<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  

Chinese type 03 vs type 95

October 10 2009 at 5:16 PM
No score for this post

  (Login HBN2025)
Middle kingdom(China)

Type 95 is equipped with the army not so long ago but now why type 03 is better?

Type 03
[linked image]

[linked image]

Type 95
[linked image]

[linked image]

[linked image] [linked image]
[linked image]

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
AuthorReply

(Login sampaix)
Elite WAFF Vet Club

HBN2025

No score for this post
October 10 2009, 5:18 PM 

I guess our honorable friend is going to tlet us know the answer to that and i appologise for the way your previous topic turned.

Good looking hardware though!

Thunder Supports Rafale [linked image]
http://rafale.freeforums.org
http://rafale.freeforums.org/rafale-vs-f-16-aerodynamics-compared-t69.html


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.


(Login HBN2025)
Middle kingdom(China)

Re: Chinese type 03 vs type 95

No score for this post
October 10 2009, 5:23 PM 

Nowadays seems every soldier carries a Type 95 even armed police carries one

Army
[linked image]

[linked image]

[linked image]



PAP
[linked image]

[linked image]

[linked image]

[linked image] [linked image]
[linked image]

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.


(Login HBN2025)
Middle kingdom(China)

Re: Chinese type 03 vs type 95

No score for this post
October 10 2009, 5:25 PM 

I guess our honorable friend is going to tlet us know the answer to that and i appologise for the way your previous topic turned.

=
No my dear friend I got no real clue why 03 is better (if not better they won't make it on top of 95)

No problem in another Thread I saw you screwing that ignorant low IQ gamer easily
happy.gif

[linked image] [linked image]
[linked image]

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Thunder
(Login sampaix)
Elite WAFF Vet Club

Well it's not the end of it i'm afraid...

No score for this post
October 10 2009, 5:31 PM 

A few years ago i tried to share some information on the raise of China technologies level mainly naval, from Jane's, i had acces to a lot of books and articles at the time. (Now it's only 45 mn away).

I was flamed to death by the usual waff's trolls (same kind of guys).

Four years later, the Chinese Navy is ranked third in the world, so i guess their analysts knows something we don't...

Thunder Supports Rafale [linked image]
http://rafale.freeforums.org
http://rafale.freeforums.org/rafale-vs-f-16-aerodynamics-compared-t69.html


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.


(Login HBN2025)
Middle kingdom(China)

Re: Chinese type 03 vs type 95

No score for this post
October 10 2009, 5:36 PM 

I was flamed to death by the usual waff's trolls (same kind of guys).

==

But you kept fighting back and still alive healthy happy.gif

I am glad we have some real knowledgeable people like Thunder and some others here otherwise WAFF is too kids garden [linked image]


[linked image] [linked image]
[linked image]

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Aotearoa
(Login AntiTerror13)
ANZACs(Aus/N.Z)

complimentary

No score for this post
October 10 2009, 8:48 PM 

I don't agree with your logic, by making type 03, doesn't mean it is better than the previous one type 95, they are complimented each other.

Type 03 is more advanced (much) version of type 81 which most chinese soldiers like it and also type 81 has been exported to many other countries and apparently very popular in US (for civilan). type 81 use 7.2 mm bullet while type 03 use new chinese standard 5.8 mm bullet.

type 95 is totally new concept for Chinese concept, it is a bullpup rifle, Chinese never have a bullpup rifle before. Type 03 is Type 03 is a conventional design.

Type 03 (QBZ-03) assault rifle is most recent development of Chinese state arms factories ..... For various but unpublished reasons the bullpup Type 95 / QBZ-95 assault rifle was apparently found not entirely satisfactory in PLA service ...... It was decided to develop a new 5.8mm assault rifle of conventional layout, which will provide necessary competition and backup to its older bullpup brother ....... In some respects this new weapon, known as QBZ-03 (Type 03 / 2003), is reminiscent to the experimental Type 87 rifle, which was developed in mid-1980s for testing of the new 5.8x42mm DAP-87 cartridge. It is not yet known if Type 03 rifle will enter widespread service with PLA troops to replace or complement Type 95 rifle.


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.

Strike Force
(Login NintendoGamer76)
Eagle Squadron(US)

Re: Chinese type 03 vs type 95

No score for this post
October 10 2009, 9:11 PM 

LOLOLOL

Look at these 2 sucking each others d!cks. Despicable.

The Type 95 looks good, other one is ugly.



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag-Map_of_the_North_American_Union.png


    
This message has been edited by NintendoGamer76 on Oct 10, 2009 9:12 PM


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Raj
(Login Arjun_m)
Satyameva Jayate(India)

Re: Chinese type 03 vs type 95

No score for this post
October 10 2009, 9:32 PM 

No offence but all thes type 3,4, 56,81 etc are AK copies !!!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.


(Login NintendoGamer76)
Eagle Squadron(US)

Re: Chinese type 03 vs type 95

No score for this post
October 10 2009, 9:34 PM 

^^^Be careful with your words or you'll have Frogman and Chinaboy teaming up on you smilies1684.gif

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag-Map_of_the_North_American_Union.png

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Aotearoa
(Login AntiTerror13)
ANZACs(Aus/N.Z)

typical poor indians

No score for this post
October 10 2009, 9:38 PM 

typical poor stupid indians .... because too much eating rat and drinking cows urine .. sad really can not see the differences ... like saying all missiles are copied of V-1 .... lol

showing how stupid indians are ... hahahaha

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.

Yaguarete_AR
(Login Yaguarete_AR)
The Conquerors (Turkey)

Re: Chinese type 03 vs type 95

No score for this post
October 11 2009, 1:29 AM 

Chinese friends: Have China sale the Type 95 or the Tpye 03 to any force in the World (at least in small quantities)?

I have to mention that a Chinese military delegation visited Argentina 3 years ago and offered us the Type 95 for replacement of the old FN FAL. Commandos and special troops tested a couple of weapons at the Campo de Mayo military range and they observed problems with barrel overheating. In fact after shooting three magazines in a row it was a real problem to sustain the weapon without gloves. I don't know if this problems have been presented in another tests.

Greetings

-------------------------------------------------------
"Las Malvinas fueron, son y ser¨¢n Argentinas"

[linked image]

[linked image] [linked image]

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.

Dolphins win
(Login Type98G)
Middle kingdom(China)

Re: Chinese type 03 vs type 95

No score for this post
October 11 2009, 1:34 AM 

Looks like the Type 95 was over hype by the Arms company, the type 3 base on a previous successful rifle would be better.

====================================
[linked image]

The animal world

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.

(Login yasin22)
The Conquerors (Turkey)

Re: Chinese type 03 vs type 95

No score for this post
October 11 2009, 2:39 AM 

what caliber does the t95 use

[linked image]

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Aotearoa
(Login AntiTerror13)
ANZACs(Aus/N.Z)

calibre

No score for this post
October 11 2009, 3:25 AM 

all new chinese rifles, including type 95 and 03 use 5.8 mm, it says better than Nato standard 5.6 mm and Russian one

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.

(Login yasin22)
The Conquerors (Turkey)

Re: Chinese type 03 vs type 95

No score for this post
October 11 2009, 4:13 AM 

i was trying to find out the max range its hard to find it in google

[linked image]

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
stp
(Login sntcip)
Member

Re: Chinese type 03 vs type 95

No score for this post
October 11 2009, 5:13 AM 

***Chinese friends: Have China sale the Type 95 or the Tpye 03 to any force in the World (at least in small quantities)?***

Well if they give for free the africans may want some!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.

(Login sampaix)
Elite WAFF Vet Club

LOL!

No score for this post
October 11 2009, 6:25 AM 

I didn't know NOT being an ignorant troll meant to get free blow jobs, we all got to learn sometimes, or do we?

Troll never learn, they have a foaked brain.


@AntiTerror13)

Be careful, you're in danger of being accused of giving head...


Thunder Supports Rafale [linked image]
http://rafale.freeforums.org
http://rafale.freeforums.org/rafale-vs-f-16-aerodynamics-compared-t69.html



    
This message has been edited by sampaix on Oct 11, 2009 7:23 AM
This message has been edited by sampaix on Oct 11, 2009 6:33 AM


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.

(Login Free_Nation)
Elite WAFF Vet Club

Re: Chinese type 03 vs type 95

No score for this post
October 11 2009, 7:22 AM 

that phucking bastard is a chinese? sh1t, i thought he was a muslim ummah scum. happy.gif


[linked image]

colours of Kaziranga

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Aotearoa
(Login AntiTerror13)
ANZACs(Aus/N.Z)

again a proof .. stupid indians

No score for this post
October 11 2009, 7:49 AM 

again another proof ..... how stupid and annoying indians are ( and of course .. extremely weak .. )

no wonder Aussies keep beating indians up ... indians are annoying, parasites, stupid, smelly and ... very weak ... very good for punching bag


    
This message has been edited by AntiTerror13 on Oct 11, 2009 11:48 AM


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.


(Login punit_prakhar)
Satyameva Jayate(India)

Re: Chinese type 03 vs type 95

No score for this post
October 11 2009, 9:13 PM 

holy fck .... so antiterror pup is a chicom happy.gif



SURRENDER OF PAKI ARMY IN 1971 [linked image]
1N 1971 A NEW HISTORY AS WELL AS A NEW NATION WAS CREATED BY WE THE INDIANS..

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Current Topic - Chinese type 03 vs type 95  Respond to this message   
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index