--


  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  

Intersting discovery

March 4 2005 at 3:20 PM
Erin GoBragh 

-
Arnold = SteveH


 
 Respond to this message   
AuthorReply
Beranger

Re: Intersting discovery

March 4 2005, 7:19 PM 

And

SteveH = Max Boyce

(Both as funny as the plague!)

Steve - if you are false posting & I'm defending you, forget the pint next sunday!!!!!!!.........






















Joke!
:-)

 
 
Erin GoBragh

Re: Intersting discovery

March 5 2005, 8:29 AM 

It just seems that the style of response from Arnold is similar to SteveH. Especially concerning Tesco.

 
 

Re: Intersting discovery

March 5 2005, 11:25 AM 

Says the poster who has posted under about 10 different post-names.

Stop being daft - only you do that sort of activity.

I find it hilarious that you accuse me of doing that though!!


 
 
Arnold

Re: Intersting discovery

March 7 2005, 3:58 AM 

I assume that Erin could be a number of people here then?

Which is odd, because all the other posters here appear to be, how can I say this without causing too much harm, "normal".

 
 

Re: Intersting discovery

March 7 2005, 9:57 AM 

Erin posts as one username, get ridiculed for his nonsenses, and then disappears. Shortly lately, a "new" poster comes on the street, spouting the same guff as "Erin", putting forward the same old tired arguments, and most importantly resuming old conversations (he had in another guise) with forum posters.

 
 
Arnold

Re: Intersting discovery

March 8 2005, 3:06 AM 

Ah - I see.

Isn't there a netiquette name for this sort of activity?

A comination of trolling and masquarading?

 
 

Re: Intersting discovery

March 8 2005, 1:54 PM 

It is often referred to as "doppelling" (which refers specifically to an established member taken another account, but often implies the member has done this for the sake of trolling).

 
 
Erin GoBragh

Re: Intersting discovery

March 8 2005, 3:19 PM 

Is there a requirement among imperialists to also be anal retentive? I ask because you two sure are.

 
 

Re: Intersting discovery

March 8 2005, 3:51 PM 

Again with the insults.

 
 
Troll

Re: Intersting discovery

March 8 2005, 8:40 PM 

Not an insult, an observation. You have proven the point by your response.

 
 

Re: Intersting discovery

March 9 2005, 2:02 AM 

Not really much of a point. If you have a point, how about expressing it like a civilised humanbeing, instead of like some chimp, and then maybe we can get a dialogue going here.

 
 
Arnold

Re: Intersting discovery

March 9 2005, 2:28 AM 

He's changed his name again!

What a strange person.

I wonder - have some chimps learned the ability to type?

 
 
Chimp

Re: Intersting discovery

March 9 2005, 3:55 AM 

I see you two aren't immune to being insulting either. Is this the pot calling the kettle black?

 
 

Re: Intersting discovery

March 9 2005, 5:26 AM 

No Erin, we all have had enough of your nonsense. You may like to think we insulted you first or whatever, but for a LONG, and I mean long, time me and others were patient with you. But you have gone beyond a joke to be honest. As Steve has said, even the frigging pro-metric board banned you. I mean, wow, just think on that okay.

 
 
Arnold

Re: Intersting discovery

March 9 2005, 8:30 AM 

I did read an old post about him not being wanted by a US based pro-metric site.

I thought that might just be a bit of leg pulling!

lol what a loser!

(I'm hoping his name will be "loser" for his next post, just to make it consistant with the flow so far)

 
 
SteveH

Re: Intersting discovery

March 9 2005, 12:04 PM 

The group in question is "USMA".

He's pretty much supported by no-one.

In fact, I've never heard of anyone to have such an unique point of view.

He's certainly one in a million.

No.

Make that won in a raffle.

 
 
Current Topic - Intersting discovery  Respond to this message   
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  
Create your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2008 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement