Always amusing watching the depraved jerkoffs of this forum flitting about with glee when there's material of a little girl being punished, or news surfaces of a female dropping some obscure reference to a childhood spanking, etc.
Dropping a bomb on congress while in session sounds like a spectacular idea, but it pales in comparison to the urgency with which you shafts should be ofted and disposed of.
But assuming that everyone who objects to postings like these is a self-loathing hypocrite is about as rational as assuming that all kid-spanking fans are pedophiles.
That spanking did not look like it hurt very much, by the way.
And there is nothing wrong with a small amount of pain when a girl is punished with a spanking.
If you think it actually hurt, take a beach flipflop, like the one used in this spanking. Now, hit yourself on the front of your leg (through your pants) 12 times. It doesn't even sting very much!
Kamryn was crying because she was punished, not because the spanking hurt a lot. She would have cried just as hard if she had been sent to her room for an hour, or made to stand in the corner, or had her dessert taken away for a week.
Kids cry when they are disciplined, it's natural.
Kamryn's grandmother was disciplining her for her own good, so that she wouldn't be so careless next time she threw a hard toy (Kamryn hit her brother in the head with a plastic toy, and so she was spanked). It's a good lesson to learn.
So what? Are you saying your enjoyment of child spanking is limited to spankings that aren't very painful? Who here would be put off by a video of little Kamryn getting spanked severely? How many would actually prefer to see that?
No matter how you explain her distress in this video or why she deserved to be punished, it doesn't change the fact that you're circulating it for entertainment. You point out it's natural for kids to cry when disciplined. How natural is it for adults to seek out footage of disciplined kids crying?
JMoney is a hypocrite who probably jacks off 5,000 times more to little kids than all of us combined to the infinite power, but hates himself for it so he tries to put us down.
Just because he objects to certain kinds of posts he's some closet pedophile hypocrite???? Okaaaaaaaaaaaay, whatever makes you feel better about your own shortcomings ROFLMAO
DOesnt work for me... it says it is a flv-file... I want to look on them, so what shalll I do? Should I use another program than Windows Media, Quicktime and DivX?
anything that involves the looking at a child as a sexual object is disturbing.
If you are dealing with older teenagers or young adults I'm in because they are developed sexually and realize that.
So little kids being disciplined is bad, but older children being disciplined is OK because they are developed sexually? So if a parent puts the spanking of their hot 16-year-old daughter on YouTube getting spanked, that is OK because the girl knows she is hot? Even though the result is complete and utter humiliation for the child? None of these videos are illegal. But I wonder about those who constantly try to say their perversion is more acceptable than the perversion of others.
I don't agree with older kids getting spanked, let alone putting it on YouTube. I don't agree with enjoying someone's pain and humiliation no matter what age they are. But I think what makes it more disturbing in the case of little kids is they are more innocent and defenseless as well as not normally sexualized in any way like a 16-year-old is likely to be.
You don't understand the law. To paraphrase a former chief judge of NY "A good prosecuter could indict a ham sandwich."
DA's are elected officials. The public likes to see a tough stance taken on pedophiles and anything that resembles child porn. I'm sure an assistant DA would be more than happy to sign an arrest warrent for someone sending videos, like this one, on adult websites, like this one.
After that, it would be up to your lawyer to convince, what I imagine would be, a very unsympathetic jury that what you've done is legal.
People have been convicted for less. Examples have been posted before.
If you are so convident in the legality of these videos, pay parents to let you film them legally disciplining their children, then sell them to cinndunc and company. I'm sure you'd make a fortune. I'd also be willing to bet you end up behind bars though.
Just because some people choose to post commercial porn here, does not make the site adult.
You do NOT have to be over 18 to view SF&R, and there are no such warnings anywhere on the site.
The Kamryn video is not pornographic or sexual. It is normal discipline in an everyday household in Mississippi. It is simply a home movie filmed by Kamryn's brother.
It is less criminal than a ham sandwich.
