Your success was not at Check, right?August 16 2011 at 8:58 AM
|BabyDance (no login)|
Response to Totally disagree - success ment
If it was - please tell us. Maureen said it better below. Also, Jamie keeps saying it was the supplements that changed her egg quality, but maybe it was the change in lab. Listen - I LOVE Dr. CHeck, and think he's the master at natural cycles - just haven't seen a lot of IVF success there - in fact, none since I've been on the boards, except one or two chemicals. Then people leave there and have success, often the next cycle elsewhere, with tweaking his protocols. Just the way it's adding up. Wish the facts were different, I'd stick with him forever. Also, for us over 40's - his 2009 SART for 41 IVF success - ZERO. That's right, ZERO. It should not be ZERO at 41.
- Reread this - yours was at Check, right? - BabyDance on Aug 16, 2011, 9:20 AM
- Re: Your success was not at Check, right? - gone_fshn on Aug 16, 2011, 10:13 AM