News source from Aviationweek. Seems like China is developing closer military relationship with Iran.
What other military equipment China can sell to Iran ?

Iran to buy China's HQ-9 SAM system

http://chinesemil.blogspot.com/

Iran will turn to China instead of Russia to acquire an advanced air defense system after relations between Iran and Russia hit rock bottom, the official Iranian news agency PressTV reported. For years Iran has been trying to purchase the S-300 anti-aircraft missile, which is considered to be one of the most advanced systems available on the market and would dramatically increase Iran's air defense capabilities against any attacks on its nuclear installations.


HongQi-9/FD-2000 system

The S-300 surface-to-air missile system, which can track targets and fire at aircraft 75 miles away, features high jamming immunity making it harder to incapacitate the system electronically, and is able to engage up to 100 targets simultaneously.

Teheran will now turn to China for the HongQi-9/FD-2000 system which combines elements "borrowed" from the Russian S-300 and the American MIM-104 Patriot system, according to the Iranian news agency. Although experts estimate that the Chinese system does not perform as well as the Russian S-300, it still presents an effective addition to bolster the Iranian air defense, which is virtually obsolete against any modern air attack on its vital strategic installations. There is no unclassified information regarding the effectiveness of western countermeasures against the HongQi-9/FD-2000 system, nor against the Russian S-300. There was unconfirmed speculation over possible electronic countermeasures used during the 2007 attack on the alleged Syrian reactor.

No, no, no.

Was not Iran buying S-300, no, S-400, no S-50000 that can detect stealth plane and 1 battery enough to destroy entire IAF and USAF?

Now they buying the cheaper Chinese SAM?

Guess kozs "rich" Iran is not that "rich after all........LOL.

how would you know chinese HQ-9 is cheaper than S-300 ?, just a stupid guess, no ?

Everyone know that Western > Russian >>>> Chinese for quality as well as price.

It is not rocket science.

Like I said before ... you are just guessing without any proof (typical brainwashed stupid head) ... in some cases, your guess is totally wrong

keep guessing mate, you will be left behind without realising it

you are just guessing without any proof

Base on past referense of chinese "quality" (or lack of it) we can call it educated guess.

If you really wanted to argue HQ-9 is superior to S-300, all can be said is - LOL.

lol, you mean as lol you are bankrupt?

-------------------------------------------------

Boom and bust cycle, is normal for all economies.

We will be back.

At least our government can be hold accountable for mistakes. Yours? Don't think so! Like I say - LOL.

LOL

Prime_evil quote

"""""""""""
If you was not an retard you will realised this"""""""""""




If_YOU_WAS_NOT_AN_RETARD



HAHAHAHAH


WTF does that mean????????????

__________________________________________________

"Being defeated makes victory taste ever more sweet" - Chinawhite

"If God gives you lemons, eat those lemons" - Chinawhite

I've never said HQ-9 is superior than S-300, we are talking about price right, typical dick head

But yes, HQ-9A is vasly superior to original S-300 and better than S-300PMU, comparable to S-300PMU1

S-300PMU2 is still superior to HQ-9A/B

Not sure whether this dickhead knows what he is talking about, not sure whether he knows there are many variant of S-300 ..

How the hell we know which one is better?Chinese one is a brand new product and Russian one never
combat tested so all is speculation.

I think Iran would make any potential attackers more uneasy when they told the world they were buying Russian instead of Chinese..

F-35 > HQ-9

---

"We should not forget that the spark which ignited the American Revolution was caused by the British attempt to confiscate the firearms of the colonists."
- Patrick Henry -

Ron Paul Library <-=+=+=+=-> Ron Paul Archives

"Gun control has cleared the way for seven major genocides since 1915, in which governments gone bad murdered 56,000,000 persons, including millions of children."
- Aaron Zelman of Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership -

"That a well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defense of a free state, therefore, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed; that standing armies, in time of peace, should be avoided as dangerous to liberty; and that in all cases the military should be under strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil power."
- Virginia Bill of Rights -

F-35 = prototype that barely exists

HQ-9 = SAM system in large scale production for several years with hundreds of missiles produced.

I would buy a Tunguska for Air defence before I bought Chinese.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"deeds, not words"

get the fawk outta here. And here i thought Iran was ready to introduce the super next generation "indigenous" Anti air missile systems with capability to bring down the moon.

=======================================================
Persian Officer: Spartans! Lay down your weapons.
Leonidas: Persians! Come and get them!

Quote
"How the hell we know which one is better?Chinese one is a brand new product and Russian one never
combat tested so all is speculation."

with your dickhead logic, would you say that Russian/Chinese/British/french/Indian nuke weapons also speculation and dummy as they are not combat tested ????

also with your dickhead logic ... because F-22 is not combat proven .. then F4 phantom (which is compat proven) better than F-22 ?

We know which one is better from the specs published/stolen and testing .. got it ?

LOL.......if you even spend 5 min on this site you would hear about S-300PMU.

But I'm talking of 1990s S-300P/PS, which I think is even much superior to HQ-9, nevermind S-300PMU2.


But yes, HQ-9A is vasly superior to original S-300 and better than S-300PMU, comparable to S-300PMU1

LOL!

To me, HQ-9 is maybe comparable to original 1980s S-300, 1st Gen version.....

Prime_evils internet "general" ROFL

Formulating these "indepth" assements from his parents basement LOL





Prime_evil quote

"""""""""""
If you was not an retard you will realised this"""""""""""




If_YOU_WAS_NOT_AN_RETARD



HAHAHAHAH


WTF does that mean????????????


__________________________________________________

"Being defeated makes victory taste ever more sweet" - Chinawhite

"If God gives you lemons, eat those lemons" - Chinawhite

LOL @ midgets and their napoleon complex.

Of course I feel inferior to you. On the internet your a 6'6 foot 30inch cock superman ROFL hahahahahahahahahahah.



Just because you make a BS claim on the internet doesn't make it true you idiot ROFL


LOL

Prime_evil quote

"""""""""""
If you was not an retard you will realised this"""""""""""




If_YOU_WAS_NOT_AN_RETARD



HAHAHAHAH


WTF does that mean????????????


__________________________________________________

"Being defeated makes victory taste ever more sweet" - Chinawhite

"If God gives you lemons, eat those lemons" - Chinawhite

HAHAHAHAH


WTF does that mean????????????


ROFL, ChinaWHITE the Chinaman is now also a grammar nazi. Oh how jolly well good on you, old chap!! How about some tea and crumpets!!

Fkin WHITE wannabe..LOL. I CAN HAS CHIGABURGER NAO?!!? lol...


==================================
Tu dhoop hain jham se bikhar
Tu hai nadee o bekhabar
Beh chal kahin ud chal kahin
Dil khush jahan teri toh manzil hai wahin.

Is is technically true that since both China and Russian missiles are almost similar they have more efficiency in jamming these missiles (I meant each others)?
That might be a reason why India never opted for S-300 system and instead is opting for a different system with Israel....

Peace comes not from the absence of trouble but from presence of god........

javascript:FTxt('')

we are not talking about insignificant india here, what india can do anyway, simply can not afford buying S-300 system, let alone developing similar system