In 1980 I bought a brand new steel and gold Submariner 1680 from an authorized dealer. The serial number is 6.1 mil. I was told that it was specially ordered from Rolex by another customer who later backed out of the sale.
Does anyone know if Rolex produced a production model steel and gold version at that time?
No they did not the first 2tone was 16803 quick set movement
August 14 2012, 5:02 PM
and saphire glass. If your watch is indeed all original Rolex I would say it is very uncommon. Do
you have the original paperword punched stating it is two tone 1680? All the other 2tone 1680's I have ever seen are aftermarket conversions and I have been dealing since 1984.
Re: No they did not the first 2tone was 16803 quick set movement
August 14 2012, 6:48 PM
I have the orginal punched warranty sheet, but don't recall if there is any mention of the two tone. The watch is at my office now and I cannot check it but will do so tomorrow and post the results, along with some pics.
If there is no mention on the paperwork, would it be possible to have Rolex verify it was shipped that way? Do you know if they keep such records? Can an expert tell the difference between a factory item and an aftermarket conversion?
Re: No they did not the first 2tone was 16803 quick set movement
August 15 2012, 1:00 AM
There was no officially-offered Rolex stainless steel/gold 1680 Submariner. Two-tone submariners did not enter the Rolex product line until the sapphire quick-set Subs of the 1980s. What most likely occurred was that the selling dealer "customized" the standard steel 1680 model per customer's request. This is not hard to do, after all, even using all authentic Rolex components. The only parts that will need to be changed with pieces from the gold model (1680/8) are as follows:
1. Bezel and insert;
2. Dial, hands and datewheel;
3. Crown; and
4. Swap standard all-steel Oyster band with two-tone Oyster band from 1675/3 GMT Master.
fatboyharris (Login fatboyharris) VRF Member 78.86.97.77
+1 In those days TT were more desirable
August 15 2012, 3:21 AM
my now retired Rolex dealer would always thoroughly check any early TT piece to make sure that it was not a conversion of a SS piece which was very common at one time.
The first TT submariner to appear in any catalogue was the later non nipple dialled 16803.
Someome must have a period dealers master watch catalogue to be able to verify the truth behind such pieces.
regards
John
This message has been edited by fatboyharris from IP address 78.86.97.77 on Aug 15, 2012 3:23 AM
is correct and very rare, not many were made. I used to have one with purple/blue dial, but sold it as the folded tu tone bracelet wasn't in good condition.
How do you guys know they were "born" that way? I am open-minded but...
August 14 2012, 9:07 PM
...it would seem an easy thing to create and I have never heard of a TT 1680 slowset from the Rolex factory before.
Any pix of these rare birds?
Thanks,
T.
conversion jobs can look pretty good, i never would have known......
August 15 2012, 1:24 AM
this 1675 was a conversion job except for the pointed crown guards case!!!!
TT watches was very hip in the 80ths so many all steel watches where pimped as the spare parts where cheap and avaliable at many more places then today
if the watch was a special order from rolex factory would it not have the serial in the caseback like the saudi and other special orders???
migth just be the AD that put it together and then it will still be regarded as a conversion job
check the caseback (any rolex watchmaker will be able to open it) and check your recipt and warranty paper if there is any text saying gold/steel or 18k/steel
either the watch is factory as the AD said but for me all i have seen has been later conversions, ie none of them had papers from rolex to back it
christian (Login poormans) VRF Member 212.247.180.79
its a realy nice set you have there but without rolex conformation..........
August 15 2012, 10:33 AM
that it left the factory that way it will most likely be regarded by most as a conversion job
most special orders has the full serial inside the caseback but that was mostly done to big companys and military/goverments that orderd many watches a time
First let me say that I think it is impossible for us to verify this watch...
August 15 2012, 10:50 AM
...but I have some questions:
-What is the clasp code on the bracelet?
-What reference #s are on the clasp & end pieces?
-Is it a fliplock clasp w/diver's extension?
-Do you know when the watch was last serviced? Because the hands & bezel insert appear to have have been replaced at some point.
Now maybe if this watch truly was a special order, Rolex Geneva can help you, as well. Because AFAIK by this period every special order piece is documented by Rolex. Also, you may want to have a watchmaker open the back & see if there is a serial # on the inside that matches the case #. That would also be characteristic of a special order watch.
But honestly I am quite skeptical since these do not appear in any Rolex literature and are simply too easy to create.
Best,
T.
The clasp is marked T8 and 78.363.18
End link 78363
End link cover 480
It is not a diver's bracelet.
The last major service @ Rolex was on 10/10/1998. It has been cleaned and oiled locally since, but not sent back to Rolex.
Yes, the hands, crown, crown tube, and bezel insert have all been replaced during major services. The bracelet itself was replaced during the last major service. I got the impression that Rolex insists on replacing whatever they deem necessary, including the bracelet. Perhaps I misunderstood, but it was nonetheless replaced.
It looks like contacting Rolex is the only sure way to verify whether or not this was a factory order.
Thanks for your help and any additional comments are welcome.
Re: First let me say that I think it is impossible for us to verify this watch...
August 15 2012, 2:21 PM
I called the Dallas Rolex service center and was told that they will not service any Rolex that is not in its original 'born' state. Seems like a rather strict policy. But if true, it would seem to support what the AD's contention that this was a custom order. It has been serviced by Rolex twice.
The lady also told me that they do not keep any records there, or anywhere else, to verify authenticity. They will provide an insurance value upon examintation of the watch. She stated that they will only do this for watches in their original state.
fatboyharris (Login fatboyharris) VRF Member 78.86.97.77
Best thing to do is write to Rolex Geneva
August 16 2012, 2:28 AM
and ask for them to clarify what was the original configuration of your watch, secondily if the watch is correct as a 1680/3 in what years were the model produced and for which markets and what was the configuration of the watch, e'g' did it come with oyster bracelet with divers extension.
Check with the Rolex Centre that performed the service to see what specification the watch was in when serviced by them. My understanding is that Rolex will not service watches which contain non Rolex parts, they have worked on a 1675/8 GMT with a modern 16518 Daytona leather strap and clasp on it, certainly not in the original form.
Regards
John
This message has been edited by fatboyharris from IP address 78.86.97.77 on Aug 16, 2012 2:30 AM
Several members have suggested that I contact Geneva to determine if my 2 tone 1680 is original or a conversion. I was wondering if anyone else has had experience on obtaining information on a specific watch from them?
Also, I located a ROLEX repair center in Geneva from their website on 1211 Geneva 26. Is this the correct location?
Has anyone contacted Rolex Geneve regarding info on a particular watch? If so, what do they provide? I am trying to determine if my 1680 2 Tone is an original build or a conversion. Would they have records of this going back 30+ years (and be willing to provide them)?
Also the only address I found on the Rolex site appears to be a service center on 1211 Geneva 26. Is this the correct address?
thanks so much for all the responses and suggestions!
Glenn
I am now the very pleased owner of this watch (my brother and I purchased it from the above original owner). It's gorgeous, first of all, and heavily documented.
The original punch-papers make no mention of it being TT, but ... RSC Dallas invoice from 1987 says "1680 St/G OPD Sub. Blk/? & Bz" and references the serial number. Bracelet is labeled as "St/G Oyster N/Exp 78363"
Planning on writing to RSC in the UK as I hear they're much better at this (hopefully to find out if it was factory vs. AD-made).
But either way, this TT 1680 definitely had the blessing of RSC Dallas in 1987 and again in 1998!