WAFF Vet Club[Click here to Join WAFF!] WAFF Moderators Forum
General Discussion
(The Den)
The World's Armed Forces Forum History, Politics, Economics and Religion Forum
Greece & Turkey Defence Forum Europe, Middle East & Africa
Defence Forum
Asia & Pacific Defence Forum
Help, Suggestions & Complaints
   
   
WAFF Debates Forum
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  

Australia vs Indonesia

January 11 2010 at 4:23 AM
No score for this post

Aviator  (Login B2_Spirit)

Who would win in an all out war?

lets hear it.

[linked image]


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
AuthorReply
Markus
(Login Markus85)
ANZACs (Australia/New Zealand)

Re: Australia vs Indonesia

No score for this post
January 11 2010, 4:27 AM 

Malaysia, New Zealand, Brasil, Russia and Singapore.


War is not good for either country. Nice flame thread though

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
scope
(Login ScopeSASR)
ANZACs (Australia/New Zealand)

Re: Australia vs Indonesia

No score for this post
January 11 2010, 4:28 AM 

Australia would bomb them to the stone age!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Markus
(Login Markus85)
ANZACs (Australia/New Zealand)

Re: Australia vs Indonesia

No score for this post
January 11 2010, 4:29 AM 

no need to bomb them back to the stone age. Just capture Bali. lol

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.

Dolphins win
(Login OakRidge)

Re: Australia vs Indonesia

No score for this post
January 11 2010, 4:32 AM 

What really is an "all out war" between Australia and Indonesia? Since they are separated by water it is going to be each sides subs taking shots at each other. Maybe some aircraft battles. And even if one side got troops landed neither have the logistics to pull anything of size off.


[linked image]
[linked image]
"Korea has not been the only battle ground since the end of the Second World War. Men have fought and died in Malaya, in Greece, in the Philippines, in Algeria and Cuba, and Cyprus and almost continuously on the Indo-Chinese Peninsula. No nuclear weapons have been fired. No massive nuclear retaliation has been considered appropriate. This is another type of war, new in its intensity, ancient in its origin--war by guerrillas, subversives, insurgents, assassins, war by ambush instead of by combat; by infiltration, instead of aggression, seeking victory by eroding and exhausting the enemy instead of engaging him. It is a form of warfare uniquely adapted to what has been strangely called 'wars of liberation,' to undermine the efforts of new and poor countries to maintain the freedom that they have finally achieved. It preys on economic unrest and ethnic conflicts. It requires in those situations where we must counter it, and these are the kinds of challenges that will be before us in the next decade if freedom is to be saved, a whole new kind of strategy, a wholly different kind of force, and therefore a new and wholly different kind of military training."-President Kennedy's Address at Graduation Exercises of the U.S. Military Academy, 1962
------------------------------
"The reason I'll be released is the same reason you think I'll be convicted. I do rub shoulders with some of the most vile, sadistic men calling themselves leaders today. But some of these men are the enemies of your enemies. And while the biggest arms dealer in the world is your boss - the President of the United States, who ships more merchandise in a day than I do in a year - sometimes it's embarrassing to have his fingerprints on the guns. Sometimes he needs a freelancer like me to supply forces he can't be seen supplying. So. You call me evil, but unfortunately for you, I'm a necessary evil."-Yuri Orlov, Lord of War
------------------------------
"Of all the weapons in the vast soviet arsenal, nothing was more profitable than Avtomat Kalashnikova model of 1947. More commonly known as the AK-47, or Kalashnikov. It's the world's most popular assault rifle. A weapon all fighters love. An elegantly simple 9 pound amalgamation of forged steel and plywood. It doesn't break, jam, or overheat. It'll shoot whether it's covered in mud or filled with sand. It's so easy, even a child can use it; and they do. The Soviets put the gun on a coin. Mozambique put it on their flag. Since the end of the Cold War, the Kalashnikov has become the Russian people's greatest export. After that comes vodka, caviar, and suicidal novelists. One thing is for sure, no one was lining up to buy their cars."-Yuri Orlov, Lord of War
------------------------------

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.

Aviator
(Login B2_Spirit)

Re: Australia vs Indonesia

No score for this post
January 11 2010, 4:32 AM 

Please post facts and weapons stats rather than emotional dribble to substantiate your claims

[linked image]


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Markus
(Login Markus85)
ANZACs (Australia/New Zealand)

Re: Australia vs Indonesia

No score for this post
January 11 2010, 4:33 AM 

yes we should all do that in an ill intended flame thread. lol

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
scope
(Login ScopeSASR)
ANZACs (Australia/New Zealand)

Re: Australia vs Indonesia

No score for this post
January 11 2010, 4:34 AM 

LOL b2 can we use u and your flight sim x 747

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.

Aviator
(Login B2_Spirit)

Re: Australia vs Indonesia

No score for this post
January 11 2010, 4:34 AM 

No flame intended , scouts honor [linked image]

[linked image]


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.

Aviator
(Login B2_Spirit)

Re: Australia vs Indonesia

No score for this post
January 11 2010, 4:36 AM 

Back to the topic, how will Australia win against the Indonesians? Weapon stats and facts only

[linked image]


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Markus
(Login Markus85)
ANZACs (Australia/New Zealand)

Re: Australia vs Indonesia

No score for this post
January 11 2010, 4:37 AM 

by summoning the mighty dragons of Zion and the lion of Zelda equiped with the latest in unicorn technology.


    
This message has been edited by Markus85 on Jan 11, 2010 4:39 AM


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Markus
(Login Markus85)
ANZACs (Australia/New Zealand)

Re: Australia vs Indonesia

No score for this post
January 11 2010, 4:38 AM 

any other way would simply be impossible.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.

Aviator
(Login B2_Spirit)

Re: Australia vs Indonesia

No score for this post
January 11 2010, 4:40 AM 

Ok jokes apart, both are evenly matched in Technology and im being serious. the only deciding factor would be who's side America is on and that would be the winner. Otherwise its a stalemate

[linked image]


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Markus
(Login Markus85)
ANZACs (Australia/New Zealand)

Re: Australia vs Indonesia

No score for this post
January 11 2010, 4:41 AM 

America with its might Dragon legion would definitely tilt the balance of power towards middle earth.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
scope
(Login ScopeSASR)
ANZACs (Australia/New Zealand)

Re: Australia vs Indonesia

No score for this post
January 11 2010, 4:42 AM 

Lol big kangaroo!!!!!!! That eats panda bears!!!!!


B2 this is a stupid thread. We know Indonesia has what 4 Su's and 10 F-16's. The Su's don't even have any weapons.

Maybe when Indonesia gets some more palm oil they can buy weapons with there fighter jets ahhahaha.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Markus
(Login Markus85)
ANZACs (Australia/New Zealand)

Re: Australia vs Indonesia

No score for this post
January 11 2010, 4:44 AM 

"big kangaroo!!!!!!! That eats panda bears!!!!!

sadly these species are currently endangered and maybe extinct in a few years if we keep sending them to war.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.

Aviator
(Login B2_Spirit)

Re: Australia vs Indonesia

No score for this post
January 11 2010, 4:46 AM 

Dude agreed Australia is a first world country but we are talking about warfare, Australia does not have any enemies and is pretty secluded from the rest of the world. Now the current state of affairs its no better than a country like Indonesia in terms of military capabilities

[linked image]


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Markus
(Login Markus85)
ANZACs (Australia/New Zealand)

Re: Australia vs Indonesia

No score for this post
January 11 2010, 4:49 AM 

who needs a armed forces when you have Panda Bear eating kangaroos on your side ?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.

JoeinTX
(Login JoeinTX)
Honorary Moderator

Re: Australia vs Indonesia

No score for this post
January 11 2010, 4:50 AM 

America with its might Dragon legion would definitely tilt the balance of power towards middle earth.

Much like Britain with the Falklands, agree.  Besides, in ten years, with F-35s and SHs and AWACS and new frigates and new subs and new missiles, etc..............Australia would wipe them up compared with what Indonesia has on it's modernization list. 

 

But, in honesty, why would Australia and Indonesia ever fight one another?  Really?  Indonesia doesn't want it.  Australia doesn't want it. 


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Markus
(Login Markus85)
ANZACs (Australia/New Zealand)

Re: Australia vs Indonesia

No score for this post
January 11 2010, 4:52 AM 

"But, in honesty, why would Australia and Indonesia ever fight one another? Really? Indonesia doesn't want it. Australia doesn't want it."

yes but B2 on WAFF wants it. So it must be done. [linked image]

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
 
< Previous Page 1 2 3 Next >
  Respond to this message   
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  
WAFF recommends these sites

Indian Defence Analysis      [Definitive Lapse of Reason]