Hah! The public is way too much in denial over the existence of spankophilia to be keen on prosecuting the relatively harmless Cinnduncs of the world. They don't want to deal with the fact that "old fashioned discipline" could be a turn-on for anyone, it's just too much of a socially taboo can of worms.
My interest in this subject stems from being spanked as a child.. I received the same treatment.
I do not agree with children being spanked to tears or at all either, really, but at times my fantasy does. We cannot control what happens, we did not post the video on YouTube and i for one have never done this to a child myself.
The videos are on-topic.
There is nothing illegal about it, the videos were shared on a public site, and going by the accents it sounds alot like they came from a state where SPANKING IS LEGAL.
If you cannot deal with the fact that more than half the members here enjoy it, why do you come here? To make us all feel like **** about our fantasies? Did you download and watch it? So you did the same thing as us? And how do we ****ing know you didn't enjoy every second of it? You just have a need to bitch and lament over everybody like a ****ing pompous moron.
Well go **** yourself *******, nobody is dead, and no children have been molested here.. No ****ing harm has been done on our part whatsoever so put that through your thick ****ing head and get the **** out of here before I do the same to you, only I'll use a thick cane to beat you bloody with.
Ooooh, I'm so petrified! But hey, I don't begrudge anyone their fantasies, it just seems kind of low to publicly use images of a real kid to stoke them.
You want to talk about hypocrisy, here's a question: Who among you all would be willing to film the spanking of a little girl in your own family and share it with this group?
If you would never do that, why the hell not? No laws would be broken, after all. She wouldn't be molested or die. So what's the problem?
There is a difference between what i would do personally and what somebody else is stupid enough to do.
Whoever posted the video may not like it, but that's what happens. And you are right for once! Nobody would die or be molested either way. So i would surive knowing those facts even if myself or somebody else in the family did choose to post such a video of a family member..
One would think that when somebody such as yourself doesn't like this kind of video they might just leave one negative remark and then never visit this thread again, the fact that you keep coming back for more proves that you do just want to lament about it and argue with everybody, and most likely try and prove something to yourself. But nobody cares. ;-)
Some might say it's somewhat justified when you attack everybody on the group who enjoys it and continue to do so. I don't know you so and you don't me so rest assured there is no reason to be alarmed at my empty threads, no matter how bad they might be.
The few minutes on my part to write a few cuss words is no biggie for me but i can admit that in a way you struck a nerve, it does somehwhat bother me that you made the remarks but I don't really care why you did so..
Re: The Kamryn video, posted by anon #1: F/f real, with a flipflop
August 15 2008, 7:24 AM
***There is a difference between what i would do personally and what somebody else is stupid enough to do.
Whoever posted the video may not like it, but that's what happens. And you are right for once! Nobody would die or be molested either way. So i would surive knowing those facts even if myself or somebody else in the family did choose to post such a video of a family member. ***
Well, you still haven't given any reason why you personally wouldn't advertise such a video here. So would you (if you had the opportunity)? If not, why not?
Re: The Kamryn video, posted by anon #1: F/f real, with a flipflop
August 15 2008, 7:51 AM
If it was for a film in which the child was getting paid for it, I might advertise the film, but not here on a fetish forum and not if the particular scene was filmed for fetish reasons.
I would not hit a child in my family or any child for fetish reasons, or at all, and I also wouldn't share any sort of footage of such an event for fetish reasons if it involved a member of my own family, for legal reasons and it would be in bad taste to directly exploit your own family in such a way knowing full well how it would be viewed by other people.
Keep in mind that the video was not advertised here on this forum by the uploader, all they did was release it publicly. If i were to take that sort of footage of a family member and share it here directly on this forum those actions may be illegal..
It would be a bad call and i know how those things are, but as I said i wouldn't advertise it here. In this case with these videos they were uploaded elsewhere and a member here merely obtained the footage and shared it, it might have been a mistake to upload it on YouTube but there was no real wrong doing on the uploaders part, because they did not post it on a fetish forum directly.