<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>

Return to Index

Eeny, meeny, miny, moe - Which one would you pick in the 60s PN/GMT/Red Sub August 6 2012 at 9:14 PM		(Login LunetteVerde) VRF Member from IP address 220.255.2.169

Respond to this message

Author

Reply

WorldOysterWatcher
(Login WorldOysterWatcher)
VRF Member
207.200.116.65

You would have thought that the...

August 6 2012, 9:20 PM

complicated movement in the Daytona would have made it pricier... I'm surprised the GMT cost more!

Respond to this message

Holycosmic
(Login holycosmic)
VRF Member
202.64.114.106

...made my day! Thanks for the pic, T.

August 6 2012, 10:09 PM

Clearly Rolex didnt think the manual winded Sport cosmograph watch was the bigger selling item. GMT's have only gained their popularity in this decade. As i recall, GMTs were regarded as affordable sport watches (entry level) back in the days.

Regards
T

Respond to this message

(Login LunetteVerde)
VRF Member
203.117.37.213

So you are the lucky stokist ;-) Here are a couple more in 1968 London - 1016/1675/5512 ?

August 7 2012, 6:00 AM

Respond to this message

Bernhard
(Premier Login bullibeer)
VRF Contributing Member
82.93.93.82

Of course.. and now look for the price of the Datejust ;-)

August 7 2012, 1:15 AM

Even more expansive then the Sub, Daytona and GMT

Best,

Bernhard

Respond to this message

Steve.P
(Login 2wsxcde3)
VRF Member
58.8.99.77

I have a Rolex advertisement from >

August 7 2012, 8:35 AM

the Bangkok Post dating back to 1980. It's priced in Thai baht which I believe was around 25:1 but you can still get a sense of proportion comparing the new value of one watch against another.

[linked image]

Respond to this message

Current Topic - Eeny, meeny, miny, moe - Which one would you pick in the 60s PN/GMT/Red Sub

<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>

Return to Index

Contact