WAFF Vet Club[Click here to Join WAFF!] WAFF Moderators Forum
General Discussion
(The Den)
The World's Armed Forces Forum History, Politics & Economics Forum
Greece & Turkey Defence Forum Europe, Middle East & Africa
Defence Forum
Asia & Pacific Defence Forum
Help, Suggestions & Complaints
   
   
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  

Army Could Replace Contractors With Soldiers to 'Re-Green' Service

February 24 2012 at 6:48 PM
No score for this post

  (Login MPOne)
WAFFer.

Army Could Replace Contractors With Soldiers to 'Re-Green' Service
Add a Comment
February 24, 2012
Military.com|by Michael Hoffman

FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. -- The Army needs to fix a system that gives soldiers more credit for operational positions than for career-broadening assignments, said Gen. Bob Cone, head of the Armys Training and Doctrine Command.

He also said he wants todays soldiers to begin retaking the places now held by civilians and contractors in the institutional Army so they can directly pass on what theyve learned in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Cone wants to shape a postwar Army that will continue to change after more than a decade of fighting. Although the service plans to draw down about 80,000 soldiers over the coming years, it wants to keep as many of its battle-hardened officers and noncommissioned officers as possible.

After the end of the Afghan war, they and other soldiers will have many more opportunities to complete a fellowship, teach at West Point or learn a language. Cone said he wants the Army to reward those kinds of assignments just as it does operational ones.

And he said not to worry that the drawdown might leave a glut of senior combat veterans without new young troops to lead: Cone argued that its about time the service folds its officers and NCOs back into the institutional Army.

The Army four-star who took over TRADOC after Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey said he wants to see soldiers get out of the habit of finding an operational assignment and sticking there.

This generation thinks that the model is, you go into a unit and stay in the fight forever. The long-term implication is that you become a colonel. How do we reinstitute the broadening experiences, thereby creating more opportunity to go to the operational force? Cone asked in a speech at the Association of the U.S. Armys Winter Symposium on Thursday.

Many soldiers would argue thats the way to ensure a promotion, but Cone said those days would end. On visits to units, soldiers have told Cone they like the idea of accepting more diverse assignments, but say they dont want to do it at the expense of [their] career.

Cone, who taught at West Point, wants promotion boards to value a career-broadening assignment such as teaching at an Army schoolhouse. He admits thats not the reality now, describing the system as broken.

The service has a responsibility to re-green the institutional Army, Cone said. He wants to replace contractors and civilians -- whose service over the past decade he was quick to commend -- with todays officers and NCOs.

Its a great way to get allow those soldiers with combat experience to share it with the rest of the Army, Cone told reporters.

He also wants these combat veterans to get to work writing the Armys future doctrine. The same generation that was let down by the doctrine that we had as they went into Iraq and Afghanistan could fix it, Cone said.

Many [doctrine manuals] hadnt been updated for 15 to 20 years and that is the reason why, in many cases, this generation of warfighters didnt use them, he said.

http://www.military.com/news/article/army-could-replace-contractors-with-soldiers-to-regreen-servi.html?ESRC=eb.nl


[linked image]"The chief aim of all government is to preserve the freedom of the citizen. His control over his person, his property, his movements, his business, his desires should be restrained only so far as the public welfare imperatively demands. The world is in more danger of being governed too much than too little.

It is the teaching of all history that liberty can only be preserved in small areas. Local self-government is, therefore, indispensable to liberty. A centralized and distant bureaucracy is the worst of all tyranny.

Taxation can justly be levied for no purpose other than to provide revenue for the support of the government. To tax one person, class or section to provide revenue for the benefit of another is none the less robbery because done under the form of law and called taxation."

John W. Davis, Democratic Presidential Candidate, 1924. Davis was one of the greatest trial and appellate lawyers in US history. He also served as the US Ambassador to the UK.
[linked image]

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Current Topic - Army Could Replace Contractors With Soldiers to 'Re-Green' Service  Respond to this message   
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  
WAFF recommends these sites

Indian Defence Analysis      [Definitive Lapse of Reason]