Steroids were used in 1970's and up thats why those horses were so dang fast!

by War Admiral Fan

 

The horses from the begining of racing till about the end of the 1960's didnt run on steroids, whcich makes them more great then horese from the 70's and up. Also, did u know Secretariat was so dossed up on steroids he couldnt reproduce for a whole year. I think steroids should be taken out of racing, also i think they should put those old Iron shoes back on the horses fo today to see what they can really do. So maybe, War Admiral, Omaha, Citation, etc., were actually better Triple Crown Winners then say Secretariat, Seattle Slew, and Affirmed. Also, dont you all see that the horses winning the Triple Crown were mainly in the first part of the Century because they were of higher status, and harder competitoin then the horses fo the 70's, and by looking at all this information we can see ONLY 3 TRIPLE CROWN WINNERS have happend since the steroids, which points out that those horsess might not have bean able to win the Triple Crown without steroids, because they may have been just moderate horses. Im not dissing the horses of the 70's TC winnners, im just saying maybe they wouldnt be TC winners without all the STEROIDS. Do you agree with me Man O' War fans?

Sincerly,

War Admiral Fan



Posted on Sep 19, 2004, 9:54 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home
Responses

Find more forums on Horse RacingCreate your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2009 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement