Did gold 1680s have big indices like this model?June 15 2012 at 4:54 PM
|Ed Heliosz (Login edheliosz)|
from IP address 18.104.22.168
|June 15 2012, 7:54 PM |
Fugazi. Go to the dial archives and look at the nipple dials.
Yes, we all know about the nipple dial. I'm talking about the big marker dial
|June 15 2012, 8:16 PM |
looks to be a matt and tritium dial from a steel sub
|June 15 2012, 8:31 PM |
not a dial from a gold sub thats been basterdised into tiffany and then into a gold casee
|This message has been edited by jedly1 from IP address 22.214.171.124 on Jun 15, 2012 8:42 PM|
No big tritium indices on the gold 1680’ Ed
|June 15 2012, 8:32 PM |
That is not the only questionable element of the watch.
Tiffany logo is much too large and wide.
Bezel and pearl are from sapphire crystal 16808 transitional era.
Indefensible example there Ed
Thanks for the info. This went for $32k at Christies Geneva 2007.
|June 15 2012, 8:48 PM |
VRF Dial Archive Curator
Just proves that old maxim attributed to PT Barnum. Best, T. Nt
|June 15 2012, 9:05 PM |
|Current Topic - Did gold 1680s have big indices like this model?|
Vintage Rolex Forum and Vintage Rolex Market are not sponsored by, associated with and/or affiliated with Rolex, S.A. or Rolex USA or any respective subsidaries or affiliates.
Copyright The VRF, Inc. 2002 - 2013