Orchi should pls continue his great work, as his posts are a welcome read each time, due to his knowledge and to his unique and absolutely refreshing style. Other people can dot the I's and cross the T's

are wonderful buddy Orchi, I'm sure you have inspired and nurtured many here.

Keep writing in your inimitable style, of the passion for Rolex, that you share so unselfishly.

Rgds Sparky

The day... that questions and posts of members here are judged on the size of their collection and money in their pocket..... is the day this forum lost his right of excistance!

Those people who put statements of 'Show yours and how much... or shut up' should be very, very ashamed of themself!!!!!
They are so negative... i guess also in live... they should leave the PC sometimes and breath the air of the real world now and then.

I guess they might be afraid for the world out there... as they seem to wish all people to behave grey (otherwise they look so dark)....... where we enjoy the colour of many different people. With own style of doing and living.


So Orchi..... this is a place of freedom. Just the magic of a mixture of opinions,... characters... and styles. That's what makes it so rich!

There is place for oldminded, depressive, negative,... kind of people... and the colourful birds of paradise....
And all deserve their room.

Respect is a bit different,..... respect you own by what you do and how you act!


Don't worry.... and no need to explain how many watches you own or don't.



Have a great weekend to you all!

doesn't hold the best example of correct written English and sometimes his posts are extremely difficult to understand.

Arthur will show us amazing watches in the next month... as of course he will hold up to his own rules....


Every time when he will command on a watch... he will show us HIS!! Yeahhh looking forward to all those bigcrowns... screwdown Newmans... Comex, Milsub Watches.... old chrono's... Milgauss watches in his collection.. and all those gilt Subs..... Albino GMT's... yeahhhhhh

Looking so forward to!!! Will be a extra boost for the forum. So many treasures we will enjoy....


Arthur we are waiting.... as the last years.. we could only see your 1 image... over and over again....


SO YEAHHHHHHh WE ARE LOOKING FORWARD.....

and not considering the poor quality of the pics he post - which definitely don't allow any kind of analysis - I do admit something that Philip pointed once: he is virtually one of the first guys to hang around here so that deserves some respect. Which would be much more from my side if he didn't have this hostile tone in every single post. End of the story form this end.

in substance to the forum. Nick I have seen your pics, and brother they are nothing to write home about. Keep on promoting your products...
By the way, have you read your post? Your grammar is horrible, honestly read your post again.

Make sure you protect your glass house before throwing stones my dealer friend.

http://rolexnessreviews.blogspot.com/

here is a new scan for you B.

One other issue, do you not think that you post the same Comex pic over and over again?



http://rolexnessreviews.blogspot.com/

nice ones... LOOOL


and indeed.... i am showing my Comex 5513 now and then.... mostly on Friday.. as i love to wear it so much!

Any problem with people owning one 5513 ???? Are you doing the 'you are not allowed to post if you only have one or view watches' statement again Arthur ????



Here you go... just for you!!!!


[IMG][/IMG]



Always remember.... you are the one stating people should first show their watches and proof they own all kinds of before posting, questioning...

Are you doing the 'you are not allowed to post if you only have one or..When did I say that??? I can not find that post?
B exactly which watch do I post over and over again?

B if a person is telling you that you are wrong and dismissing your opinion on an issue in which you possess the physical item and have a history regarding that item and not being the case for the rebutter. It makes it hard for me to give weight to the counter argument. That is my opinion.

Replace the GMT with your Comex or PN and how would you respond to a counter argument about a fact about your watch from a person who never has handled or owned a Comex? See my point. I feel that owning a certain rare if you will product puts you further on the drivers seat then if not having any familiarity with that item. One gains experience in the nuances of an item by ownership. Do you not agree?

A



http://rolexnessreviews.blogspot.com/

I can understand... that you might feel different when someone is commenting something which is in your hand.. and you feel it is wrong.

But then you can also relax... and trun away.... instead of telling someone... he first should show you the watches he owned/own ... to proof if he is capable of commenting on the subject.

It shure as hell felt like pointing someone down.... because of not owning or having the 'money'/collection.
I guess it will frighten quite some people from asking questions and commenting... that are not big collectors.

So for the future of this... i also would like to see more and more people feel comfortable to post and join the discussion.... don't you think.


ANd indeed i don't aggree......... as i learned a lot,... a real lot... of a wonderful person... on the Milsub subject... from a guy... who does not own a Milsub as far as i know.... but who is into the subject soo deep. And real passionate about it... and the SBS.

I got great gifts from him... and talking to him is one of my big joys.



But... again... the watches are shown... the bigcrowns... your watches????


Best,

B

I believe your lack in the proficiency of the English language and or comprehension skills make it arduous for you to follow my posts..
"best example of correct written English"
You are not the one to talk..even that sentence you wrote is nonsensical..

http://rolexnessreviews.blogspot.com/