"Truth" is definetly what I am after but, it seems to me very irresponsible to take this story of a grand farce and instantly give credit to it and believe everything that I have researched was caused by this one person. From what I have gathered Ray Wallace was never taken seriously at all. I am not one who believes everything I hear, to do so would be unscientific to say the least. To accept hearsay as "truth" is not in my nature. His family's testamony would not be admisable in a court of law. There was doubt long before Ray wallace passed away and there was evidence long before he was ever born.